Oh Pedro... lol funny stuff.
On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 10:20 AM Sebastian wrote:
> On 16.06.2018 10:57, Pedro Larroy wrote:
> > Hi Sebastian.
> >
> > Thank you for your comment. That's why I said "I would propose", because
> I
> > don't know if it's possible as my experience with Apache is
On 16.06.2018 10:57, Pedro Larroy wrote:
Hi Sebastian.
Thank you for your comment. That's why I said "I would propose", because I
don't know if it's possible as my experience with Apache is limited to the
MXNet project.
How do you interpret this part?: "Since the appointed Project Management
Whoa, who said that? I can’t find it on this thread.
On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 8:37 AM Sebastian wrote:
> > I would propose the two following action points:
> >
> > * Resetting the list of committers to people that have contributed in
> the
> > previous terms in the latest 6 months
> > *
Hi Sebastian.
Thank you for your comment. That's why I said "I would propose", because I
don't know if it's possible as my experience with Apache is limited to the
MXNet project.
How do you interpret this part?: "Since the appointed Project Management
Committees have the power to create their
I would propose the two following action points:
* Resetting the list of committers to people that have contributed in the
previous terms in the latest 6 months
* Suspend veto rights temporarily and use simple majority for decisions
that need a vote so we realign the project with the
gt; trust to manage commits.
> >
> > So; -1 to quality being more important than quantity. It's not.
> >
> > Hen
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 1:15 PM, Sheng Zha wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > There have been
its.
>
> So; -1 to quality being more important than quantity. It's not.
>
> Hen
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 1:15 PM, Sheng Zha wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > There have been a couple of offline inquiries from contributors about
> >
gt; commitment. That's wrong imo. All commits are equal (as are any other
> actions for the project, such as answering a question, improving wiki,
> maintaining CI, helping people on Slack). Becoming a committer is about the
> trust built up by the committers not having to modify the action (
motion process, this is
> > about whether the individual has shown the commitment to be extended the
> > trust to manage commits.
> >
> > So; -1 to quality being more important than quantity. It's not.
> >
> > Hen
> >
> >
> >
> > O
than quantity. It's not.
>
> Hen
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 1:15 PM, Sheng Zha wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > There have been a couple of offline inquiries from contributors about
> > becoming a committer. From those inquiries, it seems that there’s
> c
individual has shown the commitment to be extended the
trust to manage commits.
So; -1 to quality being more important than quantity. It's not.
Hen
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 1:15 PM, Sheng Zha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There have been a couple of offline inquiries from contributors about
>
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 10:54 PM, Pedro Larroy wrote:
> * I personally don't like the idea that comittership status is decided in a
> closed mail list. This is not the transparency level that I would expect in
> an open source project. I'm happy to receive feedback from others that
> might be
As an aside: if you want to learn more on the background of Apache, or free and
open source in general join us at Http://fossbackstage.de in Berlin in walking
distance from U2 stop Eberswalder Str.
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
>
>Pedro.
>
>On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 10:31 AM Yasser Zamani
>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 6/9/2018 12:45 AM, Sheng Zha wrote:
>> > There have been a couple of offline inquiries from contributors
>about
>> > becoming a committer. From those inqu
inquiries from contributors about
> > becoming a committer. From those inquiries, it seems that there’s
> confusion
> > in our community about how to become a committer, so I’d like to take
> this
> > opportunity to clarify.
> >
> > The guideline about becoming a com
On 6/9/2018 12:45 AM, Sheng Zha wrote:
> There have been a couple of offline inquiries from contributors about
> becoming a committer. From those inquiries, it seems that there’s confusion
> in our community about how to become a committer, so I’d like to take this
> opportunit
I guess you should add instructions about speaking on various event like
conf., meetups - to present the whole project team.
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 11:15 PM, Sheng Zha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There have been a couple of offline inquiries from contributors about
> becoming a committer
Hi,
There have been a couple of offline inquiries from contributors about
becoming a committer. From those inquiries, it seems that there’s confusion
in our community about how to become a committer, so I’d like to take this
opportunity to clarify.
The guideline about becoming a committer can
18 matches
Mail list logo
