[jira] Created: (MYFACES-127) dataTable (or h:column rendered=) confuses its var with previous instances of dataTable

2005-03-10 Thread Dave E Martin (JIRA)
dataTable (or h:column rendered=) confuses its var with previous instances of dataTable --- Key: MYFACES-127 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-127 Project: MyFaces Ty

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-127) dataTable (or h:column rendered=) confuses its var with previous instances of dataTable

2005-03-10 Thread Dave E Martin (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-127?page=comments#action_60633 ] Dave E Martin commented on MYFACES-127: --- I should note that when I said "later via an include" that it is not the include thats inside the first datatable (the second

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-125) processDecodes in AliasBean not implemented

2005-03-10 Thread Sylvain Vieujot (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-125?page=comments#action_60623 ] Sylvain Vieujot commented on MYFACES-125: - You're right. It's fixed now. Thank you. Sylvain. > processDecodes in AliasBean not implemented > -

[jira] Updated: (MYFACES-126) Another Portlet API dependency found in NavigationHandlerImpl

2005-03-10 Thread Stan Silvert (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-126?page=history ] Stan Silvert updated MYFACES-126: - Attachment: patch.diff > Another Portlet API dependency found in NavigationHandlerImpl > - >

[jira] Created: (MYFACES-126) Another Portlet API dependency found in NavigationHandlerImpl

2005-03-10 Thread Stan Silvert (JIRA)
Another Portlet API dependency found in NavigationHandlerImpl - Key: MYFACES-126 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-126 Project: MyFaces Type: Bug Reporter: Stan Silvert Attachments: patc

[jira] Updated: (MYFACES-38) nested h:dataTables don't correctly update its children (was: SF#1030116 by Heath - heaththegreat)

2005-03-10 Thread Heath Borders-Wing (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-38?page=history ] Heath Borders-Wing updated MYFACES-38: -- Attachment: UIData.java Fixed the nested UIData bug. I had to override encodeEnd to do it (which means that our code does not have the _exact_

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-102) ValueChangeListener Invoked in every post back

2005-03-10 Thread Heath Borders-Wing (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-102?page=comments#action_60617 ] Heath Borders-Wing commented on MYFACES-102: I'd say this is more of a feature than a bug. I don't think that all UIInputs should save their value when it is re

Nested UIDatas works!

2005-03-10 Thread Heath Borders
I finally hunkered down and fixed the nested UIDatas problem. I had to scrap all the existing code that saved the state of contained EditableValueHolders because it didn't include any special code for EditableValueHolders inside another UIData. Also, there are probably some efficiency improvement

[jira] Updated: (MYFACES-38) nested h:dataTables don't correctly update its children (was: SF#1030116 by Heath - heaththegreat)

2005-03-10 Thread Heath Borders-Wing (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-38?page=history ] Heath Borders-Wing updated MYFACES-38: -- Attachment: 3-Layered-MyFaces-Nested-DataTable-Test.war This is a test war with increased complexity. It has 3 layers of dataTables with lots

Re: Revised Webapps Proposal

2005-03-10 Thread Sean Schofield
Matthias told me he is going to take a stab at this so I will wait and see what he comes up with. sean

Re: 1.09 and incubator status

2005-03-10 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Kito- using MyFaces is fine ;) but also I can understand doubts against a a) non-certified impl of JSF spec. b) "incubator status" implementation. b) is not active, only some infrastructure work, but that's all... (e.g. for host http://myfaces.apache.org/ ) However, here at Apache there is a gro

[Fwd: Fwd: FW: MyFaces]

2005-03-10 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
we got also a very cool "powered by MyFaces" logo :-))) Original Message Subject: Fwd: FW: MyFaces Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 15:18:24 -0500 From: Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <

Re: 1.09 and incubator status

2005-03-10 Thread Sean Schofield
That's what I thought. I just wanted to make sure I understood you. On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:24:47 -0500, Kito D. Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 02:16 PM 3/10/2005, you wrote: > > > Can someone tell me when 1.08 or 1.09 will be released, and when MyFaces > > > may move out of the incubator?

Re: 1.09 and incubator status

2005-03-10 Thread Kito D. Mann
At 02:16 PM 3/10/2005, you wrote: > Can someone tell me when 1.08 or 1.09 will be released, and when MyFaces > may move out of the incubator? I'm sensing skepticism from customers > because of the lack of a recent release, and the incubator status... Which customers? Do you mean myfaces users or c

Re: 1.09 and incubator status

2005-03-10 Thread Kito D. Mann
At 01:13 PM 3/10/2005, you wrote: Kito- > Also, are there any plans for the TCK? we asked the board of the ASF about the TCK. The board requested for the JSR#127 TCK. But I guess that will take again some time :-( So ne detailed plan or a specific date regarding be *certified* JSF impl. Ok. Than

Revised Webapps Proposal

2005-03-10 Thread Sean Schofield
Here is an updated proposal. We should create a new simple-examples webapp using the simplified JSP pages that I gave Matthias. This I think we are in 100% agreement on this (we'll leave the original alone for now.) We should dramatically simplify the build scripts used to build the webapps.

Re: Examples Subproject (Re: [VOTE] Simplified Examples (was Simplified Examples))

2005-03-10 Thread Sean Schofield
OK I am going to put together a *new* simplifed-examples folder and WAR and tweak the build scripts. We'll leave the current ones alone. It sounds like we have 100% agreement on that so I'll go ahead. If someone is available for check-in in a few hours please let me know. sean On Thu, 10 Mar

Re: 1.09 and incubator status

2005-03-10 Thread Sean Schofield
> Can someone tell me when 1.08 or 1.09 will be released, and when MyFaces > may move out of the incubator? I'm sensing skepticism from customers > because of the lack of a recent release, and the incubator status... Which customers? Do you mean myfaces users or customers that are paying for deve

Re: 1.09 and incubator status

2005-03-10 Thread Sean Schofield
Regarding the next release. I suggest that we resolve any outstanding tree2 issues so we can officially rename to tree and drop the current one. Its been several days since I responded to Oliver's issues but I haven't heard anything back yet. I *really* think we should try to avoid having two tr

Re: 1.09 and incubator status

2005-03-10 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Kito- > Also, are there any plans for the TCK? we asked the board of the ASF about the TCK. The board requested for the JSR#127 TCK. But I guess that will take again some time :-( So ne detailed plan or a specific date regarding be *certified* JSF impl. HTH, Matthias On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:31:49

Re: 1.09 and incubator status

2005-03-10 Thread Kito D. Mann
At 12:30 PM 3/10/2005, you wrote: MyFaces is officially a top level project now, moving out of the incubator is just a technical issue anymore! That's great to hear, Martin. The next release is being prepared right now (Matthias is working on this, I think)... Matthias, can you give me some detai

Re: 1.09 and incubator status

2005-03-10 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Kito- Martin is right. We are now a top level project of the ASF. The infrastructure guys are working on things like mailinglists, DNS entry, and so one. What we did in December was a vote regarding releasing MyFaces 1.0.8. There were enough votes from committers and user. That version is available

Re: 1.09 and incubator status

2005-03-10 Thread Hendrik Neumann
a new offical release would be great - thanks to all of you MyFaces guys :-) Greetings, Hendrik

Re: Simplified Examples

2005-03-10 Thread Martin Marinschek
Well, what I meant was: - keep the existing example application and move out most of the pages to the new simple example app. - so what we then have would be: the current example app minus all component pages for the demonstration of menu structure, navigation, validation, etc.. - and a simple w

Re: 1.09 and incubator status

2005-03-10 Thread Martin Marinschek
MyFaces is officially a top level project now, moving out of the incubator is just a technical issue anymore! The next release is being prepared right now (Matthias is working on this, I think)... regards, Martin On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:31:49 -0500, Kito D. Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey

1.09 and incubator status

2005-03-10 Thread Kito D. Mann
Hey, Can someone tell me when 1.08 or 1.09 will be released, and when MyFaces may move out of the incubator? I'm sensing skepticism from customers because of the lack of a recent release, and the incubator status... ~~~ Kito D. Mann

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-125) processDecodes in AliasBean not implemented

2005-03-10 Thread Mathias Broekelmann (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-125?page=comments#action_60601 ] Mathias Broekelmann commented on MYFACES-125: - thanks for the fast reply. I´ve tried the toUpperCase button with my modifcations and did not got an exception.

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-123) UIComponentTag breaks Portlet support: ClassCastException

2005-03-10 Thread Stan Silvert (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-123?page=comments#action_60595 ] Stan Silvert commented on MYFACES-123: -- Actually, I found that it wasn't a problem with a new code change. It looks like UIComponentTag has not been changed in quite

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-125) processDecodes in AliasBean not implemented

2005-03-10 Thread Sylvain Vieujot (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-125?page=comments#action_60593 ] Sylvain Vieujot commented on MYFACES-125: - The processDecodes has been added. But I didn't remove the calls to makeAlias() and removeAlias() in method queueEvent(F

[jira] Resolved: (MYFACES-125) processDecodes in AliasBean not implemented

2005-03-10 Thread Sylvain Vieujot (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-125?page=history ] Sylvain Vieujot resolved MYFACES-125: - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version: Nightly Build > processDecodes in AliasBean not implemented > --

Re: Examples Subproject (Re: [VOTE] Simplified Examples (was Simplified Examples))

2005-03-10 Thread Heath Borders
It seems like we should keep our extensions/components in a separate branch from our api/impl this would encourage interoperability between different implementations. On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:52:54 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > done. > > Bruno Aranda wrote: > > I think

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-121) struts-faces incompatibilities with .do servlet mapping

2005-03-10 Thread Manfred Geiler (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-121?page=comments#action_60591 ] Manfred Geiler commented on MYFACES-121: The patch simply makes JspViewHandlerImpl take the first FacesServlet mapping in the web.xml as default. So, since 99% of u

Re: Examples Subproject (Re: [VOTE] Simplified Examples (was Simplified Examples))

2005-03-10 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
done. Bruno Aranda wrote: I think we could add the FAQ: Can I use myFaces extensions with the JSF RI? On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 08:32:54 -0500, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks Matthias for all the work on the website! On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:29:15 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Examples Subproject (Re: [VOTE] Simplified Examples (was Simplified Examples))

2005-03-10 Thread Bruno Aranda
I think we could add the FAQ: Can I use myFaces extensions with the JSF RI? On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 08:32:54 -0500, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks Matthias for all the work on the website! > > On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:29:15 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: Examples Subproject (Re: [VOTE] Simplified Examples (was Simplified Examples))

2005-03-10 Thread Sean Schofield
Thanks Matthias for all the work on the website! On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:29:15 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Manfred, > > thanks for feedback. > > Ok so we will have as far as I see our current website app > and soon simplified web app. > > On subproject I don't want t

Re: Examples Subproject (Re: [VOTE] Simplified Examples (was Simplified Examples))

2005-03-10 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Manfred, thanks for feedback. Ok so we will have as far as I see our current website app and soon simplified web app. On subproject I don't want to run mailinglist on CVS and so on. Only a special folder in CVS like the Struts guys do with their subprojects (eg flow) @website: I just made some chan

Re: Examples Subproject (Re: [VOTE] Simplified Examples (was Simplified Examples))

2005-03-10 Thread Sean Schofield
If we go with the option of just adding simplified examples we should change what goes in the current examples application. I've been saying all along that its ok to have a few sets of examples. Currently the myfaces-examples basically has a simple example of every component wrapped inside a more

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-125) processDecodes in AliasBean not implemented

2005-03-10 Thread Mathias Broekelmann (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-125?page=comments#action_60589 ] Mathias Broekelmann commented on MYFACES-125: - call to makeAlias() and removeAlias() in method queueEvent(FacesEvent) should be removed to make nested component

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-121) struts-faces incompatibilities with .do servlet mapping

2005-03-10 Thread JIRA
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-121?page=comments#action_60588 ] Matthias Weßendorf commented on MYFACES-121: I changed code base of Struts-Faces lib and removed the Wrapper clazz and changed the RequestProcessor clazzes And

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-121) struts-faces incompatibilities with .do servlet mapping

2005-03-10 Thread JIRA
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-121?page=comments#action_60587 ] Matthias Weßendorf commented on MYFACES-121: Mike, I patched MyFaces on my local box and tested the myfaces.jar (including your patch) against: -plain struts

[jira] Created: (MYFACES-125) processDecodes in AliasBean not implemented

2005-03-10 Thread Mathias Broekelmann (JIRA)
processDecodes in AliasBean not implemented --- Key: MYFACES-125 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-125 Project: MyFaces Type: Bug Versions: Nightly Build Reporter: Mathias Broekelmann This bug prev

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-122) ApplicationImpl.createConverter(java.lang.Class) does not follow jsf spec

2005-03-10 Thread JIRA
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-122?page=comments#action_60585 ] Matthias Weßendorf commented on MYFACES-122: Mike, thanks. Also that is the same for createConverter(java.lang.String converterId) ("If there is no such regis

Re: Examples Subproject (Re: [VOTE] Simplified Examples (was Simplified Examples))

2005-03-10 Thread Manfred Geiler
Why *replace* current examples? Let's start a new webapp called "simplesamples" or "tutorial" or similar. At the time when every single component is part of this new webapp we could still remove the old examples or make it deprecated. No need to hurry, IMHO. +1 for simplified version -1 for rep

Re: Examples Subproject (Re: [VOTE] Simplified Examples (was Simplified Examples))

2005-03-10 Thread Bruno Aranda
Hi, I think this is a wonderful idea. Having different applications demonstrating the use of myFaces would be the best source of help for the users and also a good reference for common patterns and situations. Users are asking over and over again the same questions (best ways to use hibernate, til

Examples Subproject (Re: [VOTE] Simplified Examples (was Simplified Examples))

2005-03-10 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hi, I thought about something like a *subproject* for our MyFaces examples sometimes before. We have now lot's of (different) applications that demonstrated the use of MyFaces (and its components) -the *hot* disscussed MyFaces-exmaple -Tiles example -WAP/WML example -the new HelloWorld example that