Resolving GPLv2-CPE categorization as Category X (was: Re: Still Plugging Away on Java EE Support)

Am Donnerstag, den 16.05.2019, 18:54 +0100 schrieb Neil C Smith: > On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 17:53, Matthias Bläsing > wrote: > > Even better, Oracle would be in the > > position to change the wording of the license if necessary and they > > are > > the only ones, t

Re: ? about pull request..

Hi Brad, Am Donnerstag, den 30.05.2019, 11:37 -0600 schrieb Brad Walker: > I submitted a pull request today.. > > https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/1272 > > It seems like the Travis build server is "stuck" waiting for my build job > to get queued.. > > As a newbie, I'm just curious to

Re: Installers -- making them official for 11.1?

Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 30.05.2019, 09:46 -0700 schrieb Kodewerk: > The Adopt project would like to distribute NetBeans but we’ve yet to > sort out what is needed to make that happen. For example, I believe > we can’t call the distro Apache-NetBeans so we’re thinking of calling > it

Re: Profiler images in main toolbar

Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 19.06.2019, 19:56 +0200 schrieb David Schulz: > Makes sense, we could also check some Icon libraries like Streamline > or Icon8 to use them as a base for our icon rework. Not sure how the > apache license works with icon libraries like that, any opinions? I think this is

Clean modules/licenses

Hi, I created a PR, that might be controversial, so this is a heads-up so that anyone, that want can speak up. I ran ant verify-all-libs-and-licenses and I did not like the output. Some things stood out: - there were several badly formatted license files - and there are dependencies on

Re: Verify NetBeans 11 with Weblgoic

Hi Vikas, the error message looks unrelated to the Weblogic integration. That looks like a problem in the loading/installation of nbjavac. For weblogic: We disabled the module as Oracle declined to make the XML descriptor files necessary for code generation available under an apache compatible

Re: Re: UML Status

Hi, Am Sonntag, den 19.05.2019, 10:01 -0500 schrieb Eric Bresie: > > This does get me wonder given now that netbeans is maintained in the Apache > context...does that make the whole thing "community" in a senses? So if > so, then would all submissions go into the netbeans repository or should >

Re: Still Plugging Away on Java EE Support

Hi Emmanuell, Am Donnerstag, den 16.05.2019, 14:29 +0200 schrieb ehsavoie: > The JavaEE 8 schemas are still under LGPL right ? How do you manage > that ? the JavaEE 8 schemas are no problem. Oracle provided these under GPLv2- CPE and CDDL. While the question whether GPLv2-CPE could be considered

Re: [DISCUSS] import Bugzilla to Jira or Plan to Drop Bugzilla

Hi, Am Freitag, den 19.04.2019, 21:37 -0400 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga: > My understanding is Oracle NetBeans bugzilla is being kept in readonly > state. That’s how e.g., Reema, is using and needing it. > > Gj > > On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 at 21:22, Wade Chandler wrote: > >> [Import Bugzilla Issues]

Re: [DISCUSS] Frontend distro of NetBeans

Hi, at this point in time I don't see any benefit in producing a bunch of different netbeans releases. Am Freitag, den 19.04.2019, 21:57 -0400 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga: > > I think one of the coolest things we could do together is spin out a > separate distro specifically for PHP/JS type

Re: [DISCUSS} Apache NetBeans Gradle Patch 1 Release

Hi, Am Freitag, den 26.04.2019, 22:57 -0700 schrieb Laszlo Kishalmi: > As Gradle was a new out-of-the box feature, I've received some > issues/feedback. I've already fixed some of them. > > I would like to do a release of those changes. Those fixes might be not > that important, but what I'm

Re: [DISCUSS} Apache NetBeans Gradle Patch 1 Release

Hi, Am Sonntag, den 28.04.2019, 06:47 -0700 schrieb Laszlo Kishalmi: > > We need to automate these things first (or talk about, if we could skip > some of the steps), then we shall be able to discuss time based releases. > so we invalidate the decission from the past? Sorry, but I think we

Re: [NETBEANS-2455] Splash Screens!

Hi Antonio, Am Samstag, den 27.04.2019, 09:53 +0200 schrieb Antonio: > Hi Laszlo, > > - For browsers: > > http://netbeans.apache.org/images/splash.svg > > - For batik: > > http://netbeans.apache.org/images/netbeans-splash-batik.svg > > This batik compatible version renders ugly in browsers,

Re: Why does NetBeans still have to download post-install the Oracle JSParser?

Hi Emilian, Am Freitag, den 12.07.2019, 15:32 +0300 schrieb Emilian Bold: > > Last I looked into this the Oracle JSParser was under a BSD license so > the only problem was the nobody is re-packaging it as a proper JAR we > can use. Has this changed recently? > That would be:

Re: Re: nb-javac and Oracle JS Parser on Maven Central

Hi, Am Dienstag, den 02.07.2019, 14:05 +0200 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga: > Yes, indeed. That's why when you use it in NetBeans, you need to approve > its license first. It is not Apache licensed, just like nb-javac is not > Apache licensed. > > Gj > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 1:57 PM Eric Bresie

Re: Procedure for uploading binaries

Hi Junichi, Am Montag, den 15.07.2019, 00:42 +0900 schrieb Junichi Yamamoto: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=115507251 thank you! Yes that is the information I was missing. And now I know how other feel when learning, that a correct search would have revealed

Re: Procedure for uploading binaries

Hi Neil, Am Sonntag, den 14.07.2019, 16:53 +0100 schrieb Neil C Smith: > There was also comments about moving to favour Maven Central where > possible > I believe? Is this not feasible here? yes, I would have preferred a prebuild artifact from maven central, but in this case there is not

Re: GIT Cloning Stalling

Hi Eric, Am Samstag, den 10.08.2019, 16:50 -0500 schrieb Eric Bresie: > Is tje JGit dependency something covered by this one? > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-519 > before jumping to conclusions about old dependencies, did you check your network setup? How are you connected

Re: Lots of issues reported, how to handle them?

Hi, Am Montag, den 12.08.2019, 16:10 +0200 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga: > > There's understandable frustration by people reporting issues ( such as our > issue filer hero Chris Lenz :-) ) about issues being filed and not being > responded to. > this might sound rude, but at this time I would no

Re: C/C++ module ?

Hi, Am Freitag, den 02.08.2019, 10:47 +0200 schrieb František Kučera: > It would be nice if Netbeans use standard ssh-agent instead of > configuring password or key in Netbeans. netbeans can and does. I don't remember the last time I entered a private key password into netbeans. Greetings

Re: Fwd: NetBeans clank JARs flagged as infected by antiviruses

Hi, Am Sonntag, den 04.08.2019, 13:52 +0300 schrieb Emilian Bold: > The false positive so the right thing to do is to tell the users, that their snake-oil software is broken. I'm sure using clang/clank libraries in trojans is realistic, these warnings are a sign of broken software (on the

Travis - Setting up additional test group for webcommon cluster in matrix fails

Hi, I hope someone has better travis foo, then me. I fixed many of the webcommon unittests: https://github.com/matthiasblaesing/netbeans/commits/webcommon-unittests2 and wanted to set them up with the travis build. This is the change:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Netbeans Standalone Java Hints Tool 11.1 [vote candidate 2]

Am Samstag, den 17.08.2019, 13:09 +0200 schrieb Jan Lahoda: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 6:26 PM Matthias Bläsing < > mblaes...@doppel-helix.eu> > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > minor problem: The SHA512 sum in this email for the source is not > > corre

Re: Project Problems on netbeans code: Missing Dependencies

Hi Eric, Am Freitag, den 13.09.2019, 07:36 -0500 schrieb Eric Bresie: > While trying to start coding with fresh 11.1 netbeans (with open jdk 12 set > as JDK in etc\netbeans.conf), bringing in the netbeans source, after it > started scanning the projects, it found a number of "Project Problems" >

Re: bits.netbeans.org vs netbeans.apache.org

Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 12.09.2019, 17:12 +0200 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga: > Sure, everything. But indeed let's start with what we need most, i.e., 8.2 > related artefacts. > > You're the one who set up the OSUOSL storage, would be happy to help, but > if you suggest some kind of structure and a

Re: updating the interface for a module or java file..

Hi Brad, Am Mittwoch, den 11.09.2019, 13:46 -0600 schrieb Brad Walker: > Let's say that I've cleaned up all references to a deprecated method. > > Now I want to remove the deprecated method since no one is using it. > > Don't I have to update the interface definition? And if so, how does one go

Re: bits.netbeans.org vs netbeans.apache.org

Hi Geertjan, Am Donnerstag, den 12.09.2019, 18:54 +0200 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga: > Amount of data is a question of downloading the bits you want and then > seeing how large that is. don't take this wrong, but that approach is the worst way to determine the amount of data. Someone with access

Re: Project Problems on netbeans code: Missing Dependencies

Hi, Am Freitag, den 13.09.2019, 12:11 -0500 schrieb Eric Bresie: > A small follow up...do folks tend to build netbeans external to netbeans > (i.e. command prompt) or do so within Netbeans itself? I can only speak for myself, but I build netbeans as a whole and then open the module I want to

Bump OpenJFX to 13 for NB 11.2?

Hello all, I know that we are nearing feature freeze, but I want to bump OpenJFX to version 13 none the less. The reason is, that OpenJFK 13 holds at least one immediate-crash bug, that makes it unusable on any machine, that has the native libraries on the search path:

Re: Why no RELEASE111 of ValidationAPI?

Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 18.09.2019, 16:59 +0200 schrieb Andreas Sewe: > > (I'm not sure it's not a bug.) > > External libs are detected during manifest parse of module. If > > validationAPI is no more referenced it will not be populated. > > Some others like implementations of nbjavac

Re: Uploading binaries

Hi Jaroslav, Am Mittwoch, den 07.08.2019, 21:15 +0200 schrieb Jaroslav Tulach: > While working on https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/1407 I tried > as > hard as I could to not upload any new binaries, but now it seems to > be > inevitable. I will have to prepare new JAR and upload it as 3rd

Future of Javascript on Netbeans

Hi, in the last few days I worked often with fresh builds on my machine and everytime I had to hop through loops (i.e. install js parser manually). At this point JS on Netbeans is annoying for me. I therefore reopened: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-1159 The reasoning: Oracle

Re: building under JDK11

Hi. Am Mittwoch, den 17.07.2019, 16:36 +0200 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga: > It's not needed anymore, that blocker, but it can be overridden via > that command line option. there is a sound reason to keep it. JDK 9 introduced incompatible changes and if you build against JDK 9 or newer the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 11.1 [vote candidate 2]

Verified - sources: * 11.1-vc2/netbeans-11.1-vc2-source.zip contains same file as the git tag 11.1-vc2 * sha512sum matched * netbeans-11.1-vc2-source.zip.asc file verified * build succeeds and yields a working netbeans 11.1 binary netbeans-11.1-vc2-bin.zip: * verified detached signature

Re: Which repository to use for NetBeans dependencies / RELEASE110?

Hi, Am Samstag, den 20.07.2019, 10:59 +0200 schrieb Peter Nabbefeld: > I'd want to migrate some plugin's source code to NB 11.0. As NetBeans > has become a top-level project of Apache: which repository should I > use for the dependencies? if you mean for maven, then the answer is none: The

Re: Building NetBeans 11.1 from source fails with compile errors

Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 02.10.2019, 23:06 +0300 schrieb mlist: > > I am trying to build NetBeans 11.1 from source code on openSUSE Leap > 15. I have read the instructions and the README.md but unfortunately > I > am getting errors which I don't know how to fix as I am not a Java > developer (my

Re: Building NetBeans 11.1 from source fails with compile errors

Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 02.10.2019, 23:21 +0300 schrieb Sahin gülci: > Hi All, > > I can't build Netbeans from master branch either, my error logs -> > https://gist.github.com/sgulci/cad916b9f0a716978bffea028c79496c > On attachment, my Netbeans Build System picture shows error on my > Netbeans

Re: Building NetBeans 11.1 from source fails with compile errors

Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 02.10.2019, 23:40 +0300 schrieb mlist: > On Wed, 02 Oct 2019 22:12:42 +0200 Matthias Bläsing wrote: > > > you are building with JDK11 against an JDK8 by setting nbjdk.home. I > > fixed this for me by switching to JDK8 as the build JDK. > > > &

Re: Building NetBeans 11.1 from source fails with compile errors

Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 02.10.2019, 23:59 +0300 schrieb Sahin gülci: > error: Source option 6 is no longer supported. Use 7 or later. > error: Target option 6 is no longer supported. Use 7 or later. you try to build with a JDK, that does not support Source version 6 anymore. That would be JDK 12

Re: JavaFx WindowManager

Am Sonntag, den 29.09.2019, 11:38 +0100 schrieb Neil C Smith: > On Sun, 29 Sep 2019, 11:24 Chuck Davis, wrote: > > > It would certainly be nice if FX > > were still part of the JDK. > > > > It never really was! ;-) > And currently it is easier than ever to pull it in and distribute it with

Re: using JavaFX as a HTML renderer

Hi Chuck, Am Sonntag, den 29.09.2019, 04:34 -0700 schrieb Chuck Davis: > Matthias, is your use case possibly displaying help for your > application? > > I ask because I'm thinking of attempting this in my app. The "modern" > approach to have help in an external browser is really, really >

Re: About the NetBeans brand and our trademark

Hi, Am Samstag, den 02.11.2019, 07:19 -0700 schrieb Laszlo Kishalmi: > As of netbeans Debian package. It kind of hurts the brand mostly by > being unmaintained. The current version can be installed, but it > installs with Java 11 which we did not support at version 10. (Not > mentioning that

Building netbeans depends on gitbox.apache.org

Hi, I currently can't build netbeans from source (and I assume the same is true for anyone). I get this: bootstrap: [echo] Bootstrapping NetBeans-specific Ant extensions... [get] Getting:

Re: Packaging an nbm for maven

Hi, Am Freitag, den 08.11.2019, 22:10 +0100 schrieb antonio: > We should document all this whole process better so people is not > confused any longer. Your questions do help us understand how badly > we're confusing things (for the better, we hope), so thanks for > asking! ;-). before we do

Re: Packaging an nbm for maven

Hi, this information is not correct. The NetBeans 11.2 Update Center for user provided plugins still is supplied by http://plugins.netbeans.org/ . You can verify this by trying to download: https://netbeans.apache.org/nb/plugins/11.2/catalog.xml.gz This redirects to:

Re: [DISCUSS] What to do with old community contributed plugins?

Hi, Am Dienstag, den 12.11.2019, 13:51 +0100 schrieb Jiří Kovalský: > we are preparing decommission of the old Plugin Portal 2.0 [1] which > is hosted on Oracle infrastructure. Before we turn off the switch we > need to decide what we want to do with the plugins contributed by all > the

Re: NetBeans plugins classloader shared

Hi, I had a similar problem (Webservice Client bases on Axis 1). It was possible to fix it this way: private static MantisConnectPortType initClient(String baseUrl, String httpUsername, String httpPassword) throws ServiceException, MalformedURLException { ClassLoader origLoader =

Re: 11.2 sources not building

It could be the download hack, introduced to work around company networks, that required explizit proxy usage. Am Freitag, den 15.11.2019, 12:52 -0800 schrieb Dmitry Avtonomov: > Could this be a temporary issue? I just tried the jar link from > central - > it worked. Didn't try building though. >

Re: Dark LaF from Donation 4

Hi Laszlo, Am Freitag, den 22.11.2019, 08:18 -0800 schrieb Laszlo Kishalmi: > > Usually who and how does the integration PR-s from code donations? > > I would like to see at least the dark LaF support landing early. I could > donate some of my free time on that, I just would like to know how

Pluginportal 3.0 - Credentials for Github/Google

Hello Jan, hello Jiří, thank you for installing the additional authentication option into the deployed plugin portal. One thing that we should ensure for the future (or fix now) is the access to the Credentials for the OAauth providers. One of the providers explicitly says, that the returned ID

Merging on github (aka Squash and Merge is broken)

Hello all Committers, please be extra careful when using the "Squash and Merge" Option on github. It is broken regarding author information. When you use the option, github tries to be clever and uses the public information of the author as present in the profile of the person on github. This

Re: Missing netbeans common api annotations

adds exports for the JSR305 annotations. Please see if that helps. Matthias > > On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 5:28 PM Matthias Bläsing > wrote: > > > Hi Martin, > > > > Am Sonntag, den 08.12.2019, 16:06 +0100 schrieb Martin Klähn: > > > while working on fixing

Re: [PluginPortal] Implement OAuth2 based authentication in PP3?

Hi, Am Samstag, den 19.10.2019, 11:54 +0200 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga: > Thanks for this research, can it be integrated into a pull request in the > pp3 tool in apache-netbeans-tools repo? > > Gj > > On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 21:55, Matthias Bläsing > wrote: > >

Re: build failure..

Hi Brad, Am Mittwoch, den 09.10.2019, 16:20 -0600 schrieb Brad Walker: > I'm getting a build failure and not sure where to look.. I have some > ideas > but thought I would ask here. > > Building w/ the following ant gives me an error: > > bwalker@brads-T460s:~/netbeans$ ant

Re: [DISCUSS] Handling release updates

Hi, Am Montag, den 28.10.2019, 19:24 + schrieb Neil C Smith: > On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 19:00, Matthias Bläsing > wrote: > > if I'm not mistaken, currently the NBMs we produce are not signed when > > we release. This is what I suggest: > > No, they're not. I just

Re: [DISCUSS] Handling release updates

Hi, Am Sonntag, den 27.10.2019, 12:18 +0100 schrieb Jan Lahoda: > [How to handle updates] > But I have no idea if we asked to an access there. (And if ASF would pay > for each signed file, then singing several hundreds NBMs would not fly > anyway, I think.) But we could at least use that for this

Re: Blocker Maven issue just opened?

Hi, Am Freitag, den 18.10.2019, 19:37 +0100 schrieb Peter Hull: > Possibly it is the change labelled "Runtime.exec and ProcessBuilder > Argument Restrictions" in > https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/11all-relnotes-5013287.html#R11_0_5 > > In which case it's not a bug introduced by

[PluginPortal] Implement OAuth2 based authentication in PP3?

Hi, it was raised on this list already and I agree, that tying the Plugin Portal to a Google Account sound like a not too good idea. I for example use my google account only for a minimal set of services and don't see why that should change. At this point Plugin Portal 3 implements an OpenID

Re: [PluginPortal] Implement OAuth2 based authentication in PP3?

Greetings Matthias Am Freitag, den 18.10.2019, 21:55 +0200 schrieb Matthias Bläsing: > Hi, > > it was raised on this list already and I agree, that tying the Plugin > Portal to a Google Account sound like a not too good idea. I for > example use my google account only for

Re: Plugin Portal Down?

Hi, Am Sonntag, den 24.11.2019, 18:14 +0100 schrieb Jiří Kovalský: > > I confirm that the new Plugin Portal 3.0 is not working and I suspect > that it's the result of Matthias Blaesing's MR #15: > > https://github.com/apache/netbeans-tools/pull/15 > > Matthias or Jan, can you please take a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 11.2-u1 update

+1 Validated: - checksum for source zip is correct - contents of source is identical with repository brach release112 as of commit d54c01082b55 (differences are contrib, git directories and LICENSE file). The differenes are expected - signature of the binaries validates - build runs clean -

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans nb-repository-plugin version 1.5

+1 Verified: - signature of the source file - signatures of the maven repository files - build plugin from source, run diffoscope and found only expected difference - source is identical (apart from expected differences) to the named repositor state and tag Thank you for you work Am Mittwoch,

Re: Accepting contributions not covered by an ICLA

Hi, I have in the past merged from non ICLA signees. Am Sonntag, den 01.12.2019, 20:54 +0100 schrieb Jan Lahoda: > > I have a question related to: > https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/1559 > > I think the patch is good to be integrated, but I believe the author > does not have an ICLA

Re: Travis is failing on building hibernateweb

'm willing to do the restore, if interest is expressed and some one willing to do the review is found. Greetings Matthias Am Donnerstag, den 28.11.2019, 08:46 -0700 schrieb Brad Walker: > I noticed that as well.. > > On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 2:09 AM Matthias Bläsing < > mblaes...

Re: Build failing locally

Am Sonntag, den 01.12.2019, 17:15 -0500 schrieb Steven Ingram: > I tried to build the project today, but I kept hitting errors which > led me to make a new clone of an up-to-date master branch of my > fork. I keep running into compilation errors. See attached > truncated output. If i need to

Re: Splitting the netbeans_default_options in netbeans.conf

Hi, Am Montag, den 25.11.2019, 22:14 +0200 schrieb Emilian Bold: > I had no idea nbexec can handle multiline values in netbeans.conf > like > that. So this should work for all launchers? > > Note that right now netbeans.conf is not really generated (minus a > small part), it's stored in git

Re: Travis is failing on building hibernateweb

That is an old problem and the build works with it. Yesterday the htmlui tests began to fail on Travis. Maybe the Xvfb server does not work? Am 28. November 2019 09:11:28 MEZ schrieb Laszlo Kishalmi : >I see this one in the recent logs: > >Cannot find build prerequisite

Re: Using git push --force

Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 20.11.2019, 15:31 -0500 schrieb Tim Boudreau: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 2:36 PM Benjamin Asbach wrote: > > > So why > > having these information in project history when it does not deliver any > > additional value? > > > > Because the point of developing software is to

Re: Building NetBeans 11.1 from source fails with compile errors

Am Donnerstag, den 03.10.2019, 15:26 +0300 schrieb mlist: > On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 23:06:58 +0300 mlist wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I am trying to build NetBeans 11.1 from source code on openSUSE > > Leap > > 15. I have read the instructions and the README.md but > > unfortunately I > > am getting

Re: Building NetBeans 11.1 from source fails with compile errors

Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 03.10.2019, 19:49 +0300 schrieb mlist: > Are you sure the culprit is ant? As I mentioned previously using > -Dpermit.jdk9.builds=true works. Doesn't that mean that ant is OK but > something else needs fixing? > > * Generally I am reluctant to downloading and installing

macOS user(s) needed to verify potential issue fix

Hello all, please have look at this issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-3249?focusedCommentId=16998515=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-16998515 TL;DR: NetBeans asks Chrome to open a file:///, Chrome does this, but it seems, that it is

Re: Missing netbeans common api annotations

2019 at 6:43 PM Matthias Bläsing > wrote: > > > Hi Martin, > > > > Am Sonntag, den 08.12.2019, 18:24 +0100 schrieb Martin Klähn: > > > thanks for tackling this. > > > Unfortunately this does not seem to solve the problem. > > > > >

Re: Missing netbeans common api annotations

Hi Martin, Am Sonntag, den 08.12.2019, 16:06 +0100 schrieb Martin Klähn: > while working on fixing compiler warnings in several places I've come along > some warnings the compiler emitted while compiling the sources. > > A short example follows: >

Re: "Apply Code Changes" with JDK 11

Hi, Am Dienstag, den 03.12.2019, 21:07 -0500 schrieb Steven Ingram: > I was happy to see recently that we can run the head of master with JDK > 11. I can build and run the app with JDK 11 (this is new info in the > project README). > > Unfortunately I was thwarted this evening by the Ant

Re: New developer saying hello to all

Hi, Am Montag, den 24.02.2020, 14:45 -0500 schrieb Nam Nguyen: > I was now able to use the web browser to edit a file, and submit a > pull request. Not the best way. No - and the PR can't be merged like this, as your Name is not correctly recorded in the commit. Please check your github

Re: Profiling method calls does not work with JDK newer than 1.8

Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 26.02.2020, 12:42 -0700 schrieb Matteo Di Giovinazzo: > Thanks Peter! I closed 3896 as a duplicate of 1428. > > I found the whole thread and I see you found a solution: NB 12.0 > might be a > good occasion to get this sorted out. I see in one of your last > comments > [1]

Re: Profiling method calls does not work with JDK newer than 1.8

Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 26.02.2020, 21:00 + schrieb Peter Hull: > As I understand it, we need to build the native interface (DLL/SO) on > every platform we support, zip them up into > profiler-external-binaries-8.2.zip (or -12 I guess!) then upload to > netbeans.osuosl.org/binaries, and finally

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache NetBeans 11.3 [vote candidate 1]

Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 20.02.2020, 09:11 -0800 schrieb Ernie Rael: > Looks like LICENSE and NOTICE are out of date in repo (diffs not > shown here) > > Only in src: DEPENDENCIES > diff -r /f/repos/netbeans/LICENSE src/LICENSE > Only in src: licenses > Only in src/nbbuild:

Re: issue possibly?

Hi Brad, please try again with a fresh copy of ant. In the past the issue could be traced back to broken ant versions linux distributions were shipping. This is not a general problem as Ubuntu is unaffected, but if I remember correctly SuSE versions were affected. Greetings Matthias Am

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 11.3 [vote candidate 1]

Vote: -1 (binding) Verification looked good: - Verified sha512 sum and signature - Checked that source code is identical to git tag - Builds cleanly on JDK 8 - the diffs between my build and the provided binaries are expected - binary build runs on JDK 8 The problem: The LICENSE file of the

Re: [DISCUSS] Wrapping up Oracle's donation of NetBeans to Apache

Hi Geertjan, Am Dienstag, den 11.02.2020, 11:46 +0100 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga: > As well as "contrib", but surely not all of "contrib": > > https://hg.netbeans.org/main/contrib/file > > There's also the community repositories and code that has not been > worked > on for many years: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 11.3 [vote candidate 2]

Vote: +1 (binding) Verification looks good (NetBeans IDE artifacts): - Verified sha512 sum and signature - Checked that source code is identical to git tag - Builds cleanly on JDK 8 - the diffs between my build and the provided binaries are expected - binary build runs on JDK 8 - nbjavac is

Re: RCP JavaFX

Hi, Am Samstag, den 22.02.2020, 14:21 -0500 schrieb Scott Palmer: > If you aren’t on Maven I strongly advise to skip it and go straight > to Gradle. It can run Ant tasks during your transition and it is a > much much better system than Maven. It will save you many days of > frustration. (The

Re: What's happened with OSUL binaries

Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 09.01.2020, 06:19 -0800 schrieb Laszlo Kishalmi: > It seems some binaries are gone missing from our > https://netbeans.osuosl.org/binaries/ > > Travis is complaining for a few days for some jobs, and now people > complaining as well. > > Can someone take a look? >

Re: Any objections against turning netbeans.org OFF?

Hi Lars, I don't see a reasonable way to do what you describe. The code is GPLv2+CDDL (to my knowledge), the content of the repositories owned by Oracle. Only the donation files can be relicensed to ALv2 and thus are eligable for integration/redistribution. The message from the ASF to my

Re: NetBeans icon patch

Hi John, hi Eirik, looking at the properties of the X window I don't see why the quality gets better after the change: Running xprop on the netbeans window gives me _NET_WM_ICON sizes: 16x16 32x32 48x48 128x128 a quick search in the JDK source gives this (on Unix): JFrame#setIconImages calls

Re: [POLL] Defaults for Binary to Source Resolution

Hi, I see the Maven implementation as the correct one (this is a copy of the reasoning in the PR): -- My scenario I tested: - I create a project `library` (just a `DemoLib` class with a `dummyMethod`) - I `maven -Prelease-profile install`ed version `1.0`, `2.0` and `3.0-SNAPSHOT`

Re: NetBeans language bundle

Before this is merged one crucial point: The new files must be verifiable come from the donation zip. If that is not the case we will not be able to establish correct license handling. Am 22. Januar 2020 09:46:11 MEZ schrieb Geertjan Wielenga : >Clone that repo, push your content to your

Re: Flat Look and Feel NB12 default?

Am Mittwoch, den 22.01.2020, 18:55 + schrieb Neil C Smith: > On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 at 18:48, John Mc > wrote: > > So I started using the latest development builds and I really like > > the > > progress with the Flat Look and Feel addition for NB11.3. Great > > job to the > > guys who have done

Re: Apache NetBeans 11.3: branch created

Hi, Am Montag, den 20.01.2020, 21:24 +0100 schrieb Eric Barboni: > Branch release113 created, it seems that build fail on > all-libs.batik.read. > Why travis is ok ? > > https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/NetBeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release113/2/console Is this a pure

Re: Any objections against turning netbeans.org OFF?

Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 02.01.2020, 16:56 +0100 schrieb Jiří Kovalský: > Can we identify parts which still need to be migrated? Is anyone > aware of something which prevents decommissioning of Oracle > infrastructure hosting the legacy services? For the plugin portal I would like to ensure,

Re: building post-11.2

Hi Glen, Am Sonntag, den 29.12.2019, 12:14 -0600 schrieb Glenn Holmer: > I haven't built from source in a while. Pulled from master, ran a > clean, > then "ant -Dpermit.jdk9.builds=true". The build failed with: > > -do-compile: > [nb-javac] Compiling 40 source files to > /mnt/common/netbeans- >

Re: bug report not showing up..

Hi Brad, Am Donnerstag, den 05.03.2020, 15:58 -0700 schrieb Brad Walker: > This improvement is not showing up on the pull requests for some > reason.. > > https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/1931 > > Am I missing something? > what do you mean? I just checked: - the PR is referenced from

Disable issue reporting support in NetBeans IDE

Hi, the following is my personal subjective reaction to seeing a few recent issues: It looks as if people stop thinking when using jira. Jira is perfectly capable to handle attachments, yet people just blindly paste the gestures and message log into the description. This brings Jira to a crawl

Re: Disable issue reporting support in NetBeans IDE

Hi, Am Samstag, den 07.03.2020, 12:31 +0100 schrieb Eric Barboni: > > NETBEANSREPORTS that we link to instead of NETBEANS > > With maybe with clearer field, log / what was I doing ... > > And for us we keep track + triage or garbage with no pollution of > main jira project > you mean the

Re: Build Error on Master

Hi Eric, Am Samstag, den 07.03.2020, 10:50 -0600 schrieb Eric Bresie: > C:\git\netbeans\nbbuild\build.xml:119: java.io.IOException: Cannot connect > to > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=netbeans-jenkins-lib.git;a=blob_plain;f=meta/netbeansrelease.json this is pretty clear -

Re: Python donation status

Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 09.04.2020, 11:39 +0200 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga: > The argument could be made that since the code was part of contrib under > the OCA (Oracle Contributor Agreement), it belongs to Oracle and Oracle can > simply donate it. yes - and assuming, that correct procedure was

Re: NetBeans Collaboration Kit

Hi, Am Freitag, den 10.04.2020, 16:38 +0200 schrieb Christian Lenz: > Anyway, other question, qhat will happen with the code under oracle? > Let me guess: Nothing. So in the end, donate the code and thats it. > No need to discuss that to much. This does not happen by itself - I only know Oracle

Re: Updating index from a remote repository fails for Netbeans 12 beta-3

Hi, this is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-4071 Greetings Matthias Am Donnerstag, den 16.04.2020, 13:13 -0700 schrieb Mark Eggers: > Environment: > > OS: Windows 10 Professional 64 bit, latest updates > JDK: Runtime Environment AdoptOpenJDK (build 11.0.6+10) > > I have a

Re: Updating index from a remote repository fails for Netbeans 12 beta-3

searches. > > . . . just my two cents > /mde/ > On 4/17/2020 11:24 AM, Matthias Bläsing wrote: > > Hi, > > > > this is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-4071 > > > > Greetings > > > > Matthias > > > > Am Donnerstag, den 16.0

  1   2   3   4   5   >