On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 9:48 PM, Matthias Bläsing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Dienstag, den 21.08.2018, 12:41 -0700 schrieb Chuck Davis:
> > Quite right and eloquently put, Scott.
> >
> > If people don't want the feature-set of JDK9 continue using NB8.2. For
> > those of us who want the feature-set (in
Describe more how git fits into the picture please.
If you're just looking for a UI to show sets of files that were edited, and
maybe group diff, that doesn't seem like it would need git.
Or you want to somehow make local history contiguous with git history? (My
intuition says this would be a
> On Aug 21, 2018, at 6:50 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
> wrote:
>
> I could be wrong but I think there's a lot of confusion about what JDK
> support means in relation to Apache NetBeans.
Got it. Using NetBeans 9+ to develop applications that require JDK 10 works
now, and support for building
With enough work NB could be written in assembly and produce anything but
the burden to do it would not be worth the cost probably. There is such a
huge architectural difference between JDK8 and JDK11 that to expect
developers to accommodate both is unrealistic -- at least is seems many
I could be wrong but I think there's a lot of confusion about what JDK
support means in relation to Apache NetBeans.
Here's the tentative release cycle:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+NetBeans+Release+Roadmap
In the upcoming release of Apache NetBeans, scheduled for
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 12:48 PM, Matthias Bläsing <
mblaes...@doppel-helix.eu> wrote:
> Matthias, being happy, that his employer finally got Java 8 into
> production...
>
Seriously, welcome to my world. And we're still not 100%, we still have
stuff running on Glassfish 3, for example.
With a
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 9:41 PM, Chuck Davis wrote:
> Quite right and eloquently put, Scott.
>
> If people don't want the feature-set of JDK9 continue using NB8.2. For
> those of us who want the feature-set (in particular HTTPClient) of JDK11 we
> need NB11 sooner rather than later. We need it
Great idea!
Josh Juneau
http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866
> On Aug 21, 2018, at 6:26 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> In the virtual meetup that we completed a few minutes ago (I'm working on
> uploading the recording
Cool.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 11:46 AM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> In this context, I mentioned the 'managing for happiness' concept today in
> the virtual meetup -- especially the idea of everyone having 100 points to
> distribute to those who've been very helpful/productive in a particular
>
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 21.08.2018, 12:41 -0700 schrieb Chuck Davis:
> Quite right and eloquently put, Scott.
>
> If people don't want the feature-set of JDK9 continue using NB8.2. For
> those of us who want the feature-set (in particular HTTPClient) of JDK11 we
> need NB11 sooner rather than
Quite right and eloquently put, Scott.
If people don't want the feature-set of JDK9 continue using NB8.2. For
those of us who want the feature-set (in particular HTTPClient) of JDK11 we
need NB11 sooner rather than later. We need it to work with the OpenJFX11
modules in Maven central (which NB9
In this context, I mentioned the 'managing for happiness' concept today in
the virtual meetup -- especially the idea of everyone having 100 points to
distribute to those who've been very helpful/productive in a particular
month (and the one with most points end of the month being the 'Apache
Thanks, merged! You should see it not too long from now and if you'd like
to make further changes, please just provide more PRs!
Gj
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 7:38 PM, Alexius DIAKOGIANNIS
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have opened a pull request
>
> On Aug 21, 2018, at 10:22 AM, Will Hartung wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 4:46 AM, Scott Palmer wrote:
>
>> This is not quite right. Anyone using the NB platform is not forced to
>> upgrade the platform they base their application on. The only thing that
>> happens is that the
Hi all,
I have opened a pull request
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans-website/pull/76 that adds a
download section as discussed in todays meeting.
Thanks
*Alexius Diakogiannis, CSM*
*Archer / Linux Lover / Java Geek*
*About me*: https://about.me/diakogiannis/
*Linked In*:
Hi everyone,
I have NetBeans running from IDE and exploring how I can improve the local
history. At the moment, I am trying to hack in some of the git code so I can
see if I can get a local history with multiple files (my top if only NetBeans
did this feature). I cannot persuade my
On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 at 10:24, Dusan Balek wrote:
> the current nb-javac sources can be found in the
> http://hg.netbeans.org/main/nb-java-x repository. To build nb-javac, use
> the NetBeans J2SE project located in make/langtools/netbeans/nb-javac
> subdirectory.
> As for the particular the
On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 at 15:22, Will Hartung wrote:
> But there's a difference between being able to be built on the latest JDK,
> and requiring the latest JDK to build/run.
+1
> Regarding the LTS, while there may not be a (free) release from Oracle,
> it's still a symbolic line in the sand of
It was inevitable, another Wiki! This one is for signing up to the
per-cluster repository reorganization process:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Per-cluster+repository+layout
Gj
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 2:05 PM, Junichi Yamamoto
wrote:
> > I doubt it is related. I don't
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 4:46 AM, Scott Palmer wrote:
> This is not quite right. Anyone using the NB platform is not forced to
> upgrade the platform they base their application on. The only thing that
> happens is that the platform code base can hold them back as well from
> building with new
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 2:16 PM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> ...Notes...
Thank you! Having notes and links here allows everyone to participate,
without having to listen to long recordings.
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Good idea, thanks.
Notes:
1. Introductions.
2. Status -- we discussed and looked at the following:
- https://netbeans.apache.org/
- https://netbeans.apache.org/download/index.html
-
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/2nd+Donation%3A+List+of+Modules+to+Review
-
> I doubt it is related. I don't see the problem in Apache NetBeans 9.0.
> Neither in today's build.
Sorry, probably, something was broken in my environment... I deleted
users directory and cache directory, then ran IDE.
Now, there is no problem.
> And, sorry, I was wrong
Need not to say sorry.
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 1:45 PM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> ...we discussed current status of Apache NetBeans, followed by some new ideas
> and discussions:..
Are you planning to share written notes as well?
It would be good to have an overview here of what was discussed as
well as any
The JDK required to run NB should be entirely independent of what JDK you can
build apps for when using NB.
“...when NB starts to require a specific Java Version,
implicitly the NB PLATFORM will have the same requirements, and that "all
of a sudden" has impact on projects outside of NB proper.”
Here's the recording (audio only) of the 2nd virtual meetup, held today --
we discussed current status of Apache NetBeans, followed by some new ideas
and discussions:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQ72aZqwGec
Gj
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Geertjan Wielenga <
I doubt it is related. I don't see the problem in Apache NetBeans 9.0.
Neither in today's build.
And, sorry, I was wrong -- you don't need the latest build to create
NetBeans to use it to build NetBeans. Simply the officially released Apache
NetBeans 9 is fine, the code to recognize the new
Hi all,
In the virtual meetup that we completed a few minutes ago (I'm working on
uploading the recording right now, will send it around when done), we
suddenly ended up talking about some kind of periodic recognition for those
who have really contributed significantly over a particular period.
On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 at 18:39, Svata Dedic wrote:
> we / you should also consider, before dropping JDK8 as a runtime
> platform, that applications that build ON TOP of NetBeans platform may
> have a way conservative requirements than developers who strive to use
> the bleeding technology edge.
The problem here is that netbeans.org has not yet been donated to Apache by
Oracle hence org.netbeans does not belong to Apache hence org.netbeans
cannot be used for Maven archetypes.
So, we need to wait for the brand/domain donation to be completed before
going further with this -- and there's
Reminder: this will take place an hour from now. :-)
Gj
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 8:42 AM, Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Two weeks ago we had our first virtual Apache NetBeans meeting, open to
> anyone and everyone involved or interested in being
Here's another perspective: the OracleLabs organization works on GraalVM (
http://graalvm.org
32 matches
Mail list logo
