[RESULT][VOTE] Establish Registry, a sub-project of Apache NiFi

All, This vote has ended with: 10 binding +1s 13 non-binding +1s 0 <= 0 The vote to establish Registry as a sub-project of the Apache NiFi TLP has passed. Thank you all for your participation in this important vote. I will submit the necessary information to infra to get the ball rolling

Re: [VOTE] Establish Registry, a sub-project of Apache NiFi

@joey, if I understand correctly, this will be an external and optional resource and so will have it's own separate project and build that's not necessary for most users getting started with NiFi. On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 9:25 AM, iCloud wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > But

Re: [VOTE] Establish Registry, a sub-project of Apache NiFi

+1 (non-binding) But want to add that we now have the (small) burden of making sure the developer docs, etc. are crystal clear on how all the sub-projects and repos fit together. More sub-projects and repos means harder for new people to get started and understand. Let’s not lose the

Re: [VOTE] Establish Registry, a sub-project of Apache NiFi

+1 (binding) On Feb 12, 2017 10:17 PM, "Jeff" wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:43 PM Brandon DeVries wrote: > > > +1 binding > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 6:36 PM Andre wrote: > > > > > +1 binding > > > > > > On Sat,

Re: [VOTE] Establish Registry, a sub-project of Apache NiFi

+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:43 PM Brandon DeVries wrote: > +1 binding > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 6:36 PM Andre wrote: > > > +1 binding > > > > On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 3:40 AM, Bryan Bende wrote: > > > > > All, > > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Establish Registry, a sub-project of Apache NiFi

+1 binding On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 6:36 PM Andre wrote: > +1 binding > > On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 3:40 AM, Bryan Bende wrote: > > > All, > > > > Following a solid discussion for the past few days [1] regarding the > > establishment of Registry as a

Re: [VOTE] Establish Registry, a sub-project of Apache NiFi

+1 binding On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 3:40 AM, Bryan Bende wrote: > All, > > Following a solid discussion for the past few days [1] regarding the > establishment of Registry as a sub-project of Apache NiFi, I'd like to > call a formal vote to record this important community

Re: [VOTE] Establish Registry, a sub-project of Apache NiFi

oe Skora <jsk...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> +1 binding > >> > >> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Peter Wicks (pwicks) < > pwi...@micron.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> +1 (non-binding) > >>> > >>>

Re: [VOTE] Establish Registry, a sub-project of Apache NiFi

;> -Original Message- >>> From: Bryan Bende [mailto:bbe...@gmail.com] >>> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 9:41 AM >>> To: dev@nifi.apache.org >>> Subject: [VOTE] Establish Registry, a sub-project of Apache NiFi >>> >>> All, >>&g

Re: [VOTE] Establish Registry, a sub-project of Apache NiFi

ter Wicks (pwicks) <pwi...@micron.com> > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Bryan Bende [mailto:bbe...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 9:41 AM >> To: dev@nifi.apache.org >> Subject: [VOTE] Est

Re: [VOTE] Establish Registry, a sub-project of Apache NiFi

ginal Message- >> From: Bryan Bende [mailto:bbe...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 9:41 AM >> To: dev@nifi.apache.org >> Subject: [VOTE] Establish Registry, a sub-project of Apache NiFi >> >> All, >> >> Following a solid discussion f

Re: [VOTE] Establish Registry, a sub-project of Apache NiFi

: [VOTE] Establish Registry, a sub-project of Apache NiFi > > All, > > Following a solid discussion for the past few days [1] regarding the > establishment of Registry as a sub-project of Apache NiFi, I'd like to > call a formal vote to record this important community deci

RE: [VOTE] Establish Registry, a sub-project of Apache NiFi

+1 (non-binding) -Original Message- From: Bryan Bende [mailto:bbe...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 9:41 AM To: dev@nifi.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Establish Registry, a sub-project of Apache NiFi All, Following a solid discussion for the past few days [1] regarding

Re: [VOTE] Establish Registry, a sub-project of Apache NiFi

+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Bryan Bende wrote: > All, > > Following a solid discussion for the past few days [1] regarding the > establishment of Registry as a sub-project of Apache NiFi, I'd like to > call a formal vote to record this important

Re: [VOTE] Establish Registry, a sub-project of Apache NiFi

+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Michael Moser wrote: > It definitely sounds like careful consideration was given to the name. > > +1 (non-binding) > > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Joe Percivall > wrote: > > > Thanks for the

Re: [VOTE] Establish Registry, a sub-project of Apache NiFi

It definitely sounds like careful consideration was given to the name. +1 (non-binding) On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Joe Percivall wrote: > Thanks for the clarification Joe and Bryan, and we appear to be on the same > page that "Apache NiFi Registry" is how it would

Re: [VOTE] Establish Registry, a sub-project of Apache NiFi

Thanks for the clarification Joe and Bryan, and we appear to be on the same page that "Apache NiFi Registry" is how it would be referred to. With that cleared up, I am a +1. Joe On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Pierre Villard wrote: > +1 as well, that will be a

Re: [VOTE] Establish Registry, a sub-project of Apache NiFi

+1 as well, that will be a very important piece of the ecosystem and looking forward its development! 2017-02-10 18:47 GMT+01:00 Joe Witt : > The name 'registry' is insufficient but we're not creating 'Apache > Registry'. We're creating a subproject of 'Apache NiFi' which is

Re: [VOTE] Establish Registry, a sub-project of Apache NiFi

The name 'registry' is insufficient but we're not creating 'Apache Registry'. We're creating a subproject of 'Apache NiFi' which is a TLP of the ASF. This subproject, just like 'MiNiFi' would properly be referred to as 'Registry: a subproject of Apache NiFi' or 'Apache NiFi Registry'. Apache

Re: [VOTE] Establish Registry, a sub-project of Apache NiFi

Well using MiNiFi as an example... Website - "MiNiFi - A subproject of Apache NiFi" Git - "nifi-minifi.git" JIRA - "Apache NiFi MiNiFi" For Registry I was thinking... Website - "Registry - A subproject of Apache NiFi" Git - "nifi-registry.git" JIRA "Apache NiFi Registry" So I didn't think

Re: [VOTE] Establish Registry, a sub-project of Apache NiFi

I 100% agree with Mike and was actually in the process of writing a very similar response. Just having "Registry" as the name will mean the trademark will be "Apache Registry" and I don't think that conveys the specificity of the sub-project. I'd much prefer something like NiFi Registry like the

Re: [VOTE] Establish Registry, a sub-project of Apache NiFi

I am in favor of the concept but the name made me pause. I did a Google search of "apache registry" and found an existing Perl module called Apache::Registry. Should I be worried about potential naming confusion? -- Mike On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Oleg Zhurakousky <

Re: [VOTE] Establish Registry, a sub-project of Apache NiFi

+1 non-binding. I like the separation and I see a lot of need for this in the community. On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Matt Burgess wrote: > +1 binding > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Bryan Bende wrote: > > All, > > > > Following a solid

Re: [VOTE] Establish Registry, a sub-project of Apache NiFi

+1 Here as well. We desperately need it. > On Feb 10, 2017, at 12:11 PM, Jeremy Dyer wrote: > > +1 non-binding. I like the separation and I see a lot of need for this in > the community. > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Matt Burgess wrote: > >>

Re: [VOTE] Establish Registry, a sub-project of Apache NiFi

+1 binding On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Bryan Bende wrote: > All, > > Following a solid discussion for the past few days [1] regarding the > establishment of Registry as a sub-project of Apache NiFi, I'd like to > call a formal vote to record this important community

Re: [VOTE] Establish Registry, a sub-project of Apache NiFi

+1 binding On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Marc wrote: > +1 non-binding -- but I think creating a sub project creates a demarcation > point that separates responsibilities in a way that makes sense. > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Bryan Bende

Re: [VOTE] Establish Registry, a sub-project of Apache NiFi

+1 non-binding -- but I think creating a sub project creates a demarcation point that separates responsibilities in a way that makes sense. On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Bryan Bende wrote: > All, > > Following a solid discussion for the past few days [1] regarding the >

[VOTE] Establish Registry, a sub-project of Apache NiFi

All, Following a solid discussion for the past few days [1] regarding the establishment of Registry as a sub-project of Apache NiFi, I'd like to call a formal vote to record this important community decision and establish consensus. The scope of this project is to define APIs for interacting