Hi Rupert:
This would indeed be a really nice feature.
Wish I knew how to do it.
Regards,
Ruth Hoffman
http://www.ruthhoffman.com
rhoff...@aesolves.com
On 1/6/14 8:48 AM, Rupert Howell wrote:
Has anybody got any good ideas for a way to disable ECAS from triggering
without commenting them out
Hi Jacques:
For what it is worth: Best OFBiz proposal I've heard in a long time!
Ruth
On 8/6/13 9:02 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi,
For some days now, I was thinking about a new way of releasing (only schedule
related). I thought about it while looking by chance at release strategies of few
on the requirement to
monitor
and control server performance. I suppose I could go to the user
list for
more ideas, but the code I'm planning to commit is pretty basic, and
users
will be free to enhance it in whatever way they please.
-Adrian
On 7/15/2012 12:13 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi Adrian
Hi Adrian:
Shouldn't this be discussed on the user list? IMHO Words like
applications and stats about services and entities...those are all
indicative of user requirements, not developer requirements.
Users should be driving requirements gathering and analysis for OFBiz
and not developers.
more cumbersome. The hierarchical features are really nice,
but if you have to hunt around to find them, it diminishes their appeal.
This is just my opinion and the reason I always end up using Flat Grey.
Best Regards,
Ruth Hoffman
On 3/20/12 12:36 PM, Anil Patel wrote:
I prefer keep Flat Gray
Interesting, but this sounds a bit dangerous to me.
How about a Utility that lets you check if an Entity exists at
all...instead of throwing nasty errors. Or am I still back in the dark
ages and this already exists in the trunk?
Thanks much for you attention to this.
Best Regards,
Ruth
Hi Hans, et al.
Could someone take a few minutes and explain to me the value of OFBiz
multi-tenancy? Why not just use SVN or other tool specifically designed
to manage multiple versions of a project where a project is an OFBiz
tenant. The problem as I see it is that the OFBiz multi-tenant
Hi Pierre:
I understand the premise. I don't understand the value proposition. I
just don't see how this is any better than separate instances. Just
wondered if anyone has done an ROI comparing the two approaches. My
analysis suggests that the OFBiz implementation may not be the best way
to
now recall
why I said lists. HTML lists (ul/ol) are created automatically by Menu
and Tree widgets.
Regards,
Ruth Hoffman
On 12/3/11 3:51 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi Jacques:
Sorry, by list I really mean Screen widgets with entity-condition
lists. Never meant to imply that I would not use
Hi Gareth:
Can't help but add my 2 cents here...
First, I take issue with Han's statement: ...it is an implementation of
a 'simple' OFBiz component all in a single webapp I would argue
that there is no such thing as a simple OFBiz component. To my way of
thinking, simple adds no value to
) also with Form/Menu widgets
and sometimes it opens you awesome possiblities. You can find examples
in OFBiz trunk and R11.04
I just wonder if this thread should not be in user ML rather...
Jacques
From: Ruth Hoffman rhoff...@aesolves.com
Hi Gareth:
Can't help but add my 2 cents here...
First, I
,
you can look it up.
-Adrian
On 9/16/2011 10:21 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Thanks BJ.
I guess OFBiz is not too backward compatible. Oh well, too bad. This
breaks all kinds of things in 9.04 that I'd like to carry over to 10.x.
Best Regards,
Ruth
On 9/16/11 5:14 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
did
, brings up all kinds of stuff that
doesn't seem to have anything to do with content search...
Anyhow, I think it needs a relook as well.
Best Regards,
Ruth Hoffman
http://www.myofbiz.com, http://www.aesolves.com
==
We will have a look at this Ruth, it is specific from the blog though,
look
Could someone explain to me - and ignorant OFBiz committer wannabe - why
the following method in version 9.04:
public static GenericDelegator getGenericDelegator(String
delegatorName) { ... }
No longer exists in the DelegatorFactory class in the most recent trunk
version?
In its place
=821391
Ruth Hoffman sent the following on 9/16/2011 1:42 PM:
Could someone explain to me - and ignorant OFBiz committer wannabe - why
the following method in version 9.04:
public static GenericDelegator getGenericDelegator(String
delegatorName) { ... }
No longer exists in the DelegatorFactory
Regards,
Ruth
On 9/16/11 5:29 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
one of the reasons I stuck with the minilang
Ruth Hoffman sent the following on 9/16/2011 2:21 PM:
Thanks BJ.
I guess OFBiz is not too backward compatible. Oh well, too bad. This
breaks all kinds of things in 9.04 that I'd like to carry over
Both. For example EventHandler implementations and some custom servlets
that extend HttpServlet.
Ruth
On 9/16/11 6:00 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
are you speaking as in a Class or has the uses of Httpservlet?
Ruth Hoffman sent the following on 9/16/2011 2:41 PM:
Anyhow, I haven't figured out a way
\ofbiz\googleCheckout\PrepareXMLTemplate.xml
chris gives a lot of examples
Ruth Hoffman sent the following on 9/16/2011 3:17 PM:
Both. For example EventHandler implementations and some custom servlets
that extend HttpServlet.
Ruth
On 9/16/11 6:00 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
are you speaking
Background:
Thur. Sept 15, 2011 3:30pm ET downloaded latest trunk zip file. Ran ant
run-install. Ran ./startofbiz.sh. Navigate my browser to:
http://localhost:8080/ecommerce/control/MainBlog?blogContentId=BLOGROOTMADMAX
Click on:
http://localhost:8080/2008-Elections-BLG10007-content
Empty
, and keep pushing for it after
having to give up and start over a time or two. Then you'll understand.
-David
On May 2, 2011, at 7:26 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
On 5/2/11 9:23 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
On 3/05/2011, at 12:51 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
List:
Why is it that David is allowed to advertise
List:
Why is it that David is allowed to advertise continuously about his
latest pet project - that has nothing to do with OFBiz - on this mailing
list and others, such as myself can't even mention a resource dedicated
entirely to OFBiz, that many have found useful, (MyOFBiz.com
On 5/2/11 9:23 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
On 3/05/2011, at 12:51 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
List:
Why is it that David is allowed to advertise continuously about his latest pet
project - that has nothing to do with OFBiz - on this mailing list and others,
such as myself can't even mention
Hi Jacques:
Out of curiosity, I have often wondered about this:
For my own coding, should I use findByPrimaryKey or findOne? Which is
the better solution? Regardless of Java, Groovy or other?
TIA
Ruth
On 4/21/11 4:11 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi,
It would not be a big work effort to
/javadocs/org/ofbiz/entity/Delegator.html#findByPrimaryKey%28java.lang.String,%20java.util.Map%29
-Adrian
On 4/21/2011 7:52 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi Jacques:
Out of curiosity, I have often wondered about this:
For my own coding, should I use findByPrimaryKey or findOne? Which is
the better
Hi Adrian:
Thanks much for your quick reply.
Best Regards,
Ruth
On 4/21/11 11:05 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
From what I recall, there is no difference in functionality. The
deprecated methods were merely an effort to simplify the Delegator API.
-Adrian
On 4/21/2011 8:02 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote
Hello Committers:
Is there any one out there who could possibly shed some light on this
compile time error?
Release: 9.04.01 downloaded today.
TIA
Ruth
Problems Processing Event
Exception: java.lang.IncompatibleClassChangeError
Message: Found class org.ofbiz.entity.GenericDelegator, but
Never mind...I just figured it out.
Thanks
Ruth
On 4/3/11 5:53 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hello Committers:
Is there any one out there who could possibly shed some light on this
compile time error?
Release: 9.04.01 downloaded today.
TIA
Ruth
Problems Processing Event
Exception
Hi Ean, Jacopo:
Please forgive if this is obvious, but I don't understand why this is a
desired behavior. Under what circumstances would you need to represent
the inventoryItemId (as serialized inventory) in the shopping cart?
From my reading of the data model, the inventoryItemId (for
Hi Jacques:
I discovered this last week during a training class I was
giving...Unfortunately, I was not hooked up to the Internet so I was not
able to demonstrate. IMHO, this should be reverted back to the expected
behavior, or alternatively, an option provided to bypass and still run
not working with
10.x on a regular basis. This was just a one-off request to take a quick
peak at some general OFBiz features and I just happen to have a 10.x
version up and running at the time.
Thanks again.
Regards,
Ruth
On 3/24/11 8:16 AM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
Le 24/03/2011 12:52, Ruth
Having just spend 6 months working in a mixed OpenTaps, OFBiz 9.x
environment, all I can say is: What a mess. Thankfully I do not have
to support the core project base - only my small piece. I still have not
found the value in the OpenTaps/Hibernate implementation. Maybe,
someday, I'll see
Well said!
I would only add...leadership to the mix. A plan needs leadership to
galvanize the community to move in a positive direction.
Regards,
Ruth
On 1/25/11 6:43 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
IMO, marketing has to do with managing (and steering) expectations. For the
generally accepted
favorite, documentation
Such a community would foster business and industry outreach (including
soliciting of requirements) and make marketing of OFBiz to industry a
primary objective.
If there is enough interest out there I'll work on next steps.
Regards,
Ruth Hoffman
Hi Jacques:
IMHO, Prototype, Dojo and jQuery all have their uses. No one library
does or can do it all...
That said, if there are no instances where Prototype and/or Dojo are
being used within the project, it seems kind of pointless to keep them
around.
Just my 2 cents.
Ruth
On 11/23/10
Hi All:
This isn't really a re-factor of Email handling. It is more closely
described as a re-factor of handling order notifications. It just so
happens that that email Services are called on to do this. Hopefully, no
email Service will be harmed in the making of this change ;-)
Just my 2
Hello Developers:
Would it be possible to attach the Subversion version number to the
packaged releases (either internally within the packaged zip file) or as
part of the file name, to the official release packages found on
http://ofbiz.apache.org/download.html.
I can think of several
Hello Developers:
I'm having a problem on my live eCommerce site where, when a user
selects any locale other than English, the BigDecimal value of the order
item's price is not being converted correctly to a string. For example a
Big Decimal value of 10.000 is getting displayed as 10,00 and
Hi Adrian:
#809901 at least that is what svn info says it is.
Thanks
Ruth
Adrian Crum wrote:
What OFBiz version are you using on your live eCommerce site?
-Adrian
On 7/26/2010 11:00 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hello Developers:
I'm having a problem on my live eCommerce site where, when a user
Hi Adrian:
svn info says revision 809901. I do believe it is 9.04.
Regards,
Ruth
Adrian Crum wrote:
So that would make it the 9.04 version?
-Adrian
On 7/26/2010 11:29 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi Adrian:
#809901 at least that is what svn info says it is.
Thanks
Ruth
Adrian Crum wrote:
What
in the correct
format based on the user's locale setting. So, the behavior you
described is correct. If you don't want the user to select a locale
other than US, then you can disable the locale selection screen.
-Adrian
On 7/26/2010 12:04 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi Adrian:
svn info says revision
in those
screen segments.
Check the Freemarker docs to see if there is a way to specify a
locale in numeric-to-string conversions. I'll see if there is
convenient way to do it in screen widgets.
-Adrian
On 7/26/2010 1:33 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi Adrian:
Thank you for your answer. However, I did
want to disable, and then
disable localization only in those screen segments.
Check the Freemarker docs to see if there is a way to specify a locale in
numeric-to-string conversions. I'll see if there is convenient way to do it in
screen widgets.
-Adrian
On 7/26/2010 1:33 PM, Ruth Hoffman
/docs/ref_builtins_number.html
You are still calling the rendering a problem but as mentioned earlier this
is actually the desired default behavior, numbers should be rendered in a locale specific
format.
Regards
Scott
On 27/07/2010, at 9:51 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Now that I have your
. If the user's locale
is in France, you will see commas.
That's why I suggested using a Freemarker built-in or whatever to
specify a locale just for that expression and not the whole screen.
-Adrian
On 7/26/2010 2:51 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Now that I have your attention:
So what is really
and pass US specific number formatting to them
when another locale is being used.
Regards
Scott
On 27/07/2010, at 10:34 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi Adrian:
This is exactly what I was looking for. I was going to try and track down what
was happening and then try and do something to overcome
to build this file.
Reporter: Ruth Hoffman
Current (June 23, 2010) apache-ofbiz-09.04.zip file does not have the ofbiz.jar
file. However, the README file does not say anything about having to build this
file. Either fix the README or make sure the zip file has the appropriate
jar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3835?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12882566#action_12882566
]
Ruth Hoffman commented on OFBIZ-3835:
-
Title should read: apache-ofbiz-9.04.zip does
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3835?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12882617#action_12882617
]
Ruth Hoffman commented on OFBIZ-3835:
-
The README file is wrong. It should be corrected
-3831
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: content
Affects Versions: Release 09.04
Environment: OFBiz Demo:
http://demo-stable.ofbiz.apache.org/ecommerce/control/main
Reporter: Ruth Hoffman
Login as admin and select any of the forum
OFBiz 9.04 downloaded from download site as zip package
Reporter: Ruth Hoffman
I get the following error when attempting to add a forum entry as a logged in
user (admin):
010-06-22 14:44:31,503 (http-0.0.0.0-8443-5) [
ServiceDispatcher.java:528:ERROR] Error in Service
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ruth Hoffman updated OFBIZ-3831:
Attachment: 9.04_001.png
Here's what shows up on the demo site.
OFBiz 9.04 Stable Demo fails
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ruth Hoffman updated OFBIZ-3831:
Attachment: 9.04_002.png
Least there be any question as to where this happens...please see
Could anyone advise a quick fix for this. The mini-language call to
looks good to me. I'm trying to get some screen shots to document how
this works.
Thanks
Ruth
Ruth Hoffman (JIRA) wrote:
Error when creating forum entry [Illegal argument calling method to execute
named min
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12881359#action_12881359
]
Ruth Hoffman commented on OFBIZ-3831:
-
Thanks Adrian.
Will look into it.
Regards,
Ruth
Issue Type: Bug
Components: content
Affects Versions: Release 09.04
Environment: OFBiz Demo:
http://demo-stable.ofbiz.apache.org/ecommerce/control/main
Reporter: Ruth Hoffman
Login as admin and select any of the forum links. Causes
/profile?viewProfile=key=1237480locale=en_UStrk=tab_pro
Ruth Hoffman sent the following on 6/22/2010 2:11 PM:
Hi BJ:
Actually, I have long ago lost track of what is where. I guess I wasn't
aware of that. Anyhow, as far as I'm concerned, it doesn't really
matter. I don't rely on the demo sites
Hi Erwan:
IMO, I found that end-users want graphical representation of data.
Sometime ago I integrated JFreeChart w/OFBiz for a client who wanted
(static) graphical representations of all sorts of things.
I'm not familiar with flotr, but anything that would help in allowing
the creation of
Hi Jacopo:
Are you talking about the Catalog Manager or the eCommerce product listings?
Regards,
Ruth
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Is anyone else getting NPE errors when using the loookup fields of the main
catalog page (for example)?
Jacopo
Hi David:
Not being as technically versed as most list members, I've got a
question that may seem obvious to you, but I was hoping you could clarify:
David E Jones wrote:
On Apr 16, 2010, at 3:51 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
On 17/04/2010, at 8:34 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
Scott Gray wrote:
Ok, sorry Adam.
Thanks
Adam Heath wrote:
Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi David:
Not being as technically versed as most list members, I've got a
question that may seem obvious to you, but I was hoping you could clarify:
Your question is to me, not David.
David E Jones wrote:
On Apr
Hi Erwan:
I have submitted several OFBiz business track proposals. I assumed that
because no one from the OFBiz PMC responded to my early posts about
technical track proposals, that there would be none.
I have several technical track ideas that I would very much like to present.
How do I go
Hi David:
If you don't want to keep it up and ASF doesn't want it, I'll take it.
Regards,
Ruth
Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword myofbiz
ruth.hoff...@myofbiz.com
David E Jones wrote:
My current registration of the
://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 15/04/2010, at 11:31 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi David:
If you don't want to keep it up and ASF doesn't want it, I'll take it.
Regards,
Ruth
Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword myofbiz
ruth.hoff
intentions (not sure at which
point though) see How to make money from open source at
http://www.opensourcestrategies.org/.
My 2 cts
Jacques
From: Ruth Hoffman rhoff...@aesolves.com
Hi Jeroen:
If this was a directed to me, then:
1) My enterprise is not a money making, commercial concern. My
want to express your love that's the place!
-Jeroen
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Ruth Hoffman rhoff...@aesolves.com wrote:
Hi Jeroen:
If this was a directed to me, then:
1) My enterprise is not a money making, commercial concern. My mission has
always been to provide high quality
Hi Ean:
Good reason to try and get ASF to keep it. (No disrespect intended but,
need I mention, underneath all this, is the commercial reality that
your comment implies.)
Regards,
Ruth
Ean Schuessler wrote:
It would cause major damage to our Google search placement to drop all
the pages in
Hi Jacopo:
Thanks.
Where should I send proposals for technical/community presentations? I
have an email address for the business tracks. How about the
technical/community ones?
Regards,
Ruth
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Apr 15, 2010, at 1:25 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi Erwan:
I have
,
Ruth
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
My guess is that you can submit them in the same way.
Jacopo
On Apr 15, 2010, at 6:33 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi Jacopo:
Thanks.
Where should I send proposals for technical/community presentations? I have an
email address for the business tracks. How about
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Ruth,
From: Ruth Hoffman rhoff...@aesolves.com
Hi Jacques:
Wow, I'm flattered that you would compare myOFBiz.com to Java! Or at
least juxtapose it with the big boys :-)
Just to clear the air:
1) myOFBiz.com is not an organization, company or any other
Hi Adam:
I thought that was the idea behind having a PARTY entity and a partyId.
When you use the PARTY as the unique user identifier, a user may have
any number of user logins, email addresses etc.
Regards,
Ruth
Adam Heath wrote:
Why oh why does the primary key for UserLogin get used as
? Please, lets get on with it instead of splitting hairs over
the purpose of the conference
Regards,
Ruth
Ean Schuessler wrote:
Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Nice, but I think you might be missing my point.
ApacheCon is all about telling the world about OFBiz and using the
immense resources available
Hi David:
I would be very interested in hosting sessions similar to last
November's ApacheCon in Oakland. I'm prepared to commit to at least (3)
50 minute sessions. If someone wants to organize something out side of
ApacheCon, then, depending on the venue, I may be able to commit to
Hi Erik:
Are you talking about ApacheCon as a for profit endeavor?
Regards,
Ruth
Erik Schuessler wrote:
I would agree, it is interesting to have a for profit event on free
or open software, it is kinda self defeating. I understand if they
were just covering costs, but that seems to be more
inconsistent with reality.
-David
On Apr 2, 2010, at 11:06 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi David:
I would be very interested in hosting sessions similar to last November's
ApacheCon in Oakland. I'm prepared to commit to at least (3) 50 minute
sessions. If someone wants to organize something
Hi Ean:
Nice, but I think you might be missing my point.
ApacheCon is all about telling the world about OFBiz and using the
immense resources available to the Foundation to do that.
IMHO it isn't really about socializing with the small and (getting
smaller by the hour) OFBiz community.
, at 11:58 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi Ean:
Nice, but I think you might be missing my point.
ApacheCon is all about telling the world about OFBiz and using the immense
resources available to the Foundation to do that.
IMHO it isn't really about socializing with the small and (getting smaller
Hi PMC and other community members:
On the official Apache Software Foundation Blog is says per ApacheCon
NA 2010:
...ApacheCon's technical tracks are currently being planned by their
respective Project Management Committees and will be announced in
upcoming weeks...
Will the OFBiz PMC
Just to clarify:
This is different then the Business/Community Track call for
participation discussed previously.
Regards,
Ruth
Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi PMC and other community members:
On the official Apache Software Foundation Blog is says per
ApacheCon NA 2010:
...ApacheCon's technical
Hello David:
I simply would like clarification on your statement: ApacheCon is a
for profit effort. No need to get confrontational.
Regards,
Ruth
David E Jones wrote:
Ruth,
I challenge you to quote where I said that.
-David
On Apr 2, 2010, at 12:53 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi Scott
that you said I made.
Sorry, I guess I just don't know how to respond. Any hints?
-David
On Apr 2, 2010, at 1:44 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hello David:
I simply would like clarification on your statement: ApacheCon is a for profit
effort. No need to get confrontational.
Regards,
Ruth
David E
Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Your point?
I asked for clarification. I got it. End of story.
Thanks for helping me out Hans. And thanks for making this mailing
list a friendlier place for all of us out here who are not privy to
all the secrets of those on the PMC.
Past or present.
Regards,
Ruth
Hans
of
implied issue here and I don't get it.
-David
On Apr 2, 2010, at 2:45 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Your point?
I asked for clarification. I got it. End of story.
Thanks for helping me out Hans. And thanks for making this mailing list a
friendlier place for all of us out here who are not privy to all
True!
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
It's better than TV :p
Jacques
From: Ruth Hoffman rhoff...@aesolves.com
David:
I think this thread is just about dead.
Regardless of what others think, I found ambiguity in your original
statement concerning the profit motive of the ApacheCon organization.
I
Hi All:
Are Entity ECAs handled by the Entity Engine exclusively?
TIA
Ruth
to Assist
Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man
Linkedin
http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=key=1237480locale=en_UStrk=tab_pro
Ruth Hoffman sent the following on 3/24/2010 1:40 PM:
Hi All:
Are Entity ECAs handled by the Entity Engine exclusively?
TIA
Ruth
Hi Adam, Scott, Jeremy:
Thanks.
That is exactly what I wanted to know.
Ruth
Adam Heath wrote:
Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi BJ:
Thanks. So does this mean that EECAs work as follows?:
1) A GenericDelegator object is gotten by the calling program
2) The GenericDelegator code looks to see if any
H Erwan:
I'd like to volunteer to host some sessions at the US ApacheCon 2010
coming up in Nov.
Regards,
Ruth
Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
Hi all,
will there be an OFBiz symposium this year at the ApacheCon like it
was in 2008 ?
Regards,
Sure would! Any volunteers?.
Regards,
Ruth
Jeroen van der Wal wrote:
Wouldn't it be smarter to organize our own conference? Would be great
to meet people involved and share experiences ouside the context of
this mailing list. And at a fraction of the cost of ApacheCon.
website
Reporter: Ruth Hoffman
Priority: Minor
Attachments: addingErpInterview.patch
Create a new list element for website. Please see attached patch.
Thanks
Ruth
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ruth Hoffman updated OFBIZ-3572:
Attachment: addingErpInterview.patch
Add news item to site index.html
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12848199#action_12848199
]
Ruth Hoffman commented on OFBIZ-3572:
-
Thanks for posting this.
Add news item
Hi Tim:
Just wondering when I can expect to see any patched changes applied to
the site?
Regards,
Ruth
://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=key=1237480locale=en_UStrk=tab_pro
Ruth Hoffman sent the following on 3/22/2010 9:44 AM:
Hi Tim:
Just wondering when I can expect to see any patched changes applied to
the site?
Regards,
Ruth
Hi Tim:
Even better! Thanks
Ruth
Tim Ruppert wrote:
Actually, when I do the commits - I push them right to the site most of the
time. Normally takes about 30 minutes or so to propagate.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Mar 22, 2010, at 10:56 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Thanks BJ.
Just was wondering
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ruth Hoffman updated OFBIZ-3565:
Attachment: addingManGuide.patch
Please see attached patch for adding Manufacturing ERP Guide
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12848360#action_12848360
]
Ruth Hoffman commented on OFBIZ-3565:
-
Hi All:
I just attached a patch to add this link
Hello All:
The following URL (as linked from the official OFBiz website) at 11:56am
EDT on Sat March 20:
https://ofbiz-vm.apache.org/catalog/control/login/main?USERNAME=adminPASSWORD=ofbizJavaScriptEnabled=Y
Returns this error:
Secure Connection Failed
An error occurred during a connection
Sat. March 20 12:00pm EDT:
http://ofbiz-vm.apache.org/ecommerce/control/main
Returns:
Not Found
The requested URL /ecommerce/control/main was not found on this server.
Apache/2.2.9 (Ubuntu) PHP/5.2.6-2ubuntu4.3 with Suhosin-Patch
mod_ssl/2.2.9 OpenSSL/0.9.8g Server at ofbiz-vm.apache.org Port
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3571
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: Release Branch 9.04, Release Candidate Branch 10.04
Reporter: Ruth Hoffman
Priority: Minor
Run Service Webtools tool returns to Schedule Job web page. Would
it
seems an enough general feature.
-Bruno
2010/3/18 Ruth Hoffman rhoff...@aesolves.com
Hi Bruno:
Here's what I do:
I wrote my own UI and use the existing contact list services to create and
manage multiple mailing lists (these are contact lists) including adding and
removing users. In addition
1 - 100 of 304 matches
Mail list logo
