I think this is a fix to a certain extent as without the association you
can't really query the records with ship group.
Regards
Vikas
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Adrian Crum
adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com wrote:
Is this a bug fix?
-Adrian
On 12/29/2011 8:30 PM, m...@apache.org
You also need to add the service definition, look for an example in
applications/party/servicedef
Regards
Vikas
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Shuany Yu shu...@foxmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to finish the part 2 of the tutorial but I haven't found where
the updatePracticePerson service is
Hi Jacopo,
I have few questions on the proposed idea for Extras.
-- Since the projects will be hosted as Apache OFBiz Extras and not officially
under ASF, In future does this means these projects should strictly follow the
ASF license? What if user group and/or the code maintainer of the
, Vikas Mayur wrote:
Hi Jacopo,
I have few questions on the proposed idea for Extras.
-- Since the projects will be hosted as Apache OFBiz Extras and not
officially under ASF, In future does this means these projects should
strictly follow the ASF license? What if user group
I do not see any issues if the existing projects that are slated to be moved to
Extras adhere to the ASF 2.0 license but as I see it further I don't see any
issues either if the license of any project is changed in future. I think it
would be good for the project overall and while its not
+1
These new ones really make sense. IMO we don't need to keep the old ones.
Regards
Vikas
On Mar 26, 2012, at 7:27 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Hi all,
I have reviewed the names of our ant tasks and I would like to propose to
rename [*] some of them to make them more consistent with
Hi Erwan,
Isn't it a good practice to commit the indentation changes separately, since
its just a one line change? Secondly, the changes in the build file seems
unrelated?
Regards
Vikas
On Mar 31, 2012, at 9:15 PM, er...@apache.org wrote:
Author: erwan
Date: Sat Mar 31 15:45:12 2012
New
.
For the indentation, I removed a loop, so the formating changes are
coming with it.
Regards,
2012/4/3 Vikas Mayur vikasma...@gmail.com:
Hi Erwan,
Isn't it a good practice to commit the indentation changes separately, since
its just a one line change? Secondly, the changes in the build file seems
+1
Regards
Vikas
On Apr 11, 2012, at 4:14 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
This is the vote thread to release a new (bug fix) release for the 10.04
branch. This new release, Apache OFBiz 10.04.02 (major release number:
10.04; minor release number: 02), will supersede the release Apache
Wonderful, thanks Jacopo
Regards
Vikas
On Apr 11, 2012, at 9:13 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Apr 11, 2012, at 5:29 PM, Vikas Mayur wrote:
Sorry, It may be out of context but should we add a note on the release page
just to clarify 10.04 - 10.04.01 ?
Yes, we will add a mention about
Jacopo,
Since 09.04.02 was the last release of the series 09.04, does the proposed new
version 09.04.03 has any purpose?
Regards
Vikas
On Apr 17, 2012, at 3:55 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
I would like to perform the following maintenance
1) archive the following versions (they will
Cappellato wrote:
ah ah, you are right Vikas!
Please disregard the proposal about 09.04.03... I probably need another coffee
Jacopo
On Apr 17, 2012, at 12:40 PM, Vikas Mayur wrote:
Jacopo,
Since 09.04.02 was the last release of the series 09.04, does the proposed
new version 09.04.03
Not sure who you intend to send it but I believe 'argument' is the least little
thing and OFBiz community can't afford it, so better apply some common sense
while throwing away anything towards this community.
Regards
Vikas
On Apr 21, 2012, at 2:16 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
Maybe you should
To keep the release cycle simple and understandable, I think we should go with
the first option.
Regards
Vikas
On Apr 24, 2012, at 1:01 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
This is just an early notice that we have 1 week before the end of April; if
we want to continue with the YY.04 pattern, and
+1
Regards
Vikas
On Apr 23, 2012, at 6:51 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
What do you think? In order to run most of the tests successfully you need to
run load-data that already depends on build...
Here is the code change I would like to commit:
Index: build.xml
Thanks Jacques for reporting this issue. This could be related to my
recent commits around one page.
I will look at it soonish.
Vikas
On Nov 18, 2008, at 6:31 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi,
By default when a new user create his/her profile in eCommerce no
billing address is set. So for
Jacques, I think it should be fixed by rev. 718617
Thanks,
Vikas
On Nov 18, 2008, at 6:31 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi,
By default when a new user create his/her profile in eCommerce no
billing address is set. So for the moment the one page checkout
fails. I propose this patch but I'm
+1
On Nov 24, 2008, at 2:41 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
At the end +1
Jacques
From: Scott Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ah ok, so you're talking about when the pk changes and then changes
again
but the entity name remains the same.
I guess the idea sounds fine to me, my only concern would be how
similar error at
https://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/catalog/control/ListShipmentMethodTypes
Vikas
On Dec 8, 2008, at 9:04 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
This commit causes the following error:
going to:
https://localhost3:8443/accounting/control/AdminMain?organizationPartyId=Company
gives the error:
Hi Dev,
There are so many drop down in the forms that show a predefined value
of either Y/N or Yes/No.
I think these are good candidates to go in Enumeration entity and
instead of using option tag of drop-down to populate predefined
value, Enumeration entity can be used.
Doing this would
+ 1
Vikas
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 11:16 PM, David E Jones david.jo...@hotwaxmedia.com
wrote:
Somehow the reminders I usually get for the board report didn't arrive, and
I forgot about it until this morning, so
If anyone is around feedback would be appreciated. I'll be submitting the
Just curious to know what should be the expected behavior when a user
select Any Role Type along with any other specific Roles in Role
Type select box ?
Vikas
On Feb 8, 2009, at 2:55 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Thanks for the pointer Scott!
Done in revision: 741964
I checked the only
AFAIK, as opposed to many hundreds (perhaps
thousands) of times for other functionality and new features.
-David
On Feb 11, 2009, at 10:50 AM, Vikas Mayur wrote:
Well, All the tests supposed to be run successfully. If you see the
logs, note that all the test are not failed.
The only reason
I have opened a issue some time back, but never get a chance to work
on that.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1951
Vikas
On Feb 15, 2009, at 1:23 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Has anyone ever tried to I18n and l10n surveys ?
Thanks
Jacques
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
Adam,
I appreciate your efforts in the recent commits to clean up test case
and its relative code. I am happy now people are getting off sleep and
want to contribute to this important part of the OFBiz.
So just you know, almost every test case in accounting require
certain pre-condition
On Mar 5, 2009, at 9:14 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Vikas Mayur wrote:
I appreciate your efforts in the recent commits to clean up test case
and its relative code. I am happy now people are getting off sleep
and
want to contribute to this important part of the OFBiz.
So just you know, almost
On Mar 7, 2009, at 2:01 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
Vikas Mayur wrote:
How did it work? I reverted back to 660193, the last patch for
OFBIZ-1790, and the accounting tests failed.
If they worked in the past, I'd like to know when. If so, then that
means something since then has caused them
On Mar 18, 2009, at 7:24 PM, m...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mor
Date: Wed Mar 18 13:54:53 2009
New Revision: 755596
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=755596view=rev
Log:
Cancel back orders from supplier if the cancelBackOrderDate (new
field on OrderItem) has passed. This is achieved
Thanks Jacques!
I have done few changes in rev. 756134 and to make them work, would
require to commit following changes. I would appreciate if you can
take a lead :) This is a small change, so not opening any new jira
issue.
Index: framework/common/config/CommonUiLabels.xml
please
Jacques
From: Vikas Mayur vikas.ma...@hotwaxmedia.com
Thanks Jacques!
I have done few changes in rev. 756134 and to make them work,
would require to commit following changes. I would appreciate if
you can take a lead :) This is a small change, so not opening any
new jira issue
Thanks Jacques!
Vikas
On Mar 20, 2009, at 1:35 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Thanks Vikas,
Your patch is in trunk 756365
From: Vikas Mayur vikas.ma...@hotwaxmedia.com
no problemo!
Uploaded the patch at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2245
Vikas
On Mar 20, 2009, at 1:19 AM
Thanks Jacques for your work!
Vikas
On Mar 28, 2009, at 11:06 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I have recently done some massive changes using Eclipse S/R with
regexp.
As it was a bit complex I had have my hand dirty. So maybe some
typos slipped in
Also I found some amp;amp; in hyperlinks
Hi Jacques,
Looks like few other changes has slipped in as well.
Thanks,
Vikas
On Apr 6, 2009, at 10:06 AM, jler...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jleroux
Date: Mon Apr 6 04:36:28 2009
New Revision: 762207
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=762207view=rev
Log:
Long life to demo.ofbiz.org
Hi,
While doing a commit in rev. 763582 for OFBIZ-2281, I come across a
type=PlainString which I think is the only occurrence in all of the
xml files. While fixing this issue, I have to remove the set tag
that has this type.
-set field=newEntity.returnItemSeqId from-
+1
Vikas
On Apr 15, 2009, at 8:18 AM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
+1
Cheers,
Tim
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
- Sam Hamilton sam.hamil...@virtualvillage.com wrote:
+1
Sam
On 15/04/2009 05:14, David Jones david.jo...@hotwaxmedia.com
IMO, this is not required at all except the one change that is to make
contactMechId optional (because of earlier changes done by Andrew
r765412).
The current service does support this. I have tested the service
createLead several times on earlier revision and it is working fine
for me.
To
but it may be
associated with the purpose type of contact address.
Vikas
On Apr 18, 2009, at 12:57 PM, Vikas Mayur wrote:
IMO, this is not required at all except the one change that is to
make contactMechId optional (because of earlier changes done by
Andrew r765412).
The current service
Thanks Jacques! I will close OFBIZ-2320 now.
Vikas
On Apr 18, 2009, at 7:25 PM, jler...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jleroux
Date: Sat Apr 18 13:55:27 2009
New Revision: 766321
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=766321view=rev
Log:
Applied fix from trunk for revision: 766307
Modified:
trying to convince second time again :)
On Apr 18, 2009, at 8:47 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Note that I'm not a fool, there is no login/pwd for this SMTP (it's
all local ;o)
Jacques
From: Tim Ruppert tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2009 5:01
+1.
See also this https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2302
Vikas
On Apr 20, 2009, at 2:59 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I think I remember a time when, when you changed the visual theme
you were going directly back to the page you were on before. But I'm
maybe wrong.
Anyway, even if
Please update http - https under Developer Access for release09.04.
Vikas
On Apr 18, 2009, at 2:54 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I have updated http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/OFBiz+Source+Repository+and+Access
for 09.04
Jacques
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Thanks Jacques!
Vikas
On Apr 20, 2009, at 1:38 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Done, thanks Vikas
Jacques
From: Vikas Mayur vikas.ma...@hotwaxmedia.com
Please update http - https under Developer Access for release09.04.
Vikas
On Apr 18, 2009, at 2:54 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I have updated
Thanks for reporting Gil. It should be fixed by r766637.
Vikas
On Apr 20, 2009, at 2:47 PM, gil portenseigne wrote:
Hi,
There is an error from the service createContact in SFA :
The Following Errors Occurred:
The following required parameter is missing: [OUT]
[createContact.contactMechId]
,
getting 403 forbidden error. I have also send a message to you
internally.
Vikas
On Apr 18, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Vikas Mayur wrote:
To add to my last reply ...
The profile page probably need to be fixed in SFA because the
contact information (if postal address) does not appear, but if I go
Thanks David!
Vikas
On Apr 20, 2009, at 8:32 PM, David E Jones wrote:
Thanks for the reminder Vikas. I have added permissions for those
who have access to the apps only for branches/release09.04.
-David
On Apr 20, 2009, at 4:48 AM, Vikas Mayur wrote:
Hi David,
I have fixed the sfa
Ashish, Do you think it would be better to go with the same way as
Jacques did for Securing URLs in Freemarker templates, that is
creating a separate issue under a parent task.
Vikas
On Apr 22, 2009, at 10:06 AM, Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote:
For any progress on this issue please refer JIRA
Hi Jacques,
This is part of Verify Pick feature added recently in trunk. This
commit is integral part of this feature and make this new feature
complete.
Now about the problem description:
With this commit, now it becomes necessary to do a Verify Pick before
Packing. Being said that,
Hi Jacques, Does that mean you agree with doing a back port for this
commit to release09.04 branch? IMO, this can be part of release branch
as described.
Vikas
On Apr 22, 2009, at 5:28 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: Vikas Mayur vikas.ma...@hotwaxmedia.com
Hi Jacques,
This is part
I did back port these change to release09.04 in r767544 and r 767449,
since I did not see any objections and hopefully will not :)
Vikas
On Apr 22, 2009, at 6:00 PM, Vikas Mayur wrote:
Hi Jacques, Does that mean you agree with doing a back port for this
commit to release09.04 branch? IMO
I have reverted these changes in release09.04 branch in r767590
following your suggestion, David. Thanks!
Vikas
On Apr 22, 2009, at 1:35 PM, David E Jones wrote:
On Apr 22, 2009, at 12:50 AM, m...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mor
Date: Wed Apr 22 06:50:16 2009
New Revision: 767394
URL:
Hi,
I would like to propose change in name of the following entities in
Portal. This would also result in changing the name of few keys.
PortalPortlet -- Portlet (since this is just about a portlet)
PortletPortletCategory -- PortletCategoryMember (as in
ProductCategoryMember)
IMO, they
, Vikas Mayur wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose change in name of the following entities in
Portal. This would also result in changing the name of few keys.
PortalPortlet -- Portlet (since this is just about a portlet)
PortletPortletCategory -- PortletCategoryMember (as in
ProductCategoryMember
to being enough of an
improvement to be worth it.
-David
On Apr 23, 2009, at 4:28 AM, Vikas Mayur wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose change in name of the following entities in
Portal. This would also result in changing the name of few keys.
PortalPortlet -- Portlet (since this is just
Hi David,
I just overlooked this nice feature of FreeMarker. Thanks for pointing
out. I have indeed made these improvements in trunk rev. 768514 and
release09.4 rev. 768514
Vikas
On Apr 24, 2009, at 8:08 PM, David E Jones wrote:
Vikas,
There is a handy little trick in FreeMarker that
Hi,
There is a lot of scope of improvements in Sales Force Automation
(SFA) application. To start with this effort, I have created 4 main
tasks - thanks Ashish for help.
Improvement task
-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2363
-- All the improvements in the existing screens
+1
Vikas
On Apr 27, 2009, at 4:01 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
+1 Using svn log -r revisionNumber
I will do the same in mergefromtrunk.bat
Jacques
From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com
+1
On Apr 27, 2009, at 6:53 AM, Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote:
Hello,
As we all know
Hi Hans,
Thanks for doing this. Btw, All the files under framework/resources/
templates does not contains any license header. I think this is again
done on purpose. You might be interested in looking at the original
jira issue for this work at
This is interesting, Jacques :)
Vikas
On May 3, 2009, at 5:07 AM, jler...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jleroux
Date: Sat May 2 23:02:10 2009
New Revision: 770996
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=770996view=rev
Log:
If someone see a problem with that I will revert...
Modified:
In security equivalency, what would happen if the permission for first
user are changed? Does these permission are also applied to second user?
Vikas
On May 5, 2009, at 8:50 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Novell Netware has that, plus security groups. You can assign
permissions to roles or groups,
be desirable behavior in certain cases but I am not able to
think of any example.
Vikas
On May 5, 2009, at 10:39 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Yes.
-Adrian
Vikas Mayur wrote:
In security equivalency, what would happen if the permission for
first user are changed? Does these permission are also
Do companies really have CSR in this age group :)
Vikas
On May 6, 2009, at 3:34 PM, Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote:
Another important factor for this improvement is more age (60's,
70's or even more), big spectacles and difficult to read for CSR
representative.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
+1
Vikas
On May 6, 2009, at 11:59 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
Btw, Jacques, I think we keep the Flat Grey forever
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Hi Scott,
This is a nice addition. Thanks!
Btw, Do you think we should also change the suite name to something
like component-name+tests or anything better?
Vikas
On May 7, 2009, at 6:24 AM, lekt...@apache.org wrote:
+test-suite suite-name=accountingtests
+
Hi Hans/Ashish,
Where does admin require this additional information?
DemoCustomer is in Customer role and is there to be used for eCommerce
applications.
If your intention is to use admin user for front end app then I think
it is not a good idea.
Vikas
On Dec 4, 2009, at 3:10 PM, Hans
Hi,
The test definition files name is not consistent throughout the
project. Some of the files name is all lowercase and others have camel
case pattern.
I think we can follow the pattern used in service definition files.
The files under accounting/testdef are
accountingtests.xml
E Jones wrote:
Why not camel case them like most other files?
-David
On Dec 29, 2009, at 1:05 PM, Bilgin Ibryam wrote:
Vikas Mayur wrote:
Hi,
The test definition files name is not consistent throughout the
project. Some of the files name is all lowercase and others have
camel case
Hi Devs,
In revision 912532 I have introduced an automated test
testUpdateFixedAssetMaintAndWorkEffortComplete for testing the process of
updating a fixed asset maintenance. In the commit I have also removed
WorkEffort.actualCompletionDate from the previous tests as this newly added
test uses the
Thanks Chirag!
Improvements committed to trunk in r1061239
Regards
Vikas
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Chirag Manocha cmano...@emforium.comwrote:
Hi Vikas,
I am bit confused with the method addProductPromoCode in ShoppingCart
class.
In ShoppingCartEvent you are calling this method on
Sorry for late reply - Jacques.
It does not relates to a real bug but I think the changes does no harm to
the release either.
is that okay?
Regards
Vikas
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Jacques Le Roux
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com wrote:
Mmm... is that a bug?
Jacques
m...@apache.org
that it should be considered as really exceptional
Thanks
Jacques
From: Vikas Mayur vikasma...@gmail.com
Sorry for late reply - Jacques.
It does not relates to a real bug but I think the changes does no harm to
the release either.
is that okay?
Regards
Vikas
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 5
+ 1
Regards
Vikas
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 4:51 AM, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.comwrote:
The problem is that when you mix code changes with formatting changes
reviewers then have inspect every chunk closely in order to figure out what
(if anything) changed in those lines.
I can't
In following service defination
service name=sendCreatePartyEmailNotification engine=simple
location=org/ofbiz/party/user/UserEvents.xml
invoke=sendCreatePartyEmailNotification auth=false
attribute name=USER_EMAIL type=String mode=IN
optional=false/
/service
Can I
Thanks Scott,
Fixed in rev. 658251.
Vikas
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Scott Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ashish
The RateType entity is already defined in the workeffort app, so warnings
are being thrown when ofbiz starts.
Regards
Scott
2008/5/17 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Author:
I have finished up a work for import/export vCard in sfa (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1649) using a jpim project
distributed under a BSD license.
This license can be reached through http://jpim.sourceforge.net/license.html
.
In above license I am confused with the statement jpim
Thanks Adrian for your recent work and concerns over moving on to use best
practices and new features especially in things that has been added newly to
the project. I am not a expert in this but still want to clarify few things.
1) What is the best way to show navigation options in a list form.
I also see few difference in find functionality:
1) When a user click on tab button - find button or any other option like
facilities under Facility, projects under Project, In my opinion the
result(s) should be shown by
default as is done in projects. It is upon user choice to use search
and would
like to hear from you (others) whether it is something doable (if this could
be part of standard convention(s)).
Vikas
-Adrian
Vikas Mayur wrote:
I also see few difference in find functionality:
1) When a user click on tab button - find button or any other option like
is
skipped (did not look at code)
Jacques
From: Vikas Mayur [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How about adding an optional attribute roleTypeId to createPerson service
to
call createPartyRole on a service eca similar to what is done in for
createPartyContactMech to create the purpose.
This is often used
In recent days, I have seen people starting asking questions more on dev
list (which supposed to go on user list), creating Jira issues for their
questions ( this is really funny) and possibly because of lack of knowledge
about distinguishing between user, dev list and now Jira issues.
I think in
Hi,
I was testing few patches for test cases posted on Jira and thought to
modify if-empty field-name= to use if-empty field= instead.
But its giving following error ( This particular log is associated with when
test is run on example component )
Any thoughts, why this is happening ?
Vikas
that you don't have a problem even if you use field-name?
Regards
Scott
2008/6/13 Vikas Mayur [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I was testing few patches for test cases posted on Jira and thought to
modify if-empty field-name= to use if-empty field= instead.
But its giving following error
PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Vikas
I can't see any reason why it would not work, where is the code I can use
to
replicate the issue?
Thanks
Scott
2008/6/13 Vikas Mayur [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Scott,
It is working fine with field-name though it gives few errors like
UtilXml.java:660:ERROR
still run just fine.
If you change field-name to field then the validation error should go
away, and things should work as before.
If that is not happening, please let me know!
-David
On Jun 12, 2008, at 10:22 PM, Vikas Mayur wrote:
Hi Scott,
It is working fine with field-name though
at 11:36 AM, Scott Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll take a look, how do I run the tests for just the example component?
Thanks
Scott
2008/6/13 Vikas Mayur [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Scott,
I have seen this problem coming while running a test case.
For now you can run the test case
Jacques, Looks like Scott name is in french :)
Vikas
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Jacques Le Roux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the Set tip Scoot,
Jacques
From: Scott Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Jacques
Looks good except for one thing:
+autocompleteOptions =
Thanks Scott - Interesting change.
BTW, I wasn't getting this error while running test case on Derby - and so
did this commit.
Vikas
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 3:35 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: lektran
Date: Fri Jun 13 15:05:56 2008
New Revision: 667667
URL:
)
org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.startServer(Start.java:312)
org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.start(Start.java:316)
org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.main(Start.java:399)
Regards
Scott
2008/6/14 Vikas Mayur [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks
Not sure I am 100% correct, but as per my understanding on how online ship
estimate are calculated - depends on certain attributes of Product entity
like inShippingBox, piecesIncluded, weight, shippingDepth, shippingHeight,
shippingWidth.
Case 1 : Lets suppose you have a Product A (productId =
+1
Vikas
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Jacques Le Roux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
Why do you think about updating all our templates following
http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/ref_depr_builtin.html ?
At least the second and the third could be done automatically.
Jacques
FYI work on this issue is still in progress.
To make this process as generic as existing checkout process it will take a
little more time considering the permutation and combinations at
Shipping and Billing information steps.
Discussions / Ideas are most welcome and why not use an existing issue
Hi Scott,
I double check it after reverting my changes and the got the same error on
Order submit.(tested only from ecommerce).
ScreenFactory.java:128:INFO ] Got 4 screens in 0.117s from:
file:/Users/vikas/work/projects/ofbiz/applications/order/widget/ordermgr/OrderPrintScreens.xml
2008-07-15
Hi Scott,
This style has been deprecated for back-end apps as per document
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBIZ/Misc+UI+Refactor+Guidelines+2
But my question is a bit different. What guidelines to follow for back-end
files (as in this case) that are also being used in ecommerce. I did not
find a
Hi Jacques,
Why not use extends=CommonAppBarMenu
extends-resource=component://common/widget/CommonMenus.xml in
catalog/Menus.xml to remove three menu items namely main, logout, login
- Vikas
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 3:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jleroux
Date: Sun Jul 27 03:23:34
Thanks David for the suggestion.
I have reverted this commit in rev. 680926
I will take a pass through the name used on contactMechId for shipping. I
think it is used as shippingContactMechId and it can also be
changed to shipToContactMechId. Doing this will have all the names prefixed
with
Hi Scott,
The only reason that I use this way depends on how the new one page checkout
is designed.
There are couple of json requests that being called on separate forms for
shipping, billing and payment etc on one page.
This will generate a new separate context and so is the reason to put the
Hi Hans,
I am getting couple of error and warnings on run-install and are
followings:
1) [ModelViewEntity.populateFields] ERROR: could not find ModelField
for entity name: WorkEffort and field: StatusId
[java] 2008-08-12 12:55:37,248 (main) [ModelViewEntity.java:
397:ERROR]
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 2:07 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: bibryam
Date: Thu Aug 14 01:37:52 2008
New Revision: 685809
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=685809view=rev
Log:
Missed these files in my previous commit.
Added:
On Aug 28, 2008, at 3:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jleroux
Date: Thu Aug 28 03:02:47 2008
New Revision: 689772
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=689772view=rev
Log:
A patch from Mridul Pathak Added support for uploading additional
Product Views (images)
?
As I outlined above it's a bit dangerous, even Groovy authors point
it out !
Of course I will follow consensus...
Jacques
From: Vikas Mayur [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Aug 28, 2008, at 3:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jleroux
Date: Thu Aug 28 03:02:47 2008
New Revision: 689772
URL: http
Getting following error on process order call and it is related to new field
added to OrderItemShipGroup entity.
Failure in create operation for entity [OrderItemShipGroup]:
org.ofbiz.entity.GenericEntityException: Error while inserting:
1 - 100 of 808 matches
Mail list logo
