Re: Writing up the release process

Pedro wrote: > One last step needed: update the version number somewhere so that > current OpenOffice users are warned that a new version is available. > Currently version 4.1.2 still reports that it "is up to date" > > Thank you all for keeping the project alive. I have added the your comment

Re: Bugzilla needs version 4.1.3 added

Marcus wrote: > Am 10/13/2016 09:34 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna: >> Marcus wrote: >>> Am 10/13/2016 08:18 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna: With the announcement of the Release of version 4.1.3 that revision should be added to Bugzilla so that bugs can be reported against it. Currently

Re: Writing up the release process

One last step needed: update the version number somewhere so that current OpenOffice users are warned that a new version is available. Currently version 4.1.2 still reports that it "is up to date" Thank you all for keeping the project alive. On 12/10/2016 22:49, Patricia Shanahan wrote:

Re: Bugzilla needs version 4.1.3 added

Marcus wrote: > Am 10/13/2016 09:34 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna: >> Marcus wrote: >>> Am 10/13/2016 08:18 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna: With the announcement of the Release of version 4.1.3 that revision should be added to Bugzilla so that bugs can be reported against it. Currently

Re: Writing up the release process

Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Keith N. McKenna wrote: >> Can you restore my space admin privileges on the Cwiki. I had removed >> all but my basic privileges. > > Sure! I've now given you all permissions I could assign. I hope this is > enough; if not, we must contact Infra (but it seems that I could

Re: Eine offene Mail an die deutsche Community und die deutschen PMC-Vertreter

Hallo Michael, *, Sorry, aber ich muss etwas dazu sagen und deutlich werden, denn auch wenn Deine Antwort ja nicht falsch ist, ist sie doch so diplomatisch das sie den Kern der Probleme nur streift. > From: Dr. Michael Stehmann [mailto:anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de] > Ich sehe nicht,

Re: AOO 4.1.3 announce - pt-BR translation

Am 10/13/2016 03:42 PM, schrieb Claudio Ferreia Filho: I don't know how is your strategy to publish the translations, but IMHO they can be added in the announce at Apache Blog. as we'll have more translated text we've created a container page to collect all. See the link at top of the

Re: Writing up the release process

Keith N. McKenna wrote: Can you restore my space admin privileges on the Cwiki. I had removed all but my basic privileges. Sure! I've now given you all permissions I could assign. I hope this is enough; if not, we must contact Infra (but it seems that I could assign the space admin

Re: AOO 4.1.3 announce - pt-BR translation

Thanks, Andrea --DONE! Warm regards,Sally From: Andrea Pescetti To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; sally Khudairi Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 4:57 PM Subject: Re: AOO 4.1.3 announce - pt-BR translation Claudio Ferreia Filho wrote: > I don't

Re: [CWiki] Account Whitelisting

Joerg Sievers wrote: jogi Joerg Sievers Whitelisted. Andrea - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO 4.1.3 announce - pt-BR translation

Claudio Ferreia Filho wrote: I don't know how is your strategy to publish the translations, but IMHO they can be added in the announce at Apache Blog. Sally, could you please add a "Translations" link at the beginning of your post

Re: Bugzilla needs version 4.1.3 added

Am 10/13/2016 09:34 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna: Marcus wrote: Am 10/13/2016 08:18 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna: With the announcement of the Release of version 4.1.3 that revision should be added to Bugzilla so that bugs can be reported against it. Currently only 4.1.3-dev is active and for

Re: This can not be true

Am 10/13/2016 09:12 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Jörg Schmidt wrote: no reasonable planning takes place. How can it be that even though *there was a help offer for the translation*, a press release is simply published in English without coordinating internationally? I agree with Joerg here.

Re: Bugzilla needs version 4.1.3 added

Marcus wrote: > Am 10/13/2016 08:18 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna: >> With the announcement of the Release of version 4.1.3 that revision >> should be added to Bugzilla so that bugs can be reported against it. >> Currently only 4.1.3-dev is active and for latest confirmation on the >> latest

Re: AOO 4.1.3 announced on en-Forum

Am 10/13/2016 03:23 PM, schrieb FR web forum: I've announced on fr-Forum and modified index.html on fr website. Somebody can commit this page? Thanks - Mail original - De: "Rory O'Farrell" À: dev@openoffice.apache.org Envoyé: Jeudi 13 Octobre 2016 10:49:56 Objet: AOO

RE: Eine offene Mail an die deutsche Community und die deutschen PMC-Vertreter

Moin Claudia, damit meine ich nicht Deine Frage. > -Original Message- > From: C. Wiebe [mailto:clad...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 9:23 PM > To: dev-de@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Eine offene Mail an die deutsche Community und die deutschen > PMC-Vertreter > >

Re: Eine offene Mail an die deutsche Community und die deutschen PMC-Vertreter

Meinst Du mich wg. meiner Frage oder die Apachis Claudia Wiebe clad...@gmail.com Am 13.10.2016 um 21:06 schrieb Jan-Christian Wienandt: Moin Jörg, … denn sie wissen nicht, was sie tun Gruß Jan - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

RE: Eine offene Mail an die deutsche Community und die deutschen PMC-Vertreter

Moin Jörg, … denn sie wissen nicht, was sie tun Gruß Jan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-de-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-de-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Bugzilla needs version 4.1.3 added

Marcus wrote: > Am 10/13/2016 08:18 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna: >> With the announcement of the Release of version 4.1.3 that revision >> should be added to Bugzilla so that bugs can be reported against it. >> Currently only 4.1.3-dev is active and for latest confirmation on the >> latest

Re: Release Archives

Am 10/13/2016 08:38 PM, schrieb Matthias Seidel: Small glitch: http://openoffice.apache.org/downloads.html "Release Archives" the "Current Version 4.1.2" should be renamed to "Apache OpenOffice 4.1.2" thanks for the hint. It'll be fixed together with more 4.1.3 changes this evening.

Re: Bugzilla needs version 4.1.3 added

Am 10/13/2016 08:18 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna: With the announcement of the Release of version 4.1.3 that revision should be added to Bugzilla so that bugs can be reported against it. Currently only 4.1.3-dev is active and for latest confirmation on the latest available is 4.1.2 right, I'll

Release Archives

Small glitch: http://openoffice.apache.org/downloads.html "Release Archives" the "Current Version 4.1.2" should be renamed to "Apache OpenOffice 4.1.2" regards Matthias smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Writing up the release process

Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Patricia Shanahan wrote: I'm thinking of creating "How to cook a release" as a child page under https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Releases, but given my inability to delete pages I would like to get opinions first. > > You can now

Bugzilla needs version 4.1.3 added

With the announcement of the Release of version 4.1.3 that revision should be added to Bugzilla so that bugs can be reported against it. Currently only 4.1.3-dev is active and for latest confirmation on the latest available is 4.1.2 Regards Keith signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Re: "Latest version" on Sourceforge

Am 10/13/2016 07:20 PM, schrieb Matthias Seidel: Thanks! This should definitely go into the release instructions... actually it is, but it's not in the right order. Therefore I've overlooked it yesterday. This needs to be changed for the next release. I've now changed the default. Thanks

Re: "Latest version" on Sourceforge

On 10/13/16 1:11 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 18:57:14 +0200 > Matthias Seidel wrote: > >> The "latest version" on >> https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/ is still >> pointing to 4.1.2. >> >> I think this had to be set

Re: "Latest version" on Sourceforge

Thanks! This should definitely go into the release instructions... Am 13.10.2016 um 19:17 schrieb Dave Brondsema: > On 10/13/16 1:11 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: >> On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 18:57:14 +0200 >> Matthias Seidel wrote: >> >>> The "latest version" on >>>

Re: "Latest version" on Sourceforge

That was not the point, the directory was visible... But now the link is OK! ;-) Am 13.10.2016 um 19:11 schrieb Rory O'Farrell: > On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 18:57:14 +0200 > Matthias Seidel wrote: > >> The "latest version" on >>

Re: "Latest version" on Sourceforge

On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 18:57:14 +0200 Matthias Seidel wrote: > The "latest version" on > https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/ is still > pointing to 4.1.2. > > I think this had to be set manually on sourceforge... > > regards > > Matthias >

"Latest version" on Sourceforge

The "latest version" on https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/ is still pointing to 4.1.2. I think this had to be set manually on sourceforge... regards Matthias smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

[CWiki] Account Whitelisting

jogi Joerg Sievers signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

AOO 4.1.3 announce - pt-BR translation

Hi I don't know how is your strategy to publish the translations, but IMHO they can be added in the announce at Apache Blog. Anyway, the pt-BR translation is published at cwiki[1],as a child page. [1]https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65875077 Congratulations for

Re: AOO 4.1.3 announced on en-Forum

I've announced on fr-Forum and modified index.html on fr website. Somebody can commit this page? Thanks - Mail original - De: "Rory O'Farrell" À: dev@openoffice.apache.org Envoyé: Jeudi 13 Octobre 2016 10:49:56 Objet: AOO 4.1.3 announced on en-Forum I have posted a

Re: Writing up the release process

> On Oct 12, 2016, at 6:05 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > > On 10/12/2016 2:55 PM, Marcus wrote: >> Am 10/12/2016 11:49 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: >>> First, congratulations to everyone on releasing 4.1.3. If this were a >>> conventional, co-located project I'd like to take

Re: This can not be true

Jörg Schmidt wrote: From: Andrea Pescetti Joerg, what if we create a copy of the Press Release on the CWiki and we append each translation as child page? Would it work? Yes, that would be a possibility. Page created at

Re: Writing up the release process

Patricia Shanahan wrote: I'm thinking of creating "How to cook a release" as a child page under https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Releases, but given my inability to delete pages I would like to get opinions first. You can now delete pages. and in general, if people do not

Re: This can not be true

+1 Andrea Pescetti schrieb am Do., 13. Okt. 2016, 09:12: > Jörg Schmidt wrote: > > no reasonable planning takes place. > > How can it be that even though *there was a help offer for the > translation*, a press release is simply published in English without > coordinating

AOO 4.1.3 announced on en-Forum

I have posted a sticky announcement of the availability of AOO 4.1.3 on the en-Forum, advising to use only the main download site and its redirection. Also in the posting is a link to the release announcement. Rory -- Rory O'Farrell

Re: This can not be true

On 10/12/2016 11:55 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: Hello Apache, Hello OpenOffice-PMC, Hello Community, I am absolutely horrified that in a situation where we have to overcome problems together, no reasonable planning takes place. I have started a Wiki page on "How to Cook a Release",

Re: This can not be true

Hello, > From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] > Two thing must be said: there was no time for coordination since the > press release had been accidentally made available before the planned > date; and the press release is traditionally kept confidential before > issuing it

Re: This can not be true

Jörg Schmidt wrote: no reasonable planning takes place. How can it be that even though *there was a help offer for the translation*, a press release is simply published in English without coordinating internationally? I agree with Joerg here. We did it for the release notes, and we can do

This can not be true

Hello Apache, Hello OpenOffice-PMC, Hello Community, I am absolutely horrified that in a situation where we have to overcome problems together, no reasonable planning takes place. How can it be that even though *there was a help offer for the translation*, a press release is simply published