Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

2014-12-04 Thread Simon Phipps
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Simon Phipps wrote: > > I just spoke with the owner of the Apple developer account for the app. He > tells me it had been used by a subcontractor, that it was unrelated to his > real business (online TV) and that he would immediately remove the app from > the iTune

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

2014-12-04 Thread Kay Schenk
On 12/02/2014 05:34 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Simon Phipps wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Rob Weir wrote: >>> >>> >>> Is there a way we could handle it even earlier, at the Apache server >>> level? Detect the incoming link based on the referrer as ones

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

2014-12-04 Thread Marcus
Am 12/03/2014 02:34 AM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Simon Phipps wrote: On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Rob Weir wrote: Is there a way we could handle it even earlier, at the Apache server level? Detect the incoming link based on the referrer as ones coming from the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

2014-12-04 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 03/12/2014 Simon Phipps wrote: I just spoke with the owner of the Apple developer account for the app. He tells me it had been used by a subcontractor, that it was unrelated to his real business (online TV) and that he would immediately remove the app from the iTunes store now he's seen what t

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

2014-12-03 Thread Roberto Galoppini
+1 and +1 on Kay's idea. 2014-12-03 0:23 GMT+01:00 Kay Schenk : > > On 12/02/2014 02:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > There's an app for Apple devices called Quick Office Pro. It is totally > > unrelated to OpenOffice project and code. A link to it is > > https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/quickoff

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

2014-12-03 Thread Simon Phipps
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:23 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > I think we should be contacting Quick Office Pro about changing their > support information if we haven't already. > I just spoke with the owner of the Apple developer account for the app. He tells me it had been used by a subcontractor, tha

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

2014-12-03 Thread Peter Kelly
> On 3 Dec 2014, at 9:15 am, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: > >> On 02 Dec2014, at 21:05, jonathon wrote: >> >> On 03/12/14 00:01, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: >> >>> The ® name for them is “Quickoffice®-Pro”. >> >> That is the name of the software. >> I've seen three or four different names for the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

2014-12-03 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Marcus wrote: In general +1. But I would like to see the complete text that should be used as general message when rejecting mails. @Andrea: Can you state this in a separate paragraph? Something like http://markmail.org/message/vsonyy6jhnrgn7uq (with the obvious minor adjustments): --- That

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

2014-12-02 Thread Louis Suárez-Potts
> On 02 Dec2014, at 21:43, jonathon wrote: > > > > On 03/12/14 02:15, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: > >> Recall that Google owns Quickoffice. > > I do not assume that any of the programs carrying the QuickOffice > moniker in the iTunes store is the same program that Google distributed. > > Lee

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

2014-12-02 Thread jonathon
On 03/12/14 02:15, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: > Recall that Google owns Quickoffice. I do not assume that any of the programs carrying the QuickOffice moniker in the iTunes store is the same program that Google distributed. Lee Elman is just as likely to be a victim as Apache OpenOffice is. >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

2014-12-02 Thread Louis Suárez-Potts
> On 02 Dec2014, at 21:05, jonathon wrote: > > > > On 03/12/14 00:01, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: > >> The ® name for them is “Quickoffice®-Pro”. > > That is the name of the software. > I've seen three or four different names for the vendor. > >> Who then is getting this money? > > Scammers

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

2014-12-02 Thread jonathon
On 03/12/14 00:01, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: >The ® name for them is “Quickoffice®-Pro”. That is the name of the software. I've seen three or four different names for the vendor. > Who then is getting this money? Scammers. jonathon * English - detected * English * English sign

RE: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

2014-12-02 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
+1 -Original Message- From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 15:23 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages On 12/02/2014 02:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: [ ... ] > Since there are

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

2014-12-02 Thread Simon Phipps
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Simon Phipps wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > >> > >> > >> Is there a way we could handle it even earlier, at the Apache server > >> level? Detect the incoming link based on the refe

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

2014-12-02 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Simon Phipps wrote: > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Rob Weir wrote: >> >> >> Is there a way we could handle it even earlier, at the Apache server >> level? Detect the incoming link based on the referrer as ones coming >> from the offending website and then red

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

2014-12-02 Thread Simon Phipps
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > > > Is there a way we could handle it even earlier, at the Apache server > level? Detect the incoming link based on the referrer as ones coming > from the offending website and then redirect that to a custom webpage > where we explain to the use

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

2014-12-02 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > There's an app for Apple devices called Quick Office Pro. It is totally > unrelated to OpenOffice project and code. A link to it is > https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/quickoffice-pro/id889011512?mt=8 > > They link to http://openoffice.org for

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

2014-12-02 Thread Marcus
Am 12/03/2014 12:23 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 12/02/2014 02:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: [...] Since there are concerns that the power to decide what to reject can be too subjective, I'm asking that we (subject to lazy consensus) agree that "Quick Office Pro" posts can be rejected with the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

2014-12-02 Thread Louis Suárez-Potts
> On 02 Dec2014, at 18:23, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > On 12/02/2014 02:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> There's an app for Apple devices called Quick Office Pro. It is totally >> unrelated to OpenOffice project and code. A link to it is >> https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/quickoffice-pro/id88901151

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

2014-12-02 Thread Kay Schenk
On 12/02/2014 02:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > There's an app for Apple devices called Quick Office Pro. It is totally > unrelated to OpenOffice project and code. A link to it is > https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/quickoffice-pro/id889011512?mt=8 > > They link to http://openoffice.org for user s

[PROPOSAL] Rejecting "Quick Office Pro" messages

2014-12-02 Thread Andrea Pescetti
There's an app for Apple devices called Quick Office Pro. It is totally unrelated to OpenOffice project and code. A link to it is https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/quickoffice-pro/id889011512?mt=8 They link to http://openoffice.org for user support. This results in many off-topic requests to the