(Bumping up th topic again)
Hi all,
One thing I noticed while building with AdoptOpenJDK are numerous
warnings regarding Javadoc.
Maybe someone with some understanding can have a look at it?
Otherwise, I have no problems when using AOO on a daily base, even with
different JREs configured.
Hi Marcus,
Am 01.10.19 um 20:20 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 01.10.19 um 10:33 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Am 01.10.19 um 01:23 schrieb Marcus:
>>> Am 30.09.19 um 22:59 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 30.09.19 um 22:35 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> We had constant 7 votes on 4.1.7 and 4.1.6 release.
Am 01.10.19 um 10:33 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 01.10.19 um 01:23 schrieb Marcus:
Am 30.09.19 um 22:59 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 30.09.19 um 22:35 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
We had constant 7 votes on 4.1.7 and 4.1.6 release. However only 3
volunteers voted in both releases.
These numbers are
Hi Marcus,
Am 01.10.19 um 01:20 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 30.09.19 um 17:31 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> No feedback=No interest?
>>
>> Maybe I should stop providing test builds.
>> That would save me a lot of my spare time...
>
> sorry for being silent for this topic. However, Java is not really my
>
Hi Marcus,
Am 01.10.19 um 01:23 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 30.09.19 um 22:59 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Am 30.09.19 um 22:35 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>>> We had constant 7 votes on 4.1.7 and 4.1.6 release. However only 3
>>> volunteers voted in both releases.
>>> These numbers are low in general. Maybe
Am 30.09.19 um 22:59 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 30.09.19 um 22:35 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
We had constant 7 votes on 4.1.7 and 4.1.6 release. However only 3 volunteers
voted in both releases.
These numbers are low in general. Maybe we need to organize test phases in
order to raize the numbers.
Am 30.09.19 um 17:31 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
No feedback=No interest?
Maybe I should stop providing test builds.
That would save me a lot of my spare time...
sorry for being silent for this topic. However, Java is not really my
favorite thing. ;-)
Marcus
Am 05.09.19 um 12:58 schrieb
On 9/5/2019 6:58 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Keith, all,
>
> Did you have time to test?
>
> Feedback is always welcome... ;-)
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
I had done successful tests on both 4.1.7 and 4.2.0. Then got
concentrating on 4.1.7 release and forgot to get back here to report.
Hi Peter,
Am 30.09.19 um 22:35 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> We had constant 7 votes on 4.1.7 and 4.1.6 release. However only 3 volunteers
> voted in both releases.
> These numbers are low in general. Maybe we need to organize test phases in
> order to raize the numbers. This will still not raise
We had constant 7 votes on 4.1.7 and 4.1.6 release. However only 3 volunteers
voted in both releases.
These numbers are low in general. Maybe we need to organize test phases in
order to raize the numbers. This will still not raise test attendance for a
single feature.
How about we schedule a
Hi Dave,
Am 30.09.19 um 18:53 schrieb Dave Fisher:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> I think that it is likely people were focused on 4.1.7 testing.
Where have all these people been when we voted for release? ;-)
> My personal opinion is that if switching does not require users to switch and
> they can use
Hi Matthias,
I think that it is likely people were focused on 4.1.7 testing.
My personal opinion is that if switching does not require users to switch and
they can use the Oracle JRE if that is what they have then the change make
sense.
Regards,
Dave
> On Sep 30, 2019, at 8:31 AM, Matthias
No feedback=No interest?
Maybe I should stop providing test builds.
That would save me a lot of my spare time...
Regards,
Matthias
Am 05.09.19 um 12:58 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Hi Keith, all,
>
> Did you have time to test?
>
> Feedback is always welcome... ;-)
>
> Regards,
>
>
Hi Keith, all,
Did you have time to test?
Feedback is always welcome... ;-)
Regards,
Matthias
Am 01.09.19 um 18:23 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Hi all,
>
> Am 31.08.19 um 18:45 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Hi Keith,
>>
>> Am 31.08.19 um 15:37 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>>> On 8/31/2019 4:23
Hi all,
Am 31.08.19 um 18:45 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Hi Keith,
>
> Am 31.08.19 um 15:37 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>> On 8/31/2019 4:23 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> At the moment I am doing my test builds (trunk and 42X) for Windows with
>>> the latest Oracle JDK (8u221).
>>>
Hi Keith,
Am 31.08.19 um 15:37 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
> On 8/31/2019 4:23 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> At the moment I am doing my test builds (trunk and 42X) for Windows with
>> the latest Oracle JDK (8u221).
>> I am still able to download, but Oracle changed its licensing. I
> Why move away?
>
> https://www.java.com -> The new license permits certain uses, such as
> personal use and development use, at no cost.
Nobody says that Oracle JVM is removed.
Just you can choose what you need.
-
To
Hi Josef,
Am 31.08.19 um 16:02 schrieb Josef Latt:
> Hi,
>
> Am 31.08.19 um 10:23 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> At the moment I am doing my test builds (trunk and 42X) for Windows with
>> the latest Oracle JDK (8u221).
>> I am still able to download, but Oracle changed its licensing.
Hi,
Am 31.08.19 um 10:23 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Hi all,
At the moment I am doing my test builds (trunk and 42X) for Windows with
the latest Oracle JDK (8u221).
I am still able to download, but Oracle changed its licensing. I am not
a lawyer and would prefer to move away from it.
Why move
On 8/31/2019 4:23 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> At the moment I am doing my test builds (trunk and 42X) for Windows with
> the latest Oracle JDK (8u221).
> I am still able to download, but Oracle changed its licensing. I am not
> a lawyer and would prefer to move away from it.
>
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
