Re: Another Basic Function that doesn't Work!!

2014-12-02 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 01/12/14 22:33, Darren Myers wrote: Thank you that worked! Very frustrated why Can't that be set as a default... its such a common task to find and replace.?? as far as I know regular expression search is not on by default. And if I search January 2014 and try to replace it with

Re: Open Office Persian Farsi language

2014-12-02 Thread FR web forum
Hello, The best place when you have problems is our support forum: https://forum.openoffice.org - Mail original - De: Darvin Darvin ddar...@ymail.com À: dev@openoffice.apache.org Envoyé: Dimanche 23 Novembre 2014 09:57:13 Objet: Open Office Persian Farsi language Hi, I was download the

Re: Another Basic Function that doesn't Work!!

2014-12-02 Thread Alain Torrens
It does?The attached doc contains 2013 April 5 in various formats, and I could not find it with any search string: 2013-04-05, 04/05/13, 4/5/13, April 5, 2013,... Please tell me how to do it. '10/11/12 demonstrates...' how?TAB From: jonathon toki.kant...@gmail.com To:

Reporting broken download link

2014-12-02 Thread andrea battinelli
Dear sirs, it appears that the link leads to cycling. Address http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/ comes up again and again after having chosen 4.1.1 in a page, mirror in the following page, and it in the following one. Sincerely, *Browser

Re: Reporting broken download link

2014-12-02 Thread Roberto Galoppini
We're facing some issues at the moment on the SourceForge site currently. We're working on getting this fixed as soon as we can. Sorry for the inconvenience. Roberto 2014-12-02 18:43 GMT+01:00 andrea battinelli andreabattine...@gmail.com: Dear sirs, it appears that the link leads to

Re: Reporting broken download link

2014-12-02 Thread Marcus
Sending the answer also to Andrea. Am 12/02/2014 07:13 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini: We're facing some issues at the moment on the SourceForge site currently. We're working on getting this fixed as soon as we can. Sorry for the inconvenience. Roberto 2014-12-02 18:43 GMT+01:00 andrea

Re: Reporting broken download link

2014-12-02 Thread Roberto Galoppini
We're back at full capacity. Roberto 2014-12-02 20:19 GMT+01:00 Marcus marcus.m...@wtnet.de: Sending the answer also to Andrea. Am 12/02/2014 07:13 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini: We're facing some issues at the moment on the SourceForge site currently. We're working on getting this

[PROPOSAL] Rejecting Quick Office Pro messages

2014-12-02 Thread Andrea Pescetti
There's an app for Apple devices called Quick Office Pro. It is totally unrelated to OpenOffice project and code. A link to it is https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/quickoffice-pro/id889011512?mt=8 They link to http://openoffice.org for user support. This results in many off-topic requests to

Officeshots.org

2014-12-02 Thread Michiel Leenaars
Dear Apache OpenOffice developers, as some of you will know we have the 10th ODF plugfest coming up next week, hosted by the UK Cabinet Office [1] - for which you are all invited, of course. For that purpose (and to support the UK government migration to ODF) we are working hard on

Re: Officeshots.org

2014-12-02 Thread Louis Suárez-Potts
Hi, On 02 Dec2014, at 17:43, Michiel Leenaars michiel...@opendocsociety.org wrote: Dear Apache OpenOffice developers, as some of you will know we have the 10th ODF plugfest coming up next week, hosted by the UK Cabinet Office [1] - for which you are all invited, of course. For that

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting Quick Office Pro messages

2014-12-02 Thread Kay Schenk
On 12/02/2014 02:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: There's an app for Apple devices called Quick Office Pro. It is totally unrelated to OpenOffice project and code. A link to it is https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/quickoffice-pro/id889011512?mt=8 They link to http://openoffice.org for user

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting Quick Office Pro messages

2014-12-02 Thread Louis Suárez-Potts
On 02 Dec2014, at 18:23, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On 12/02/2014 02:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: There's an app for Apple devices called Quick Office Pro. It is totally unrelated to OpenOffice project and code. A link to it is

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting Quick Office Pro messages

2014-12-02 Thread Marcus
Am 12/03/2014 12:23 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 12/02/2014 02:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: [...] Since there are concerns that the power to decide what to reject can be too subjective, I'm asking that we (subject to lazy consensus) agree that Quick Office Pro posts can be rejected with the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting Quick Office Pro messages

2014-12-02 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: There's an app for Apple devices called Quick Office Pro. It is totally unrelated to OpenOffice project and code. A link to it is https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/quickoffice-pro/id889011512?mt=8 They link to

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting Quick Office Pro messages

2014-12-02 Thread Simon Phipps
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote: Is there a way we could handle it even earlier, at the Apache server level? Detect the incoming link based on the referrer as ones coming from the offending website and then redirect that to a custom webpage where we explain

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting Quick Office Pro messages

2014-12-02 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote: Is there a way we could handle it even earlier, at the Apache server level? Detect the incoming link based on the referrer as ones coming from the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting Quick Office Pro messages

2014-12-02 Thread Simon Phipps
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote: Is there a way we could handle it even earlier, at the Apache server level? Detect

RE: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting Quick Office Pro messages

2014-12-02 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
+1 -Original Message- From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 15:23 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting Quick Office Pro messages On 12/02/2014 02:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: [ ... ] Since there are concerns that

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting Quick Office Pro messages

2014-12-02 Thread jonathon
On 03/12/14 00:01, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: The ® name for them is “Quickoffice®-Pro”. That is the name of the software. I've seen three or four different names for the vendor. Who then is getting this money? Scammers. jonathon * English - detected * English * English

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting Quick Office Pro messages

2014-12-02 Thread Louis Suárez-Potts
On 02 Dec2014, at 21:05, jonathon toki.kant...@gmail.com wrote: On 03/12/14 00:01, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: The ® name for them is “Quickoffice®-Pro”. That is the name of the software. I've seen three or four different names for the vendor. Who then is getting this money?

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting Quick Office Pro messages

2014-12-02 Thread jonathon
On 03/12/14 02:15, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: Recall that Google owns Quickoffice. I do not assume that any of the programs carrying the QuickOffice moniker in the iTunes store is the same program that Google distributed. Lee Elman is just as likely to be a victim as Apache OpenOffice is.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rejecting Quick Office Pro messages

2014-12-02 Thread Louis Suárez-Potts
On 02 Dec2014, at 21:43, jonathon toki.kant...@gmail.com wrote: On 03/12/14 02:15, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: Recall that Google owns Quickoffice. I do not assume that any of the programs carrying the QuickOffice moniker in the iTunes store is the same program that Google