Re: Reporting broken download link
I've confirmed its the 'MD5 Check Utility 2.31 from TSoft' thats at fault. The downloaded file does match when I do the test on Linux, online and with MD5Sum, so its gotta be that app. Thanks Marcus. On 27/12/2014 05:32, Marcus wrote: Am 12/26/2014 11:52 AM, schrieb Nigel Johnstone: The file downloads, but the resulting executable doesn't match the md5 signature given here: http://archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.1/binaries/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe.md5 The MD5 for this download does not pass the MD5 test (using MD5.exe used on Windows, see screenshot). MD5 from your website: 40fc525bc8b26ac7e1a7cef0e02a08f3 Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe Downloaded executable Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe is 140,852,175 bytes long I don't see a difference when downloading the executable and the MD5 hash from the URL you've mentioned above. For me it's identical. Please try again a download. Maybe there was an interuption. Or use the official download webpage for the current release: http://www.openoffice.org/download/ Or use another mirror sever of your choice: http://sourceforge.net/settings/mirror_choices?projectname=openofficeorg.mirrorfilename=4.1.1/binaries/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.1_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe HTH Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Explaining Java (was RE: Java 32)
On 27/12/2014 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: How about this? Create an ooo-site/trunk/content/java/ *folder* where the index.htm will be the new version of the target file. This can be done in advance because and, after the text is considered OK, internationalization could proceed without pressure in anticipation of 4.2.0. there is no link to it from anywhere yet. This would be OK. then java/index.html becomes, for translations, xx/product/java.html ; we already do this for other files. I missed the message about timing and 4.1.2 versus 4.2.0 somehow. So, we can we discuss changes to the messages and maybe make bugzilla issues but changes should not be made to the trunk until 4.1.2 is out the door? Code and translations follow separate paths. The current trunk can be freely modified and it will lead to, say, 4.2.0 (exact numbering still undecided). For a bugfix release (like 4.1.2) we will have a separate line based on AOO410, the one that was used for 4.1.0 and 4.1.1. So code is OK. Translations, instead, currently have only one version available: in our example, it can be set to trunk or to the 4.1.2 branch. And it is currently aligned with trunk. So if we created (for code) a 4.1.2 branch and you pushed the new English string to it, translators wouldn't find it in Pootle and wouldn't be able to localize it. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: building aoo on windows
Hi Ariel, finished second build with --enable-pch \ --disable-odk build --all -P2 -- -P2 build time was about 5 1/2 hours, before it took more than 12 hours ... adding 4 cores to the virtual machine made the difference ;-) Regards Oliver -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Fwd: Warning from dev@openoffice.apache.org
Hi, sorry to bother, I receive messages like the following every once in a while (the last one was a couple of months ago). Looks pretty similar to: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8433 I'm not sure if it is generalized or just me. Is there anything I can do on my side? Is it worth reporting when it happens? Thanks. Best regards, Emanuele Forwarded Message Subject:Warning from dev@openoffice.apache.org Date: 27 Dec 2014 16:28:17 - From: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org To: emanuel...@gmail.com Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the dev@openoffice.apache.org mailing list. I'm working for my owner, who can be reached at dev-ow...@openoffice.apache.org. Messages to you from the dev mailing list seem to have been bouncing. I've attached a copy of the first bounce message I received. If this message bounces too, I will send you a probe. If the probe bounces, I will remove your address from the dev mailing list, without further notice. I've kept a list of which messages from the dev mailing list have bounced from your address. Copies of these messages may be in the archive. To retrieve a set of messages 123-145 (a maximum of 100 per request), send a short message to: dev-get.123_...@openoffice.apache.org To receive a subject and author list for the last 100 or so messages, send a short message to: dev-in...@openoffice.apache.org Here are the message numbers: 50969 51006 50985 --- Enclosed is a copy of the bounce message I received. Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12895 invoked for bounce); 17 Dec 2014 10:13:11 - Date: 17 Dec 2014 10:13:11 - From: mailer-dae...@apache.org To: dev-return-509...@openoffice.apache.org Subject: failure notice - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Warning from dev@openoffice.apache.org
On 27 December 2014 at 17:42, Emanuele emanuel...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, sorry to bother, I receive messages like the following every once in a while (the last one was a couple of months ago). Looks pretty similar to: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8433 I'm not sure if it is generalized or just me. You get these messages because our mailer cannot sent mail to you mailbox after several retries. If your mail server (in your case google) is down for a short period our mail program simply retries, but if e.g. your mailbox is full, google will not accept the mail and rejects it, when that has happened a couple of times the message below will be generated. Is there anything I can do on my side? Most of the bounces are due to a full mailbox, so controlling that is one step. Is it worth reporting when it happens? not really, there is nothing we can do. rgds jan i. Thanks. Best regards, Emanuele Forwarded Message Subject:Warning from dev@openoffice.apache.org Date: 27 Dec 2014 16:28:17 - From: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org To: emanuel...@gmail.com Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the dev@openoffice.apache.org mailing list. I'm working for my owner, who can be reached at dev-ow...@openoffice.apache.org. Messages to you from the dev mailing list seem to have been bouncing. I've attached a copy of the first bounce message I received. If this message bounces too, I will send you a probe. If the probe bounces, I will remove your address from the dev mailing list, without further notice. I've kept a list of which messages from the dev mailing list have bounced from your address. Copies of these messages may be in the archive. To retrieve a set of messages 123-145 (a maximum of 100 per request), send a short message to: dev-get.123_...@openoffice.apache.org To receive a subject and author list for the last 100 or so messages, send a short message to: dev-in...@openoffice.apache.org Here are the message numbers: 50969 51006 50985 --- Enclosed is a copy of the bounce message I received. Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12895 invoked for bounce); 17 Dec 2014 10:13:11 - Date: 17 Dec 2014 10:13:11 - From: mailer-dae...@apache.org To: dev-return-509...@openoffice.apache.org Subject: failure notice - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Fwd: Warning from dev@openoffice.apache.org
I also just received one. I've also received a warning from the user list a few days ago. Since I'm using gmail as my provider, I'm not sure how to respond to the warning, gmail admins should be receiving this warning if their service is failing. This email account is only used to subscribe to the openoffice and libreoffice mailing lists, nothing else. Why the warning? How to resolve things? Thanks, Lee On 12/27/2014 08:42 AM, Emanuele wrote: Hi, sorry to bother, I receive messages like the following every once in a while (the last one was a couple of months ago). Looks pretty similar to: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8433 I'm not sure if it is generalized or just me. Is there anything I can do on my side? Is it worth reporting when it happens? Thanks. Best regards, Emanuele - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: OpenOffice@15 @ApacheConNA in April
On 12/24/2014 04:17 AM, jan i wrote: On Wednesday, December 24, 2014, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: On 18/12/2014 Kay Schenk wrote: OK. I just created a page for topics. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=50855951 Please add as you desire! Maybe we can finalize this in the next few days. Thanks, I've integrated it with some other topics, based on what was useful to hear (and what was missing) in Budapest. We are now at 10 topics in https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=50855951 Nice changes, Andrea! If I understand correctly, what we are supposed to do is: list some topics that we would like to see covered, so that we can shape a balanced track. And then speakers will be asked to give priority to these topics when submitting their talks in the OpenOffice track. Jan Iversen wrote: please remember talks must be submitted to the cfp page. You mean, when someone decides that he wants to speak about a specific topic (within the ones we list, or another one, but giving priority to what we list), then the talk will have to be submitted in the conference system, right? So this will be up to the individual candidate speakers and not to the people now defining topics. yes and no, the individual speakers have to submit their own proposals, but the intention was that the program committee not only come up with suggestions, but also find speakers, so that in the end e.g. a final AOO track is made. rgds jan i I'm not sure we can actually do this part. I think having the topics will probably determine the best speakers. Hopefully, these speakers will submit proposals. Of course, PMC members will likely be the best speakers for a few of the items. In any case, I would like to send out a message to our announcements and dev lists about the topics and the conference before Jan. 1 if there are no objections. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- - MzK There's a bit of magic in everything, and some loss to even things out. -- Lou Reed - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Staging 4.1.2 (was RE: Budapest and thereafter.)
On 15/12/2014 Pedro Giffuni wrote: Il giorno 14/dic/2014, alle ore 17:20, Andrea Pescetti ha scritto: On 14/12/2014 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk/main/writerperfect/ at revision 1645375. ... I think it would be good to have a stronger check for 4.1.2 though. I'm CCing Pedro who told me something similar (possibly the very same issue) Yes. According to my records the PMC was notified OK, I verified that everything builds fine without it and I removed main/writerperfect: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1648122 Please note that the status is not completely clear, see https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118919 for more (but if we are not using it, maybe the discussion is not worth it anyway). Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: OpenOffice@15 @ApacheConNA in April
On 27/12/2014 Kay Schenk wrote: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=50855951 Nice changes, Andrea! We also need a 3-5 lines descriptions to appear at https://wiki.apache.org/apachecon/ACNA2015ContentCommittee I'm not sure we can actually do this part. I think having the topics will probably determine the best speakers. Hopefully, these speakers will submit proposals. We can do it in phases. As usual, we are a widely distributed project and indeed it's very hard that all the most competent people for each topic are physically in the same place. For some topics we will have the best people, for some other topics we will have competent people who can still deliver a good presentation, for some we may have nobody. and those should then be removed. In any case, I would like to send out a message to our announcements and dev lists about the topics and the conference before Jan. 1 if there are no objections. The dev list is OK for a start (last time I sent a request for talk proposals to the announce list, I got several funny but useless proposals). So if we can start by finalizing the topics, then ask here if we have volunteers for each topic, we can start putting some names. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: location of scripting.dtd?
[...] The files listed below are not conventional files used in ODF packages. The basic ODF files do not use DTDs and files by those names are not part of the standard ODF document structure. [...] The Apache OpenOffice source code does ship sample scripts with parcel-descriptor.xml files, which refer to scripting.dtd. Two of the DeveloperGuide/ScriptingFramework samples have them: ScriptSelector/ScriptSelector/parcel-descriptor.xml ScriptingFramework/SayHello/SayHello/parcel-descriptor.xml Both refer to a scripting.dtd: parcel language=Java xmlns:parcel=scripting.dtd Yet scripting.dtd is mising. I did find some of the other DTDs I was looking for in the AOO sources, and one that may be related: main/xmloff/dtd/script.mod may be (or have been) related. main/xmlscript/dtd has libraries.dtd, library.dtd, and module.dtd. Still, no scripting.dtd that I can find in Apache OpenOffice SDK or source. Perhaps this file was part of an earlier Sun/Oracle release, that was deleted during the incubation process? (BTW, LibreOffice also does not have this dtd.) Thanks, Lee - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
RE: location of scripting.dtd?
-- replying below to -- From: Lee Fisher [mailto:l.office.fis...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2014 17:34 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: location of scripting.dtd? [...] The files listed below are not conventional files used in ODF packages. The basic ODF files do not use DTDs and files by those names are not part of the standard ODF document structure. [...] The Apache OpenOffice source code does ship sample scripts with parcel-descriptor.xml files, which refer to scripting.dtd. Two of the DeveloperGuide/ScriptingFramework samples have them: ScriptSelector/ScriptSelector/parcel-descriptor.xml ScriptingFramework/SayHello/SayHello/parcel-descriptor.xml Both refer to a scripting.dtd: parcel language=Java xmlns:parcel=scripting.dtd Yet scripting.dtd is mising. orcmid That is one peculiar namespace declaration. It is *not* an invocation of a DTD. It is use of a relative URI (a no-no) as a namespace identifier. In a time long ago, some DTDs were installed in the directories of the binaries. That still happens, though there is probably no earthly reason for them to be there. Take a look at OpenOffice4/share/dtd/officedocument/1_0/ wherever you have AOO 4.1.1 installed. These are a throw-back to the original proposal of OpenOffice.org in the creation of ODF 1.0, which then chose to use Relax NG and namespaces instead. XML files with DTDs on them, for the parts defined in ODF, do not have or require DTDs. The *.mod ones are modules that are included in others by external-entity definitions. Look at the office.dtd for examples. The script.mod is one of those. These applied only to OpenOffice 1.x releases. They are not for ODF as it was approved. Read the notice in office.dtd. I would look at script.mod, compile some ODT files with scripts in them, and see what you can surmise the grammar of current script files might be in ODF packages. /orcmid I did find some of the other DTDs I was looking for in the AOO sources, and one that may be related: main/xmloff/dtd/script.mod may be (or have been) related. main/xmlscript/dtd has libraries.dtd, library.dtd, and module.dtd. Still, no scripting.dtd that I can find in Apache OpenOffice SDK or source. Perhaps this file was part of an earlier Sun/Oracle release, that was deleted during the incubation process? (BTW, LibreOffice also does not have this dtd.) Thanks, Lee - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Reporting broken download link
Not Able to Download Apache Open Office Update.Page had recurring error..
