Hi All,
this is something of a self promotion but I have a tool that is
intended to be of use to ODF developers and testers.
It is available via GitHub see http://hammyau.github.io/ODFExplorer/
for some details.
Thanks for you time.
Any and all feedback welcome.
Ian C
Am 08/28/2015 06:07 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On 08/27/2015 09:05 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
Hi
I am in the process of migrating our unit tests from cppunit to Google
Test. However AOO doesn't build with cppunit and hasn't been routinely
built with cppunit for a while, which means our unit
Am 08/29/2015 12:11 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 26/08/2015 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
The three patches for the basic part are probably easier to understand
separately:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 6:07 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/27/2015 09:05 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
Hi
I am in the process of migrating our unit tests from cppunit to Google
Test. However AOO doesn't build with cppunit and hasn't been routinely
built with cppunit for a
In any case this is too much traffic on the private mailing list.
I would understand Dennis' mail as a wake-up call how much it is
currently and that there is an urgent need to turn down the number of mails.
Marcus
Am 08/28/2015 11:58 PM, schrieb Phillip Rhodes:
So what, if anything,
I'd love to see a comparison with a half dozen other projects.
On Aug 29, 2015 02:42, Marcus marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
In any case this is too much traffic on the private mailing list.
I would understand Dennis' mail as a wake-up call how much it is currently
and that there is an urgent
On 8/29/15 8:39 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
I'd love to see a comparison with a half dozen other projects.
I would discourage any reasoning based on aggregate message counts.
Every +1 on a PMC member VOTE counts as a message, for example. The
thing to look carefully at is what is being discussed
On Aug 29, 2015 12:21, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/29/15 8:39 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
I'd love to see a comparison with a half dozen other projects.
I would discourage any reasoning based on aggregate message counts.
Every +1 on a PMC member VOTE counts as a message, for
Good idea, Phil
Separating out [VOTE] and maybe even [DISCUSS] threads related to [VOTE]s
and/or lazy consensus should be possible. I will look into that as a
refinement in future reports. (It will also be helpful if the practices for
tagging mail threads are followed consistently.)
It
Keith N. McKenna k...@apache.org has asked for 4.1.2_release_blocker:
Issue 120706: CRASH - navigating tables containing NULL timestamps in
DataSourceBrowser using mysql JDBC connector causes AOO to crash
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120706
--- Comment #6 from Keith N. McKenna
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Separating out [VOTE] and maybe even [DISCUSS] threads related to
[VOTE]s and/or lazy consensus should be possible. I will look into
that as a refinement in future reports.
I would save you some hours and rely on easy indicators and on a clear
goal: full
We could reduce private traffic if we discussed the policy for trademarks in
public. The community can help write a clear policy statement with real and
fictional examples. This would serve the community by reducing private
inquiries to unusual cases not previously considered or unclearly
On Aug 29, 2015 14:02, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
Rich,
I have no means to produce comparisons with other projects and it is out
of scope for me here. Maybe other projects might undertake it just to
satisfy themselves that their activity is as confined as it is thought to
Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org has asked for 4.1.2_release_blocker:
Issue 126258: javadoc fails to build
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126258
--- Comment #6 from Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org ---
I suggest that we include this patch in 4.1.2:
- One-line patch
- Fixes a
On 20/08/2015 Phillip Rhodes wrote:
I ran into this bug:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126258
I just applied the patch in the bug, trying the build again now.
Thank you for bringing it to the list's attention anyway (and thanks
Alexander for contributing the patch in the first
On 14 Aug, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 09/08/2015 Don Lewis wrote:
Looks like you are compiling with gcc 4.9. I ran into this same problem
on FreeBSD and worked around it by changing the -Os optimization flag
... This is a gcc bug, see:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65009
Hello,
I want to change my entry on the reference list (old company) - can you
please tell me, who I have to contact for this matter?
Thank you in advance and best regards, David
Dear Sir or Madam,
If anyone who knows programming, can modify and change Open Office, how do you
maintain control quality? Or are they only aloud to modify or change a copy
of their Open Office that they downloaded?
Thank You,
Adrian
From the Chair,
I don't know, off-hand, what the proportion of discussion of Trademark Policy
is in the PMC private discussion activity so far this year.
However, a discussion of trademark policy, as such, especially with real and
fictional examples, is inappropriate on this list if it is
All of the source code used in making an Apache OpenOffice distribution is
available free to the public, in the same manner as the OpenOffice software the
people directly.
The code can be downloaded, modified (or not) and used to build the programs.
The use of that code is governed by the
Hmm, I guess it has been a long day.
Read:
... in the same manner as the OpenOffice software that people obtain to use
directly.
Read:
Distributing a modified version of the software must not be done in a manner
that infringes those trademarks.
[;), Dennis
-Original Message-
As me from my soapbox:
Any proposal for reworking trademark policies would naturally grandfather
prior arrangements. My hope is that any rework of policies would be more and
not less generous than current reality.
I think that the project should have an open source code test for Powered By
FWIW, that patch did indeed fix the build error I was seeing, so I endorse
the idea of going ahead and merging that.
Phil
This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org
wrote:
On 20/08/2015 Phillip Rhodes wrote:
I ran
23 matches
Mail list logo
