A FreeBSD user is trying to unbreak the ppc64 build and ran into an
issue with the sot module. I dig into it pretty deeply and it looks to
me like a gcc bug. It's reproducable in amd64. It seems to affect
gcc10, gcc11, and gcc12 builds. The build failure does not happen with
gcc9.
It is not
On 11 Mar, Don Lewis wrote:
> I've had some time in the last couple of weeks to work on the FreeBSD
> port. I was able to get 4.1.14 to build and updated the FreeBSD port to
> that version. I committed the upgrade to the main branch of the FreeBSD
> ports tree on March 8. I merge
FYI, I do maintain a FreeBSD port of AOO42X and periodically update it
with newer snaphots of our code. FreeBSD users can install binary
packages of it. It was broken for quite a while, but I've gotten it
working again.
-
To
On 12 Mar, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Don,
>
> thank you for your detailed report!
>
> Most of the technical things are above my understanding. ;-)
Some of it is beyond mine, in particular the iterator stuff. I'm also very
unfamiliar with that part of the code and have no idea how to test it
I've had some time in the last couple of weeks to work on the FreeBSD
port. I was able to get 4.1.14 to build and updated the FreeBSD port to
that version. I committed the upgrade to the main branch of the FreeBSD
ports tree on March 8. I merged the change to the current ports
quarterly branch a
On 26 Apr, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 9:57 PM Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> I'm gonna look into the serf->(lib)curl option... Since we don't use any
>> of the fancy features of serf, I'm thinking that the easy option might be
>> best
>
>
>
> Hi
>
> I've ported our WebDAV
On 13 Apr, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community
> builds of
> Apache OpenOffice 4.1.12-RC1 as GA.
>
> These artifacts can be found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.12-RC1/
>
> Please cast your vote:
>
The
BTW, FreeBSD doesn't even use epm. It should be possible to patch
configure.ac to avoid looking for it.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On 20 Jun, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi Arrigo, all
>
> Development seems to be quite live at
> https://github.com/silnrsi/graphite
We are using SIL Graphite, http://silgraphite.sourceforge.net/
Looking at the Graphite technical overview page mentioned here:
On 20 Jun, Yury Tarasievich wrote:
> Hello Peter,
>
> You are right on both issues, of course.
>
> To be fair, on your (1), I didn't touch that
> variable check, I just brute-forced the C++11
> mode of compilation.
>
> Which leads to your (2), but thing is, modern
> boost sort of requires
On 16 Jun, ard...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: ardovm
> Date: Wed Jun 16 19:07:44 2021
> New Revision: 1890844
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1890844=rev
> Log:
> Build script for AOO 4.1.10 under Mingw
>
> Better late than never... could be used as a template for the future
I thought
The Release Candidate is good for production/GA:
[X] yes / +1
[ ] no / -1
My vote is based on
[ ] binding (member of PMC)
[X] I have built and tested the RC from source on platform [FreeBSD]
[ ] I have tested the binary RC on platform [ ]
On 20 Apr, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Before we call a vote, I'd like to ask as many people as possible to give the
> 2nd release candidate of AOO 4.1.10 a good, solid test.
>
> The source files and complimentary community builds for this RC can be found
> at:
>
>
On 25 Mar, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>> #422 #426 #447 Windows: Drop support for Visual Studio <=14.0/2015
>
> Seems, we are out of look here due to the ancient compiler we still use
> on Windows...
Same with nss. I suspect lack of C99 support is the issue.
[X] yes / +1
[ ] no / -1
My vote is based on
[ ] binding (member of PMC)
[X] I have built and tested the RC from source on platform [FreeBSD]
[ ] I have tested the binary RC on platform [ ]
On 18 Jan, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary
On 6 Jan, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>
>> On Jan 6, 2021, at 9:19 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>>
>> Hello All,
>>
>>
>> - My own build of trunk on Linux can open the file.
>>
>> Do you think that this is worth more investigation before releasing
>> 4.1.9?
>>
>
> AFAICT, it is not a
On 16 Dec, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 05:56:48PM -0500, Carl Marcum wrote:
>
>> On 12/15/20 3:37 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>> >
>> > On 15.12.20 20:14, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > On Dec 15, 2020, at 12:57 PM, Matthias Seidel
>> > > > wrote:
>> > >
On 9 Dec, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>
>> On Dec 9, 2020, at 9:56 AM, Mechtilde wrote:
>>
>> Hello Jim,
>>
>>>
>>> So I was thinking we just have these 3:
>>>
>>> --with-epm
>>> --with-dmake
>>> --with-beanshell
>>
>> I want to differ whether we build with system version or with separate
>>
On 7 Dec, Peter Kovacs wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I haave an issue with configuring I am unfammiliar with.
>
> configure: error: requirements to build the gtk-plugin not met. Use
> --disable-gtk or install the missing packages
>
> What does this mean? I did not find this in any package.
>
On 2 Dec, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Building --enable-debug is causing a weird issue...
>
> ../unxmaccx.pro/bin/makedepend: error: got signal 4
> dmake: Error code 1, while making '../unxmaccx.pro/obj/checkdll.obj'
> dmake: '../unxmaccx.pro/obj/checkdll.obj' removed.
>
> I'm not sure if this is
On 1 Dec, j...@apache.org wrote:
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> jim pushed a commit to branch trunk
> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice.git
>
>
> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/trunk by this push:
>
On 10 Nov, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> CentOS7: glibc 2.17
> Ubuntu 14.04: glibc 2.19
>
> Since CentOS7 emulates the "super stable" worldview of RHEL, the
> CentOS7 version will likely always be the older one.
In that case I think a Ubuntu build is unlikely to run on CentOS 7.
On 10 Nov, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> History: For previous AOO releases (up to 4.1.8), we have used
> CentOS5 as our build environ for our community builds.
> As of 4.2.x, this is no longer an option. Instead, we
> baselined CentOS7 (mainly due to gstreamer 1.0).
>
>
For 4.2.0, we are talking about building on CentOS 7. Therefore some of
platforms that we currently support won't support 4.2.0, in particular
CentOS 5, which is currently EOL and CentOS 6, which is still supported
upstream, at least for now the last time I looked.
If a user is running on an
On 7 Nov, John D'Orazio wrote:
> Hello all, ss I continue building and debugging the next release of my
> Writer add-on, in which I'm attempting to include the *Chrome Embedded
> Framework* in it's Java flavoured build (I'm using the builds from this
> release
>
On 2 Nov, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community
> builds of
> Apache OpenOffice 4.1.8-RC3 as GA.
>
> These artifacts can be found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.8-RC3/
>
> Please cast your vote:
The
On 1 Nov, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi Don
>
>> On 11/01/2020 5:55 PM Don Lewis wrote:
>
>> What about AOO418?
>
> Apparently this issue only happened with my own build. It does not occur with
> the official 418 RC3 build compiled by Jim
> (I mentioned
On 1 Nov, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Don,
>
> Thanks for the update!
>
> @Pedro: Does that solve the problem? If yes, could you set the issue to
> "RESOLVED"?
What about AOO418?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 31 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Don,
>
> Am 31.10.20 um 13:58 schrieb Don Lewis:
>> On 30 Oct, Pedro Lino wrote:
>>> Just recompiled AOO 4.1.8 on another Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64 without issues.
>>>
>>> Installing 4.1.8 over 4.1.7 end with error reported
On 30 Oct, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Just recompiled AOO 4.1.8 on another Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64 without issues.
>
> Installing 4.1.8 over 4.1.7 end with error reported 2 years ago
>
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127774
I just updated that ticket with some new information. It is possible
On 29 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I think we are ready for 4.1.8-RC3. I'll start Linux and macOS builds.
Building on CentOS 5 and running both on CentOS 5 and Ubuntu 16 seem to
work.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
trunk and AOO42X should also get this fix.
On 29 Oct, j...@apache.org wrote:
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> jim pushed a commit to branch AOO418
> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice.git
>
>
> The following commit(s) were
On 28 Oct, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 28 Oct, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 27 Oct, Don Lewis wrote:
>>> On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>> Maybe... but it DID WORK before. That is, before the mega patch,
>>>> configure did the "right thing". So if som
On 28 Oct, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 27 Oct, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> Maybe... but it DID WORK before. That is, before the mega patch,
>>> configure did the "right thing". So if something is causing configure
>>> to make a di
On 27 Oct, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Maybe... but it DID WORK before. That is, before the mega patch,
>> configure did the "right thing". So if something is causing configure
>> to make a different decision, it is due to the interaction w
On 28 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> In particular, this is when building from the "official" SRC_RELEASE
> tarball we provide. Is the inc/reporevision.lst file not included?
It is in one of the RCs that I looked at.
-
To
6f662dc2a8f9%40%3Cdev.openoffice.apache.org%3E
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
> Am 28.10.20 um 18:33 schrieb Don Lewis:
>> Something that we are still missing for AOO418 is a fix for getting the
>> revision info when building from a source tarball instead of a git
>>
Something that we are still missing for AOO418 is a fix for getting the
revision info when building from a source tarball instead of a git
checkout. Someone mentioned this a couple weeks ago.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
tinent difference between the 2...
>
>> On Oct 27, 2020, at 5:24 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>>
>> On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> For completeness, and especially for those not following the thread,
>>> what we have conclusively shown is that it is NOT an issue w/ the
ewer distros.
>> On Oct 27, 2020, at 5:09 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 27, 2020, at 2:34 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>>>
>>> On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>> Thanks all... I am now building the final
On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Thanks all... I am now building the final 'git bisect' test, based on
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/f7070ae3689d0d34bf9dab3d31f56744d0df4784
>
> assuming that this is good, it seems like 99% likely that the problem arose
> with
>
>
On 22 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Regarding this commit:
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/8d4c92f789718b2f73ea62d487811a0c9d476739
>
> why the change
>
> - CONFIGURE_ACTION=Configure linux-generic64
> + CONFIGURE_ACTION=Configure linux-x86_64 no-dso no-shared $(NO_ASM)
On 21 Oct, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 21 Oct, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 21 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Oct 21, 2020, at 4:21 PM, Andrea Pescetti
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It looks like we are getting closer
On 21 Oct, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 21 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 21, 2020, at 4:21 PM, Andrea Pescetti
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> It looks like we are getting closer I mean, we have a commit that
>>> is only relevant to Cen
Sounds like
test="string-length($shift)!=0"
doesn't work, which is odd ...
>>
>>> On Oct 21, 2020, at 2:41 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>>>
>>> On 21 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>> OK... so $shift is a number then, or should be? But sometimes $shift
&
On 21 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>
>> On Oct 21, 2020, at 4:21 PM, Andrea Pescetti
>> wrote:
>>
>> It looks like we are getting closer I mean, we have a commit that
>> is only relevant to CentOS 5 and we know that Jim's builds are done
>> on CentOS 5 and have the bug, while the others
On 21 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> never mind this... it's not a matter of building. I can build fine. It
> just crashes on Ubuntu. no idea why.
Are you building on the same version of Ubuntu?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
n my reading. I don't know what
number() would do in this situation.
> I'm thinking this isn't the problem though with the failures :/
Yeah, I think it's probably something else that went in at the same time,
and I think also that build OS vs. deployment OS is part of the mix.
>> O
On 21 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> so are YOU able to build HEAD of AOO418 on CentOS5 ??
I haven't tried to build today's HEAD, but I've built and tested all of
my AOO418 commits on CentOS 5 before I made the commits.
-
To
On 21 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Am 21.10.20 um 17:43 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Should that fix be just:
>>
>>
>
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/9510f3847723b65ae47efff8796e6f14f586ce09
>
> Really looks like a candidate...
I doubt it. Unless you are building on CentOS 5,
On 21 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Should that fix be just:
>
>
That would work, but it would produce a different output. It would
always put ">> $shift" in the output whenever $shift is nonblank. The
change that I committed only puts ">> $shift" in the output if $shift is
nonblank and
On 21 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I don't have it, but that was around the end of Aug right? So right around
> the time when a bunch of stuff was included like updates to nss, libxslt,
> libxml2...
>
> I'm trying to get my head around the logic of
>
>
>
On 12 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Don,
>
> Am 12.10.20 um 00:49 schrieb Don Lewis:
>> On 10 Oct, Don Lewis wrote:
>>> On 10 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>> Hi Don,
>>>>
>>>> Am 10.10.20 um 13:30 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>>
On 10 Oct, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 10 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi Don,
>>
>> Am 10.10.20 um 13:30 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>> On 10 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>> Hi Don,
>>>>
>>>> Am 10.10.20 um 13:04 schrieb Don Lewis:
>&
On 11 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> **
> ERROR: ERROR: Missing files
> in function: remove_Files_Without_Sourcedirectory
> **
>
> That looks like the problem Don is having on FreeBSD.
>
On 11 Oct, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> I've built the 4.1.8-RC2 sources from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.8-RC2/source/
> on a new CentOS 7 VM and generated "installed" (not packaged), RPM and
> DEB builds that I tested on a variety of Fedora and Ubuntu systems.
>
> All
On 10 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Don,
>
> Am 10.10.20 um 13:30 schrieb Don Lewis:
>> On 10 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Hi Don,
>>>
>>> Am 10.10.20 um 13:04 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>>> On 9 Oct, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>>>&g
On 10 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Don,
>
> Am 10.10.20 um 13:04 schrieb Don Lewis:
>> On 9 Oct, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>> It’s a guess, but which Java are you using?
>> OpenJDK 1.8.0_252
> What happens if you build with Java 7?
>>
>>> Some of tho
avadoc is being run on some files that have never been run
through javadoc before in recent history. I have no idea what might be
triggering that and why it suddenly started happening.
> Regards,
> Dave
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Oct 9, 2020, at 6:08 PM, Don Lewis wrote
I started working on the FreeBSD port for 4.1.8. Unlike the the other
ports, the FreeBSD port doesn't bundle fonts with the package. Instead
it uses fonts from the system, installing them separately if necessary.
To do this, it configures with the --without-fonts option. This 4.1.8
RC2 fails
I want to download the source tarball for RC2, but this page:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-fullsets
isn't helpful.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 6 Oct, j...@apache.org wrote:
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> jim pushed a commit to branch AOO418
> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice.git
>
>
> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/AOO418 by this push:
>
On 6 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Thanks! Since these are relatively new, I think that this can hold for 4.1.9
I'd at least like to get the nss update into trunk/AOO42X where it can
soak for a while.
>> On Oct 6, 2020, at 12:19 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>>
>> On 6 Oct, Jim Ja
On 6 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> OK... as expected, it fails on macOS.
>
> 2 things I see: in the nss.patch file there is a line:
>
> Only in misc/build/nss-3.39/nss/coreconf: Darwin.mk.rej
>
> So I'm wondering if the patch file itself or maybe even the whole pull
> request is borked.
>
Any progress on nss?
On 30 Sep, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I'll see how the build on macOS goes, but likely won't be able to get to it
> until Monday.
>
>> On Sep 29, 2020, at 2:52 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>>
>> On 29 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Hi Don,
>&
On 5 Oct, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 8:08 AM Don Lewis wrote:
>
>> On 5 Oct, dam...@apache.org wrote:
>> > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>> >
>> > damjan pushed a commit to branch trunk
>&
On 3 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Libexpat has been updated!
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
>
>
> Weitergeleitete Nachricht
> Betreff: [libexpat/libexpat] Release R_2_2_10 - 2.2.10
> Datum:Sat, 03 Oct 2020 11:35:44 -0700
> Von: Sebastian Pipping
On 5 Oct, dam...@apache.org wrote:
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> damjan pushed a commit to branch trunk
> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice.git
>
>
> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/trunk by this push:
>
I've got everything on my list for AOO418 in the queue:
* Fix for old java detection when building with new java
Set java compilation target to version 1.5 #101
https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/101
* Bug fixes from upstream for bundled libxml2 and serf modules
ugh.
This is one more level of escaping than I think should be necessary, but
\\n didn't seem to help.
> Thanks for your help
>
> Kind regards
>
> Mechtilde
>
> Am 30.09.20 um 08:38 schrieb Don Lewis:
>> On 30 Sep, Mechtilde wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>
On 30 Sep, Mechtilde wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I set up a recent build environment with Debian 9.
>
> I have got the same error message again:
>
> ~/openoffice/main/instsetoo_native$ build --from cui
> build -- version: -
>
>
> =
> Building module cui
> =
>
> Entering
On 29 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Don,
>
> Am 26.09.20 um 23:47 schrieb Don Lewis:
>> On 26 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Am 25.09.20 um 18:05 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>> Am 25.09.20 um 14:01 schrieb Jim Jagiel
On 27 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Am 26.09.20 um 23:43 schrieb Don Lewis:
>> On 26 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Hi Don,
>>>
>>> Is this an easy fix?
>> Yes. What minimum version should we target?
>
> The same as in trunk?
Trunk currently
On 26 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Am 25.09.20 um 18:05 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Am 25.09.20 um 14:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> That looks quite a bit more straightforward :-)
>> Let's wait for Don's PR, this is only a minor update from Python 2.7.17
>> to 2.7.18.
>
> Merged
On 26 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Don,
>
> Is this an easy fix?
Yes. What minimum version should we target?
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
> Am 25.09.20 um 22:54 schrieb Don Lewis:
>> On 25 Sep, Don Lewis wrote:
>>> On 24 Sep, Don Lewis wrote:
>&g
On 25 Sep, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 24 Sep, Don Lewis wrote:
>> I've been looking into the problem where AOO418 can't detect older
>> versions of java when it is built with a new version of java. This is a
>> definite puzzle because the detection is done by the jvmfwk mo
On 24 Sep, Don Lewis wrote:
> I've been looking into the problem where AOO418 can't detect older
> versions of java when it is built with a new version of java. This is a
> definite puzzle because the detection is done by the jvmfwk module, and
> the code in that module is ident
On 24 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Great!
>
> We should also cherry-pick Don's Python update:
>
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/26aca12f509e5c739c98db9ce5641a2c5feecea7
>
> And update LICENSE:
>
>
On 24 Sep, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Well, gotten further but now there are packaging issues. Something with the
> new apr/apr-util/serf stuff is getting hosed... looking into it:
>
> ERROR: The following files could not be found:
> ERROR: File not found: libapr-1.0.5.2.dylib
> ERROR: File not
I've been looking into the problem where AOO418 can't detect older
versions of java when it is built with a new version of java. This is a
definite puzzle because the detection is done by the jvmfwk module, and
the code in that module is identical between AOO418 and trunk. The only
difference is
On 22 Sep, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Just a FYI that HEAD of AOO418 builds on macOS with no issues so far...
https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/94 has some macOS-specific
changes from AOO42X.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 20 Sep, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>
> Am 20.09.20 um 20:16 schrieb Dave Fisher:
>>> On Sep 20, 2020, at 9:40 AM, Marcus wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 19.09.20 um 12:36 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
Keep in mind that C++ Standard has changed a lot in reasoned years,
and at least I would like to go with the
On 20 Sep, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>
>> On Sep 20, 2020, at 9:40 AM, Marcus wrote:
>>
>> Am 19.09.20 um 12:36 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>>> Keep in mind that C++ Standard has changed a lot in reasoned years,
>>> and at least I would like to go with the new standard. If we stick
>>> to the old code
After dodging a local wildfire and potential evacuation, excessive heat
warnings and requests by the power company to conserve power, possible
rolling blackouts due to power shortages, high wind warnings with a two
day Public Safety Power Shutoff to avoid power-line caused fires, smoke
plumes from
On 4 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Jim, Don,
>
> Am 28.08.20 um 15:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Let's commit and work after pushed.
>
> We should try
>
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887
>
> again for 4.1.8.
I've included it in a large bundle of cherry-picks that I've been
I've been looking at upgrading a bunch of our bundled dependencies, and
it looks like upgrading libxslt (or maybe libxml2) breaks the build on
CentOS 5.
The writerfilter module uses xsltproc to generate the header
resources.hxx, and in some cases it contains invalid C cod such as:
On 30 Aug, Carl Marcum wrote:
> Hi Don,
>
> On 8/29/20 8:02 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 29 Aug, Don Lewis wrote:
>>> On 29 Aug, Don Lewis wrote:
>>>> On 23 Aug, Carl Marcum wrote:
>>>>> I'm setting up a new CentOS 5.5 VM that I can build 4.1.x s
On 29 Aug, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 29 Aug, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 23 Aug, Carl Marcum wrote:
>>> I'm setting up a new CentOS 5.5 VM that I can build 4.1.x series on.
>>>
>>> First hurdle was figuring out out how to point to the vault.centos.org
>>
On 29 Aug, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 23 Aug, Carl Marcum wrote:
>> I'm setting up a new CentOS 5.5 VM that I can build 4.1.x series on.
>>
>> First hurdle was figuring out out how to point to the vault.centos.org
>> archived rpms.
>> Unfortunately no git was
On 29 Aug, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 23 Aug, Carl Marcum wrote:
>> I'm setting up a new CentOS 5.5 VM that I can build 4.1.x series on.
>>
>> First hurdle was figuring out out how to point to the vault.centos.org
>> archived rpms.
>> Unfortunately no git was
On 23 Aug, Carl Marcum wrote:
> I'm setting up a new CentOS 5.5 VM that I can build 4.1.x series on.
>
> First hurdle was figuring out out how to point to the vault.centos.org
> archived rpms.
> Unfortunately no git was available then.
I've managed to resurrect my CentOS 5 VM.
git builds from
On 27 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Am 27.08.20 um 19:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>
>> Hi Don,
>>
>> Am 24.08.20 um 04:04 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>> I've got a bunch of cherry picks that I'm planning to merge into AOO418.
>>> There are two categories:
On 27 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Don,
>
> Am 26.08.20 um 03:55 schrieb Don Lewis:
>> On 25 Aug, Don Lewis wrote:
>>> On 25 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
>>>>> On 08/25/2020 8:35 PM Don Lewis wrote:
>>>>> Try deleting /opt/openoffice4/progr
On 25 Aug, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 25 Aug, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 25 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 08/25/2020 8:35 PM Don Lewis wrote:
>>>
>>>> Try deleting /opt/openoffice4/program/libgcc_s.so.1
>>>> For some reason that bogus f
On 25 Aug, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 25 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
>>
>>> On 08/25/2020 8:35 PM Don Lewis wrote:
>>
>>> Try deleting /opt/openoffice4/program/libgcc_s.so.1
>>> For some reason that bogus file is getting packaged by your build.
>>
>&g
On 25 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
>
>> On 08/25/2020 8:35 PM Don Lewis wrote:
>
>> Try deleting /opt/openoffice4/program/libgcc_s.so.1
>> For some reason that bogus file is getting packaged by your build.
>
> Yep. That fixed it. It doesn't make any sense to me
On 25 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi Matthias
>
>> On 08/25/2020 8:07 PM Matthias Seidel wrote:
>
>> If you start AOO in a shell with "soffice", does that give some information?
>
> Didn't think about that :)
>
> /opt/openoffice4/program/javaldx: error while loading shared libraries:
>
On 25 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi Matthias
>
>> On 08/25/2020 8:07 PM Matthias Seidel wrote:
>
>> If you start AOO in a shell with "soffice", does that give some information?
>
> Didn't think about that :)
>
> /opt/openoffice4/program/javaldx: error while loading shared libraries:
>
On 25 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Pedro,
>
> Am 25.08.20 um 20:11 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>> Hi Don
>>
>>> On 08/25/2020 10:59 AM Don Lewis wrote:
>>> With the latest batch of cherry-picks that I just pushed to AOO418 and
>>> using OpenJDK 8, I
On 25 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi Don
>
>> On 08/25/2020 10:59 AM Don Lewis wrote:
>
>> With the latest batch of cherry-picks that I just pushed to AOO418
>> and using OpenJDK 8, I was able to build AOO418 on Ubuntu 18.
>
> After updating with your
1 - 100 of 402 matches
Mail list logo
