Re: 4.1.3 building

[Andrea Pescetti]

Jim Jagielski wrote:

Once built and tested, how does one upload? I'm assuming
the prepare-download-tree.sh in aoo-devtools??


All builds have already been uploaded by Ariel for this RC. No need to 
upload anything else.


I did upload a full set of Linux-64 builds to 
http://home.apache.org/~pescetti/openoffice-4.1.3-dev-r1761989/ but due 
to missing communication (a non-delivered notification to this list) we 
are using the ones by Ariel for Linux-64 too.


prepare-download-tree.sh is just a helper that will rearrange your 
builds into the right layout. It works for Linux-64, needs minimal 
tweaks for other systems.


Builds (not needed now, since Ariel has already built all systems) must 
indeed be uploaded through svn commit to 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3-rc1/binaries/ 
which is quite slow; so Ariel committed one binary at a time. I'm not 
sure how it would work with svn locking if we tried to commit multiple 
builds to the same dir simultaneously; possibly it will just work as 
expected, no idea.


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: 4.1.3 building

[Jim Jagielski]

> On Sep 27, 2016, at 11:03 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile  
> wrote:
> 
> 
> IMO providing different builds for same arch will make it difficult to
> QA, so I will go on with the Linux 64-bit builds. If someone wants to
> build on CentOS 5 32 bit and upload the binaries, please tell and do so.
> 

Unless someone else picks this up (or has picked it up),
let me know and I'll start a build.

Still need insights on the upload process on how to get
these upstream (unless it's simply an svn copy to
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3-rc1/binaries/

PS: I'll be using my ASF signing key.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: 4.1.3 building

[Jim Jagielski]

Once built and tested, how does one upload? I'm assuming
the prepare-download-tree.sh in aoo-devtools??


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: 4.1.3 building

[Marcus]

Am 09/29/2016 09:04 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:

Marcus wrote:

Am 09/29/2016 03:26 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:

RAT is a tool that we might even not want to use. The important thing is

sometimes I really don't know why someone is coming to such a statement.
This is one of this moments. Why shouldn't we use the RAT scan? Do you
want to search for broken license headers yourself? ;-)


No, of course! I meant: the important thing for the release is that
licenses are OK. RAT is a tool that we use for convenience, but it is
not mandatory that it passes; if RAT gives warnings that are false
positives then we are free to ignore these warnings; and the release
will still be OK, it is not invalidated by the fact that a tool gives
false positives. So it is not mandatory to fix this for 4.1.3, but it
deserves attention for 4.1.4.


so, you have referred RAT to the current release but not in general. 
That's OK. And sure, it's not mandatory for any release. I never meant 
it this way. It's just that your wording was a bit ambigous and I've asked.


Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: 4.1.3 building

[Andrea Pescetti]

Marcus wrote:

Am 09/29/2016 03:26 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:

RAT is a tool that we might even not want to use. The important thing is

sometimes I really don't know why someone is coming to such a statement.
This is one of this moments. Why shouldn't we use the RAT scan? Do you
want to search for broken license headers yourself? ;-)


No, of course! I meant: the important thing for the release is that 
licenses are OK. RAT is a tool that we use for convenience, but it is 
not mandatory that it passes; if RAT gives warnings that are false 
positives then we are free to ignore these warnings; and the release 
will still be OK, it is not invalidated by the fact that a tool gives 
false positives. So it is not mandatory to fix this for 4.1.3, but it 
deserves attention for 4.1.4.


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: 4.1.3 building

[Marcus]

Am 09/29/2016 03:26 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:

Marcus wrote:

Am 09/27/2016 11:13 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:

Possibly. But those files are generated during the build anyway, so the
fact that RAT does not know about them is irrelevant.

Sure, but the report is not green. But IMHO it should be green when we
want to look at 4.1.3 as official release.
At the end it's just an extended excludes list.


RAT is a tool that we might even not want to use. The important thing is


sometimes I really don't know why someone is coming to such a statement. 
This is one of this moments. Why shouldn't we use the RAT scan? Do you 
want to search for broken license headers yourself? ;-)


Sure for the 4.1.x branch there won't be any further changes that would 
result in license problems. But what about trunk?



license compatibility, and we are OK on that aspect. Though, I suggest
that you open an issue about this and nominate it as a 4.1.4 (not 4.1.3)
blocker.


Done. Maybe indeed a bit late for 4.1.3. I haven't seen that the exclude 
list is in "main/", now I know it. ;-)


Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: 4.1.3 building

[Ariel Constenla-Haile]

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 12:45:02PM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> >IMO providing different builds for same arch will make it difficult to
> >QA, so I will go on with the Linux 64-bit builds.
> 
> Yes, if you already started uploading Linux-64 I agree this is the best
> solution.
> 
> > If someone wants to
> >build on CentOS 5 32 bit and upload the binaries, please tell and do so.
> 
> I haven't done it yet, but it's likely I can upload and build them by Friday
> night European time (if bandwidth allows). I'm more confident with Linux-64
> since I have plenty of machines where I can test it. But Linux-32 should
> work too. If it helps to get things ready earlier, I can thus do Linux-32.
> Just let me know.

I started uploading the Linux 32-bit packages; Windows installers with
newer VC redist come next. So the only thing missing is the source
release tars and zip.


Regards
-- 
Ariel Constenla-Haile


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: 4.1.3 building

[Andrea Pescetti]

Marcus wrote:

Am 09/27/2016 11:13 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:

Possibly. But those files are generated during the build anyway, so the
fact that RAT does not know about them is irrelevant.

Sure, but the report is not green. But IMHO it should be green when we
want to look at 4.1.3 as official release.
At the end it's just an extended excludes list.


RAT is a tool that we might even not want to use. The important thing is 
license compatibility, and we are OK on that aspect. Though, I suggest 
that you open an issue about this and nominate it as a 4.1.4 (not 4.1.3) 
blocker.


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: 4.1.3 building

[Marcus]

Am 09/27/2016 11:13 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:

On 25/09/2016 Marcus wrote:

Finally I got a AOO 4.1.3 with release options - but only en-US. I used
the following varaible + value in the build script: ...
LANG="de en-US fr pt ja"

the language option seems to be a problem with the build script:
Not OK:
--with-lang="${LANGS}"
OK:
--with-lang="de en-US fr pt ja"


Note that you have LANG and LANGS above, and that LANG happens to be set
by the system in the shell in general. The script from SVN


yes, sorry, just a typo. I've always used LANGS.


http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.1.3/
works well for me; if it doesn't for you we can check better, but of
course the explicit list is equivalent.


I've played with deleting the brackets {} or quotes "" but it doesn't 
helped. There must be something else that is special in my setup.



Ratscan shows the following files without correct header:
- main/LinuxX64-64Env.Set
- main/LinuxX64-64Env.Set.sh
- main/autom4te.cache/output.0
- main/autom4te.cache/requests
- main/autom4te.cache/traces.0
- main/config.log
- main/config.params
- main/configure
- main/warn
Something to add to "main/rat-excludes"?


Possibly. But those files are generated during the build anyway, so the
fact that RAT does not know about them is irrelevant.


Sure, but the report is not green. But IMHO it should be green when we 
want to look at 4.1.3 as official release.


At the end it's just an extended excludes list.

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: 4.1.3 building

[Andrea Pescetti]

Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:

IMO providing different builds for same arch will make it difficult to
QA, so I will go on with the Linux 64-bit builds.


Yes, if you already started uploading Linux-64 I agree this is the best 
solution.



 If someone wants to
build on CentOS 5 32 bit and upload the binaries, please tell and do so.


I haven't done it yet, but it's likely I can upload and build them by 
Friday night European time (if bandwidth allows). I'm more confident 
with Linux-64 since I have plenty of machines where I can test it. But 
Linux-32 should work too. If it helps to get things ready earlier, I can 
thus do Linux-32. Just let me know.


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: 4.1.3 building

[Ariel Constenla-Haile]

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 03:43:40AM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 23/09/2016 Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> >it might be time to start building it ;)
> >I'll start doing so on Windows, as Jim and Andrea seem to cover the
> >other platforms.
> 
> Sorry for the miscommunication,

Yes, as I saw no reply to this on the weekend, I started uploading Mac
+ Windows; once finished those, I started with Linux 64-bits as I saw no
further reply.

> I see that the message where I was saying
> that http://home.apache.org/~pescetti/openoffice-4.1.3-dev-r1761989/ (full
> Linux-64 in all languages) was being uploaded reached the list, but that the
> one where I said that upload (to home; not to dist yet) was complete did not
> make it.
> 
> As for speed, uploading all Linux-64 builds to home took 6-8 hours. Not
> fantastic, but not bad either, especially compared to the performance I
> remembered from dist+SVN.

I can confirm this speed issue; last weeks I uploaded Windows and macOS
builds for some bugs, and my upload speed for sftp://home.apache.org was
from two to three times what I see now on svn://dist.apache.org.

> I see you are uploading Linux-64 builds right now. Unless you believe it's
> faster if I upload mine, I would say that you can continue the upload.

IMO providing different builds for same arch will make it difficult to
QA, so I will go on with the Linux 64-bit builds. If someone wants to
build on CentOS 5 32 bit and upload the binaries, please tell and do so.


Regards
-- 
Ariel Constenla-Haile


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: 4.1.3 building

[Andrea Pescetti]

On 23/09/2016 Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:

it might be time to start building it ;)
I'll start doing so on Windows, as Jim and Andrea seem to cover the
other platforms.


Sorry for the miscommunication, I see that the message where I was 
saying that 
http://home.apache.org/~pescetti/openoffice-4.1.3-dev-r1761989/ (full 
Linux-64 in all languages) was being uploaded reached the list, but that 
the one where I said that upload (to home; not to dist yet) was complete 
did not make it.


As for speed, uploading all Linux-64 builds to home took 6-8 hours. Not 
fantastic, but not bad either, especially compared to the performance I 
remembered from dist+SVN.


I see you are uploading Linux-64 builds right now. Unless you believe 
it's faster if I upload mine, I would say that you can continue the 
upload. I will still try a test upload to SVN+dist for a few languages 
(in a separate dir) to evaluate performance.


As for platforms: I am happy that you provided both Windows and Mac OS X 
and I would have suggested that you did this anyway. For Linux I'm quite 
confident that my builds would be OK and that Jim's on Linux-32 
(following the same recipe) would be OK too.


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: 4.1.3 building

[Marcus]

Am 09/25/2016 12:03 AM, schrieb Marcus:

Am 09/24/2016 03:51 PM, schrieb Marcus:

Am 09/23/2016 10:18 PM, schrieb Marcus:

Am 09/23/2016 10:12 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:

On 9/23/2016 1:00 PM, Marcus wrote:

Am 09/23/2016 09:26 PM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:25:19AM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote:

- Source revision r1761818


Isn't this time to agree that this revision will be the one we
release?
Haven't seen any call from the RM, but it might be time to start
building it ;)

I'll start doing so on Windows, as Jim and Andrea seem to cover the
other platforms.


@Patricia:
Maybe you can tell us what your further plan is. Do you have any other
fixes in mind?


2 persons with the same thought in the same minute. ;-)


No more fixes in mind, and I believe it has been built in each
environment, so I don't expect any more build fixes.

Time to create a release candidate.


great. I'll try to build 4.1.3 on Fedora 21 with the release options. Of
course it's not the official baseline system. But maybe good enough to
see if it's working.


I get a problem with ant:

Configure error message says the required version is >= 1.7.0.

ant is installed with version 1.9.4. So, newer than the required 1.7.0.
I've also set the symlink "ant -> /usr/bin/ant" and executing configure
includes the "--with-ant-home=$HOME/ant" option.

What else is needed to run configure successfully?


I don't know why but after starting over and prepared the build again,
it's now working.

Finally I got a AOO 4.1.3 with release options - but only en-US. I used
the following varaible + value in the build script:

LANG="de en-US fr pt ja"

OK, something for tomorrow.


the language option seems to be a problem with the build script:

Not OK:
--with-lang="${LANGS}"

OK:
--with-lang="de en-US fr pt ja"

BTW:
Ratscan shows the following files without correct header:
- main/LinuxX64-64Env.Set
- main/LinuxX64-64Env.Set.sh
- main/autom4te.cache/output.0
- main/autom4te.cache/requests
- main/autom4te.cache/traces.0
- main/config.log
- main/config.params
- main/configure
- main/warn


Something to add to "main/rat-excludes"?

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: 4.1.3 building

[Marcus]

Am 09/24/2016 03:51 PM, schrieb Marcus:

Am 09/23/2016 10:18 PM, schrieb Marcus:

Am 09/23/2016 10:12 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:

On 9/23/2016 1:00 PM, Marcus wrote:

Am 09/23/2016 09:26 PM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:25:19AM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote:

- Source revision r1761818


Isn't this time to agree that this revision will be the one we
release?
Haven't seen any call from the RM, but it might be time to start
building it ;)

I'll start doing so on Windows, as Jim and Andrea seem to cover the
other platforms.


@Patricia:
Maybe you can tell us what your further plan is. Do you have any other
fixes in mind?


2 persons with the same thought in the same minute. ;-)


No more fixes in mind, and I believe it has been built in each
environment, so I don't expect any more build fixes.

Time to create a release candidate.


great. I'll try to build 4.1.3 on Fedora 21 with the release options. Of
course it's not the official baseline system. But maybe good enough to
see if it's working.


I get a problem with ant:

Configure error message says the required version is >= 1.7.0.

ant is installed with version 1.9.4. So, newer than the required 1.7.0.
I've also set the symlink "ant -> /usr/bin/ant" and executing configure
includes the "--with-ant-home=$HOME/ant" option.

What else is needed to run configure successfully?


I don't know why but after starting over and prepared the build again, 
it's now working.


Finally I got a AOO 4.1.3 with release options - but only en-US. I used 
the following varaible + value in the build script:


LANG="de en-US fr pt ja"

OK, something for tomorrow.

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: 4.1.3 building

[Marcus]

Am 09/23/2016 10:18 PM, schrieb Marcus:

Am 09/23/2016 10:12 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:

On 9/23/2016 1:00 PM, Marcus wrote:

Am 09/23/2016 09:26 PM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:25:19AM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote:

- Source revision r1761818


Isn't this time to agree that this revision will be the one we release?
Haven't seen any call from the RM, but it might be time to start
building it ;)

I'll start doing so on Windows, as Jim and Andrea seem to cover the
other platforms.


@Patricia:
Maybe you can tell us what your further plan is. Do you have any other
fixes in mind?


2 persons with the same thought in the same minute. ;-)


No more fixes in mind, and I believe it has been built in each
environment, so I don't expect any more build fixes.

Time to create a release candidate.


great. I'll try to build 4.1.3 on Fedora 21 with the release options. Of
course it's not the official baseline system. But maybe good enough to
see if it's working.


I get a problem with ant:

Configure error message says the required version is >= 1.7.0.

ant is installed with version 1.9.4. So, newer than the required 1.7.0. 
I've also set the symlink "ant -> /usr/bin/ant" and executing configure 
includes the "--with-ant-home=$HOME/ant" option.


What else is needed to run configure successfully?

Thanks

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: 4.1.3 building

[Ariel Constenla-Haile]

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:25:19AM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> - Source revision r1761818

Isn't this time to agree that this revision will be the one we release?
Haven't seen any call from the RM, but it might be time to start
building it ;)

I'll start doing so on Windows, as Jim and Andrea seem to cover the
other platforms.

-- 
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: 4.1.3 building

[Oliver Brinzing]

2. I would like to get a list of environments in which 4.1.3 has been 
successfully built. I'll
announce time to build a release candidate when it builds in the required 
environments.


aoo413 product build with revision 1761976 on win7 successful finished.

btw.: "activex" module also builds fine while same build configuration fails on 
trunk

see issue
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126996
windows build breaks in module extensions - activex


Oliver

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: 4.1.3 building

[Oliver Brinzing]

Hi,


2. I would like to get a list of environments in which 4.1.3 has been 
successfully built. I'll
announce time to build a release candidate when it builds in the required 
environments.


just finished an aoo413 debug build with revision 1761976 on win7.
no build breaks so far ;-)

will try a product build now...

Oliver


./configure \
--with-build-version="$(date +"%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S %z (%a, %d %b %Y)")" \
--with-vendor="AOO Debug Build" \
--with-dmake-url="http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2;
 \
--with-ant-home="/cygdrive/c/build/ant" \
--with-mozilla-build="/cygdrive/c/build/mozilla-build" \
--with-frame-home="/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v7.0" \
--with-psdk-home="/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v7.0" \
--with-midl-path="/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v7.0/bin" \
--with-cl-home="/cygdrive/c/Program Files (x86)/Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0/VC" 
 \
--with-mspdb-path="/cygdrive/c/Program Files (x86)/Microsoft Visual Studio 
9.0/Common7/IDE" \
--with-asm-home="/cygdrive/c/Program Files (x86)/Microsoft Visual Studio 
9.0/VC/bin" \
--with-csc-path="/cygdrive/c/Windows/Microsoft.NET/Framework/v3.5" \
--with-jdk-home="/cygdrive/c/Program Files (x86)/Java/jdk1.7.0"  \
--with-nsis-path="/cygdrive/c/Program Files (x86)/NSIS/Unicode" \
--with-directx-home="/cygdrive/c/Program Files (x86)/Microsoft DirectX SDK (June 
2010)" \
--with-atl-include-dir="/cygdrive/c/WinDDK/7600.16385.1/inc/atl71" \
--with-atl-lib-dir="/cygdrive/c/WinDDK/7600.16385.1/lib/ATL/i386" \
--with-mfc-include-dir="/cygdrive/c/WinDDK/7600.16385.1/inc/mfc42" \
--with-mfc-lib-dir="/cygdrive/c/WinDDK/7600.16385.1/lib/Mfc/i386" \
--enable-pch \
--with-package-format="installed msi" \
--enable-win-x64-shellext \
--enable-category-b \
--enable-bundled-dictionaries \
--with-lang="de" \
--without-stlport \
--without-junit \
--enable-verbose \
--disable-odk \
--without-fonts \
--disable-online-update \
--disable-strip-solver \
--enable-symbols \
--enable-dbgutil \
--enable-crashdump \
--enable-debug


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: 4.1.3 building

[Andrea Pescetti]

Andrea Pescetti wrote:

Sample builds (English, German, Italian) from a few hours ago -but not
from my latest build- are at
http://home.apache.org/~pescetti/openoffice-4.1.3-dev-r1761683/


Latest builds for all languages are now uploading (I'll do it in small 
batches, not as a whole) to

http://home.apache.org/~pescetti/openoffice-4.1.3-dev-r1761989/
This is the full Linux-64 (DEBs, RPMs, language packs) stack. I'm 
uploading it just as a performance test. Server performance was much 
better than the one I remembered for 4.1.2, then it dropped for a while 
but it's still better than it used to be. Of course home.apache.org is 
not meant for hosting dev builds, but SVN ("dist") would be worse since 
it's useless to store 15 GBytes of data per day in SVN, knowing that no 
RC will come out of it.



There are a few differences in the configure options, namely: ...
4) We were using ant 1.7.1 (from the repositories?) for 4.1.2 builds,
see
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.1.2/unxlngix6/config.log?revision=1736814=markup#l1134
; we download and use 1.9.7 now; I haven't checked this properly yet,
but we had a recent discussion with Kay saying that configure (which
checks for ant >= 1.7.0) was wrong.


I confirm there is an "ant17" package in the official CentOS 5 
repositories (added in CentOS 5.9). It provides ant 1.7.1. I haven't 
tried building with it. If it works, this would allow us to avoid any 
manually downloaded dependencies and the CentOS 5 recipe would be 
completely clean.



5) We are now explicitly passing --without-stlport which looks good
since (if I recall correctly) this was the default anyway.


Confirmed. I've checked the configure script and indeed --with-stlport 
is no longer supported. So --without-stlport is the default (and 
actually the only possible option).



6) We are now passing --without-junit ; I'm still not completely clear
if this makes any difference in our case.


It does make a difference at build time, and in 4.1.2 we had JUnit 4: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.1.2/unxlngix6/config.log?revision=1736814=markup#l1165 
; though, it may well be possible that this only affect build-time tests 
and it does not affect the final build. In this case, we can do without 
JUnit 4 (which is not provided by any CentOS packages).


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: 4.1.3 building

[Marcus]

Am 09/21/2016 10:49 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:

1. My current policy for release blocker is to grant it immediately if
it seems obvious to me that a fix is needed to build 4.1.3. I will also
do so based on prior security@ discussion. Otherwise, I'll ask for input
on dev@ before deciding.

2. I would like to get a list of environments in which 4.1.3 has been
successfully built. I'll announce time to build a release candidate when
it builds in the required environments.


a few days ago I've done a build on Fedora 21. Not the baseline system 
and not with the releae configure options.


However, I'll update to the newest SVN changes, try the release options 
and see what's coming out of the build.


Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: 4.1.3 building

[Andrea Pescetti]

Patricia Shanahan wrote:

1. My current policy for release blocker is to grant it immediately if
it seems obvious to me that a fix is needed to build 4.1.3. I will also
do so based on prior security@ discussion. Otherwise, I'll ask for input
on dev@ before deciding.


OK. 4.1.4 is a good fallback solution for important but not critical 
bugs anyway.



2. I would like to get a list of environments in which 4.1.3 has been
successfully built. I'll announce time to build a release candidate when
it builds in the required environments.


I've built AOO413 on Linux-64 with the following details:
- CentOS 5 VM as described in 
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#CentOS_5

- Source revision r1761818
- Real source revision r1761381 (both are obtained using "svn info"; the 
latter is the one that matters, as the former increases for any commit 
in any ASF project)
- Build scripts as per 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.1.3/unxlngix6/


Sample builds (English, German, Italian) from a few hours ago -but not 
from my latest build- are at 
http://home.apache.org/~pescetti/openoffice-4.1.3-dev-r1761683/


There are a few differences in the configure options, namely:

1) Build Version is a bit richer in 
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#Configure 
but I went for the more compact one from the 4.1.2 scripts


2) Language list is much longer in the 4.1.2 scripts and I maintained 
that one - even though I usually build with fewer languages


3) Package format does not have "installed" in the 4.1.2 scripts, which 
looks OK (we only ship RPM+DEB)


4) We were using ant 1.7.1 (from the repositories?) for 4.1.2 builds, 
see 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.1.2/unxlngix6/config.log?revision=1736814=markup#l1134 
; we download and use 1.9.7 now; I haven't checked this properly yet, 
but we had a recent discussion with Kay saying that configure (which 
checks for ant >= 1.7.0) was wrong.


5) We are now explicitly passing --without-stlport which looks good 
since (if I recall correctly) this was the default anyway.


6) We are now passing --without-junit ; I'm still not completely clear 
if this makes any difference in our case.


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

4.1.3 building

[Patricia Shanahan]

1. My current policy for release blocker is to grant it immediately if 
it seems obvious to me that a fix is needed to build 4.1.3. I will also 
do so based on prior security@ discussion. Otherwise, I'll ask for input 
on dev@ before deciding.


2. I would like to get a list of environments in which 4.1.3 has been 
successfully built. I'll announce time to build a release candidate when 
it builds in the required environments.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org