Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
Hi Stephan,
thank you very much for your answers!
... cut ...
* ad application/vnd.sun.star.uno-component;type=native:
No, such files are not put on any path. If those libraries are UNO
libraries that support services/singletons, they will be found by the
UNO
Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
Hi Stephan,
after further experimentations a synopsis:
* In order to install a scripting package under OOo one needs to
supply a jar-file according to the scripting framework specs
o if all parts are Java then adding all needed classes to that
Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
Hi Caio Tiago,
thank you *very* much, your directions worked right out of the book! ;)
First I deinstalled the Ubuntu OOo, then followed your instructions and
was able to install the genuine OOo from the OOo homepage, getting the
standard installation tree on the /opt
Takashi Ono wrote:
Hi,
Although the use of string classes in tools project is commented as depreciated,
they are still used in many codes.
They have constructors with one numeric argument to generate string of one
character. To protect the misuse of these constructors, the class definition
Hi Rony,
Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
Hi there,
just wanted to report that the genuine OOo 2.1 can be invoked via Java
from the command line, whereas the Ubuntu version cannot.
Did remove the genuine OOo 2.1 and re-installed the Ubuntu OOo 2.0.4
version (the latest they have). The Ubuntu version
Hi,
these were the required jar files suggested by netbeans: (i noticed
you didnt mention jut.jar in the comments of your code)
juh.jar
jurt.jar
jut.jar
officebean.jar
ridl.jar
unoil.jar
Thank you for this list, will look into it!
---
Ad your environment: it seems that you have the
Hi,
these were the required jar files suggested by netbeans: (i noticed
you didnt mention jut.jar in the comments of your code)
juh.jar
jurt.jar
jut.jar
officebean.jar
ridl.jar
unoil.jar
One last remark: it is likely that your pacakge works because of
officebean.jar.
But I would
I tried executing the attached jar file on another ubuntu edgy box
WITHOUT netbeans or the OO sdk...with just OO2.04 (the standard Ubuntu
openoffice installation) installed, it works perfectly, if i do either
: java -jar helloworld.jar or if do a launch with JVM from the Gnome
file manager...
In fact... officebean.jar is not required for the helloworld appit
was suggested by the netbeans wizard, but it will work without it
On 2/5/07, Rony G. Flatscher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One last remark: it is likely that your pacakge works because of
officebean.jar.
But I would not
Hi,
In fact... officebean.jar is not required for the helloworld appit
was suggested by the netbeans wizard, but it will work without it
That is very interesting!
Could you please either send me the jar-file (or its included manifest
file) and the settings of CLASSPATH, PATH and
Hi Stephan,
The Ubuntu layout you described in a previous mail (libs in
/usr/lib/openoffice/program, jars in /usr/share/java/openoffice)
cannot work (at least not without some modifications to the OOo code
base). Not sure why Ubuntu decided to ship a broken OOo (maybe they
are not even aware
Hi Jürgen,
the problem is quite simple. The Ubuntu guys install OpenOffice or
part of it in a way which is not supported in all cases. For example
the Java UNO bootstrap mechanism depends on a specific layout
(directory structure, Stephan has pointed out earlier).
And yes i agree that they
Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
Hi,
In fact... officebean.jar is not required for the helloworld appit
was suggested by the netbeans wizard, but it will work without it
That is very interesting!
Could you please either send me the jar-file (or its included manifest
file) and the settings of
i have sent you the project with the build scripts offlist...
but you dont need things like ld_library_path for the jar deploymet to
work... there is an installationfinder loader packaged within the
jar which locates the openoffice installation and other arbitary paths
automatically which i
Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
See, I would like to learn what is needed for an out-of-the-box Ubuntu
OOo installation to be employed to run Java apps from the command line.
(Here SDK/NetBeans/Eclipse setups can come into ones way as it is then
not always clear which environment is in effect under
Hi there,
thanks to everyone, I was not aware of special needs to find OOo. Ashok
was kind enough to send me his jar file, and its content is:
Archive: helloworld.jar
testing: META-INF/OK
testing: META-INF/MANIFEST.MF OK
testing: org/ OK
Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
However, *where* would one find the com.sun.star.lib.loader. package?
Look in the SDK/classes directory...
Get the SDK at api.openoffice.org
jim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Hi Jim,
However, *where* would one find the com.sun.star.lib.loader. package?
Look in the SDK/classes directory...
Get the SDK at api.openoffice.org
Oh, I see. Was not aware of that at all.
But this would mean that one cannot reliably deploy Java applications
from the command line without
Hi there,
just a stupid question: why doesn't the Bootstrap helper class use the
com.sun.star.lib.loader. knowing the important role of that library to
find the OO executable ?
Regards,
---rony
However, *where* would one find the com.sun.star.lib.loader. package?
Look in the
Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
Hi Stephan,
The Ubuntu layout you described in a previous mail (libs in
/usr/lib/openoffice/program, jars in /usr/share/java/openoffice)
cannot work (at least not without some modifications to the OOo code
base). Not sure why Ubuntu decided to ship a broken OOo (maybe
Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
Hi there,
just a stupid question: why doesn't the Bootstrap helper class use the
com.sun.star.lib.loader. knowing the important role of that library to
find the OO executable ?
See http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66050 for a
planned improvement in
Mathias Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As long as no must changes are due the only disadvantage of binfilter
in its current form is that it must be rebuilt sometimes. That's bearable.
That reads each time for almost everybody outside Sun. But OTOH, it
would prolly only shave off 3 minutes on
Jens-Heiner Rechtien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Hm - hard to estimate how many of those binary documents are still in
active use. And it would be interesting if they are kept just because
of laziness, or for good reasons (I clearly suspect the former).
Laziness is
Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
Hi Stephan,
, in the case of the ooRexx scripting engine:
* there is a platform dependent DLL/so which needs to be accessible
(at the moment I copy it into OOoHome/program), so the library
is *not* an UNO-component, just a native library,
* there
Hi Rüdiger,
being late to the thread, and being the one who implicitly initiated
this ...
Why would you copy additional stuff into binfilter?
Because binfilter has a code base which lives several years in the past,
whilst the current code base moves forward constantly. At some point,
you
Hi Stefan,
Any chance you can help me get some skeletal unit tests setup for CWS
configrefactor01 ? I'm very happy to write nice chunks of unit test, but
getting the environment setup (and some config data to play with) is
more problematic I think. I checked in the (simple enough)
Hello 蒋闯,
As far as I can see the the file format is broken. I think you have
bypassed the localization procedure. The process is described here:
http://www.khmeros.info/tools/oo2.0_program_translaltion.html
Pavel, please correct me if you have a better link for this case.
You also may try to
Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi Stefan,
Any chance you can help me get some skeletal unit tests setup for CWS
configrefactor01 ? I'm very happy to write nice chunks of unit test, but
getting the environment setup (and some config data to play with) is
more problematic I think. I checked in the
Hello,
Why the mathematical formulas in all OO versions have so low graphic
quality?
This happens specially when you save as HTML to publish online.
3+2 can appear as 3-2 !
From version to version of OO you can see many design changes: icons, logos,
presentations, buttons,...
but when it
Hi,
I would like to work on a change to the sc code.
I have built the 2.0.4 source on my machine, and browsed the code for a
month or so.
The change my company wants me to make involves improving the drawing of the
cells area of the sc window. Currently, it flashes, because the whole
thing is
Gregg Weber wrote:
I would like to work on a change to the sc code.
I have built the 2.0.4 source on my machine, and browsed the code for a
month or so.
The change my company wants me to make involves improving the drawing of
the
cells area of the sc window. Currently, it flashes, because the
31 matches
Mail list logo
