,
---rony
On 04.09.2011 18:56, Niklas Nebel wrote:
In case anyone is still reading these lists:
I have left Oracle and started a new job, not related to
OpenOffice.org. Because of this, I won't have enough time for any
meaningful participation in the new OpenOffice.org at Apache. So
it's time
the
standalone Rexx scripts via the command line, including the GUI
UNO_API_info tool.)
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask them.
---rony
--- cut here
Announcing the new release of BSF4ooRexx, 2011-08-22
On 11.06.2011 17:55, Niklas Nebel wrote:
On 11.06.2011 17:43, rony wrote:
On 11.06.2011 17:36, Niklas Nebel wrote:
Dependencies on LGPL libraries may soon become a problem.
What would be the problem here?
[Just curious why it was o.k. in the past, but may be a problem
soon ?]
http
Hi Ariel,
On 11.06.2011 20:26, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hello rony,
On Saturday 11 June 2011, 12:43, rony wrote:
Hi Niklas,
On 11.06.2011 17:36, Niklas Nebel wrote:
Dependencies on LGPL libraries may soon become a problem.
What would be the problem here?
Oh
the pun) solvable
problem.
Sounds promising, nevertheless.
:)
---rony
--
-
To unsubscribe send email to dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands send email to sy...@openoffice.org
with Subject: help
it?
---rony
--
-
To unsubscribe send email to dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands send email to sy...@openoffice.org
with Subject: help
,
---rony
On 06.06.2011 18:07, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 17:28:24 +0200
rony ro...@openoffice.org wrote:
[... lots of hostile ranting ignored ...]
And by the way, if you wanted to be constructive, why did you not
supply a link to the place for reporting it? If it was easy
On 07.06.2011 12:53, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 12:45:09PM +0200, rony wrote:
Thank you very much for the link! In the meantime further information
has become available, thanks to Renés comments, so the installation
seems to be (very unfortunate!) intentional (to cripple
professionals should be able to rely on to be
available, if anyone else creates/distributes an OOo or LO package
(possibly with added functionality, leaving the base line, i.e.
standard/reference package, intact).
Regards,
---rony
P.S.: In the case of Ubuntu I would expect that they at least
interface with 11.04 bad
times, either taking their users hostage for experiments, or having
total amateurs in charge for the most important application there exists
for an operating system for PC-based end users.)
---rony
line does not work (using their unoinfo-output for Java) !
Instead one needs to deinstall LO, remove ~/.libreoffice in home, get
the official LO distribution and install it, then things start to work
as was the case in the past with OOo.
Unbelievable !
---rony
P.S.: Maybe the Ubuntu people do
that at least explain/clarify parts of these questions at this
point in time?
TIA,
---rony
--
-
To unsubscribe send email to dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands send email to sy...@openoffice.org
with Subject: help
On 11.04.2011 16:16, Joachim Lingner wrote:
On 11.04.11 15:35, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 04/11/11 14:42, rony wrote:
On 11.04.2011 13:16, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 04/11/11 12:24, rony wrote:
What I would be after would be to get this information at
installation
time without any user
Hi there,
should I open an issue for this? If so, whom should I assign it to?
---rony
On 10.04.2011 13:53, rony wrote:
Hi there,
testing all kind of combinations, the following behaviour can be observed:
* case 1: starting OOo via the Application folder
o case 1a (OOo
Dear Stephan and Thomas,
thank you for your pointers!
On 11.04.2011 09:54, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 04/09/11 11:27, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
for an installation routine it is necessary to determine whether the
installed version of OOo is 32- or 64-bit, as this determines which
libraries
On 11.04.2011 13:16, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 04/11/11 12:24, rony wrote:
What I would be after would be to get this information at installation
time without any user-interaction (most won't know what would be asked)
in a platform independent manner.
Something equivalent to a hyptohetic
this seems to be a bug in OOo's scripting framework support
on MacOSX resp. the Java environment set up by OOo before executing the
scripting framework functionality.
Is there anything I could do/try?
If not, should I file an issue (and if so, what level and whom to assign
to) ?
---rony
versions then the request would be for all
platforms)? If so, what would be the correct means?
TIA
---rony
--
-
To unsubscribe send email to dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands send email to sy...@openoffice.org
in the context of
the scripting framework if doing a Tools - Macro - Run!
Is there anything I could (try) to do ?
TIA,
---rony
On 08.04.2011 17:29, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
Hi there,
currently debugging a scripting language added to OOo 3.3 via an
oxt-extension. The integration into OOo is done
framework editor to load a script
first thing and run it off the editor in the first OOo session,
then everything works (also subsequent dispatches).
Does anyone have any ideas what might cause such a phenomenon?
Any ideas highly welcome!
TIA,
---rony
Hi Christian,
On 15.02.2011 22:30, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi Rony, *,
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Rony G. Flatscher
rony.flatsc...@wu-wien.ac.at wrote:
in the meantime it has become possible to install an oxt-package that
adds ooRexx as a new macro language to OOo on the MacOSX
Hi Alex,
On 16.02.2011 10:46, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
Le 15/02/11 21:49, Rony G. Flatscher a écrit :
Hi Rony,
in the meantime it has become possible to install an oxt-package that
adds ooRexx as a new macro language to OOo on the MacOSX.
The tested ooRexx scripts run correctly
On 16.02.2011 12:21, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
Le 16/02/11 11:57, rony a écrit :
Hi Rony,
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92926
*UNBELIEVABLLE !!!*
This is just unbelievable, having P2 priority and no one really fixes this
for years it seems? How can
Hi Alex,
On 16.02.2011 14:47, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
Le 16/02/11 12:07, rony a écrit :
Thanks for the links, will check them out. As it happens, the ports
mechanism on Mac has oorexx so I have done installed it through the
ports system.
Yes, but be aware that the version
setup if one wishes to achieve that? Is
there a readme or wiki somewhere describing the necessary environment?
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
On 15.02.2011 13:31, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 02/15/11 11:54, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
trying to figure out the setup needs for OOo 3.3 on MacOSX, if wishing
to use Java from the commandline to bootstrap and work with OOo 3.3.
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide
/OpenOffice.org.app/Contents/program
propValue=/Applications/OpenOffice.org.app
propValue=/Applications/OpenOffice.org.app/Contents/basis-link/program
propValue=/Applications/OpenOffice.org.app/Contents/basis-link
---rony
On 15.02.2011 16:27, rony wrote:
On 15.02.2011 13:31, Stephan Bergmann
are candidates for that to occur. However, on Windows and Linux
this does not happen as there are (global) references to these Java
objects which should inhibit any disposals.
TIA,
---rony
On 15.02.2011 16:27, rony wrote:
On 15.02.2011 13:31, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 02/15/11 11:54, Rony
=$CLASSPATH:$UNO_PATH:$OOOJAVA/juh.jar:$OOOJAVA/jurt.jar:$OOOJAVA/ridl.jar
export
CLASSPATH=$CLASSPATH:/Applications/OpenOffice.org.app/Contents/basis-link/program/classes/unoil.jar
---rony
on Windows and Linux.
Any ideas what could be the reason? Where would I find any logs on
MacOSX relating to such a problem (where is OOo logging errors to on
that platform)?
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
contributor.
What you do is truly great, btw. Thanks a lot Ariel.
+1
++1
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
Hi Stephan,
On 14.09.2010 14:55, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 09/14/10 08:21, rony wrote:
The logfile (and a text-file giving information on the system) can be
found at:http://wi.wu.ac.at/rgf/tmp/OOo/.
One odd thing in
http://wi.wu.ac.at/rgf/tmp/OOo/ubuntu%5fdesktop%5f1004%5fsoffice%2estrace
Dear Stephan,
On 15.09.2010 11:51, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 09/15/10 08:12, rony wrote:
administra...@flatscher:~$ ls -alF
/home/administrator/.openoffice.org/ hadm-ooo.txt
insgesamt 12
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 2010-09-06 10:04 ./
drwxr-xr-x 33
available with
scripting on that particular machine (so it is more curiosity than
necessity to figure out what is happening on that Ubuntu-10.04-desktop
installation, which came without Java orginally).
Regards,
---rony
On 13.09.2010 17:47, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 09/13/10 15:13, rony wrote
uninstalling all
Java may have left over some settings that are causing this phenomenon.)
---rony
On 06.09.2010 20:36, rony wrote:
On 06.09.2010 16:47, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 09/06/10 12:39, rony wrote:
On 06.09.2010 11:55, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 09/06/10 11:37, Rony G
this infrastructure will be available
(maybe the earliest estimation) ?
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
On 06.09.2010 16:47, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 09/06/10 12:39, rony wrote:
On 06.09.2010 11:55, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 09/06/10 11:37, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
After a fresh install of a German Ubuntu-desktop 10.4.1 and
starting any
OOo module a popup error comes along informing one
into OOo and learns,
that it does not work) and how to remedy it?
TIA,
---rony
On 06.09.2010 11:55, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 09/06/10 11:37, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
After a fresh install of a German Ubuntu-desktop 10.4.1 and starting any
OOo module a popup error comes along informing one that OOo cannot
determine the user-interface language and then aborts.
So
Retrying...
On 24.08.2010 11:54, rony wrote:
Hi René,
On 24.08.2010 10:38, Rene Engelhard wrote:
rony, OK please try
$ cd /usr/lib/ure/share/java
$ ln -f ../../../../share/java/openoffice/jurt.jar jurt.jar
Yup, that makes it work !
---rony
Hi René,
On 24.08.2010 10:38, Rene Engelhard wrote:
rony, OK please try
$ cd /usr/lib/ure/share/java
$ ln -f ../../../../share/java/openoffice/jurt.jar jurt.jar
Yup, that makes it work !
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e
a problem in the Ubuntu distribution with the setup
somewhere.
Regards,
---rony
On 23.08.2010 11:42, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 21/08/2010 23:57, rony wrote:
Hi René,
sorry that it took a while to get back, but I got totally carried away
changing/enhancing the installation scripts and had
?
Is there a command-line utility which one could use to make sure that
after unopkg OOo gets reliably shutdown? Or with other words: how could
one make sure in an un/installation script, that OOo has completely shut
down after unopkg, before proceeding ?
---rony
explicitly leavees an instance open.)
sorry for the noise, just found what I need: XDesktop.terminate().
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
Hi René,
On 23.08.2010 16:05, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:01:45PM +0200, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
for installing an extension (under Ubuntu in this particular case) in an
installation script the command-line tool unopkg is used. When
starting OOo thereafter a warning
the Ubuntu-OOo after
deinstalling the genuine OOo?
(Or do I have to go through Synaptic manager and check all sort of
modules (with the risk that I am overlooking an important one, given
that the OOo related modules seem to be quite dispersed.)
---rony
/../basis-link/program/classes/unoil.jar:/usr/lib/openoffice/progra
The genuine OOo will have practically the same setting, except that its
directory would be pointed to:
/opt/openoffice.org3/program/../basis-link/ure-link/share/java/*.
HTH,
---rony
On 17.08.2010 21:32, rony wrote:
Hi René
?
I can tell you, that on Mandriva OOo installs itself into /opt, so I
would expect a similar behaviour on Fedora and SuSE as well, since the
rpm-packages are all the same. ;)
Good to know!Maybe a last question: which Linux distributions are known
to be 100%
Regards,
---rony
Björn,
On 16.08.2010 16:56, Björn Michaelsen wrote:
Am Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:12:50 +0200
schrieb Rony G. Flatscher rony.flatsc...@wu-wien.ac.at:
Maybe a last question: which Linux distributions are known to be 100%
compatible in their Java interfaces to OOo with the genuine OOo
Hi René,
On 17.08.2010 21:05, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 06:49:24PM +0200, rony wrote:
(Due to a package that excercises the Java-UNO-bridge I have stumbled
over Ubuntu's distro which seems to be broken in that area and read
Where exactly? (Ubuntu borrows my
the appropriate install
script?
* does the genuine OOo install into /opt on Fedora or SuSE as well?
Maybe a last question: which Linux distributions are known to be 100%
compatible in their Java interfaces to OOo with the genuine OOo ?
TIA,
---rony
should a German extension description file be authored, in
order for the package manager to dipslay the German umlauts correctly?
(Alternatively, is there a place where one could explicitly determine
which codepage got used to create that text? If so, where and how could
that be done?)
---rony
such that it
works (and it works great and as intended!).
Regards,
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
#sem_201007a.
---rony
.
ooRexx:http://www.ooRexx.org
BSF4ooRexx: http://wi.wu.ac.at/rgf/rexx/bsf4oorexx/current/
bundled Packages: {
none
}
Greatful for any further hints/suggestions!
---rony
who has created Java based extensions,
but was new for me! Just applied it and it now works like a charm!
Again, kudos to you and Oliver!
---rony
P.S.: Now, in hindsight (after your explanations) this makes perfect sense
is a little bit
unfortunate.]
TIA,
---rony
Hi Stephan,
On 16.07.2010 08:48, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 07/15/10 22:10, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
today I stumbled over the following interesting (read: time-consuming)
problem: while caching Java objects representing individual UNO_ENUM
values, all of a sudden
Hi Stephan,
On 16.07.2010 14:51, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 07/16/10 13:48, rony wrote:
On 16.07.2010 08:48, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 07/15/10 22:10, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
today I stumbled over the following interesting (read: time-consuming)
problem: while caching Java objects
objects representing individual UNO_ENUM
values really unsafe, i.e. the UNO side may garbage collect them?
(This seems to happen even if the Java class object representing the
UNO_ENUM gets cached!)
---rony
as a result of running
unopkg list --shared. The grep I am using on Windows is: GNU grep 2.5.3.)
Actually, the following does not work either under Windows:
unopkg list --shared test.txt
test.txt would be a 0-byte file.
Any ideas?
---rony
for
installing the OOo SDK.)
TIA,
---rony
is many times frustrating, especially for beginners in
an area of OOo (even experts of one or two modules are beginners if
turning to new modules). There is a lot of resources that is being
wasted just to figure out what the original cause of an exception was,
if possible at all.]
---rony
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 03/11/09 15:12, rony wrote:
[Yes, I wholeheartedly agree, that the current situation is many
times frustrating, especially for beginners in an area of OOo (even
experts of one or two modules are beginners if turning to new
modules). There is a lot of resources
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 03/11/09 15:12, rony wrote:
[Yes, I wholeheartedly agree, that the current situation is many
times frustrating, especially for beginners in an area of OOo (even
experts of one or two modules are beginners if turning to new
modules). There is a lot of resources
, but that I
will loose interest.
+1
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
on interdependencies between OOo Basic and
invoked non-OOo-Basic code via Java that bootstraps independently to OOo
in order to get a xContext?
TIA,
---rony
P.S.: Here's the OOo Basic code-snippet to invoke the ooRexx script via
dispatch:
-- cut here -
Sub
TWO arguments, instead of only
one. The last argument is of type Boolean and has a value of True.
Any comments/hints/explanations now that only genuine OOo
functionality is used? Does this qualify as a bug?
Regards,
---rony
Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) wrote:
Hi there,
not sure whether dev
generates a simple HTML page - no content
directly use able as Wiki content. But feel free to change
the script so it exports the list using the right format .-)
Is there a way to also get the file-type patterns for each filter?
---rony
then
type_registration = fprops(p).Value
... use type_registration ( which is an internal type name)
... to retrieve it's property Extensions and print it out
endif
you should be able to extend your list view very easy.
Thank you *very* much, indeed!
Regards,
---rony
, in order to solve your
problem. Your findings could be valuable for other readers of this list,
hence the request to report back your findings/advice.]
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
.
---rony
P.S.: Of course I am always interested in seeing the Smalltalk snippets
from time to time to relate to another posting of yours...
/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/ProUNO/Collections_and_Containers
it seems that XEnumerationAccess is a subclass of XContainer and as
such possesses the XRefreshableInterface, which you then would neet to
query explicitly from the XEnumerationAcess object.
HTH,
---rony
is written in C++, the BSF4Rexx package enables ooRexx to
camouflage Java as ooRexx (bridging ooRexx and Java in both directions).
The ooRexx interaction with OOo uses the OOo Java bridge, hence the
packaging of the OOo support with BSF4Rexx.
---rony
Original Message
Subject
be available already, or whether one needs to
query that interface). However, this may be interesting in other
contexts, where a service object is returned and it may be interesting
to know which interfaces got queried for already.
---rony
at runtime?
E:\rony\dev\bsf\src\binrexxtry
REXX-ooRexx_3.2.0(MT) 6.02 16 Jun 2008
rexxtry.rex lets you interactively try REXX statements.
Each string is executed when you hit Enter.
Enter 'call tell' for a description of the features.
Go on - try a few
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote:
Hi Rony,
I did start the discussions regarding Java version, OpenJDK, baseline
etc. on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sorry for not announcing it here. Reason for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is, that all stakeholders from the last agreement
!
Is [EMAIL PROTECTED] an OOo mailing list that one should subscribe to to learn
as early as possible about Java related changes (configuration, class
loader schemes,etc.)?
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
to it)!
Regards,
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi there,
after upgrading to FireFox 3.0 the OpenOffice.org menu extension is Not
compatible with Firefox 3.0 and therefore disabled.
Are there any plans to update this little (and from time to time very
helpful) add-on?
---rony
into FireFox 3.0.
However, FF was not able to find a newer version of the menu extension,
when it automatically checked for one! Maybe one needs to change further
version information in the rdf- and installation js-files as well?
Anyway, being a very happy camper...
:)
Regards,
---rony
Hi there,
just noticed that running DEV300/m23 with Java 1.4 does not work anymore:
- cut here -
E:\rony\dev\bsf\src\bintestOOo.rex
Exception in thread main java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError:
com/sun/star/comp/helper/Bootstrap (Unsupported major.minor version 49.0
from any of the OOo supported
scripting languages.
TIA,
---rony
) should I try to assign
such an issue?
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
running already and on which Java has been
deployed already independent of OOo!
Just my 2 cents...
---rony
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi *,
On Nov 11, 2007 3:54 AM, jonathon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rony wrote:
FWIW: MS Word has been having that ability for quite a few versions now.
There one would use the Language tab on styles to define what language
it is used for (on that dialog
install and de-install
it, using the Software option in the System folder. However, some
associations (I think ODT or ODS) did not get restored correctly.
Start-up times are abmysal in this beta drop, not sure whether IBM is
able to improve that.
---rony
://www.opensource.org/ is a good place for researching all
sort of OSS licenses (on the left column), [L]GPL's home would be at
http://www.gnu.org/.
HTH,
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e
the progress of a presentation which is adjustable on
the click of a mouse in case a presentation got changed (added/removed
slides):
Original Message
Subject:[api-dev] Announcing OpenOffice-Impress-Snippets in ooRexx ...
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 21:30:42 +0200
From: rony [EMAIL
an issue for that problem.
Should I assign it to someone already?
Thanks!
---rony
P.S.: As a sidenote: it would be possible with the help of Apache's
upcoming BSF 3.0 (in beta at the moment) to employ javax.script
(introduced with Java 6) on earlier versions of Java (BSF 3.0 is
compiled for Java 4
quick answers!
---rony
P.S.: Of course all OOo jars would be needed in addition that reside in
the classes directory.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Jürgen,
did submit the issue and set it to P1 (highest priority), as maybe other
third party Java based components/extensions may be affected by this too.
(Though P1 might have been to high.)
Here's the URL: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81445.
Regards,
---rony
Juergen Schmidt wrote:
Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
Hi Jürgen,
did submit the issue and set it to P1 (highest priority), as maybe other
third party Java based components/extensions may be affected by this
too.
(Though P1 might have been to high.)
Here's the URL:
http://www.openoffice.org
established, then it might become
possible over time, to generate even the new glue code from it.)
Again, this is pure speculation and could be totally undoable, but maybe
not.
Ceterum censeo, new macro recording ... ?
---rony
and compile it if there is a compelling need; but
the knowledge about many of the C++ idosyncrasies has faded).
---
Ceterum censeo, macro recording ...
:)
Regards,
---rony
Mathias Bauer wrote:
Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
But there must be a mapping available which maps from UNO to C++ as
otherwise the C++ code would not be invocable via UNO?
Of course: this is the Dispatch API! The UI elements use die Dispatch
API to call a method in a UNO object
and locks them into MSO.)
/begin|end opinion, feelings, not quotable as facts
---rony
as it should be done for *all* modules as quickly
as possible, if OOo should win and take over the hearts of the OOo
users, especially the huge group of end-users sitting in all of these
departments that should be migrated from MSO to OOo!
Just my 2 cents.
---rony
P.S.: If designed and done right
to discuss this, before really going out and
filing an issue (possibly wrongly).
you can submit an issue for the docu if you want
Hmm, maybe this is not warranted (saving resources for other issues).
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e
this, before really going out and
filing an issue (possibly wrongly).
Any comments/hints/insights?
---rony
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
