ICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repository.
> [ ] All files have license headers as specified by OpenWhisk project
> policy [1].
> [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
>
> This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours.
>
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-release/blob/master/docs/license_compliance.md
--
Regards,
James Thomas
+1
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 19:27, Matt Rutkowski wrote:
> +1 All for keeping our clients updated and released regularly.
>
>
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
n is: 'Does the result
> > contain an error field?'). But also other decision logic may be
> > applicable.
> >
> > This PR https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4604 is a small change
> > that extends ActivationFileStorage.
> >
> > Please help and comment on the PR.
> >
> > Thank you, Ruediger
> >
> >
--
Regards,
James Thomas
/openwhisk/apache-openwhisk-3.20.0/
--
Regards,
James Thomas
The voting is now closed. The vote has PASSED with 4 +1 binding votes from
Dominic Kim, Matt Rutkowski, Dave Grove and Rob Allen. There were no
+0 or -1 votes.
I will now publish the artifact to the release directory.
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 12:32, James Thomas wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Th
ch OpenWhisk repository.
> > [ ] All files have license headers as specified by OpenWhisk project
> > policy [1].
> > [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
> >
> > This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> >
> > [1]
> > https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-release/blob/master/docs/license_compliance.md
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
/docs/license_compliance.md
--
Regards,
James Thomas
is now being added
> > > > to launch the Api Gateway with Standalone Server [1]. With this it
> > > > should be possible to direct new OpenWhisk users to use the Standalone
> > > > server to try out various features provided by OpenWhisk
> > > >
> > > > So far tests look fine and would now like to seek some feedback from
> > > > community on this feature. For this it would be helpful if you can try
> > > > out a beta build and see if it works as expected
> > > >
> > > > # Fetch custom docker build of apigateway which has
> > > > apache/incubator-openwhisk-apigateway#347 fixed
> > > > $ docker pull chetanmeh/apigateway
> > > >
> > > > # Download the openwhisk-standalone jar
> > > > $ wget
> > > >
> > > https://github.com/chetanmeh/incubator-openwhisk/releases/download/0.11/openwhisk-standalone.jar
> > > > $ java -Dwhisk.standalone.api-gateway.image=chetanmeh/apigateway -jar
> > > > openwhisk-standalone.jar --api-gw
> > > >
> > > > Post this you can use the steps as mentioned in [2] to check out the
> > > > gateway support.
> > > >
> > > > Please share any feedback on #4571 or this mail thread
> > > >
> > > > Chetan Mehrotra
> > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/4571
> > > > [2]
> > > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/blob/master/docs/apigateway.md
> > > >
> > >
--
Regards,
James Thomas
| 2017-07-12
> 47| incubator-openwhisk-podspecs | 2017-07-12
> 48| incubator-openwhisk-client-python | 2017-07-10
> 49| incubator-openwhisk-package-jira | 2017-07-10
> 50| incubator-openwhisk-selfserve-test | 2017-06-26
> 51| incubator-openwhisk-GitHubSlackBot | 2017-03-16
> 52| incubator-openwhisk-sample-slackbot| 2017-01-25
--
Regards,
James Thomas
Rat 0.13 and
> found no other problems.
>
> --dave
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-client-js/pull/189
>
> On 2019/08/01 15:44:50, James Thomas wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is a call to vote on releasing version 3.20.0 release candidate
>
idual steps manually.
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/293
--
Regards,
James Thomas
lease.
[ ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repository.
[ ] All files have license headers as specified by OpenWhisk project
policy [1].
[ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours.
--
Regards,
James Thomas
67643.html
On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 at 17:16, Rodric Rabbah wrote:
>
> This will be the first release post graduation. I’d like to make sure we’ve
> gone through and closed issues raised in previous incubator votes.
>
> -r
>
> > On Jul 22, 2019, at 12:10 PM, James Thomas wr
/apache/incubator-openwhisk-client-js/issues/162
[2 - https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-client-js/issues/158
& https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-client-js/issues/159
[3] - https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-client-js/issues/177
--
Regards,
James Thomas
p
> > Change the Apache HBase Project Chair (Duo Zhang, VP)
> > Establish the Apache OpenWhisk Project (Dave Grove, VP)
> > Change the Apache Attic Project Chair (Mads Toftum, VP)
>
>
> \o/
>
> Rob
--
Regards,
James Thomas
e quite different, the
> > method of migrating a package name is similarly not well-defined in
> > both systems.
> >
> > Does anyone have more info about how NPM runs their repository? Maybe
> > they can add in some redirects of some sort.
> >
> > On Mon, 15
rom
non-committers. We just need a clear intent by the author to
contribute under our normal terms."
There are other links in the blog post to ASF projects discussing this
in the past and coming to the same conclusion.
--
Regards,
James Thomas
; that would be my preferred choice.
> >
> > However, I feel that, given our Scala background, Rust would be a much
> better choice for the KnativeWhisk controller. So I propose to use Rust
> for the KwhiskController.
> >
> > What does the community think of the proposal?
> >
> >
> > --
> > Michele Sciabarra
> > mich...@sciabarra.com
> >
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
[2] - following NPM JS module conventions - apache-openwhisk is much
preferable than a single word (apacheopenwhisk).
--
Regards,
James Thomas
ow
> nightly), I think we should pin all the dependent images etc and make a
> release available.
>
> An existential question is whether we should use the standalone controller
> which is faster to startup and adapt our docs accordingly.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -r
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
t; write/execute".
> "51" would mean the owner can do "read/not write/execute".
>
> There might be more cases, but I believe we can deal with them in the same
> way.
> Any feedback or idea on this would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks
> Best regards,
> Dominic
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
-openwhisk-client-js/pull/180
--
Regards,
James Thomas
the release
> > > > [ ] 0 Don't care
> > > > [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
> > > >
> > > > Release verification checklist for reference:
> > > > [ ] Download links are valid.
> > > > [ ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
> > > > [ ] DISCLAIMER is included.
> > > > [ ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
> > > > release.
> > > > [ ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk
> > repository.
> > > > [ ] All files have license headers as specified by OpenWhisk
> project
> > > > policy [1].
> > > > [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
> > > >
> > > > This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/blob/master/docs/license_compliance.md
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Santana
> >
> >
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
on the PRs. *
--
Regards,
James Thomas
> >>
> > > > > >> Chetan Mehrotra
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 4:57 PM Nick Mitchell <
> > moose...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>>
> > > >
Does anyone have anything for the meeting on Wednesday? I can add you
to the agenda as I'm running the call. I know there's lots of exciting
stuff going on from the mailing list so if anyone wants to share on
the call - let me know!
--
Regards,
James Thomas
d this release be numbered 0.10.0 or 1.0.0?
> >
> > --dave
> >
> > [1]
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ddf47c05e72426a47f0a414e1dd68cc6075fa4a60be1753318ebfe58@%3Cdev.openwhisk.apache.org%3E
--
Regards,
James Thomas
the NPM guidelines from ASF, we comply with all of them
apart from the name. I've opened an issue to track this and will wait
on the legal discussion.
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-client-js/issues/169
--
Regards,
James Thomas
on planning for rotation.
>
> > I’d like to nominate Dave Grove for consideration.
>
> Thanks Rodric. I'm happy to take a turn at some point. Whether that's
> soon or a couple years down the road doesn't matter to me.
>
> -dave
--
Regards,
James Thomas
12:30 PM, David P Grove wrote:
> >
> > WhiskerControl
--
Regards,
James Thomas
u=https-3A__cwiki.apache.org_confluence_pages_viewpage.action-3FpageId-3D115526932=DwIBaQ=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg=LUNmCHjmrhrkjp9ZF9fhwg=LFSSfkEdvRwfS3FkELMfDq_7zw2s2_TKfw_AXT9Dw2o=YGyPOxDTHT-HjpQZb1_UMuX4dySHKqv0FH0AkPlJjpg=
> > [4]
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__incubator.apache.org_guides_graduation.html-23community-5Fgraduation-5Fvote=DwIBaQ=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg=LUNmCHjmrhrkjp9ZF9fhwg=LFSSfkEdvRwfS3FkELMfDq_7zw2s2_TKfw_AXT9Dw2o=oYAfkquuRCiMbdk0S-TF9_IG9jFe1OYc-qtxFDjBf2Q=
> >
> >
--
Regards,
James Thomas
The voting is now closed. The vote has PASSED with 4 +1 binding votes from
Rodric Rabbah, Ying Chun Guo, Matt Rutkowski and Dave Grove and no +0
or -1 votes.
I'll send the notice to the incubator mailing list to get the vote
started there.
On Thu, 30 May 2019 at 17:42, James Thomas wrote
lease.
[ ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repository.
[ ] All files have license headers if necessary.
[ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours.
--
Regards,
James Thomas
t; >
> > > > Usage:
> > > > curl -s "
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-openwhisk-release.git;a=blob_plain;f=tools/rcverify.sh;hb=HEAD
> > > > " -o rcverify.sh
> > > > chmod +x rcverify.sh
> > > > rcverify.sh openwhisk-apigateway 'OpenWhisk API Gateway'
> > > 0.10.0-incubating
> > > > rc2
> > > >
> > > > Please vote to approve this release:
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > > > [ ] 0 Don't care
> > > > [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
> > > >
> > > > Release verification checklist for reference:
> > > > [ ] Download links are valid.
> > > > [ ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
> > > > [ ] DISCLAIMER is included.
> > > > [ ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
> > > > release.
> > > > [ ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk
> > repository.
> > > > [ ] All files have license headers as specified by OpenWhisk project
> > > > policy [1].
> > > > [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
> > > >
> > > > This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/blob/master/docs/license_compliance.md
> > > > [2]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/3a33c365fb755f364385bff06ac681912fd1af7a43a9b58a881d6b85@%3Cdev.openwhisk.apache.org%3E
> > > >
> > >
> >
--
Regards,
James Thomas
t; Please vote to approve this release:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > [ ] 0 Don't care
> > [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
> >
> > Release verification checklist for reference:
> > [ ] Download links are valid.
> > [ ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
> > [ ] DISCLAIMER is included.
> > [ ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
> > release.
> > [ ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repository.
> > [ ] All files have license headers as specified by OpenWhisk project
> > policy [1].
> > [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
> >
> > This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/blob/master/docs/license_compliance.md
> > [2] https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/281
> >
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-runtime-nodejs/commit/386b13d5642e7e8d9dee00913fc97d529c9637ef
--
Regards,
James Thomas
; http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval lists
> what's required for releases.
>
> -Bertrand
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
lease.
[ ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repository.
[ ] All files have license headers if necessary.
[ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours.
--
Regards,
James Thomas
ot change it - openwhisk has a uniform model across all the
> >> runtimes and this would start to diverge... i can be convinced but
> >instinct
> >> is to leave it alone.
> >>
> >
> >I think the change could be justified if it was part of a broader
> redesign
> >to enable concurrent activations in a runtime.
> >1. pass in a context object instead of stashing
> activation-specific
> >params in the environment
> >2. require proper structured logging
> >
> >--dave
> >
> >
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
nd should be OK
> > this time... but the catalog actions that are pinned to node6 will need
> to
> > be updated in a second phase.
> >
> > -r
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 12:52 PM James Thomas
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wednesday
re's lots more details about the project in the project README and I've
now written a blog post in more details about the project here:
http://jamesthom.as/blog/2019/04/29/apache-openwhisk-web-action-http-proxy/
--
Regards,
James Thomas
using these SDKs "in the wild"
and can't see a valid use-case for continuing to provide them given all the
changes in the platform since they were introduced.
Does anyone have any comments? If not, I'll open a PR in the CLI to start
removing them.
--
Regards,
James Thomas
on to fix the
failures (https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/4450)
--
Regards,
James Thomas
one have any feedback on those proposals?
--
Regards,
James Thomas
gt; [ ] DISCLAIMER is included.
> [ ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
> release.
> [ ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repository.
> [ ] All files have license headers if necessary.
> [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
>
> This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours.
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
the release and help us.
Minor issues raised during the vote from members have been captured
and will be fixed in the next release.
-- Forwarded message -
From: James Thomas
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 17:14
Subject: [VOTE]: Release Apache OpenWhisk Client JS (incubating) 3.19.0
js/pull/151
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-client-js/pull/152
> > >
> > > I've opened a new PR to add the missing files necessary for a release.
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-client-js/pull/154
> >
your agenda items!
>
> Call details:
> Zoom: https://zoom.us/j/5043933185
>
> Wednesday April 3rd
> - 11AM EST(Eastern US)
> - 5PM CET (Central Europe),
> - 4PM UTC, 12AM CST (Beijing)
>
>
> Thanks
> Tyson
--
Regards,
James Thomas
On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 17:21, James Thomas wrote:
>
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 17:40, Carlos Santana wrote:
> >
> > Using the website I would think it doesn’t count as verifying the artifacts.
> >
> > Just playing devils advocate here.
> >
> > Going
On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 12:07, James Thomas wrote:
> > Non-binding +1:
> > Matt Sicker
>
> I think this might be wrong now that I'm a mentor? Or does it only
> apply to the IPMC vote?
>
> --
> Matt Sicker
--
Regards,
James Thomas
bout using an external service, you can host the tool
yourself.
--
Regards,
James Thomas
Mar 2019 at 12:57, Sobkowiak Krzysztof
wrote:
> +1
>
> Best regards
>
> Krzysztof
>
>
> On 18.03.2019 19:14, James Thomas wrote:
> > This is to call for a vote for the release of Apache OpenWhisk Client JS
> > (incubating) 3.19.0
> >
> > List of J
Matt Sicker
There were no -1 or 0 votes.
The vote has passed in the dev list of OpenWhisk, based on Apache voting policy.
I am closing the vote mail thread, and will send out another email for
IPMC to vote.
-- Forwarded message -
From: James Thomas
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 at 18:14
experience in this provide guidance on which is
correct?
--
Regards,
James Thomas
f the steps using a shell script similar to
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/sling-tooling-release/blob/master/check_staged_release.sh
> > "
> > in one of the recent release vote threads.
> >
> > Thanks to James Thomas, we have a web-based verificat
ISCLAIMER is included.
> [ ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> [ ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repository.
> [ ] All files have license headers if necessary.
> [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
>
> regards,
>
> --dave
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
U3h2nElV5sk_WI=
>
> - Wednesday March 20th
> 11AM EST(Eastern US)
> 5PM CET (Central Europe),
> 4PM UTC, 12AM CST (Beijing)
>
> Thanks,
> dragos
>
>
>
>
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
wskdeploy
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release and the reason
>
> Checklist for reference:
> [ ] Download links are valid.
> [ ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
> [ ] DISCLAIMER is included.
> [ ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current releas
.
--
Regards,
James Thomas
t
> considering graduation in parallel.
>
> Please share your thoughts,
>
> --dave
>
> [1]
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b2217c61caad5c7a0369699d06d44e5cf688d3cba982e354a45b8c78@%3Cdev.openwhisk.apache.org%3E
> [2]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=103091999
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
rom others. Assuming there are no technical blockers, I would
> > like to initiate a formal release process for these three components
> early
> > next week.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > --dave
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
eveloper tooling. For example, IBM Cloud Functions switched from a
> > "classic" ansible-driven VM-based deployment to a Kubernetes-based
> > deployment of OpenWhisk in the middle of 2018. None of our customers
> > noticed or cared (from their perspective nothing changed and all their
> > existing programs still run just fine).
> >
> > Finally, the focus of this project is where the community takes it. We
> can
> > even go multiple directions simultaneously. That's how open source works
> :)
> >
> >
> > --dave
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
> I'm thinking primarily to restrict this to web actions initially, although
> there are some extensions that are also reasonable to consider
> subsequently:
>
>1. we could also make it work for POST invoke, namely wsk action invoke
>--main.
>2. we can extend it to sequences so that you can create a sequence from
>fn@main1, fn@main2
>3. we can further extend it to conductor continuations
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/4349
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
wrote:
> This is awesome. Thanks James for sharing it.
>
> -r
>
> > On Feb 8, 2019, at 12:11 PM, James Thomas wrote:
> >
> > Hello Whiskers.
> >
> > On Wednesday's Community Call, I presented my work on building a
> "pluggable
> > trigger
the release?
Speak now or forever hold your peace (until the next release...)
--
Regards,
James Thomas
ation is added by the controller when an action is created or
> > updated unless already present. The default value for the annotation is
> > "false", meaning no key is injected to the action context.
> >
> > Furthermore comments and feedback is appreciated.
> >
> > -r
> >
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
nimal impacts with the hopes it will get our comm.
> thinking about what are the essential differentiators of OW to carry
> forward on a Kube/Knative stack.
>
> Kind regards,
> Matt
>
>
>
> From: James Thomas
> To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
> Date: 02/19/2019 06:01 AM
&g
compose use it by default?
> >
> > I'm trying to reproduce failures reported in the slack channel for
> > docker-compose/make quick-start and it occurred to me we can startup even
> > faster with the lean configuration.
> >
> > -r
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
That should be "Wednesday (February 20th)."
On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 at 11:55, James Thomas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please add to this thread any agenda items you'd like to discuss at the
> Tech Interchange call tomorrow - Wednesday (February 19th).
>
> Call details:
>
>
)
- Zoom: https://zoom.us/my/asfopenwhisk
--
Regards,
James Thomas
t; their own. But I'm finding that our nodejs6 runtime more convenient for
> >> some development because of its built-in packages.
> >>
> >> So I opened a draft PR (new on GitHub!) to add some packages to our
> images
> >> here:
> >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-runtime-nodejs/pull/111
> >>
> >> Feedback welcome and especially appreciated if you aren't a provider
> that
> >> runs their own images.
> >>
> >> -r
> >>
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
go-github
> repo.
> >
> > Thoughts on adding the app it to our openwhisk repos?
> >
> > -r
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
is appreciated by
> contributors
> > and project maintainers alike.
> >
> > I thank you for your patience if you've been waiting on me specifically
> for
> > a review. I am hoping that this round of housekeeping will help us all
> > regain some velocity on accepting contributions.
> >
> > -r
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
All feedback welcome!
--
Regards,
James Thomas
;
> Call details:
>
> Web Meeting: Tech Interchange (bi-weekly):
> - Day-Time: Wednesdays, 11AM EST(Eastern US), 5PM CET (Central Europe),
> 4PM UTC, 12AM CST (Beijing)
> - Zoom: https://zoom.us/my/asfopenwhisk
>
> Cheers,
>
> Justin Halsall
>
> Ps. Carlos I noted
cepted the invitation.
>
> Please join me in welcoming him!
>
> Regards,
> -- Carlos
>
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
r new Committer!
> >
> > Based on his ongoing and valuable contributions to the project, the
> > OpenWhisk PPMC has elected Rob Allen as a Committer and he has
> > accepted the invitation.
> >
> > Please join me in welcoming him!
> >
> > Regards,
> > -- Carlos
> >
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
a client
> > that could invoke a whisk action `onMessage`.
> >
> > I'd like to get feedback from the community at large as to this
> > proposal. Interested in your thoughts, ideas, etc.
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-apigateway/issues/325
> >
> > -Matt
> > matthew.ham...@gmail.com
> >
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
; >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 1:55 PM Shawn Black >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Howdy, all!
> > >> I would like to contribute the code for the .NET 2.1 runtime that I
> had
> > >> demoed earlier today during the 2018-10-10 Apache OpenWhisk Tech
> > >> Interchange meeting.
> > >> The current GitHub repo is:
> > >> https://github.com/shawnallen85/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet
> > >> Thanks!!Shawn
> >
> >
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
tor, Open Technology, IBM
> Cloud
>
> Notes ID: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: s...@us.ibm.com,
> Phone: +1(919)254-7182
> Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United
> States
>
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
es are correct for each OpenWhisk repo.
> [ ] All files have license headers if necessary.
> [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
>
> Thank you very much.
>
>
> Best wishes.
> Vincent Hou (侯胜博)
>
> Advisory Software Engineer, OpenWhisk Contributor, Open Technology, IBM
> Cloud
>
> Notes ID: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: s...@us.ibm.com,
> Phone: +1(919)254-7182
> Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United
> States
>
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
t release.
> [ ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repo.
> [ ] All files have license headers if necessary.
> [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> Best wishes.
> Vincent Hou (侯胜博)
>
> Advisory Software Engineer, OpenWhisk Contributor, Open Technology, IBM
> Cloud
>
> Notes ID: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: s...@us.ibm.com,
> Phone: +1(919)254-7182
> Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United
> States
>
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
o compiled archives bundled in source archive.
>
> Thank you very much.
>
>
> Best wishes.
> Vincent Hou (侯胜博)
>
> Advisory Software Engineer, OpenWhisk Contributor, Open Technology, IBM
> Cloud
>
> Notes ID: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: s...@us.ibm.com,
> Phone: +1(919)254-7182
> Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United
> States
>
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
With OpenWhisk I think we're very close to make AI Actions a first-class
> citizen for developers, and I've created a wiki to explore what it would
> take to get there [1]. Coincidently James Thomas also published today his
> experience with Tensorflow and OpenWhisk [2]
>
>
> I'm i
it is a tool to develop an action in go locally simulating what
> would happen when run in the real OpenWhisk.
>
>
> How does sound the idea? Is it worth the effort?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Michele Sciabarra
> openwh...@sciabarra.com
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
t; [ X ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repo.
> [ X ] All files have license headers if necessary.
> [ X ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
>
> Cheers,
> Justin Halsall
--
Regards,
James Thomas
| xargs -n10 file | grep -v ASCII
>
> -Bertrand
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
t;
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
ources.tar.gz
> > under the folder of apache-openwhisk-incubator-0.9.0-rc1.
> >
> > Shall we include the name "incubator" as part of the version name? Or it
> > does not sound attractive.
> >
> >
> > Best wishes.
> > Vincent Hou (侯胜博)
> >
> &
abarra.com
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018, at 6:31 PM, Rob Allen wrote:
> > > On 20 Jun 2018, at 16:24, Matt Rutkowski wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Can we go with 0.9.0?
> > > >
> > >
> > > 0.9.0 is fine with me.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Rob
> > >
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
ut
> wsk action invoke myAction --result -p message hello
>
> # 4. Test it
> cd ../openwhisk && ./gradlew install && cd ../openwhisk-runtime-ruby
> ./gradlew :tests:test --tests *actionContainers.
> Ruby25ActionContainerTests*
> ```
>
> Best,
> Kei
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
rter (June); I plan to
> post it tomorrow to the board's Wiki; please review and comment here or on
> our CWiki:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=85475755
>
> Thanks,
> Matt
>
> PS message me if you need CWiki access
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
t; nick
>
>
> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 7:22 AM, James Thomas
> wrote:
>
> > One of most frequent complaints[1][2][3] I hear from developers using
> > serverless platforms is coping with cold-start latency when dealing with
> > sudden bursts of traffic.
> >
]
https://twitter.com/search?f=tweets=default=%20%23AWSWishlist%20warm=typd
[3]
https://theburningmonk.com/2018/01/im-afraid-youre-thinking-about-aws-lambda-cold-starts-all-wrong/
[4] - https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/2795
--
Regards,
James Thomas
ps://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENWHISK/
> 2018-04-11+OW+Tech+Interchange+-+Meeting+Notes
>
> Will verify James when back in health can host on the 25th
>
> cheers,
> -mr
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
nt me to miss (as I will use primarily the "dev" list discussions, as
> > well as scan the merged PRs over last 3 months across most repos.
> >
> > Any help appreciated.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Matt
> >
> >
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
available.
>
>
> Alexander Hitchins
>
> E: a...@alexhitchins.com
> W: alexhitchins.com
> M: 07788 423 969
> T: 01892 523 587
>
>
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
6758b2014
> months ago289MB |
>
> (the `openwhisk-image` is the image with the proxy and the action, while
> the `openwhisk-exec` contains just the proxy)
>
> ---
>
> All the instructions how to run the benchmark by yourself are in the repo
> here:
>
> https://github.com/sciabarracom/openwhisk-runtime-go
>
> --
> Michele Sciabarra
> openwh...@sciabarra.com
>
--
Regards,
James Thomas
d to address some weaknesses that emerged in the discussion (again, thank
> to James Thomas for pointing them out).
>
> First, the most relevant, my approach requires you implement a supporting
> library able to run an http server in each language you want to support. So
> one fo
quot;:{"name":"Mike"}}'
> {"greetings":"Hello, Mike"}
> ```
>
> As you can see, the function changed and now it implements the "hello"
> handler.
>
> But the replaced server is still able to run init so let's do it again
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
