[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4579?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16436872#comment-16436872
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-4579:
-
Github user JamesRTaylor commented on the issue:
Hi,
This benchmark study might help you:
https://hortonworks.com/blog/hbase-cassandra-benchmark/
However, YMMV as per your workload, cluster tuning and node types.
If you are doing random point lookups(using exact rowkey/primary key) then
i think you can probably try using
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Taylor resolved PHOENIX-4605.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 5.0.0
4.14.0
> Support running
Is it still the plan to get rid of deprecated HBase APIs in the 4.x
branches? This would ease the pain of porting changes between 4.x and 5.x
branches. I think it's likely that both branches will need to be maintained
for some time. We'd likely need to get a Tephra release with this done too,
but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16436782#comment-16436782
]
James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3837:
---
[~aertoria] - looks like this never made it into
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16436745#comment-16436745
]
Hudson commented on PHOENIX-4605:
-
FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build Phoenix-4.x-HBase-0.98 #1855
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16436734#comment-16436734
]
Hudson commented on PHOENIX-4605:
-
FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build Phoenix-4.x-HBase-1.3 #92 (See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16436528#comment-16436528
]
James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-4605:
---
Patch was for 4.x-HBase-1.3. I use this branch because
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16436520#comment-16436520
]
Ethan Wang commented on PHOENIX-4605:
-
I tried to check the patch on master. I got error for two
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16436521#comment-16436521
]
Ethan Wang commented on PHOENIX-4605:
-
+1
> Support running multiple transaction providers
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16436516#comment-16436516
]
James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-4605:
---
Attached final patch. Only change was to work around
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Taylor updated PHOENIX-4605:
--
Attachment: PHOENIX-4605_v3.patch
> Support running multiple transaction providers
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16436514#comment-16436514
]
James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-4605:
---
Thanks for the review, [~aertoria].
{quote}Do we have a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16436504#comment-16436504
]
Ethan Wang commented on PHOENIX-4605:
-
I see. that make sense.
I see lots of code changes is due
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16436483#comment-16436483
]
James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-4605:
---
{quote}My understanding is that before this feature we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16436433#comment-16436433
]
Ethan Wang commented on PHOENIX-4605:
-
Just catching up the thread.
My understanding is that before
Hi All,
Is there any optimized way to retrieve the larger dataset of ~1 million rows (1
row = 200 bytes of data) from HBase via Phoenix jdbc driver.
In my application we are using Phoenix 4.8 with HBase 1.2 and getting slower
performance while fetching the data through sql query.
We have a 5
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4579?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16436287#comment-16436287
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-4579:
-
Github user JamesRTaylor commented on the issue:
Github user JamesRTaylor commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/295
Thanks for the updates, @ChinmaySKulkarni. Looks like you still need to
rebase it. Also, one test that would be really valuable would be to:
* disable auto upgrade
* run execute upgrade
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16435992#comment-16435992
]
Ankit Singhal edited comment on PHOENIX-4683 at 4/12/18 5:36 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16435992#comment-16435992
]
Ankit Singhal edited comment on PHOENIX-4683 at 4/12/18 5:36 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16435992#comment-16435992
]
Ankit Singhal commented on PHOENIX-4683:
[~vincentpoon], can you please close the connections
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16435913#comment-16435913
]
James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-4605:
---
Thanks, [~aertoria]! FYI, attached v2 patch with the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Taylor updated PHOENIX-4605:
--
Attachment: PHOENIX-4605_v2.patch
> Support running multiple transaction providers
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Josh Elser updated PHOENIX-4685:
Priority: Blocker (was: Major)
> Parallel writes continuously to indexed table failing with OOME
Ok, thanks for that update, James (and Thomas for trying!)
I'll take a look at what's there first. What I remember was that the
JIRA update removed some APIs which the old precommit stuff required.
Don't know if that's ultimately related to the lack of emails or not,
but I should poke before
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16435831#comment-16435831
]
Ethan Wang commented on PHOENIX-4605:
-
No problem. Looking at it.
> Support running multiple
Thanks, Josh! Thomas tried to get the existing one working again. He found
that everything works (the runs are actually happening), but that the job
just fails to send the email out. Not sure if there's an easy fix or not. I
have no objections to moving to Yetus, though.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at
Hi,
Please shout if anyone has objections to me being destructive to the
current PreCommit job in attempts to migrate over to Yetus. I'll copy
the existing job (to allow a revert), but I think using the current one
will make things easier in that I won't have to involve INFRA to add
another
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16435722#comment-16435722
]
James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-4605:
---
[~aertoria] - neither Ohad nor Thomas are available -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16435283#comment-16435283
]
Hudson commented on PHOENIX-4366:
-
FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build PreCommit-PHOENIX-Build #1829
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16435282#comment-16435282
]
Hudson commented on PHOENIX-4658:
-
FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build PreCommit-PHOENIX-Build #1829
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16435279#comment-16435279
]
Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla edited comment on PHOENIX-4685 at 4/12/18 10:12 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16435279#comment-16435279
]
Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla commented on PHOENIX-4685:
--
[~an...@apache.org] [~elserj] Agree
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla updated PHOENIX-4685:
-
Attachment: PHOENIX-4685_v2.patch
> Parallel writes continuously to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16435272#comment-16435272
]
Ankit Singhal commented on PHOENIX-4685:
bq. Make sure I'm understanding this correctly: we'd
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16435075#comment-16435075
]
Chinmay Kulkarni commented on PHOENIX-4575:
---
Sure [~jamestaylor]. Please review my PR. Thanks!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16435073#comment-16435073
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-4575:
-
Github user ChinmaySKulkarni commented on the issue:
Github user ChinmaySKulkarni commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/297
@JamesRTaylor please review. Thanks @mujtabachohan for your initial
patches.
- Added nit changes as suggested by James on JIRA
- Rebased with master
- @ankitsinghal please
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16435057#comment-16435057
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-4575:
-
GitHub user ChinmaySKulkarni opened a pull request:
GitHub user ChinmaySKulkarni opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/297
PHOENIX-4575: Phoenix metadata KEEP_DELETED_CELLS and VERSIONS should be
property driven
Adds configurable properties for KEEP_DELETED_CELLS and VERSIONS.
You can merge this pull request
41 matches
Mail list logo
