Re: Worth doing a 4.0.1 release soon?

Seems useful to do a 4.0.1 soon but I think we should wait a few weeks. There have been a few issues reported and they continue to come in at reasonable steady pace. None of the issues so far seem to be blockers though. -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html

Re: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.poi.ss.usermodel.Workbook

I'm not sure why you need to load poi differently from xmlbeans. The xmlbeans is correct but your poi dependencies are nothing like anything I've ever seen. Could you use the standard pom settings? org.apache.poi poi-ooxml 4.0.0 -- Sent from

Re: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.poi.ss.usermodel.Workbook

Somehow you've disabled the standard transitive dependency loading mechanisms in your maven build. Try adding: org.apache.poi poi 4.0.0 But without transitive dependency loading, you're going to have to explicitly add lots of dependencies

Re: Worth doing a 4.0.1 release soon?

There were some bugs in the maven pom dependencies that we published. We were missing commons-math3 dependency and some dependencies were listed with old version numbers. -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html

xmlbeans 3.0.2 release?

Should we do an XMLBeans 3.0.2 release? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-520?jql=project%20%3D%20XMLBEANS%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%22Version%203.0.2%22 -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html -

Re: xmlbeans 3.0.2 release?

I have pushed xmlbeans 3.0.2 release candidate to: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/org/apache/xmlbeans/xmlbeans/3.0.2/ https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/xmlbeans/ -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html

[VOTE] xmlbeans 3.0.2 release

I would like to complete an xmlbeans 3.0.2 release this week. Can I call a vote? The changes are listed in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-520?jql=project%20%3D%20XMLBEANS%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%22Version%203.0.2%22 Here's my +1. -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.n

Re: [VOTE] xmlbeans 3.0.2 release

I've been using the Oracle 8 JDK as my default for a while but thought that for building XMLBeans it would be better to use an older JDK since we support JDK 6 and above. JDK 6 is not easily installed on Macs so I thought JDK 7 was a better bet. -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.

Re: [VOTE] xmlbeans 3.0.2 release

No external parties have reported bugs. I did notify a few external projects about the release of 3.0.0 and some upgraded to it. If people have issues, there is enough documentation on the web that I would expect them to be able to find the POI mailing list or the XMLBeans JIRA. 1 non-POI person

Re: [VOTE] xmlbeans 3.0.2 release

I've created a basic build job at https://builds.apache.org/view/P/view/POI/job/POI-XMLBeans-DSL-1.6 I downloaded the zip/tgz/jar files from the build (built using JDK 1.6). I replaced the artifacts in the staging repos: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/org/apache/xmlbe

Deleting build job XMLBeans-DSL-1.6

Does anyone know how to delete the Jenkins job https://builds.apache.org/job/XMLBeans-DSL-1.6/ ? I created a new job called POI-XMLBeans-DSL-1.6 because it's easier to find it if it's grouped with the other POI jobs. https://builds.apache.org/view/P/view/POI/ -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.104

Re: Deleting build job XMLBeans-DSL-1.6

Thanks Andi -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

Re: FormulaEvaluator float presicion problem

Could you try using DataFormatter after using the FormulaEvaluator? https://stackoverflow.com/questions/21538481/xssf-how-to-get-anything-as-string/21550258#21550258 -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html

Re: [VOTE] xmlbeans 3.0.2 release

XMLBeans 3 has similar XML parser factory code to POI and with the reported issues and fixes we've done for POI 4.0.1, I was hoping to release similar fixes for XMLBeans 3.0.2. Would it be feasible to get XMLBeans 3.0.2 reviewed? -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f23

Re: Here are my slides (if attachments are not stripped)

LGTM. 2 minor typos: conjuction uneccessary -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apa

[VOTE] xmlbeans 3.0.2 release [rc2]

I've uploaded new artifacts with a couple of extra changes. Still built using the apache jenkins jdk 1.6 build. https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20XMLBEANS%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%22Version%203.0.2%22 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/org/apach

Re: [VOTE] xmlbeans 3.0.2 release [rc2]

Thanks everyone. There have been 4 +1s (including me). I will proceed with the release in the coming days if there are no objections. -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html - To unsubscribe,

POI 4.0.1 release

Is it time for us to look at doing a POI 4.0.1 release? Are there any issues we would like to see completed before we proceed? -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html - To unsubscribe, e-mai

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: POI-DSL-OpenJDK #545

The condition is `next != -1` but the value of next appears to -1 so that this condition is false. Maybe the condition should `next == -1` -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html - To unsubs

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.0.1 release (RC1)

I found a few missing classes in poi-ooxml-schemas.jar. We have some gaps in the XDDF testing and this leads to us not adding all the necessary OOXML classes for XDDF to the poi-ooxml-schemas.jar. https://github.com/apache/poi/commit/df83dab1a49900d85d9a20c0ee6d5a7a31f0eb9c -- Sent from: http:/

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.0.1 release (RC1)

I'm +1 -- the fix can wait till 4.0.2 and there is the workaround to use full schema jar. -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.0.1 release (RC1)

Tim - would you be able to provide some sample files and we can add some regression tests? -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.0.1 release (RC1)

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62943 fix was to bring back a try catch block around the code that had been removed in 4.0.0. The 4.0.0 issue seems to affect users that have very old parsers - typically part of Application Servers that have their own non-standard parsers. I'm happy t

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.0.1 release (RC1)

The real fix is https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62692 - XMLBeans-519 fixes a similar issue in XMLBeans (the SAXHelper code in XMLBeans is basically a copy/paste of POI equivalent). -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html ---

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.0.1 release (RC2)

+1 Thanks for all the hard work getting this over the line. -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Adding mockito as testCompile dependency in poi:main module

Thanks for your contributions. Feel free to use Mockito in any of the submodules you need to use it in. -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.

Re: Throwing EvaluationException slows down evaluation, proposed change: not fill stack trace

For me, this kind of optimisation needs to be configurable. Most users would not need this performance optimisation and would be better off to get the full stack trace. I would pitch that something like XmlOptions in the XMLBeans project is a useful model. This allows users to choose to override t

Re: null excetion when using workbook write function

The directoryEntry that is causing in the NullPointerException is set in the HSSFWorkbook constructor. Could you be passing a null into this constructor? -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html

Re: XMLBeans bugs / build / commit

The META-INF/services files appear in xmlbeans-xpath-2.6.0.jar. 50 07-23-2012 15:42 META-INF/services/org.apache.xmlbeans.impl.store.PathDelegate.SelectPathInterface 52 07-23-2012 15:42 META-INF/services/org.apache.xmlbeans.impl.store.QueryDelegate.QueryInterface Since that ja

Re: Java-11 Compatibility of POI 4.0.x

We unit test our POI 4.0 code base with java 11. if you are seeing issues, could you provide a lot more detail? -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr

Re: setBulletAutoNumber does not work, always get error - PowerPoint found a problem with content...

Thanks for the report. Could you raise an issue in https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/ ? -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For addit

Re: SXSSF cannot work with large excel files

For reading large documents use https://github.com/monitorjbl/excel-streaming-reader or https://github.com/apache/poi/blob/trunk/src/examples/src/org/apache/poi/xssf/eventusermodel/XLSX2CSV.java If you run into issues with shared strings table being too large, you might also want https://github.co

Re: XMLBeans Jira - new version tag

Hi Andi, I just added https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-526?jql=project%20%3D%20XMLBEANS%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%22Version%203.0.3%22 -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html ---

xmlbeans 3.0.3

Should we release xmlbeans 3.0.3? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-532?jql=project%20%3D%20XMLBEANS%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%22Version%203.0.3%22 -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html ---

Re: Event Based APIs for parsing docx,doc,pptx,ppt files

Noone that I know of is actively working on a streaming API for docx or pptx. Contributions to POI in these areas would be welcome. One low level approach is to read docx/pptx files as zip files. If they are password protected, you can use POI to first create a copy of the file with the password p

Re: Unit Test failure

The code that is failing is not POI code, it is from the java runtime. It appears the test is trying to read a png file and convert it to a jpeg in preparation for the POI part of the test. Maybe we should just find a jpeg file for the test instead of doing this conversion. -- Sent from: http:

Re: Next release of POI/XmlBeans?

I've dropped the xmlbeans staging jars. -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.o

Re: Next release of POI/XmlBeans?

For xmlbeans, I would recommend getting the release jars and zips from https://builds.apache.org/view/P/view/POI/job/POI-XMLBeans-DSL-1.6/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/build/ This guarantees the jars were built with Java 6. For the nexus release, I follow this guide: https://central.sonatype.org/p

Re: XML Beans 3.0.3 candidate build

Yes, to release the jars, you just need to run the release option in the repository.apache.org UI. I would suggest that we leave the jars in staging for a few days, just in case someone spots any issues. I've changed the POI build to use the xmlbeans 3.0.3 jars from staging and the build seems fi

Re: XML Beans 3.0.3 candidate build

Calling the next release 3.1.0 seems sensible to me. +1 -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h

Re: [VOTE] XMLBeans 3.1.0 release

+1 -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

Re: [Bug 63289] New: org.apache.poi.hpsf.Util poi-4.0.1

What version are you upgrading from? That org.apache.poi.hpsf.Util class no longer exists. I went back nearly 2 years in code history and find no sign of such a class. -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html ---

Re: Ready for 4.1.0 release?

In the ant build, we can download different versions of bouncycastle into different directories. The openpgp task can use the old bouncycastle jar and the dsig can use the new one. Bouncycastle has lots of security fixes and it seems bad to completely switch back to a very old version. These were

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.1.0 release (RC3)

Thanks Greg. In my testing, I had to make a couple of small code changes to get things working again but nothing big and this is an intermediate version upgrade so that's expected. +1 -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html --

github PR for MAPIType.isFixedLength

https://github.com/apache/poi/pull/143 The notifications for github PRs seem not to happen any more. I don't know a lot about the H**F foramts. Would someone be able to review github-143? -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html -

POIFS int size - limits size to 2G

I'm not very familiar with the OLE specification that POIFS implements. Right now, we have the size parameter implemented as an int which means that we are limited to a file size of approx 2G. I had a look at changing the int to a long but this has a knock-on effect for lots of classes. Is there a

[VOTE] Should future XMLBeans releases support a min version of Java 8

We've already released some JDK 6 friendly XMLBeans releases. With https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/XMLBEANS/issues/XMLBEANS-541 and just to make life easier for future development, could we move to just building with Java 8 (and newer versions)? Here's my +1 for the change. -- Sent fro

Re: [VOTE] Should future XMLBeans releases support a min version of Java 8

We have 4 +1s. I will proceed with the build changes over the coming days. Ping me if there are any objections. -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr

Re: Concatenating, Indexing, and Copying a document to the end of another

My personal opinion is that I'd prefer not to add this to the POI core. It is quite possible to have a community where people have side projects that use the core code. The core POI code is already very large and we only have a small number of volunteers to maintain it. If we were to add this code

xmlsec upgrade issue

I didn't want to complicate the last release but I discovered that POI signing does not work with the latest xmlsec jar. (https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63712) This signing code base is not something I am very familiar with - but it would be nice not to stuck on the old jar. --

Re: Pivot Table - Data Column with % of Parent Calculation

That class is generated from a schema. It is a big task to regenerate those classes based on a newer version of the schema - and fix issues and uptake extra features - so we only do this upgrade every few years. http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-376.htm -- Sent fro

Re: [Bug 60567] XSSFReader caused OutOfMemoryError when reading a large excel file in HDFS as inputStream

OPCPackage.open(file) is more efficient memory wise than OPCPackage.open(inputStream) /** * Open a package. * * Note - uses quite a bit more memory than {@link #open(String)}, which * doesn't need to hold the whole zip file in memory, and can take advant

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: POI-DSL-1.6 #367

I see a similar test issue when I build on my laptop -- View this message in context: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/Build-failed-in-Jenkins-POI-DSL-1-6-367-tp5727976p5727978.html Sent from the POI - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -

Re: Java 6 support

I favour more regular non-beta releases generally and like the idea of a 4.0 release. I'm pretty neutral on the JRE version support. My employers mandate JRE 1.8 usage and I think, for security reasons, this is the right approach. My 2 cents is that we could continue to support a 3.x branch and bac

TestFonts failing on my laptop

Hi, The new test, TestFonts, is failing on my laptop. https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1801329 I have a Mac and the font size seems to be 399 instead of the 312 expected in the test. java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<399.0> but was:<312.0> at org.junit.Assert.fail(As

Re: TestFonts failing on my laptop

I'm temporarily commented out the assertion that was failing. https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1801395 -- View this message in context: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/TestFonts-failing-on-my-laptop-tp5728134p5728135.html Sent from the POI - Dev mailing list archive

Re: svn commit: r1801806 - in /poi/trunk/src/ooxml: java/org/apache/poi/xssf/streaming/SXSSFWorkbook.java java/org/apache/poi/xssf/streaming/SheetDataWriter.java testcases/org/apache/poi/xssf/streamin

I thought that the writeAttribute made the code a bit easier to read. Also, concatenating strings before writing them to the Writer does add overhead. I did some similar work (with others) on a similar writer implementation in February and removing the string concats and using additional write call

Re: XDDF implementation shared between XSSFChart and XSLFChart

Would it be feasible to keep the existing classes and APIs and have them delegate to the XDDF impl? We could immediately deprecate any of these legacy APIs. -- View this message in context: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/XDDF-implementation-shared-between-XSSFChart-and-XSLFChart-tp5728

Re: Help with task:

Thanks Avinash. Would you be able to create a sample or samples using Kotlin? Apache POI does support quite a lot of Microsoft document formats but maybe xlsx is a good place to start. The XSSF API for reading and/or writing xlsx files might be a good one to demonstrate. Feel free to suggest someth

Re: 3.17-beta2 vs. 3.17 final?

+1 to a 3.17 final release -- View this message in context: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/3-17-beta2-vs-3-17-final-tp5728538p5728543.html Sent from the POI - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe,

Re: Discussions on POI 4.0 / Java7/8 voting

My votes are: a) 4.0 b) JDK8 (if Tika team agrees to upgrade) c) yes d) semver -- View this message in context: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/Discussions-on-POI-4-0-Java7-8-voting-tp5728560p5728566.html Sent from the POI - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ---

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.17 release (RC3)

+1 -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

Re: Apache POI 4.0/Java 8

I agree with Andi about using 4.0.0-SNAPSHOT as the release number. I'd like to make regular 4.0.x releases and to have 4.y release on a similar cadence to the existing 3.z releases (2 or so a year). -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html ---

Re: 3.17.1?

We could just call it 3.18. -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] Getting a fixed version of XMLBeans

I'm happy to work on e) if we do need committers. My view is that we can move away from xmlbeans over time but that it is useful to maintain it in the interim. I don't know if we've formed an opinion on whether to continue with the research into using JAXB but my gut feeling is that we will proba

Re: svn commit: r1815953 - /poi/site/src/documentation/content/xdocs/overview.xml

Thanks for the reminder, Javen. I've now updated status.xml. -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: svn commit: r1815994 - in /poi/trunk/src: java/org/apache/poi/sl/usermodel/ java/org/apache/poi/ss/format/ java/org/apache/poi/util/ ooxml/java/org/apache/poi/xssf/usermodel/helpers/ resources/dev

I just added some code that iterates code points. It looks like there will be a lot of other code that needs to be modified but this is just an initial toe in the water. -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html -

Re: svn commit: r1815988 - /poi/trunk/src/java/org/apache/poi/ss/format/CellDateFormatter.java

I switched this code to use Locale.ROOT for now. The current POI code base uses this in more places than the LocaleUtil.getUserLocale(). -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html - To unsubscri

Re: Avoid exception The maximum length of cell contents (text) is 32,767 characters

https://support.office.com/en-us/article/Excel-specifications-and-limits-1672b34d-7043-467e-8e27-269d656771c3#ID0EBABAAA=2016,_2013 - 32,767 is the limit in Excel. To support LibreOffice as a special case and apply different limits is feasible but non-trivial. Could you raise a bugzilla issue to t

Re: Avoid exception The maximum length of cell contents (text) is 32,767 characters

If you're stuck, you could subclass SXSSFCell in your application and have the logic in your subclass skip the cell size check. -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html - To unsubscribe, e-mai

Re: Can't compile EvaluationConditionalFormatRule

I use IntelliJ and it handles the poi repo well, in my experience. I allow IntelliJ to use the gradle build and use a Zulu 8 JDK as the SDK. -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html - To unsub

XMLBeans in 4.0.0 release

Relating to https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59268 : would it be possible to have a vote on what the XMLBeans solution should be for the 4.0.0 release? I understand the desire to replace XMLBeans altogether but I don't think we have enough developer time available to do this in the 4.

Re: XMLBeans in 4.0.0 release

I don't fancy trying to merge the xmlbeans and poi ant builds. I've been trying for an hour or more and still getting issues. If the major objection to the com.github.pjfanning:xmlbeans dependency is that my name is in the groupId, I can request a new groupId from OSS Sonatype. They require that y

deprecations under semantic versioning

I haven't thought too much about the version number to put in @Removal annotations since we moved to semver for 4.0.0. I've just been routinely adding @Removal version 4.2 based on the old deprecation strategy in POI 3.x. I'm wondering whether we should say that 4.1 is the removal version for anyth

adding dependencies on h2 and mockito

Are there any objections to me adding dependencies on h2 jar dependency for https://github.com/apache/poi/pull/85 and a test dependency on mockito? I think mockito would be useful for allowing us to test edge cases. An example is https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1822253 where c

***UNCHECKED*** RE: adding dependencies on h2 and mockito

I could make h2 a `provided` dependency in our poi-ooxml pom. The use of h2 is opt-in in the new code in my PR but I'll need to refactor the code to allow our code not to throw ClassNotFoundException if the h2 classes are not on the runtime classpath. This is do-able but my concern is that this is

poi .classpath file

Is it ok to delete this and just have Eclipse users create the Eclipse workspace using `gradle eclipse`? Just makes for fewer places where we need to manage the jar version numbers. -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html -

Failing gump tests

Hi, I don't know much about the gump tests. They are failing due to the mockito code. The gump environment seems to be set up with a CLASSPATH environment variable and this doesn't include mockito or its dependencies (byte-buddy and objenesis). Can anyone give me pointers? http://vmgump-vm3.apache

Re: Failing gump tests

+1 to remove jump tests -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

Timeline for 4.0.0 release

It's over 5 months since the POI 3.17 release. I'm wondering if we should be thinking about about releasing 4.0.0. Is there anything that is in progress that we should consider waiting for? -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html -

Re: XMLBeans in 4.0.0 release

Who would be in a position to follow up with Apache Foundation (or XMLBeans PMC) about taking XMLBeans out of the attic? Nick summarised the requirements, as follows: * Vote to take it on * Wait for attic PMC to confirm * Get infra to unlock svn for xmlbeans * Merge in fixes * Test,

publishing poi xmlbeans jars

If we were to publish our own xmlbeans jar, say with groupId `org.apache.poi`, artifactName `xmlbeans` and version `2.7.0` - how would we go about that? I use OSS Sonatype for publishing my open source jars - but I presume that Apache has its own process for publishing artifacts and granting access

RE: publishing poi xmlbeans jars

I have a small preference from getting xmlbeans out of the attic but I don't know who to talk to about that. Would someone be able to point us in then right direction? If the attic approach is politcally complicated, then proceeding with publishing an org.apache.poi:xmlbeans shouldn't be hard.

RE: publishing poi xmlbeans jars

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/attic-general/201802.mbox/%3C1519744891.257410.1285160920.6801732D%40webmail.messagingengine.com%3E Looks like we're not going to make much progress on resurrecting Apache XMLBeans. I've already put the modified xmlbeans code in poi svn. Can we just use th

RE: publishing poi xmlbeans jars

1. For users whose only dependency on xmlbeans is from poi then, we can choose to override the dependency to point to any maven artifact we like: http://central.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/poi/poi-ooxml-schemas/3.17/poi-ooxml-schemas-3.17.pom 2. For users, who use xmlbeans but not poi, they can ch

Re: Fwd: Challenge on automatic generation of documentation

+1 -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

Re: Single Java 9 module jar?

Could we consider keeping all the jars but ensure that no package spans jars? -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional c

Re: Single Java 9 module jar?

I had a quick look at it looks like we'd have to move a lot of classes to new packages. Maybe, the poi-all jar is the path of least resistance. -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html - To un

Re: publishing poi xmlbeans jars

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/attic-general/201803.mbox/browser I think we could spend a lot of time on the attic approach. -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html - To unsubscri

Re: Fwd: Build failed in Jenkins: POI-DSL-1.10 #1

One potential approach would be to use commons-compress zip support instead of the built-in java support. This might help us work around the fact that the core java implementation can change in ways that cause us issues. With commons-compress, it might even be best for us to see if they'll take the

Re: Fwd: Build failed in Jenkins: POI-DSL-1.10 #1

I'm also wondering if maybe we could abandon the reflection approach and just have ThresholdInputStream wrap the entry's InputStream and count the bytes that are read, and blow up when the thresholds are breeched. We might lose out on some cases but the code would be easier to maintain. -- Sent

Re: publishing poi xmlbeans jars

Thanks Dave. I think it would be good to get the XMLBeans JIRA project reopened if and when we get the XMLBeans project into the Apache Incubator. Some of the issues we want to fix are already tracked as XMLBeans JIRAs. -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html

Re: publishing poi xmlbeans jars

My attempt at a short description of why we want to be able to patch xmlbeans. Apache Poi has a significant dependency on XmlBeans. There would need to be a lot of work done to switch to an alternative (and this might happen at a later date). We have identified a few issues in XmlBeans that we wou

Re: publishing poi xmlbeans jars

I have an experimental xmlbeans jar where I changed the package name to org.apache.poi.xmlbeans just to see if it was feasible to get it build. I also have a poi branch that successfully uses this jar. https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/github/pjfanning/xmlbeans/2.7.0-beta1/ It should be feasible t

Re: publishing poi xmlbeans jars

+1 -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

git repo is not in synch with svn

Anyone know who to contact about https://github.com/apache/poi being out of sync with svn? -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For

xdocreport dependency on full ooxml-schemas jar

ssary features directly. [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.1:compile (default-compile) on project fr.opensagres.poi.xwpf.converter.core: Compilation failure: Compilation failure: [ERROR] /Users/pj.fanning/code/xdocreport/thirdparties-exte

Re: 3.18? Or push for 4?

The current trunk is intended for a 4.0.0 release. We have significant changes in there, including making Java 8 the lowest supported runtime. If we want to release 3.18, we would need to branch from 3.17 release point and cherry pick the most useful bug fixes. 4.0.0 is awaiting a few things before

Re: Review #62355

+1 4.0.0 is a good place to make changes like this - otherwise, we'd need to make them in a 5.0.0 release later. -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr

Re: Using StAX parser for .xlsx files

I would suggest converting the xlsx sheets to CSV and importing into Spark using its built-in CSV data source. -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr..

  1   2   >