[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14010868#comment-14010868
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-5748:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pavel Moravec reassigned QPID-5748:
---
Assignee: Pavel Moravec
[C++ broker] Make Queue::purgeExpired more efficient by calling
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pavel Moravec resolved QPID-5748.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.29
Fixed together with removal of ExpiryPolicy that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pavel Moravec closed QPID-5748.
---
[C++ broker] Make Queue::purgeExpired more efficient by calling
AbsTime::now() just once
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14010969#comment-14010969
]
Alex Rudyy commented on QPID-5786:
--
Hi Bobby,
I had been trying to reproduce the issue
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:43:48AM -0400, Alan Conway wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 11:40 -0400, Justin Ross wrote:
In which scenarios are you having to set it? If you produce two builds to
two distinct install prefixes, they should be pre-defaulted with the
approprate home dir, so you
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:06:44AM -0400, Alan Conway wrote:
What's the general feeling about using SWIG in dispatch? To date
dispatch uses hand-crafted calls based on Python.h primitives. My
impression is that works OK for a small python/C interface but the
interface is getting to the point
Hi all,
I would like to write some automated tests for ACL in C++ broker, similar to
current queue purge. Trying to understand the current code / call of:
session.queue_purge(queue=q3)
I can't find where queue_purge is declared? grepping source code gives me no
clue..
(or alternatively, what
Pavel,
All of the management methods are declared in the management schema
files. You can find the purge method declared in
specs/management-schema.xml.
The code for handling that method is in cpp/src/qpid/broker/Queue.cpp in
the method: Queue::ManagementMethod().
-Ted
On 05/28/2014 10:27 AM,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21978/
---
Review request for qpid and Andrew Stitcher.
Bugs: QPID-5788
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14011234#comment-14011234
]
Gordon Sim commented on QPID-5788:
--
Suggested fix available for review:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21978/#review44128
---
Such a short piece of code, so many comments... sorry.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21929/#review44138
---
/proton/trunk/proton-c/bindings/perl/perl.i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ken Giusti resolved QPID-5588.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: Future)
0.28
Python client fails
On May 28, 2014, 5:18 p.m., Andrew Stitcher wrote:
/trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/client/SslConnector.cpp, line 127
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21978/diff/1/?file=597359#file597359line127
It's probably worthwhile parsing the config file so that you can set
the ssl options there too.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21978/
---
(Updated May 28, 2014, 7:51 p.m.)
Review request for qpid and Andrew Stitcher.
Ken Giusti created QPID-5790:
Summary: Python client should prefer select() to poll() if patched
by eventlet
Key: QPID-5790
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5790
Project: Qpid
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21978/#review44159
---
I don't understand your comment about not changing the static
On May 28, 2014, 5:18 p.m., Andrew Stitcher wrote:
/trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/client/SslConnector.cpp, line 127
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21978/diff/1/?file=597359#file597359line127
It's probably worthwhile parsing the config file so that you can set
the ssl options there too.
On May 28, 2014, 8:14 p.m., Andrew Stitcher wrote:
I don't understand your comment about not changing the static variables to
class members, as function statics will be duplicated in any forking
process in exactly the same way.
Function statics are really the same executable
On May 28, 2014, 5:18 p.m., Andrew Stitcher wrote:
/trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/client/SslConnector.cpp, line 127
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21978/diff/1/?file=597359#file597359line127
It's probably worthwhile parsing the config file so that you can set
the ssl options there too.
On May 28, 2014, 8:14 p.m., Andrew Stitcher wrote:
I don't understand your comment about not changing the static variables to
class members, as function statics will be duplicated in any forking
process in exactly the same way.
Function statics are really the same executable
On May 28, 2014, 8:14 p.m., Andrew Stitcher wrote:
I don't understand your comment about not changing the static variables to
class members, as function statics will be duplicated in any forking
process in exactly the same way.
Function statics are really the same executable
On May 28, 2014, 8:14 p.m., Andrew Stitcher wrote:
I don't understand your comment about not changing the static variables to
class members, as function statics will be duplicated in any forking
process in exactly the same way.
Function statics are really the same executable
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21929/
---
(Updated May 29, 2014, 4:58 a.m.)
Review request for qpid, Darryl Pierce,
25 matches
Mail list logo
