Netbeans used to start with a custom SecurityManager implementation which was
not replaceable in an APP nor the IDE itself. I think this was changed to be
pluggable, but I just don’t remember the details.
Gregg
On Jun 2, 2015, at 6:14 AM, Peter j...@zeus.net.au wrote:
Yes,
Should run
Hi Gregg,
IIRC, you did some work with the RMIClassLoader that greatly improved
interoperability with NB. I don't recall seeing it in the qa-refactor branch. I
think it's really important to have that work in the next release.
Any chance you can you merge it into the qa-refactor-namespace
Hi Dennis:
Your response sounds a little snarky to me, but that may be just email not
conveying tone correctly, or the curse of the iPhone.
If I’m not mistaken, the changes you’re talking about are contained in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RIVER-336
Greg,
Wow, this escalated quickly. Not being snarky, and I do get the impression that
you're now lecturing me. Let's just all take a step back.
I am not implying anything about incompatibilities with net beans or any other
IDE. I'm not sure why you went there.
You're right about two
It's the RMIClassLoader work that was done, thought I had made that clear.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 5, 2015, at 11:06 AM, Greg Trasuk tras...@stratuscom.com wrote:
Need to define “run within NetBeans”. I think Gregg’s work you’re thinking
of was about being able to build NetBeans
Dennis is thinking of the solution I was trying to use to get things to run
inside of netbeans, the platform, to use it to create Jini enabled clients.
The SecurityManger issue, I think, still existed. The problem is that I’ve
been away from that issue for a few years now and my memory is
Dennis is thinking of the solution I was trying to use to get things to run
inside of netbeans, the platform, to use it to create Jini enabled clients.
The SecurityManger issue, I think, still existed. The problem is that I’ve
been away from that issue for a few years now and my memory is
Need to define “run within NetBeans”. I think Gregg’s work you’re thinking of
was about being able to build NetBeans plugins that could access services and
perhaps export services.
“Running” a program from within Netbeans, i.e. invoking the Ant script or
executing “java …” works fine as-is.
Yes,
Should run fine from within Netbeans,I haven't tried Eclipse, but it
should also work. Unlike previous builds, it doesn't need cigwin and
it builds on jvm's other than Sun's, such as IBM's J9.
Peter.
On 27/05/2015 6:09 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I'll check out that branch and take
I'll check out that branch and take a look. Any tips on which tool chain
to use to compile it on a Windows 8.1 system?
On 5/26/2015 8:30 PM, Dennis Reedy wrote:
Hi Patricia,
I’ve done the work in the river/jtsk/skunk/qa-refactor-namespace branch, having
eyes and hands on this would be great!
On 5/2/2015 2:16 PM, Dennis Reedy wrote:
The vote for the namespace change from com.sun.jini and com.artima to
org.apache.river has passed. I’ll begin this work in the
skunk/qa_refactor branch. I might require assistance in testing, so
volunteers would be appreciated.
Is this the right time to
Hi Patricia,
I’ve done the work in the river/jtsk/skunk/qa-refactor-namespace branch, having
eyes and hands on this would be great!
Thanks
Dennis
On May 26, 2015, at 1025PM, Patricia Shanahan p...@acm.org wrote:
On 5/2/2015 2:16 PM, Dennis Reedy wrote:
The vote for the namespace change
The vote for the namespace change from com.sun.jini and com.artima to
org.apache.river has passed. I’ll begin this work in the skunk/qa_refactor
branch. I might require assistance in testing, so volunteers would be
appreciated.
As far as the other suggestions are concerned:
(1)
-
+1 : I approve of this modificationRegardsBishnu
Bishnu Prasad Gautam
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:40:22 -0400 Subject: Re: [Vote]
Namespace change from com.sun.jini and com.artima to
org.apache.river From: br...@systap.com To:
dev@river.apache.org
+1 : I approve of this modification On Apr 30
+1
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Dennis Reedy dennis.re...@gmail.com
wrote:
As part of the upcoming 3.0 release (based off of the skunk/qa_refactor
branch), it would be perfect timing to move the package names of
com.sun.jini and com.artima to org.apache.river.
Voting period will end
of this modificationRegardsBishnu
Bishnu Prasad Gautam
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:40:22 -0400
Subject: Re: [Vote] Namespace change from com.sun.jini and com.artima
to org.apache.river From: br...@systap.com
To: dev@river.apache.org
+1 : I approve of this modification
On Apr 30
-
+1 : I approve of this modificationRegardsBishnu
Bishnu Prasad Gautam
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:40:22 -0400
Subject: Re: [Vote] Namespace change from com.sun.jini and com.artima
to org.apache.river From: br...@systap.com
To: dev@river.apache.org
+1 : I approve
+1
On 4/30/2015 1:14 PM, Dennis Reedy wrote:
As part of the upcoming 3.0 release (based off of the skunk/qa_refactor
branch), it would be perfect timing to move the package names of com.sun.jini
and com.artima to org.apache.river.
Voting period will end May 2, 2015 5:00 PM EDT.
As per
+1 : I approve of this modification
On Apr 30, 2015 1:15 PM, Dennis Reedy dennis.re...@gmail.com wrote:
As part of the upcoming 3.0 release (based off of the skunk/qa_refactor
branch), it would be perfect timing to move the package names of
com.sun.jini and com.artima to org.apache.river.
+1 : I approve of this modification
On 30/04/2015 22:14, Dennis Reedy wrote:
As part of the upcoming 3.0 release (based off of the skunk/qa_refactor
branch), it would be perfect timing to move the package names of com.sun.jini
and com.artima to org.apache.river.
Voting period will end May
+1.
Greg Trasuk
On Apr 30, 2015, at 4:14 PM, Dennis Reedy dennis.re...@gmail.com wrote:
As part of the upcoming 3.0 release (based off of the skunk/qa_refactor
branch), it would be perfect timing to move the package names of com.sun.jini
and com.artima to org.apache.river.
Voting
+1 : I approve of this modificationRegardsBishnu
Bishnu Prasad Gautam
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:40:22 -0400
Subject: Re: [Vote] Namespace change from com.sun.jini and com.artima to
org.apache.river
From: br...@systap.com
To: dev@river.apache.org
+1 : I approve of this modification
22 matches
Mail list logo
