Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_MXTests #6

See Changes: [aharui] WebService compiles except for XMLDocument and getTimer [aharui] ByteArray also needs IDataInput/Output [aharui] beginnings of implementation of WebService

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs #44

See Changes: -- [...truncated 1.15 MB...] [java] Oct 17, 2019 4:30:53 AM com.google.javascript.jscomp.LoggerErrorManager println [java] WARNING:

Re: [Discussion] Where Nightly builds links must be located (we must remove it from download page)

I think our invitation to become a committer by getting source code or getting involved should be emphasized more, but I'm not doing the work on the website. IMO, we've hit the point of diminishing returns. Carlos should do something quick and simple to make the ASF happy unless he has time

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs #43

See Changes: -- [...truncated 2.15 MB...] [java] ^ [java] [java]

New apache-royale questions for Oct 16 - Stack Exchange

***1 new question in [ApacheRoyale Tag Notifications filter]() on stackexchange.com*** [DataGrid cell background color issue on Apache

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs #42

See Changes: [carlosrovira] jewel-imagebutton: remove default browser outline and imports not [carlosrovira] update all jewel themes --

Re: Testimonials Page (Was: Re: About Royale Docs Improvements over latest months)

Hi folks, please remember we have this request open. It's very few time for you you all, just invest 5 minutes in send a phrase, name, job and picture to appear in out testimonials page :) This can sum to the rest of things that will make others want to use Royale El vie., 4 oct. 2019 a las

Re: [Discussion] Where Nightly builds links must be located (we must remove it from download page)

Maybe something like this would be better? Source Code For developers who want to get involved in framework development, source code and nightly build download links can be found on our get involved page . > On Oct 16, 2019, at 11:36 PM, Alex

Re: [Discussion] Where Nightly builds links must be located (we must remove it from download page)

I'm not sure how that is better than the disclaimer that was there. But if you feel it is important, we'll find out when the page gets reviewed again. -Alex On 10/16/19, 12:44 PM, "Harbs" wrote: I think we should add a section to the download page about nightly builds. Someone who is

Re: [Discussion] Where Nightly builds links must be located (we must remove it from download page)

Updated with your suggestion Harbs: https://royale.codeoscopic.com/download/ El mié., 16 oct. 2019 a las 21:44, Harbs () escribió: > I think we should add a section to the download page about nightly builds. > Someone who is looking for the nightly builds might not know where to find > it. > >

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs #41

See Changes: [aharui] WebService compiles except for XMLDocument and getTimer [aharui] ByteArray also needs IDataInput/Output [aharui] beginnings of implementation of WebService [aharui]

Re: [Discussion] Where Nightly builds links must be located (we must remove it from download page)

I think we should add a section to the download page about nightly builds. Someone who is looking for the nightly builds might not know where to find it. Something like: We do not recommend nightly builds for application developers as they have not been properly tested and can have serious

Re: [Discussion] Where Nightly builds links must be located (we must remove it from download page)

Hi, I did it in pre: https://royale.codeoscopic.com/download/ https://royale.codeoscopic.com/get-involved/ will push it tomorrow if nobody suggest any other change thanks Carlos El mié., 16 oct. 2019 a las 21:27, Alex Harui () escribió: > Sounds ok to me. > > On 10/16/19, 12:21 PM,

Re: [Discussion] Where Nightly builds links must be located (we must remove it from download page)

Forgot to share the get involved page for you to check actual state: https://royale.apache.org/get-involved/ Thanks El mié., 16 oct. 2019 a las 21:20, Carlos Rovira () escribió: > Hi, > > thanks all for sharing ideas on how to deal with this issue. For what I > read I like some of them. > > We

Re: [Discussion] Where Nightly builds links must be located (we must remove it from download page)

Sounds ok to me. On 10/16/19, 12:21 PM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote: Hi, thanks all for sharing ideas on how to deal with this issue. For what I read I like some of them. We already have a "Get Involved" page (most of the time with forget we have menu options in the

Re: [Discussion] Where Nightly builds links must be located (we must remove it from download page)

Hi, thanks all for sharing ideas on how to deal with this issue. For what I read I like some of them. We already have a "Get Involved" page (most of the time with forget we have menu options in the footer bar and top level menu options are only a subset of what we think "most important" for

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_MXTests #5

See Changes: [piotrzarzycki21] Add Moonshine IDE file to tourdeflex [piotrzarzycki21] Fix MX NumberFormatter to be usable in MX components [carlosrovira] remove toString in

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs #40

See Changes: -- [...truncated 2.04 MB...] [java] ^ [java] [java]

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs #39

See Changes: -- [...truncated 2.05 MB...] [java] ^ [java] [java]

Re: [Discussion] Where Nightly builds links must be located (we must remove it from download page)

The principle behind the policy is not ridiculous. AIUI, it is important that the general public only downloads artifacts that the PMC has approved as an act of the foundation, otherwise the foundation's ability to provide a legal shield for release managers is weakened. I mostly agree that

Re: [Discussion] Where Nightly builds links must be located (we must remove it from download page)

Hopefully a separate public page is allowed. What a ridiculous policy! -- Josh Tynjala Bowler Hat LLC On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 6:30 AM Andrew Wetmore wrote: > Can they have their own dedicated page, wreathed around with cautions and > disclaimers to scare away folks who

Re: [Discussion] Where Nightly builds links must be located (we must remove it from download page)

Can they have their own dedicated page, wreathed around with cautions and disclaimers to scare away folks who should not be using them? On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 9:42 AM Carlos Rovira wrote: > Hi, > > we get request to remove Nightly builds from download page (see issue in > GitHub below). > I

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs #38

See Changes: -- [...truncated 2.05 MB...] [java] ^ [java] [java]

[Discussion] Where Nightly builds links must be located (we must remove it from download page)

Hi, we get request to remove Nightly builds from download page (see issue in GitHub below). I open this thread to discuss where is better place for it. thanks El mié., 16 oct. 2019 a las 14:26, GitBox () escribió: > carlosrovira commented on issue #498: Nightly builds must not be promoted >

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs #37

See Changes: [noreply] Added MXAdvancedDataGridItemRenderer in SparkRoyale [noreply] Added MXAdvancedDataGridItemRenderer in SparkRoyaleClasses [noreply] Update List.as remove theme from