Re: testing with browserstack. IE11 bad surprise

2018-04-08 Thread Harbs
The only exception to the IE support is MDL Slider. The features needed for that are sketchy at best on IE… > On Apr 8, 2018, at 1:20 PM, Carlos Rovira wrote: > > Hi Alex, > > > 2018-04-08 7:53 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui : > >> Hi Carlos, >> >>

Re: testing with browserstack. IE11 bad surprise

2018-04-08 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Alex, 2018-04-08 7:53 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui : > Hi Carlos, > > I think you missed my point and main question. The question is: Does MDL > and Bootstrap support IE? If so, then they have found a way to customize > Button. MDL supports IE10-11 and in some way IE9

Re: testing with browserstack. IE11 bad surprise

2018-04-07 Thread Alex Harui
Hi Carlos, I think you missed my point and main question. The question is: Does MDL and Bootstrap support IE? If so, then they have found a way to customize Button. Seems like we should be able to do the same, but maybe it won't be the Jewel theme. It might be something else, maybe folks who

Re: testing with browserstack. IE11 bad surprise

2018-04-07 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Alex, I think is better to show you IE11 rendering [1] I think the image is self explanatory. I didn't analyze it already, maybe is some huge problem that makes it totally broken, but if not, if I need to have a complete rendering only for IE11 for each control and component we have, I think

Re: testing with browserstack. IE11 bad surprise

2018-04-07 Thread Alex Harui
IMO, we need Royale to work on IE11. It does not mean that Jewel must work on IE11, but it would be nice if some theme did, other than Basic. It turns out that my colleagues can't be sure of their data since IE was mostly being used for intranet apps in large enterprises, but I think IE is being