On Wednesday 21 September 2016 15:18:36 Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> > On Wednesday 21 September 2016 14:03:00 Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday 21 September 2016 11:56:30 Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> >>> And use Testing PaxExam which comes with all required
> >>> configurations.
>
> On Wednesday 21 September 2016 14:03:00 Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 21 September 2016 11:56:30 Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>>> And use Testing PaxExam which comes with all required configurations.
>>
>> I want to keep my dependencies low
>
> One bundle (3 classes)
On Wednesday 21 September 2016 14:03:00 Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> > On Wednesday 21 September 2016 11:56:30 Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> > And use Testing PaxExam which comes with all required configurations.
>
> I want to keep my dependencies low
> >>>
> >>> One bundle (3 classes)
> On Wednesday 21 September 2016 11:56:30 Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> And use Testing PaxExam which comes with all required configurations.
I want to keep my dependencies low
>>>
>>> One bundle (3 classes) vs. lots of boilerplate code... YMMV.
>>
>> I tried this for the i18n module,
On Wednesday 21 September 2016 11:56:30 Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> >>> And use Testing PaxExam which comes with all required configurations.
> >>
> >> I want to keep my dependencies low
> >
> > One bundle (3 classes) vs. lots of boilerplate code... YMMV.
>
> I tried this for the i18n module, but
>
>>> And use Testing PaxExam which comes with all required configurations.
>>
>> I want to keep my dependencies low
>
> One bundle (3 classes) vs. lots of boilerplate code... YMMV.
I tried this for the i18n module, but I get
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
On Tuesday 20 September 2016 16:04:07 Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> > On Tuesday 20 September 2016 14:57:40 Robert Munteanu wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 13:49 +0200, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> >>> I think we created a monster when it comes to configuration
> >>> requirements
> >>> with the Oak
> On Tuesday 20 September 2016 14:57:40 Robert Munteanu wrote:
>> On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 13:49 +0200, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>>> I think we created a monster when it comes to configuration
>>> requirements
>>> with the Oak server bundle.
>>>
>>> Have a look at [1] where I had to add dozens of
> On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 13:49 +0200, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>> I think we created a monster when it comes to configuration
>> requirements
>> with the Oak server bundle.
>>
>> Have a look at [1] where I had to add dozens of configurations just
>> to
>> get a JCR repository running. And this
On Tuesday 20 September 2016 14:57:40 Robert Munteanu wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 13:49 +0200, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> > I think we created a monster when it comes to configuration
> > requirements
> > with the Oak server bundle.
> >
> > Have a look at [1] where I had to add dozens of
On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 13:49 +0200, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> I think we created a monster when it comes to configuration
> requirements
> with the Oak server bundle.
>
> Have a look at [1] where I had to add dozens of configurations just
> to
> get a JCR repository running. And this requires not
I think we created a monster when it comes to configuration requirements
with the Oak server bundle.
Have a look at [1] where I had to add dozens of configurations just to
get a JCR repository running. And this requires not only OSGi
configurations but also framework properties.
Let's start with
12 matches
Mail list logo
