Re: [S1] [VOTE] Struts 1.3.9 Quality

2007-07-22 Thread Joe Germuska
On 7/21/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 GA +1 GA -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "I felt so good I told the leader how to follow." -- Sly Stone

Re: name inconsistency

2007-06-28 Thread Joe Germuska
TED]> wrote: > > On 6/27/07, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Sorry, I have been very absentee from Struts discussions, but I took a > > minute to review this one... > > > > Acknowledging that consistency (between s:set, s:url, s:bean, et

Re: name inconsistency

2007-06-27 Thread Joe Germuska
> We > > need to be equally careful in Struts 2, so that we don't suddenly > > invalidate > > whole classes of use cases (such as JSPX). > > > > -- > > Martin Cooper > > > > > > -Dave > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "I felt so good I told the leader how to follow." -- Sly Stone

Re: [s1] ActionContext in execute()?

2007-03-07 Thread Joe Germuska
ic ActionForward execute(ActionContext context) throws Exception; Thanks, Paul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.ge

Re: [s1] Help to Initialize Commands

2007-02-22 Thread Joe Germuska
hen used as bean reference, effectively making it available as named Spring bean instance." May save you some coding...Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "The truth is that we learned from João forever to be out of tune." -- Caetano Veloso

Re: ServletRequestAware Interface doubled

2007-02-01 Thread Joe Germuska
nce we are not in production yet, we should work on clean interfaces and risk some minor/easy to fix code breaks for users. +1 -- now is the time, definitely. -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "The truth is that we learned from João forever to be out of tune.&

Struts2 and Java 1.4 (Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.4 Quality)

2007-01-30 Thread Joe Germuska
patible jars are a convenience for some users, but I do not think they should be considered fully supported or a blocking issue for a Struts 2 release. Anyone strongly disagree? Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "The truth is that we learned from João forever to be out of tune." -- Caetano Veloso

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.4 Quality

2007-01-30 Thread Joe Germuska
f OGNL. +1 beta -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "The truth is that we learned from João forever to be out of tune." -- Caetano Veloso

Re: [VOTE] Release Struts Annotations 1.0.0

2007-01-27 Thread Joe Germuska
likely that the "struts-annotations-101-staging" repository will not be around for ever. I will allow that this may be more about formality than anything else, and I won't object to a build done this way, but it seemed worth mentioning. Maybe someone else feels more strongly about

Re: [VOTE] Release Struts Annotations 1.0.0

2007-01-25 Thread Joe Germuska
+1 worked for me as well Ditto. +1 -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "The truth is that we learned from João forever to be out of tune." -- Caetano Veloso

Re: Struts service facade

2007-01-23 Thread Joe Germuska
53935 Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.

Re: [S2] Freemarker 2.3.8? ( was Re: [S2] Freemarker Confusion)

2007-01-23 Thread Joe Germuska
atibility issues considered more substantial? -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "The truth is that we learned from João forever to be out of tune." -- Caetano Veloso

Re: [S2] Freemarker 2.3.8? ( was Re: [S2] Freemarker Confusion)

2007-01-22 Thread Joe Germuska
.html It's been out since July. I'm updating some training materials, and I'll try it here locally. -Ted. On 1/20/07, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I see now that the syntax I was trying to use was > added in Freemarker 2.3.7 --

Re: [S2] Freemarker Confusion

2007-01-20 Thread Joe Germuska
handling/reporting. I've already submitted patches for null handling in the select tags--this is just another instance were nulls slip through the cracks. Tom Joe Germuska wrote: > I've ran into an odd problem of my own and while I'm troubleshooting > it, I'm > hitting

[S2] Freemarker Confusion

2007-01-20 Thread Joe Germuska
self, except apparently I haven't found Freemarker syntax documentation which is right for our environment. Thanks Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "The truth is that we learned from João forever to be out of tune." -- Caetano Veloso

Re: Struts 2.0.3 tag broken (was Re: struts-2.0.3-all.jar missing files?)

2007-01-19 Thread Joe Germuska
posed to always go look for new snapshots unless you specify differently. But if Rene's solution works, that makes sense. -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "The truth is that we learned from João forever to be out of tune." -- Caetano Veloso

Re: Struts 2.0.3 tag broken (was Re: struts-2.0.3-all.jar missing files?)

2007-01-19 Thread Joe Germuska
unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PR

Re: [Tiles2] JSTL functions for Tiles taglib?

2007-01-16 Thread Joe Germuska
definition (layout pages for attributes, composite pages for the latter ones), so a simple "insertAttribute" does not give a complete idea of what it is. Ciao Antonio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For a

Re: [Tiles2] JSTL functions for Tiles taglib?

2007-01-12 Thread Joe Germuska
they're out there" as "we really oughta use 'em" -- especially since we resolved one of the questions I had about verbosity. I think people should remember that they are out there. I'm not sure I've found a critical use case for them yet, either in Tiles or in S

JSTL functions in *struts* JSP tags

2007-01-12 Thread Joe Germuska
thought was foo At least if we do have a use case for JSTL functions, we could use the ActionContext threadlocal to get our hands on the ServletContext, etc. Is it worth doing something for just the simplest case, or should I just get used to a little extra clutter in my pages? Joe -- Joe Germu

mvn deployment best practices? (Re: Permissions problems deploying to snapshot repo)

2007-01-12 Thread Joe Germuska
ECTED]> wrote: Fixed. Don Joe Germuska wrote: > Hey, I just sent this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and when I went to build a new > snapshot of struts-annotations, I got a "permission denied" > > Turns out the existing file is owned by mrdon:apcvs with 644 perms. > > I th

Permissions problems deploying to snapshot repo (Re: Failed build of svn HEAD on Mac OS X)

2007-01-12 Thread Joe Germuska
nnotations-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar on the repo server? Joe On 1/12/07, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This was actually just fixed in an obscure side dependency, struts-annotations (https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1392) I haven't deployed snapshots to the Apache repo

Re: [Tiles2] JSTL functions for Tiles taglib?

2007-01-12 Thread Joe Germuska
lement in the Tiles configuration file, they should be the same. Antonio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com

Re: [Tiles2] JSTL functions for Tiles taglib?

2007-01-11 Thread Joe Germuska
make these changes, although I'm not totally up to speed on Tiles development, the move to TLP, etc; if someone who has been more active wants to do it, I'll gladly defer. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "The truth is that we learned from João forever to be out of tune." -- Caetano Veloso

Re: [Tiles2] JSTL functions for Tiles taglib?

2007-01-11 Thread Joe Germuska
On 1/11/07, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I inferred the intent. I'm not sure if I agree with it or not, but I really haven't thought about it much. I agree there was lots of room for simplification and clarification in Tiles, so I won't say it was the w

Re: [Tiles2] JSTL functions for Tiles taglib?

2007-01-11 Thread Joe Germuska
plification and clarification are sometimes at odds with each other! Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "The truth is that we learned from João forever to be out of tune." -- Caetano Veloso

[Tiles2] JSTL functions for Tiles taglib?

2007-01-11 Thread Joe Germuska
led. In any case, I thought it would be interesting to see what people think of JSTL functions in Struts and/or Tiles even if this isn't the right case for them. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "The truth is that we learned from João forever to be out of tune." -- Caetano Veloso

Re: [VOTE] Promote Struts 1.3.5 to General Availability

2006-09-14 Thread Joe Germuska
Please respond with a vote on GA quality for Struts 1.3.5 [X ] +1Yes, Struts 1.3.5 should be promoted to GA quality. [ ] +/- 0 [ ] -1 No, let it remain Beta quality -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "The truth is that we learned from João forever

Re: Locale resolver (Re: WW/SAF2 i18n & Cintoo Messages)

2006-06-30 Thread Joe Germuska
ly, I think using an interface is a cleaner design than depending upon reflection, but I wouldn't veto a reflection based solution. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you ca

Re: Locale resolver (Re: WW/SAF2 i18n & Cintoo Messages)

2006-06-30 Thread Joe Germuska
lted cookies or request parameters. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can burn it out, it can be fixed. Try something new

Re: Struts 1.3.x: Using multiple chain configurations

2006-06-30 Thread Joe Germuska
e of catalogs which contain commands. You'd use the to specify the name of a catalog and the name of a command within that catalog which is to be executed to process the request. Therefore, you could specify different "bootstrap" commands for each controller until you turn blu

Re: Thoughts on 1.3.x

2006-06-29 Thread Joe Germuska
xt under a well known key. It's just that it feels so outdated! Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can bur

Re: Does Struts really need two frameworks? (long)

2006-06-21 Thread Joe Germuska
ution, so that anyone obtaining SAF2 can use Action 1, Action 2, and/or Shale 1? I don't like including either Action 1.3 or Shale 1.x in the SAF 2.0 release. People who need them can get them. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really ca

Re: [action2] Upgrade Dojo toolkit

2006-06-20 Thread Joe Germuska
rating "dojo" into its own theme is very much the right approach as well... Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can burn it out, it ca

Re: [action2] Upgrade Dojo toolkit

2006-06-19 Thread Joe Germuska
yep. I'm sure that's part of where I started to get the idea (along with the way DWR provides JS from behind a servlet) -- but what Martin is suggesting is presumably more specific to Dojo and not just a way of plugging it into Struts? Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http

Re: [action2] Upgrade Dojo toolkit

2006-06-19 Thread Joe Germuska
ts and make the tags do some of the client-side setup and such, but that's really more about convenience than integration to me (and not that convenience isn't important!). What about a modern alternative to the html:javascript tag which consulted serverside validation config?

Re: Struts 1.3.x: Using multiple chain configurations

2006-06-14 Thread Joe Germuska
point out where you think it's unnecessarily complicated? Do you have any ideas about how to do it differently? Joe Phil Joe Germuska wrote: At 9:23 PM +0100 6/13/06, Phil Zoio wrote: Is it possible to have multiple chain configurations for the same Struts 1.3 app. For exampl

Re: [Standalone Tiles] Changing the Semantics of the InsertTag

2006-06-14 Thread Joe Germuska
At 9:00 AM -0700 6/14/06, Wendy Smoak wrote: On 6/14/06, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Would you consider some kind of compatibility mode? That is, before you remove support for these, could there be a way for people to configure things for a more strict or more comp

Re: [Standalone Tiles] Changing the Semantics of the InsertTag

2006-06-14 Thread Joe Germuska
ut any major uses of the insert tag? Does this change remove any functionality that anyone is currently relying on? Thanks, Greg [1] http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SB-21 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Struts 1.3.x: Using multiple chain configurations

2006-06-13 Thread Joe Germuska
talogs, we would want to make this easier than it is now, but so far we just don't know enough about if or how people are likely to want to do this, so it's hard to know how to make it easier. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really c

Re: Why TagUtils.instance is final static. That cause me a lot of problem.. Is a small change can be done ...?

2006-06-13 Thread Joe Germuska
ted to returning the conventional one? Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can burn it out, it can be fixed. Try somethin

Re: Some comments & questions on Struts 1.3 chain & Strecks

2006-06-08 Thread Joe Germuska
looked up its CatalogFactory there. I think that in general, the Struts 1.x initialization process is awfully constraining, but I haven't had any substantially better ideas about how to do it. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can

Re: [SAF2] Tossing an idea around: PDFResult

2006-06-06 Thread Joe Germuska
phony.com/webwork/api/com/opensymphony/webwork/views/jasperreports/JasperReportsResult.html Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can burn it out, it can be fixed. Try som

Re: [SAF2] Tossing an idea around: PDFResult

2006-06-05 Thread Joe Germuska
n with the iText team for eventual integration to their project, or if not, to be served independently. Is there any problem with iText's license? (dual LGPL/MPL)? May be worth a look at PDFBox, which is BSD licensed: http://pdfbox.org/ Just a few fragmentary thoughts... Joe -- Joe Ger

Re: Request to publish Struts 1.3.5

2006-05-28 Thread Joe Germuska
. In my mind, 1.3.5 has not been released yet, and Wendy's test build could be scrapped and a new 1.3.5 produced, but I'm not sure if everyone exactly agrees with all of that. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anythi

Re: Request to publish Struts 1.3.5

2006-05-28 Thread Joe Germuska
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- HTH, Ted. * http://www.husted.com/struts/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com

Re: Custom RequestProcessor

2006-05-25 Thread Joe Germuska
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Miguel Galves - Engenheiro de Computação Já leu meus blogs hoje? Para geeks http://log4dev.blogspot.com Pra pessoas normais http://miguelgalves.blogspot.com "Não sabendo que era impossível, e

Re: [action1] Snapshot of 1.3.5 available

2006-05-25 Thread Joe Germuska
At 8:10 PM -0700 5/24/06, Wendy Smoak wrote: On 5/24/06, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I haven't had a chance to file a bug on this one yet, but I think there's a problem in how the PerformForward command handles modules. (I posted about it to the list but got no res

Re: DWR/Struts integration: why? (Re: JavaOne Ajax Discussion)

2006-05-25 Thread Joe Germuska
org/internet-drafts/draft-crockford-jsonorg-json-04.txt Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can burn it out, it

Re: JavaOne Ajax Discussion

2006-05-24 Thread Joe Germuska
about inconsistent states based on different invocation mechanisms, then I don't see any real objection. I still don't *get it*, but that's my problem :) Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by tryin

Re: DWR/Struts integration: why? (Re: JavaOne Ajax Discussion)

2006-05-24 Thread Joe Germuska
At 11:55 AM -0400 5/24/06, Frank W. Zammetti wrote: On Wed, May 24, 2006 11:12 am, Joe Germuska wrote: > Forgive me if this has been covered elsewhere, but I'm still confused about why someone would want to "integrate" DWR with Struts? I've only used it a bit, but

DWR/Struts integration: why? (Re: JavaOne Ajax Discussion)

2006-05-24 Thread Joe Germuska
ople to use ServletFilters where they want common behavior on every request. Help me out here... Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can burn it out,

Re: [action1] Snapshot of 1.3.5 available

2006-05-24 Thread Joe Germuska
orward looked like it was mishandling modules. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can burn it out, it can be fixed. Try som

Re: XWork 2, JDK 1.5

2006-05-23 Thread Joe Germuska
as a lot of uncommitted changes, it would probably make sense to let him commit them before migrating, if the migration is to go ahead. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even

Re: [action2] Build broken

2006-05-19 Thread Joe Germuska
or additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can burn it out, it can be fixed. Try som

Various Module bugs in Struts 1.3.x (Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.4 Quality)

2006-05-16 Thread Joe Germuska
At 1:07 PM -0500 5/16/06, Joe Germuska wrote: I've uncovered a couple of things in porting an old Struts 1.1 application to 1.3; I know they probably need to go in Jira, but I wanted to get a little discussion about them before filing them. Actually, now I think i'll send them separ

Bug/change in interpretation of ActionMapping with CRP (Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.4 Quality)

2006-05-16 Thread Joe Germuska
At 1:07 PM -0500 5/16/06, Joe Germuska wrote: I've uncovered a couple of things in porting an old Struts 1.1 application to 1.3; I know they probably need to go in Jira, but I wanted to get a little discussion about them before filing them. Actually, now I think i'll send them separ

Release Process thoughts (Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.4 Quality)

2006-05-16 Thread Joe Germuska
ting an old Struts 1.1 application to 1.3; I know they probably need to go in Jira, but I wanted to get a little discussion about them before filing them. Actually, now I think i'll send them separately with different subject lines to help manage the various conversations that might arise.

[OT] reading resources from nested JARs (Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.4 Quality)

2006-05-11 Thread Joe Germuska
n formal documentation of this issue? We've always just worked around it. The bottom line, it is better to hide DTDs in the JAR, but in case it does not work a readily available HOW-TO should be provided. Indeed. -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "Yo

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.4 Quality

2006-05-11 Thread Joe Germuska
y, but since by default most people wouldn't have removed the chain-config.xml from the ZIP, I think it's easier to say "change this in web.xml" than "unpack this thing from web.xml and then edit it." Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com

Re: SAF2 Support for Java 1.4

2006-05-11 Thread Joe Germuska
n compatibility. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can burn it out, it can be fixed. Try something new

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.4 Quality

2006-05-10 Thread Joe Germuska
At 11:21 AM -0700 5/10/06, Wendy Smoak wrote: On 5/10/06, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This seems like the smallest of things, but the distribution includes struts-core-1.3.4.jar and not struts-action-1.3.4.jar. I thought we'd decided to change that? The upgrade note

Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.4 Quality

2006-05-10 Thread Joe Germuska
I've had 1.3 based code in production for months, so I'm GA on the code -- as for whether the above is an important packaging problem or just something that needs to be updated in docs, I'll defer. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You reall

Re: Messages Round II (was Leveraging known constructs (was Public API first draft))

2006-05-05 Thread Joe Germuska
e, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http:

Re: [action2] Leveraging known constructs (was Public API first draft)

2006-05-05 Thread Joe Germuska
ands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAI

Re: SAF 1.3.x and legacy RequestProcessor

2006-05-05 Thread Joe Germuska
At 3:03 PM +0100 5/5/06, Niall Pemberton wrote: On 5/5/06, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Its probably academic, but since CRP extends RP then it seems incorrect to deprecate the whole class with a view to removing in the future. Wouldn't it be more correct to dep

Re: SAF 1.3.x and legacy RequestProcessor

2006-05-05 Thread Joe Germuska
ds are superceded by commands; it's just the set-up (and possibly teardown?) that are still new enough that it's hard to know. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if yo

Re: [action2] Public API first draft

2006-05-04 Thread Joe Germuska
, but I've found it pretty handy. It's also a bigger model change from both Struts and Webwork than may be appropriate at this time. In short, I think it's nice to have a "warning" level if we can work out a clean way to support it. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: SAF 1.3.x and legacy RequestProcessor

2006-05-04 Thread Joe Germuska
chain non-functional. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can burn it out, it can be fixed. Try somethin

Re: Action 1 and 2 as separate projects? (was This has gone too far.)

2006-04-26 Thread Joe Germuska
it on dev, add issues to the tracker, etc. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can burn it out, it can be fixed. Try something new." -- Robert Moog ---

Re: [action2] Action Next++ (Ti Phase 2)

2006-04-24 Thread Joe Germuska
it up later. I'm inclined to agree with Bob here. At this point, I think that the first release of SAF2 should be taking the stage as more than just WebWork 2.x with renamed packages. It doesn't need to be radically different, but it should be more than that. Joe

Re: Standalone Tiles as TLP

2006-04-24 Thread Joe Germuska
s belongs in Struts projects (and the same for tiles-velocity probably, although I don't really know that code.) Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can burn it out,

Re: [Struts Ti] XWork?

2006-03-30 Thread Joe Germuska
ur first release, so your help will be big. I haven't yet had a chance to look at this myself. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can burn it out, it can be fixed. Tr

Re: [Struts Ti] XWork?

2006-03-30 Thread Joe Germuska
#x27;s the status/plan/etc? This is something I've just started thinking about in the last couple of weeks, but don't want to reinvent the wheel... Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something ne

RE: SV: Struts 1.3 and Internationalization

2006-03-30 Thread Joe Germuska
that inherently lies within Struts does not help Struts become better. Hermod -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Cooper Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 12:46 AM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: SV: Struts 1.3 and Internatio

Re: SV: Struts 1.3 and Internationalization

2006-03-29 Thread Joe Germuska
with some code deep down in Struts not being able to access the locale from the request, and adding support would mean no backward compatibility. Correct me if I am wrong. It is quite some time since I ran into this (1.2.2 or something), and I solved it by hacking the html:text tag and some other

JS Libraries (was Re: [WebWork2] TODO)

2006-03-28 Thread Joe Germuska
s very conservative about that, but it may do us well to challenge that philosophy. Still, having roots in that philosophy, again my inclination is to try to be more library agnostic. Can that work? Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can

Re: [WebWork2] TODO

2006-03-27 Thread Joe Germuska
At 9:59 AM -0500 3/27/06, Frank W. Zammetti wrote: On Mon, March 27, 2006 9:22 am, Joe Germuska said: I wonder if there's a way to generalize an "API" out of these so that we are less bound to an implementation. Certainly, a date picker or rich text field which ultimate

Re: [WebWork2] TODO

2006-03-27 Thread Joe Germuska
ield which ultimately just ends up setting a value of a single form field should be not too hard to generalize, although I haven't looked at all the models for integrating JS widgets into a page neatly. I guess there are also issues of triggering the widgets, etc. Hope this helps

Re: WebWork renaming strategy *revised*

2006-03-25 Thread Joe Germuska
t;SAF" for purely aesthetic reasons, but not to the point where I'd make a fuss. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can burn it out,

Re: WebWork renaming strategy

2006-03-24 Thread Joe Germuska
javawebparts.sourceforge.net Supplying the wheel, so you don't have to reinvent it! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything

Re: Maven 2 repository containing Action 1.3?

2006-03-23 Thread Joe Germuska
s Nico's extrapolation, but in any case, I just don't think it's necessary to have that extra layer in there. Not something I feel extremely strongly about, but since two other folks brought it up, I figured I'd chime in. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog

Applying Annotations to Struts (Re: [OT] What can I do?)

2006-03-20 Thread Joe Germuska
ystems to Java 5, and I doubt he's the most conservative one out there. (well... maybe :) naah.) Spring, at least, supports Annotations in pre-Java-5, so there is an example that could be mined. I don't know how much extra effort it takes, but I thought I'd throw it o

Re: [Proposal] Consolidate extras, EL, taglibs, and faces under 'action' (was Maven groupId and svn repo structure)

2006-03-17 Thread Joe Germuska
Wendy ----- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying s

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.9 Quality

2006-03-17 Thread Joe Germuska
e too many Struts flavors already. -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can burn it out, it can be fixed. Try something new."

Re: [Proposal] Switch to JIRA

2006-03-01 Thread Joe Germuska
re: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-742 -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can burn it out, it can be fixed. Try something new.&quo

RE: Next steps for Action 1.3.1 (was Re: Reasons for 1.3 release)

2006-02-20 Thread Joe Germuska
in further debates if there were any more points raised beyond our mutual opinions. I think by far the bigger issue is that not enough people have looked closely at the code enough for a strong discussion to be held. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com &quo

Re: Reasons for 1.3 release

2006-02-20 Thread Joe Germuska
focus is on coding request handling paths as opposed to wiring together components and events (as in Shale). Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can burn it

Re: Reasons for 1.3 release

2006-02-17 Thread Joe Germuska
u couldn't possibly use servlet filters instead of the chain without at least requiring those upgrading to Struts 1.3 to learn the new way to configure their web.xml. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying s

Re: Reasons for 1.3 release

2006-02-16 Thread Joe Germuska
thers will never bother to touch Struts 1.3 and will have already started using WebWork. There is a broad spectrum of users out there. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can

Re: [VOTE] Confirm the Struts Action Library 1.3.0 release plan

2006-02-16 Thread Joe Germuska
If people agree with some of the recent concerns about the API, like the naming and responsibility of the ActionContext class, then they could vote to mark the release merely Alpha -- but that doesn't mean there shouldn't be a release. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http:/

Re: [VOTE] Confirm the Struts Action Library 1.3.0 release plan

2006-02-15 Thread Joe Germuska
't think we necessarily have to worry that much about this potential overlap. That said, I wouldn't veto a change if other committers agree strongly with Paul. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by tr

Re: [VOTE] Confirm the Struts Action Library 1.3.0 release plan

2006-02-13 Thread Joe Germuska
At 10:24 AM -0800 2/13/06, Don Brown wrote: +1 Lets just get something out the door already :) +1 and amen -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying something new, and even if you can burn it out, it can be f

Re: Validation Security Hole?

2006-01-26 Thread Joe Germuska
e globally turned it off until any action mappings have that attribute set.. An additional, independent parameter to turn it off just seems like it will be confusing. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by trying s

Re: [VOTE] Accept WebWork 2 Merger Incubator Proposal

2006-01-25 Thread Joe Germuska
arguments for either way. For example, when referring to a musical group whose name isn't plural, there are different conventions in the US and the UK. Like this current headline from nme.com: "Elbow join Lancastrian super-gig" In the States, it would probably be "Elbow joi

Re: [VOTE] Accept WebWork 2 Merger Incubator Proposal

2006-01-25 Thread Joe Germuska
At 8:16 PM -0800 1/24/06, Don Brown wrote: = PROJECT PROPOSAL = WebWork 2: A Java web application development framework A proposal to merge the WebWork 2 community and codebase into the Apache Struts project. The new codebase is slated to become Struts Action 2. +1 -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL

Re: Validation Security Hole?

2006-01-23 Thread Joe Germuska
, not primarily at least. At 4:54 PM -0500 1/23/06, Rick Reumann wrote: On 1/23/06, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 3:37 PM -0500 1/23/06, Frank W. Zammetti wrote: > The proposed solution requires that the person intentionally using this feature make one further indi

Re: Validation Security Hole?

2006-01-23 Thread Joe Germuska
ies http://www.omnytex.com AIM: fzammetti Yahoo: fzammetti MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, January 23, 2006 3:16 pm, Joe Germuska said: At 3:11 PM -0500 1/23/06, James Mitchell wrote: While in my own work, I don't use html:cancel as a firewall to bad data, I can see where this has a p

Re: Validation Security Hole?

2006-01-23 Thread Joe Germuska
chell Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist Consulting / Mentoring 678.910.8017 - Original Message - From: "Joe Germuska" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: gmane.comp.jakarta.struts.devel Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 10:10 AM Subject: Re: Validation Security Hole? Here

Re: Validation Security Hole?

2006-01-23 Thread Joe Germuska
mmediately and delete all copies of this message. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://blog.germuska.com "You really can't burn anything out by tryi

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >