Re: Would we need to achieve better place in trends ranking?

Being smaller than Spring Boot is a pretty low bar ;) But interesting--I actually would have guessed both would be more resource-intensive; I'm clearly behind-the-times. On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 5:18 AM Johannes Geppert wrote: > In my first tests it looks like Struts2 is not to heavy to run as

Re: Would we need to achieve better place in trends ranking?

In my first tests it looks like Struts2 is not to heavy to run as a lambda function. In fact the bundled jar is smaller than a similar Spring Boot version and the used memory is lower as well. See my small comparison between these both serverless solutions:

RE: Would we need to achieve better place in trends ranking?

>-Original Message- >From: Dave Newton >Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2018 11:24 PM >To: Struts Developers List >Subject: Re: Would we need to achieve better place in trends ranking? > >On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 2:44 PM Yasser Zamani >wrote: > >> Instead

Re: Would we need to achieve better place in trends ranking?

> > > MG> remembering days of barosso-wannamacher regime the JS library du-jour > >was 'sitemesh' has struts2 deprecated support for sitemesh? > SiteMesh had nothing to do with JS. MG>more of an alert to JS programmers that for title/body/page.properties decorations can be handled by sitemesh

Re: Would we need to achieve better place in trends ranking?

> > > MG> remembering days of barosso-wannamacher regime the JS library du-jour > >was 'sitemesh' has struts2 deprecated support for sitemesh? > SiteMesh had nothing to do with JS.

RE: Would we need to achieve better place in trends ranking?

>MG>remembering days of barosso-wannamacher regime the JS library du-jour >was 'sitemesh' >MG>has struts2 deprecated support for sitemesh? Hi Martin, No not yet AFAIK. However maybe we will have to because Sitemesh seems has been abolished in 2015 [1] Regards. [1]

Re: Would we need to achieve better place in trends ranking?

MG>agreed ..pls see ? below From: Dave Newton Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2018 2:54 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: Would we need to achieve better place in trends ranking? On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 2:44 PM Yasser Zamani wrote: > Instead we may

Re: Would we need to achieve better place in trends ranking?

On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 2:44 PM Yasser Zamani wrote: > Instead we may focus to facilitate "show mobile version of user web > app". I don't know if S2 already have such facilities e.g. via Tiles or > SiteMesh plugin. > Desktop vs. Mobile is now solidly in the realm of CSS, possibly with

Re: Would we need to achieve better place in trends ranking?

On 12/5/2018 5:58 PM, Dave Newton wrote: > On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 4:37 AM Yasser Zamani > wrote: > >> I found dagger2 best when there are limited resources and we need an >> urgent performance e.g. in mobile devices. But Struts unfortunately is not >> able to be used in mobile app developments

Re: Would we need to achieve better place in trends ranking?

> @dev wdyt? I thought what about add integration with front-end trends e.g. React, Angular, Vu.js, Node.js? Node.js is not front-end. You can use Struts with js front-ends, all you need is to serve json. Which can be achieved with rest or json plugin. Speaking of which, the json plugin can

Re: Would we need to achieve better place in trends ranking?

On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 4:37 AM Yasser Zamani wrote: > I found dagger2 best when there are limited resources and we need an > urgent performance e.g. in mobile devices. But Struts unfortunately is not > able to be used in mobile app developments so we can postpone dagger 2 to > when Struts will

RE: Would we need to achieve better place in trends ranking?

>From: Ken McWilliams >Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 5:55 AM >To: Struts Developers List >Subject: Re: Would we need to achieve better place in trends ranking? > >Lukasz it's good to hear the JSON plugin is on the horizon. For my own work I >created a new JSON Resul

Re: Would we need to achieve better place in trends ranking?

2017-11-10 11:35 GMT+01:00 Yasser Zamani : > However, I thought about bring these to our maven build and github > system. I saw this approach a few month ago with Apache commons-lang. > When I requested a pull, I saw it fails because I don't add a @since tag > or because I

Re: Would we need to achieve better place in trends ranking?

On 11/10/2017 12:58 PM, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > I have added a Jenkins build to perform a Sonar analysis per push but > I disabled spamming the dev@ list for now;-) > > https://builds.apache.org/analysis/overview?id=org.apache.struts%3Astruts2-parent > > 2017-11-08 11:18 GMT+01:00 Lukasz

Re: Would we need to achieve better place in trends ranking?

I have added a Jenkins build to perform a Sonar analysis per push but I disabled spamming the dev@ list for now ;-) https://builds.apache.org/analysis/overview?id=org.apache.struts%3Astruts2-parent 2017-11-08 11:18 GMT+01:00 Lukasz Lenart : > There is a Sonar instance

Re: Would we need to achieve better place in trends ranking?

There is a Sonar instance running https://builds.apache.org/analysis/ 2017-11-07 19:16 GMT+01:00 Yasser Zamani : > > > On 7/18/2017 10:37 AM, Lukasz Lenart wrote: >> less static util classes and coupled code > > I started playing with JDepend [1] to see if I can have a

Re: Would we need to achieve better place in trends ranking?

On 7/18/2017 10:37 AM, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > less static util classes and coupled code I started playing with JDepend [1] to see if I can have a graphical anatomy of Struts :) and see if any wrong connection has been established during development. However, it is not updated for several

Re: Would we need to achieve better place in trends ranking?

On 7/19/2017 5:55 AM, Ken McWilliams wrote: > Lukasz it's good to hear the JSON plugin is on the horizon. For my own work > I created a new JSON Result type using FlexJson, for some reason I liked it > better when serializing JPA Entities, it will by default serialize > primitive types on the

Re: Would we need to achieve better place in trends ranking?

> > Are we, volunteers, allowed to help/contribute with such structural > > changes? I hope yes. If so, I have passion in `support for > > actors/asynchronous request handling`. Could you please register an > > issue with a few directive details? then we can pick and start work on > > that :) same

Re: Would we need to achieve better place in trends ranking?

2017-07-18 12:03 GMT+02:00 Yasser Zamani : > Are we, volunteers, allowed to help/contribute with such structural > changes? I hope yes. If so, I have passion in `support for > actors/asynchronous request handling`. Could you please register an > issue with a few directive

Re: Would we need to achieve better place in trends ranking?

Thanks a lot for your share of experience (I have read it several times these days). As I understand, you mention sparkjava because of it's DI (Dagger2), right? To understand deeper, I'll study them as soon as I had time to understand `what make the difference` and if Struts has a chance to

Re: Would we need to achieve better place in trends ranking?

Lukasz it's good to hear the JSON plugin is on the horizon. For my own work I created a new JSON Result type using FlexJson, for some reason I liked it better when serializing JPA Entities, it will by default serialize primitive types on the object but will not travel the graph unless you

Re: Would we need to achieve better place in trends ranking?

Great! Happy that I know these now! Are we, volunteers, allowed to help/contribute with such structural changes? I hope yes. If so, I have passion in `support for actors/asynchronous request handling`. Could you please register an issue with a few directive details? then we can pick and start

Re: Would we need to achieve better place in trends ranking?

2017-07-17 10:49 GMT+02:00 Yasser Zamani : > Absolutely, I did not mean you yourself should do or did something :) I > just asked these to know if me/we, contributors, should just wait for > user's demands in jira. or no, it's needed to analysis, study and discus >

Re: Would we need to achieve better place in trends ranking?

Thank you very much! I have no experience with Spring MVC and JSF so far. So unfortunately I do not know about it's major release migrations. I also have no idea why it is in more usage :/ Absolutely, I did not mean you yourself should do or did something :) I just asked these to know if

Re: Would we need to achieve better place in trends ranking?

2017-07-15 15:55 GMT+02:00 Yasser Zamani : > Hi there, > > This is a 2016 trend of Web Framework Usages from [1]. > java-web-frameworks-usage-trends > > I would like to know if we need an analysis of why S2 is number 4 in > ranking? If so, then we can plan for enhancements