Re: 1.3.0 Release - Next Steps

On 12/20/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The result of 'maven multiproject:site', zipped up, is 17.5 MB. I still can't get that goal to run, so I've been building the ones I work on individually. -- E:\projects\Apache\struts\flow\src\java\org\apache\struts\flow\core\javascript\f om\

svn commit: r358289 - in /struts/site/trunk/xdocs: acquiring.xml index.xml kickstart.xml navigation.xml

Author: husted Date: Wed Dec 21 05:21:40 2005 New Revision: 358289 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=358289&view=rev Log: Site * Add "Building Struts" section to Acquiring. Modified: struts/site/trunk/xdocs/acquiring.xml struts/site/trunk/xdocs/index.xml struts/site/trunk/xdocs

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37992] New: - Enhancement required In DynaValidatorForm

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37995] New: - Hanging Fileupload in Large Input JSP

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37995] - Hanging Fileupload in Large Input JSP

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37996] New: - ClassCastException in MessageResourcesFactory.createFactory

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[shale] ShalePhaseListener behaviour when ViewController throws exceptions

I've come across an issue with the ShalePhaseListener that occurs whenever a ViewController throws an exception. We are using MyFaces 1.1.1 in a project but have also included shale-core.jar and shale-spring.jar to take advantage of the shale's ViewController functionality (which is a lifesa

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project struts-taglib (in module struts) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project struts-taglib has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affect

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project struts-taglib (in module struts) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project struts-taglib has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affect

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37997] New: - FormTag looses "name" attribute in XHTML mode

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37996] - ClassCastException in MessageResourcesFactory.createFactory

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37997] - FormTag looses "name" attribute in XHTML mode

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [shale] ShalePhaseListener behaviour when ViewController throws exceptions

On 12/21/05, Darren Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I've come across an issue with the ShalePhaseListener that occurs > whenever a ViewController throws an exception. > > We are using MyFaces 1.1.1 in a project but have also included > shale-core.jar and shale-spring.jar to take advantage of

[PROPOSAL] Rename Struts Ti to Struts Action 2.0 Proposal, keep Ti as code name

As we discovered further at ApacheCon this year, there is a lot of confusion as to what Struts is and where it is going. The story that I think we are all in agreement is Struts has two separate but equal frameworks - Action and Shale. To avoid further confusion, I propose we rename Struts Ti

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rename Struts Ti to Struts Action 2.0 Proposal, keep Ti as code name

I for one think this makes a tremendous amount of sense. However, does the word "proposal" still possibly represent some confusion? Is Shale still being billed as a "proposed Struts 2.0"? If it is, then calling Ti a proposal as well makes sense, but then there is still some confusion about Shale

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rename Struts Ti to Struts Action 2.0 Proposal, keep Ti as code name

On 12/21/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As we discovered further at ApacheCon this year, there is a lot of > confusion as to what Struts is and where it is going. The story that I > think we are all in agreement is Struts has two separate but equal > frameworks - Action and Shale. T

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rename Struts Ti to Struts Action 2.0 Proposal, keep Ti as code name

At 11:36 AM -0800 12/21/05, Don Brown wrote: As we discovered further at ApacheCon this year, there is a lot of confusion as to what Struts is and where it is going. The story that I think we are all in agreement is Struts has two separate but equal frameworks - Action and Shale. To avoid fur

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rename Struts Ti to Struts Action 2.0 Proposal, keep Ti as code name

The package name follows the Shale and really Jakarta convention where the TLP (Struts and Jakarta respectively) isn't included in the package name. As for there being "one true Struts 2.0", I believe that idea has gone by the wayside. It might be possible someday to merge Shale and Action, b

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rename Struts Ti to Struts Action 2.0 Proposal, keep Ti as code name

On 12/21/05, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At 11:36 AM -0800 12/21/05, Don Brown wrote: > >As we discovered further at ApacheCon this year, there is a lot of > >confusion as to what Struts is and where it is going. The story > >that I think we are all in agreement is Struts has two s

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37997] - FormTag looses "name" attribute in XHTML mode

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35127] - [taglib] All Javascript validation fails when is present

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [PROPOSAL] Rename Struts Ti to Struts Action 2.0 Proposal, keep Ti as code name

At 12:10 PM -0800 12/21/05, Don Brown wrote: The package name follows the Shale and really Jakarta convention where the TLP (Struts and Jakarta respectively) isn't included in the package name. As for there being "one true Struts 2.0", I believe that idea has gone by the wayside. It might be

[PROPOSAL] Revised: Rename Struts Ti phase 1 to Struts Action 2.0, leave Ti to explore original goals

Thank you everyone for your quick feedback. Based on the various comments and discussions, I'd like to revise my proposal: 1. Rename Struts Ti phase 1 to Struts Action 2.0 - Will contain WebWork, Struts migration tools, commons-chain integration, and other small improvements 2. Leave Ti to e

Re: [PROPOSAL] Revised: Rename Struts Ti phase 1 to Struts Action 2.0, leave Ti to explore original goals

Sorry, but I'm going to try to tweak this proposal with the hope that it makes this whole discussion even simpler: I propose we get rid of the name Ti entirely. Just as there is no such thing as a Struts framework (Struts Shale and Struts Action, right?), I propose that from this day forth we shun

Re: [PROPOSAL] Revised: Rename Struts Ti phase 1 to Struts Action 2.0, leave Ti to explore original goals

On 12/21/05, Patrick Lightbody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sorry, but I'm going to try to tweak this proposal with the hope that > it makes this whole discussion even simpler: > > I propose we get rid of the name Ti entirely. Just as there is no such > thing as a Struts framework (Struts Shale a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38000] New: - ShalePhaseListener executes ViewController.prerender twice after exception

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38000] - ShalePhaseListener executes ViewController.prerender twice after exception

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [PROPOSAL] Revised: Rename Struts Ti phase 1 to Struts Action 2.0, leave Ti to explore original goals

On 12/21/05, Patrick Lightbody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sorry, but I'm going to try to tweak this proposal with the hope that > it makes this whole discussion even simpler: > > I propose we get rid of the name Ti entirely. Just as there is no such > thing as a Struts framework (Struts Shale a

Re: [PROPOSAL] Revised: Rename Struts Ti phase 1 to Struts Action 2.0, leave Ti to explore original goals

I thought that you guys wanted simply to rename WebWork 2.x to Struts 2.0 (along with package renaming), and to add stuff from Ti later in the mix. I guess I got it all wrong ;-) Michael. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [PROPOSAL] Revised: Rename Struts Ti phase 1 to Struts Action 2.0, leave Ti to explore original goals

Cool. Yeah, I'm not suggesting we don't have a sandbox or anything, I just want us to get the phrase "Struts Ti" out of the mouths of people outside of the development community. Sounds like we're all in agreement. On 12/21/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/21/05, Patrick Lig

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38000] - ShalePhaseListener executes ViewController.prerender twice after exception

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] Struts Shale 1.0.0 Quality

On 12/5/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Once you have had a chance to assess to quality of this build, please > respond with a vote on the quality: The core-library API docs are missing from the 1.0.0 build. Other than that, I don't see anything that hasn't already been reporte

svn commit: r358479 - /struts/site/trunk/xdocs/volunteers.xml

Author: martinc Date: Wed Dec 21 20:01:00 2005 New Revision: 358479 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=358479&view=rev Log: Wendy is now a PMC member. Modified: struts/site/trunk/xdocs/volunteers.xml Modified: struts/site/trunk/xdocs/volunteers.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/str

[Struts Wiki] Update of "StrutsMaintenanceMaven" by WendySmoak

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by WendySmoak: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsMaintenanceMaven The comment on the change is: Note that we're using Maven 1.0.2 to avoid confusio