Actually, it's not Beta (or Alpha or GA) nor is it a Release, until we
vote on it, in, say, a week from now. At this point, it's just a Test
Build. Until the community has got used to this new build numbering
scheme, we need to be very careful about how we label each build.
--
Martin C
Thanks. I've requested the change.
--
Martin Cooper
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 09:19:00 +1300, Richard Bywater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just wondering if its just me, or is the Bugzilla Bug Report still
> going to the old [EMAIL PROTECTED] address? Should this
>
ess that I followed for 1.2.4, and that is the process that I want
to see us adopt. It was actually my understanding that we had already
done so, which is why I've been following it. If the HTTPD process is
different from that, then I am -1 on adopting that process.
--
Martin Cooper
>
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 12:13:10 -0500, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 9:35 AM -0700 10/18/04, Martin Cooper wrote:
> >On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 08:07:41 -0500, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >Here's my +1 for adopting the HTTP server
ixing "Alpha Build" and "Beta Release" is confusing, and people will
not cotton on to the distinction between Build and Release. That
distinction is important, and we need people to recognise it.
--
Martin Cooper
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 16:11:30 -0400, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTEC
ced bug-free beta software? For that matter,
have you ever experienced bug-free software at all? ;-)
--
Martin Cooper
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Craig McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
ming
out of the Struts project. And yes, we should document that. ;-)
--
Martin Cooper
> Craig
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:06:25 -0500, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > At 10:55 AM -0700 10/18/04, Martin Cooper wrote:
> > >The 1.2.1
the way we build and
release Struts, the model that was proposed was the Tomcat model, and
that is still the model I would like to see us follow, terminology and
all.
--
Martin Cooper
>
> Craig
>
>
>
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 04:32:30 -0400, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
For a very long time now, we have had a strict policy of not including
anything that is not part of the HTML 4.01 spec or XHTML spec. I am
still very much in favour of that policy, and am actively
disinterested in seeing non-conforming additions to Struts.
--
Martin Cooper
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004
Do you have a particular objection to adopting the Tomcat scheme,
which Craig and I, at least, prefer over the HTTPD scheme? Can't we
just settle on the Tomcat scheme and move on?
--
Martin Cooper
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 01:02:35 -0400, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 01:31:45 -0400, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:13:51 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
> > Do you have a particular objection to adopting the Tomcat scheme,
> > which Craig and I, at least, prefer over the HTTPD scheme? Can't
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 01:28:29 -0400, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 20:47:56 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
> > When we first started discussing changes to the way we build and
> > release Struts, the model that was proposed was the Tomcat model,
>
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:54:35 -0700, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:39:44 -0700, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 01:28:29 -0400, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 19 Oct 2004
sabled, but it does show that the CLA he faxed
in has now been recorded, so a message to infra@ or ([EMAIL PROTECTED])should be
all that's needed. I'll ping them right now...
> > On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:38:15 -0700, Martin Cooper
> >> (BTW, I'm more than a little surpri
from Apache servers. (Which I'm
> sure the HTTPD team would do anyway.)
>
> Could people please signify which approach they would like to use for our release
> process, Tomcat or HTTPD? If we can get an actual majority vote on this, I'll shut
> up.
>
As
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 21:50:21 -0500, Eddie Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 11:33 AM
&
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 07:20:11 -0500, Eddie Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -----
> From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Eddie Bush" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL
old
e-mail account, meaning that any mail that would have been sent to
that should be sent to your new account.
--
Martin Cooper
> Thanks!
>
> Eddie
>
> ---
> avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
> Virus Database (VPS): 0443-3, 10/22/2004
> Tested on: 10/23
e component list to
choose from.)
If there is some question about whether it's in the external component
or in the glue, I think the bug should be left here until that is
determined.
--
Martin Cooper
> Does that rub anyone wrong? Why? I'm curious about protocol here.
>
>
bounce messages annoying ...
>
I think that's fine as long as you add a comment to that effect in the
bug report.
--
Martin Cooper
> Thanks! :-)
>
> ---
> avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
> Virus Database (VPS): 0443-3, 10/22/2004
> Tested on: 10/23/2004 1
olunteers.xml':
> authorization failed (https://svn.apache.org)
>
> Are you familiar with this at all? I was able to check things out (anonymously)
> using SVN without a hitch.
>
Just guessing, but this (your anonymous checkout) might be the
problem. If you didn't chec
Hmm, that's odd. I unsubscribed that address last night. Not sure why
it would still be bouncing. ;-(
--
Martin Cooper
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 21:06:44 -0500, Eddie Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm a committer for the Jakarta Struts project, and I'm
Um, that's Apache Commons. Jakarta Commons is alive and well. ;-)
--
Martin Cooper
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 21:15:14 -0500, Eddie Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Commons is closing? It only had one project in it? Am I delusional or is
> that incorrect?
>
> The commons is
ssed off with this discussion that I'm not
going to bother trying to push for what I believe is the right way to
do this, and I'll let Ted define the process we use, even if I
consider that to be the wrong way. If everyone else is happy with
that, then so be it.
--
Martin Cooper
> Most o
. Of course, a +1
> also implies that you will support the release, as always.
>
So now I only get to vote if I have an app in production? Give me a
break, Ted. First you hijack the original intent to move to a Tomcat
release process and convert it to the HTTPD process instead, and now
of fixes in the 1.3 trunk that
we also needed to get a 1.2.x to GA.)
--
Martin Cooper
>
>
>
> Problem Ticket Roundmap
>
> * #5157 - logic:iterate attributes inconsistent with rest of struts - Could be
> invalid
>
> * #18169 - Resource attribute of ms
get the data back to the server, then why tie the data
representation to the language you happen to be using in the client?
There is already a "standard" way of doing this, of sorts. It's XML.
The XMLHttpRequest object provides a means to do this, as do
browser-based frameworks such a
I just checked in DownloadAction, so it will be in the next nightly
build, and part of Struts 1.2.6.
--
Martin Cooper
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 11:31:20 -0400 (EDT), Frank W. Zammetti (MLists)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Martin... I'm not sure this is going to get through to the l
much
reason for Actions other than backwards compatibility. So rather than
have a standard Action that delegates to a chain, it seems to me that
it would make more sense to base things on Chain, and have a standard
Command that delegates to an Action to preserve backwards
compatibilty.
--
Martin
onent to communicate back to its server-side partner
without serialising and deserialising the page tree along with it.
That pretty much breaks the partial page rendering scheme right there,
unless you have the client and server parts of your components
communicate with each other "out of ban
checklist template to the website, but left it
> unlinked.
>
> * http://struts.apache.org/release-checklist.html
+1 (with the corrected link to the HTTPD guidelines ;)
--
Martin Cooper
> -Ted.
>
> On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 00:59:28 -0500, Eddie Bush wrote:
> > http://jakarta.a
I'd encourage, if we go down this path, is the creation of
one validator object in JavaScript that has the various validators as
methods, rather than creating a bunch of methods in the global
namespace. What we have now in Commons Validator does not scale, and
is increasingly likely to cause p
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 14:33:12 -0400, Frank W. Zammetti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Cooper wrote:
>
>
> > The app you describe does sound a little more extreme than one might
> > want, but I think it's a great illustration of what can be done with
> >
from the dev
list. It turns out that it was also subscribed to the user list, and I
just unsubscribed it from that. We should be OK now.
--
Martin Cooper
> I actually tried to contact the postmaster, but never heard anything back,
> the last time around.
>
> Eddie
>
>
>
>
have a lot of distinct
pages to construct and a page designer person doing that), JSF would
help you get there faster. Unfortunately, that's not the case for me,
and probably for many people building next generation web apps.
--
Martin Cooper
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 14:54:16 -0700, Craig Mc
n d'etre" for
JSF. So what, exactly, is the connection between JSF and Shale?
And why does Shale need to be linked to JSF?
--
Martin Cooper
> Craig
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
AFAIK, you shouldn't have to do the first two things for each file.
Those should just happen by default.
--
Martin Cooper
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 19:27:30 -, Niall Pemberton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've added a new page, but someone with with more SVN knowledge thean
One of the initial reasons for having one trunk / branches / tags
group, rather than several, was the desire to be able to refactor
across artifacts. If that is still retained with the proposal below,
then I'm fine with it. Otherwise, I think we need to consider it a bit
more.
--
Martin C
core' instead. Can I
still use the regular SVN move mechanism to move the class over,
keeping history, etc., when 'core' and 'faces' have separate trunk /
branches / tags?
boolean martin_happy = (answer.equals("yes")); // ;-)
--
Martin Cooper
> Don
>
&g
ng enough, and it's time to "move on to bigger and better
> things".
>
+1 to branching at 1.2.6. Assuming there are no objections, I'll
create a 1.2.x branch at the same time as I do the 1.2.6 label.
--
Martin Cooper
> We did tag and roll 1.2.5, it just didn't go
omeone wants to do
> the deed.
>
Excellent! I will roll it today.
BTW, I saw that you checked in a fix for #31642, but it still shows as
open in Bugzilla.
--
Martin Cooper
> -Ted.
>
>
>
> On Wed, 02 Jun 2004 09:14:12 -0400, Ted Husted wrote:
> > As mentioned, we can
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 12:03:48 -0500, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 07:56:02 -0800, Martin Cooper wrote:
> > Excellent! I will roll it today.
>
> The one thing might be a quick update of the release notes to catch us up. It
> should only be a
via the lists or via the bug
database.
--
Martin Cooper
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
andbox,
just for good measure. Going forward, the intent is to independently
release components, so we probably won't be tagging everything again. I
just wanted to make sure we had a solid grounding if we ever need to back
up.
--
Martin Cooper
-
l path names,
since there didn't seem much point (at least until I'm trying to work
on multiple branches at the same time).
--
Martin Cooper
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 22:00:49 -0600, Eddie Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's the best (ie. quickest, most painless) way to up
st get struts/*/trunk instead of the whole enchilada. ;-)
--
Martin Cooper
> Jack
>
> --
>
> "You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep."
>
> ~Native Proverb~
>
> "Each man is good in Hi
ApacheCon that ServletUnit is a
good, stable, full-featured framework for testing, well, servlet-based
code. I'd like us to take a look at that before we make any hard
decisions about testing frameworks.
--
Martin Cooper
> Don
>
>
>
> Joe Germuska wrote:
>
> >
,
> LazyDynaMap, WrapDynaBean.getInstance(), and FastHashMap,. What's up?
You need to update your BeanUtils and Digester versions. See section 1.5 here:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease126
--
Martin Cooper
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Jack
>
> On Mon, 22 No
I got side-tracked into a config
implementation - but I'm hoping that will be done soon. Once
FileUpload 1.1 is released, then I'll get to work on fixing the big
mess that is upload in Struts 1.2. ;-)
--
Martin Cooper
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:59:37 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED
of Struts 1.3. However, since we
instituted a policy of not depending on any other components that are
unreleased, that's not going to happen until Commons Chain is released
- which is exactly why I'm pushing to get that released. ;-)
--
Martin Cooper
> > I would assume that the
to
look in two different places, it simply looks for hivemodule.xml in
the META-INF directory. That would work for both web apps and jar
files.
--
Martin Cooper
> Don
>
>
>
> Craig McClanahan wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:58:11 -0800, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROT
ry it in Shale. ;-)
Also, it seems unfortunate that ShaleWebContext appears to be already
nailed to the servlet API, rather than usable with portlets as well.
--
Martin Cooper
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For addit
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:53:00 -0800, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:44:04 -0800, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there any reason that a JSF-independent version of the
> > application-wide controller scheme, as j
e a
> class that runs shell and batch scripts that compile classes? I've
> not done that and don't have a clue. Talk to me! LOL ;-)
I'm afraid I don't really understand what you are asking for. Are you
just asking for how you can compile Java code from Java code? I
inclusion is however.
My preference is to not add the app itself to Struts. f you don't want
to host it yourself, and believe it needs ongoing development, you
might want to talk to the folks at the Struts Applications project on
SourceForge.
--
Martin Cooper
> --
> Frank W. Zammet
h a
definitive set of criteria for what is, and is not, accepted, making
it difficult to close the door to any random Struts app once the door
is open.
Of course, this is just me; other Struts committers may have different opinions.
--
Martin Cooper
>
> Jack
>
> On Fri,
ge, what -
and where - is it?
--
Martin Cooper
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 19:53:22 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 18:24:41 -0800, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:39:51 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROT
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 23:27:44 -0500, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's a download module in the struts-examples application.
Er, that's an upload example. ;-)
--
Martin Cooper
> Originally, these were separate applications demonstrating validation,
> do
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 13:33:38 -0500, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 20:42:07 -0800, Martin Cooper wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 23:27:44 -0500, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> There's a download module
e currently allow to be used.
One example of how we might do this:
Do things the way we do now (i.e. a custom property):
Set a mapped property instead of an individual one:
Notice the use of 'key' instead of 'property' to indicate that this
will land up as a key/value pair in
providing a better environment for testing.
+1 for defining a context, reducing servlet API dependencies, and
making the framework more testable. :-)
--
Martin Cooper
> Is there any interest in this, or is it cracked? If it's not
> cracked, we might also take a longer-term look at
is would be where things like the current module and
the module's resource bundles are stashed, amongst other things as you
suggested.
--
Martin Cooper
> Ted, in fact, suggested an API bean previously as well, and I believe
> has even started sketching out what one might look like.
&g
Hmm, that's odd. How are you trying to build? I can run 'ant clean
dist' just fine with Digester 1.6, and that builds
tiles-documentation.war.
--
Martin Cooper
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 09:54:36 -0500, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't compile the til
I don't think it's fair to
expect them to keep Eclipse config files up to date when they make
changes elsewhere.
2) This would open the door for just about any other tool's config
files to be kept in our repo. If it's OK for Eclipse, why not IDEA,
netBeans, JBuilder, JDevelop
Please move this thread to a Java language mailing list. This
discussion is not related to Struts. Thanks.
--
Martin Cooper
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:30:03 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Craig,
>
> I am thinking of doing a wrapper, e.g. PointComposite, which will
velop your HaD ideas, then great! But have the Struts
part of the discussion here, and please ask your Java language
questions elsewhere. By your logic, this list would be open to any and
all Java language questions, and I for one am very strongly against
allowing that to happen.
--
Martin Cooper
Thanks. I've fixed this by removing the two Struts references from the
Jakarta FAQs page, since Struts is no longer part of Jakarta.
--
Martin Cooper
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 09:29:16 -0600, Matt Bathje <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> Not sure where to send this, but
Availability (GA)
-
If you are voting for Alpha or Beta, please state your concerns with
the build as it is today.
Only the votes of Struts PMC members are binding. However, all
opinions and feedback are welcome.
--
Martin Cooper
My own vote...
Beta. While a number of issues have been reported, my opinion is that
#32490 is enough to preclude GA, since I believe we need to have the
tag libraries in sync for a GA release.
--
Martin Cooper
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 22:49:35 -0800, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We did just get Commons Resources promoted out of the sandbox, and I'm
hopeful that we'll get that puppy released soon. Finally!
--
Martin Cooper
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 11:37:38 -0800 (PST), David Graham
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We didn't do it earlier because we wanted
You're quoting from the Jakarta decision making page. We're not at
Jakarta any more, and have our own process now. You have some catching
up to do, Eddie. ;-)
Here's what we're doing these days:
http://struts.apache.org/releases.html
--
Martin Cooper
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 2
dst who likely feel
otherwise. This might sound odd, but perhaps, if we do have people who
are interested in actively pursuing Maven, we should move the Maven
stuff to contrib until such time as it provides a working replacement
for our Ant build system?
> Also, why do we have so many copies of the mai
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 10:51:24 -0800 (PST), David Graham
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I don't have a problem with tossing the Maven stuff. However, I
> > believe we do have some Maven mavens in our midst who
tml
This is what Maven-generated Ant builds use.
--
Martin Cooper
>
> On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 10:51:24 -0800 (PST), David Graham
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't have a problem with tos
e
signatures of the distribution using the keys found on the main Apache web
site:
http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/commons/chain/KEYS
For more information on Commons Chain, see the Chain web site:
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/cha
Currently, we say that Ant 1.5.4 is required for building Struts. I'd like
to bump that to 1.6.2 as a minimum, so that we can take advantage of some
of the features that were introduced in Ant 1.6.
Anyone have any objections?
--
Martin C
our build system in tune with reality. ;-)
My own suggestion: Support only 4.1.x, 5.0.x, 5.5.x.
--
Martin Cooper
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The web site will help you with this. See the following for starters:
http://struts.apache.org/faqs/helping.html#contribute
http://struts.apache.org/acquiring.html
--
Martin Cooper
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 12:02:48 +0530, Sunny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm interested i
://struts.apache.org/download.cgi
The Release Notes are available on the Struts web site at:
http://struts.apache.org/userGuide/release-notes.html
--
Martin Cooper
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands
tion about struts-chain. If
you want to gripe about on- or off-topic, I highly recomment replying
to the message that you have a problem with, and not one that asks a
valid on-topic question.
--
Martin Cooper
> What you suggest I said is patently stupid. So, I have to admit I
> don'
er than the Documentation
section), get away (I hope) from a war file as our means of
publishing documentation (and the site), and come up with a better way
of updating the site reliably. But that's a future itch, for an
Fine with me. Are you planning to do this for the 1.2 branch as well as trunk?
--
Martin Cooper
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 23:15:21 -, Niall Pemberton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone object to me moving Strut's dependency on to the recently
> released Version 1.1.4 of
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 21:43:00 -0800, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Cooper wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 21:18:16 -0800, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I added the struts-bsf as a Struts subproject,
> >>
>
d for the chain plugin
Yup.
If any of the above are stupid questions, my excuse is that I'm really
tired, and probably shouldn't be replying tonight at all... ;-)
> Of course, if someone is already doing the integration, ignore this.
> Otherwise, comments appreciated. I'll
I'm working on this right now. I have the 'get' stuff done locally,
but there's some other build stuff I want to clean up before I commit
that. (Last night's Cactus property clean-up was part of that.)
--
Martin Cooper
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 22:10:50 -0800, Don Brown
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 09:09:16 -0600, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 10:29 PM -0800 12/16/04, Don Brown wrote:
> >Martin Cooper wrote:
> >>On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 21:47:53 -0800, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Who is workin
to the chain, in
which case you'd want all of the original struts-chain except for the
chain config file (or at least you'd want a way to override the
default). So I'm not sure this is a reason to keep them separate.
How the default chain is overridden is a good question, though. If we
set t
dule hierarchies. Course the devil is in the
> implementation details :)
This is effectively the inverse of "extends", right? It's push rather
than pull, in that the master pushes config down into the subs, rather
than the subs pulling config from the master. I need to think a bit
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Dakota Jack wrote:
How is JSF not OT with struts-dev or struts-user? Struts is not dead
yet, is it? And, if not, why is struts airtime free to JSF?
You don't consider a question about STRUTS-chain - a component in the
Struts sandbox - to be relevant to Struts?
--
M
erty is set, and then builds
against what is in that directory. If someone really wants to put the
dependencies elsewhere, they can still define 'foo.jar' to do that.
The versions of each dependency can also be overridden if necessary.
Will that work for you?
--
Martin Cooper
> Cra
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 13:13:03 -0800, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 12:54:38 -0800, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 12:38:27 -0800, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 19:06:56 -0800, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Intermixed.
>
> On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 18:36:41 -0800, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 13:13:03 -0800, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
ver to this as soon as makes sense for us. That will get me beating
on this in short order, so that we can refine the way it works and
iron out any issues.
> Next up: extracting the taglibs :)
You're a glutton for punishment, lad. ;-)
--
Martin Cooper
> Don
>
>
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 19:25:09 -0800, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to request the following Bugzilla components be added:
> - bsf
> - sandbox
Done.
--
Martin Cooper
> If I do this myself, please point me in the right direc
the Tiles
> definitions even if Struts is not present, via TilesServlet (which I
> believe already exists?) and/or a new ServletContextListener
> implementation since we're willing to use Servlet 2.3.
+1
--
Martin Cooper
> Craig
>
> On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 18:29:43 -080
cies on Tiles. If it isn't possible to
extract all of the Tiles pieces into a separate subproject, then we
have the wrong abstraction, and other people would not be able to
build extensions like Tiles without help in the form of changes to the
core.
--
Martin Cooper
> Craig
>
> ---
mpany is shut down over the holidays. I'm also adding
an XML config capability, to make it easier to configure the filter
(but also usable outside the filter). Portlet support is already done
and checked in.
--
Martin Cooper
> >
> > Jack
> >
>
> Craig
>
> ---
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 09:47:04 -0600, Vic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> from main menu in struts clicking download binaries give a cgi error.
Fixed.
I've also changed the privs on the cgi script to try to prevent this
from happening again.
--
Martin Cooper
> Is there another lin
this is, um, less than optimal, but until the new build is ready,
perhaps we should do the same thing. On the other hand, I don't think
we want to put a lot of effort to making this all work when the build
system is changing (hopefully next week).
--
Martin Cooper
> Thanks for the help
tsTestCase into the fold, since we'd need to build that before
'core' could be built and tested.)
So what do people think? My preference, as I said, is (1).
--
Martin Cooper
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 1278 matches
Mail list logo
