Re: [DISCUSS] 3.1.x EOL

2017-08-16 Thread Stephen Mallette
It's been a week now and there haven't been any concerns about EOL for 3.1.x on either this list or more recently the gremlin users list. I'm happy to call that consensus. :) we'll make 3.1.8 the last release on that line. We'll just have tp32 and master to maintain going forward - i don't think

Re: [DISCUSS] 3.1.x EOL

2017-08-11 Thread Stephen Mallette
Expanded this discussion to the user list: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/gremlin-users/zQHHOC5uoYw/tSaxOlMFCgAJ On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Jason Plurad wrote: > +1 on closing out with 3.1.8 > > Most providers have already moved to 3.2.x. Any providers still on 3.1.x > should chime in on

Re: [DISCUSS] 3.1.x EOL

2017-08-09 Thread Jason Plurad
+1 on closing out with 3.1.8 Most providers have already moved to 3.2.x. Any providers still on 3.1.x should chime in on this thread (BlazeGraph , ChronoGraph

Re: [DISCUSS] 3.1.x EOL

2017-08-09 Thread David Brown
On Aug 9, 2017 8:23 AM, "Ted Wilmes" wrote: > That makes good sense to me. I'd be honored to lead it off into the sunset. > > --Ted > > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 6:14 AM, Jorge Bay Gondra > > wrote: > > > 3.1 line is about 2 years old, I think its a lot of time for a relatively > > new project like

Re: [DISCUSS] 3.1.x EOL

2017-08-09 Thread David Brown
I'm On Aug 9, 2017 6:51 AM, "Stephen Mallette" wrote: > We have taken backward compatibility and long term support to a new level > in TinkerPop 3.x as compared with previous major versions. We're about to > go on eight releases of the 3.1.x line of code. Now that 3.3.0 is about to > release I'm

Re: [DISCUSS] 3.1.x EOL

2017-08-09 Thread Ted Wilmes
That makes good sense to me. I'd be honored to lead it off into the sunset. --Ted On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 6:14 AM, Jorge Bay Gondra wrote: > 3.1 line is about 2 years old, I think its a lot of time for a relatively > new project like TinkerPop. > I'm in favor of making 3.1.8 the last release of

Re: [DISCUSS] 3.1.x EOL

2017-08-09 Thread Jorge Bay Gondra
3.1 line is about 2 years old, I think its a lot of time for a relatively new project like TinkerPop. I'm in favor of making 3.1.8 the last release of the 3.1 branch. On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Stephen Mallette wrote: > We have taken backward compatibility and long term support to a new le

[DISCUSS] 3.1.x EOL

2017-08-09 Thread Stephen Mallette
We have taken backward compatibility and long term support to a new level in TinkerPop 3.x as compared with previous major versions. We're about to go on eight releases of the 3.1.x line of code. Now that 3.3.0 is about to release I'm wondering if we need to continue with support of any kind on the