and BFS/DFS.
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, 21 September 2016, Dylan Millikin <
>>> dylan.milli...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> yeah I like the barrier().store() best as well.
>>>>>
>>>>&
t;> both worlds and BFS/DFS.
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, 21 September 2016, Dylan Millikin <
>> dylan.milli...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> yeah I like the barrier().store() best as well.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 21,
) best as well.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Jean-Baptiste Musso <
> jbmu...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think barrier().store() for .aggregate() is very appropriate and
>
; >
> > > People also tend to confuse .as() and .store()/.aggregate().
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, 20 September 2016, Marko Rodriguez > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I was thinking that store() and ag
as() and .store()/.aggregate().
> >
> > On Tuesday, 20 September 2016, Marko Rodriguez >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I was thinking that store() and aggregate() should simply be “store().”
> > >
> > > store()
confuse .as() and .store()/.aggregate().
>
> On Tuesday, 20 September 2016, Marko Rodriguez
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was thinking that store() and aggregate() should simply be “store().”
> >
> > store() -> store
I think barrier().store() for .aggregate() is very appropriate and fully
tells what is going on.
I like both, +1 for one or the other.
People also tend to confuse .as() and .store()/.aggregate().
On Tuesday, 20 September 2016, Marko Rodriguez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was thinking that st
+1 I find this to be way more explicit. Kinda got tripped by this a while
back.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Daniel Kuppitz wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Marko Rodriguez
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was thinking that store() and ag
+1
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Marko Rodriguez
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was thinking that store() and aggregate() should simply be “store().”
>
> store() -> store(local)
> aggregate() -> store(global)
>
> Or:
>
> aggregat
Hi,
I was thinking that store() and aggregate() should simply be “store().”
store() -> store(local)
aggregate() -> store(global)
Or:
aggregate() -> barrier().store()
Random thoughts…
Marko.
http://markorodriguez.com
10 matches
Mail list logo