Re: Store and Aggregate

2016-11-15 Thread Marko Rodriguez
and BFS/DFS. >>>> >>>> On Wednesday, 21 September 2016, Dylan Millikin < >>> dylan.milli...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> yeah I like the barrier().store() best as well. >>>>> >>>>&

Re: Store and Aggregate

2016-09-26 Thread Marko Rodriguez
t;> both worlds and BFS/DFS. >>> >>> On Wednesday, 21 September 2016, Dylan Millikin < >> dylan.milli...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> yeah I like the barrier().store() best as well. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Sep 21,

Re: Store and Aggregate

2016-09-21 Thread Robert Dale
) best as well. > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Jean-Baptiste Musso < > jbmu...@gmail.com > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I think barrier().store() for .aggregate() is very appropriate and >

Re: Store and Aggregate

2016-09-21 Thread Ted Wilmes
; > > > > People also tend to confuse .as() and .store()/.aggregate(). > > > > > > On Tuesday, 20 September 2016, Marko Rodriguez > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I was thinking that store() and ag

Re: Store and Aggregate

2016-09-21 Thread Jean-Baptiste Musso
as() and .store()/.aggregate(). > > > > On Tuesday, 20 September 2016, Marko Rodriguez > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I was thinking that store() and aggregate() should simply be “store().” > > > > > > store()

Re: Store and Aggregate

2016-09-21 Thread Dylan Millikin
confuse .as() and .store()/.aggregate(). > > On Tuesday, 20 September 2016, Marko Rodriguez > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I was thinking that store() and aggregate() should simply be “store().” > > > > store() -> store

Re: Store and Aggregate

2016-09-21 Thread Jean-Baptiste Musso
I think barrier().store() for .aggregate() is very appropriate and fully tells what is going on. I like both, +1 for one or the other. People also tend to confuse .as() and .store()/.aggregate(). On Tuesday, 20 September 2016, Marko Rodriguez wrote: > Hi, > > I was thinking that st

Re: Store and Aggregate

2016-09-20 Thread Dylan Millikin
+1 I find this to be way more explicit. Kinda got tripped by this a while back. On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Daniel Kuppitz wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Marko Rodriguez > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I was thinking that store() and ag

Re: Store and Aggregate

2016-09-20 Thread Daniel Kuppitz
+1 On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Marko Rodriguez wrote: > Hi, > > I was thinking that store() and aggregate() should simply be “store().” > > store() -> store(local) > aggregate() -> store(global) > > Or: > > aggregat

Store and Aggregate

2016-09-20 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Hi, I was thinking that store() and aggregate() should simply be “store().” store() -> store(local) aggregate() -> store(global) Or: aggregate() -> barrier().store() Random thoughts… Marko. http://markorodriguez.com