[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15301361#comment-15301361
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1312:
---
Github user okram commented on
Github user okram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/320#issuecomment-221764771
Can you add some more complex tests? For instance:
```
out().count().is(0).as("a")
```
Also, `RangeByIsCountStrategy` doesn't have `a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15301336#comment-15301336
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1310:
---
Github user okram commented on
Github user okram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/319#issuecomment-221763598
```
[INFO]
[INFO] Reactor Summary:
[INFO]
[INFO] Apache TinkerPop ...
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
prepare your quarterly board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 15 June 2016, 10:30 am PDT.
The report for your podling will form a
GitHub user dkuppitz opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/320
TINKERPOP-1312 .count().is(0) is not properly optimized
Tweaked `RangeByIsCountStrategy`. The patterns ...
* `count().is(0)`
* `count().is(lt(1))`
* `count(
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15301103#comment-15301103
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1312:
---
GitHub user dkuppitz opened a p
Github user okram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/319#issuecomment-221718317
Sorry. Giraph is breaking on integration tests. Easy fix. Will post BUILD
status when full integration tests complete.
---
If your project is set up for it,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15300922#comment-15300922
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1310:
---
Github user okram commented on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15300837#comment-15300837
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1310:
---
GitHub user okram opened a pull
GitHub user okram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/319
TINKERPOP-1310: Allow OLAP to return properties as Detached
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1310
I created {{HaltedTraverserFactoryStrategy}} which is an OLAP stra
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15300789#comment-15300789
]
Daniel Kuppitz commented on TINKERPOP-1298:
---
Without TINKERPOP-1280 traversa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-818?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Daniel Kuppitz closed TINKERPOP-818.
Resolution: Won't Fix
> Consider a P.type()
> ---
>
> Key
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Daniel Kuppitz updated TINKERPOP-1312:
--
Summary: .count().is(0) is not properly optimized (was: .is.count(0) is
not properl
Daniel Kuppitz created TINKERPOP-1313:
-
Summary: Rename RangeByIsCountStrategy
Key: TINKERPOP-1313
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1313
Project: TinkerPop
Issue Type:
I'd think from a TinkerPop branding perspective, it probably helps to have
the name in there. It's Apache TinkerPop, not Apache Gremlin.
I just took a quick look on a mirror, and some other Apache projects
(Spark, Kafka, HBase, NiFi, Pig, Zookeeper) don't even include apache in
their distributable
> but maybe perhaps Stephen would like to get a talk like that at Cassandra
Summit?
hehe - i'm sure you could have found a way to make that topic interesting.
i'm not so sure i could. :)
> Psssht, the original Uni_pop _has Tinkerpop support, and a better unicorn
logo...
ha!
> Seriously though,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15300506#comment-15300506
]
Daniel Kuppitz edited comment on TINKERPOP-1312 at 5/25/16 5:48 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15300506#comment-15300506
]
Daniel Kuppitz commented on TINKERPOP-1312:
---
Benchmarking {{g.V().filter()}}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15300494#comment-15300494
]
Marko A. Rodriguez commented on TINKERPOP-1312:
---
This is a really good i
Daniel Kuppitz created TINKERPOP-1312:
-
Summary: .is.count(0) is not properly optimized
Key: TINKERPOP-1312
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1312
Project: TinkerPop
Is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15300416#comment-15300416
]
Marko A. Rodriguez commented on TINKERPOP-1311:
---
Right now, {{Traverser.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15300412#comment-15300412
]
Marko A. Rodriguez commented on TINKERPOP-1311:
---
Ah. And then we should
Marko A. Rodriguez created TINKERPOP-1311:
-
Summary: AttachableFactory and its entailments.
Key: TINKERPOP-1311
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1311
Project: TinkerPop
More stuff ---
One thing I think that we really need to drive home to providers is
TraversalStrategies. That should be a blog post too. I've talked to two graph
databases providers recently and both were concerned about performance through
the TinkerPop API. They didn't know they could write pr
Psssht, the original Uni_pop _has Tinkerpop support, and a better unicorn
logo...
Seriously though, for wider Tinkerpop adoption it would be cool to have a
general "Provider Template" along with the tutorial/blogpost :
* Default `structure` implementation, with /*IMPLEMENT READ/WRITE/ETC
I concur. A nice idea, but no follow through.
Marko.
http://markorodriguez.com
On May 24, 2016, at 3:23 PM, Stephen Mallette wrote:
> yeah - the "fragility" was something i'd hoped to see addressed. the PR has
> a long way to go to be something that could be really merged i think. Note
> that
jason i think that was a suggestion to conform more to standard apache
releases from someone in incubator. if it was mandatory we would have
burned for that too many times to count at this point. i'm good to change
it if everyone else is. what do we want them to be?
apache-tinkerpop-console-x.y.z.
Hi,
> I've been tinkering recently in this space, more specifically to better
> understand the gremlin-test suite in general. A blog post sounds like a
> good idea. I can take a stab at it.
Cool.
>> Maybe working on referencing these pages via perhaps a blog post from
>> someone would be cool. S
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15300163#comment-15300163
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1307:
---
Github user asfgit closed the p
Hi,
Yes, an imminent release is good. There are 2 severe bug fixes in master/
(3.2.1) that I would like to get out there. 3.2.0 had lots of internal changes
to OLAP and I paid the price by incurring bugs. :|
> Somebody had mentioned that our distributables are supposed to be named
> apache-tink
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marko A. Rodriguez closed TINKERPOP-1307.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.2.1
> NPE with OLTP nested group() i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15300161#comment-15300161
]
Marko A. Rodriguez commented on TINKERPOP-1307:
---
Tested user query and i
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/318
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fe
Maybe working on referencing these pages via perhaps a blog post from
someone would be cool. Something along the lines of "Creating a graph db
with Tinkerpop" or some other variation that may get good hit results in a
google search.
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Stephen Mallette
wrote:
> We'
Agreed. A big on-going problem TinkerPop has is that people invariably
stumble upon TinkerPop 2 and Blueprints/Pipes. If they find TP2, maybe they
presume it is dead, so they roll their own.
I've been tinkering recently in this space, more specifically to better
understand the gremlin-test suite i
Somebody had mentioned that our distributables are supposed to be named
apache-tinkerpop*.zip instead of apache-gremlin*.zip. Maybe that's
something that should be done along with this release.
-- Jason
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Stephen Mallette
wrote:
> cool, Ted. it would be good to ha
We've seen a lot of new graphs come out that don't do TinkerPop from the
start. Perhaps they make a conscious decision not to - i dunno. I just
wonder if part of the problem is the provider docs for doing an
implementation:
http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.0-incubating/dev/provider/
are they
cool, Ted. it would be good to have another hand there.
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Ted Wilmes wrote:
> I think a release sounds good. I'd be interested in witnessing the the
> post-PMC vote release steps so that I might be able to help out on an
> upcoming release.
>
> --Ted
>
> On Wed, M
I think a release sounds good. I'd be interested in witnessing the the
post-PMC vote release steps so that I might be able to help out on an
upcoming release.
--Ted
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Marvin Froeder wrote:
> Your are right, for some reason I though it was on the artifactId as wel
Your are right, for some reason I though it was on the artifactId as well
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Stephen Mallette
wrote:
> I don't think we need to relocate anything. The "-incubating" is just in
> the version name, so we will just remove it for future releases.
>
> On Wed, May 25, 20
I don't think we need to relocate anything. The "-incubating" is just in
the version name, so we will just remove it for future releases.
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:55 AM, Jean-Baptiste Musso
wrote:
> I think this is a good idea. This could make these releases look more
> "stable": I've often fel
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15299803#comment-15299803
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1307:
---
Github user spmallette commente
Github user spmallette commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/318#issuecomment-221531476
All tests pass with `docker/build.sh -t -n -i`
VOTE +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply ap
I think this is a good idea. This could make these releases look more
"stable": I've often felt that the -incubating suffix somehow made
releases look "alpha-ish" / "beta-ish", even though they were not.
Naming aside, bug fixes never hurt.
Jean-Baptiste
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:49 AM, Stephen
Github user dkuppitz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/318#issuecomment-221502808
Full test suite passed, query times look good ...
VOTE: +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15299653#comment-15299653
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1307:
---
Github user dkuppitz commented
47 matches
Mail list logo
