Hi, Yes, an imminent release is good. There are 2 severe bug fixes in master/ (3.2.1) that I would like to get out there. 3.2.0 had lots of internal changes to OLAP and I paid the price by incurring bugs. :|
> Somebody had mentioned that our distributables are supposed to be named > apache-tinkerpop*.zip instead of apache-gremlin*.zip. Maybe that's > something that should be done along with this release. There is really no such thing as "tinkerpop" besides the source code which is distributed as apache-tinkerpop-*.zip. The two other distributions are gremlin-console and gremlin-server and I think we should keep those naming conventions as they are so they reflect what is being distributed. Thus, I think the naming of our artifacts is correct. Thanks, Marko. http://markorodriguez.com On May 25, 2016, at 8:38 AM, Jason Plurad <[email protected]> wrote: > Somebody had mentioned that our distributables are supposed to be named > apache-tinkerpop*.zip instead of apache-gremlin*.zip. Maybe that's > something that should be done along with this release. > > -- Jason > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> cool, Ted. it would be good to have another hand there. >> >> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Ted Wilmes <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I think a release sounds good. I'd be interested in witnessing the the >>> post-PMC vote release steps so that I might be able to help out on an >>> upcoming release. >>> >>> --Ted >>> >>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>>> Your are right, for some reason I though it was on the artifactId as >> well >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Stephen Mallette < >> [email protected] >>>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I don't think we need to relocate anything. The "-incubating" is just >>> in >>>>> the version name, so we will just remove it for future releases. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:55 AM, Jean-Baptiste Musso < >>> [email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I think this is a good idea. This could make these releases look >> more >>>>>> "stable": I've often felt that the -incubating suffix somehow made >>>>>> releases look "alpha-ish" / "beta-ish", even though they were not. >>>>>> >>>>>> Naming aside, bug fixes never hurt. >>>>>> >>>>>> Jean-Baptiste >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:49 AM, Stephen Mallette < >>>> [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> We've seen a lot of good fixes/optimizations to 3.1.3 and 3.2.1 >>> and I >>>>>>> wonder if we shouldn't exercise our new found TLP powers to do a >>>>> release >>>>>>> and get rid of the "-incubating" at the end of our "current" >>>>>> distributions >>>>>>> and artifacts. thoughts? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>
