I think a release sounds good. I'd be interested in witnessing the the post-PMC vote release steps so that I might be able to help out on an upcoming release.
--Ted On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote: > Your are right, for some reason I though it was on the artifactId as well > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I don't think we need to relocate anything. The "-incubating" is just in > > the version name, so we will just remove it for future releases. > > > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:55 AM, Jean-Baptiste Musso <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > I think this is a good idea. This could make these releases look more > > > "stable": I've often felt that the -incubating suffix somehow made > > > releases look "alpha-ish" / "beta-ish", even though they were not. > > > > > > Naming aside, bug fixes never hurt. > > > > > > Jean-Baptiste > > > > > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:49 AM, Stephen Mallette < > [email protected] > > > > > > wrote: > > > > We've seen a lot of good fixes/optimizations to 3.1.3 and 3.2.1 and I > > > > wonder if we shouldn't exercise our new found TLP powers to do a > > release > > > > and get rid of the "-incubating" at the end of our "current" > > > distributions > > > > and artifacts. thoughts? > > > > > >
