On 2024/04/17 14:21:06 Rainer Jung wrote:
> Am 17.04.24 um 15:34 schrieb Michael Osipov:
> > Rainer, I do not fully understand the problem here. We use libtool to solve
> > exactly this problem with versioned SONAMEs. It will create symlinks to the
> > SONAME.
> >
Rainer, I do not fully understand the problem here. We use libtool to solve
exactly this problem with versioned SONAMEs. It will create symlinks to the
SONAME.
Do you expect anyone even with dlopen() to load libfoo.o.{SOVERSION} unless it
is strictly needed?
E.g.:
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel
I have complained about this many times...
On 2024/02/12 20:58:14 Christopher Schultz wrote:
> All,
>
> The release managers have bumped-up their tool chains to Java 17 or
> later for all supported releases. Tomcat 11 requires Java 21. Tomcat
> 8.5.x only requires Java 11.
>
> But the
On 2024/02/07 16:05:17 Michael Osipov wrote:
> On 2024/02/04 19:54:25 Mark Thomas wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > AS you have probably noticed I am working on another round of Tomcat
> > Native releases.
> >
> > We are overdue on switching to 1.3.x so I w
On 2024/02/07 18:19:24 Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Michael,
>
> On 2/7/24 11:05, Michael Osipov wrote:
> > On 2024/02/04 19:54:25 Mark Thomas wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> AS you have probably noticed I am working on another round of Tomcat
>
On 2024/02/04 19:54:25 Mark Thomas wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> AS you have probably noticed I am working on another round of Tomcat
> Native releases.
>
> We are overdue on switching to 1.3.x so I would like to propose the
> following with this release round:
>
> - create a new 1.3.x branch from the
> >> The next 8.5.x and 9.0.x releases would then ship with Tomcat Native
> >> 1.3.0 but minimum required/recommended Tomcat Native versions would not
> >> change.
> >
> > I wouldn't bother with 8.5 and 1.3, I'd use 1.2.x until end of 8.5 and the
> > put 1.2.x EOL.
>
> I'm still leaning towards
On 2024/02/04 19:54:25 Mark Thomas wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> AS you have probably noticed I am working on another round of Tomcat
> Native releases.
>
> We are overdue on switching to 1.3.x so I would like to propose the
> following with this release round:
>
> - create a new 1.3.x branch from the
On 2023/12/18 17:00:43 Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 17/12/2023 16:32, Sean Whitton wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am working to backport the fix for CVE-2023-46589 to Tomcat version
> > 8.0.14, which is what we have in Debian "jessie". This is under the
> > Extended LTS project for older Debian
On 2023/11/14 16:53:38 Mark Thomas wrote:
> All,
>
> We are currently unable to produce cross-platform repeatable builds for
> Tomcat 8.5.x with Java 11 due to https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8320082
>
> We have several options:
>
> 1. Do nothing. Build remains repeatable on the same OS.
On 2023/11/05 14:50:11 Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 05/11/2023 10:10, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > On 03/11/2023 15:07, Michael Osipov wrote:
> >> On 2023/11/03 11:57:56 Mark Thomas wrote:
> >>> On 03/11/2023 09:26, Michael Osipov wrote:
> >>>> This change no
On 2023/11/05 10:10:20 Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 03/11/2023 15:07, Michael Osipov wrote:
> > On 2023/11/03 11:57:56 Mark Thomas wrote:
> >> On 03/11/2023 09:26, Michael Osipov wrote:
> >>> This change now completely missed to enfore Java 17 on < 11 and opt-in to
>
On 2023/11/03 11:57:56 Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 03/11/2023 09:26, Michael Osipov wrote:
> > This change now completely missed to enfore Java 17 on < 11 and opt-in to
> > skip the required during tests I have introduced last month.
>
> Tomcat 11.0.x has required Java
This change now completely missed to enfore Java 17 on < 11 and opt-in to skip
the required during tests I have introduced last month.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On 2023/11/02 15:20:37 Mark Thomas wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The update to BND 7.0.0 requires Java 17. Do we want to update the build
> process to use Java 17 or do we want to revert the BND update?
>
> I'm leaning towards switching to Java 17 as not updating would prevent
> any future update if
On 2023/11/02 15:51:53 Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 4:20 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The update to BND 7.0.0 requires Java 17. Do we want to update the build
> > process to use Java 17 or do we want to revert the BND update?
> >
> > I'm leaning towards
On 2023/10/30 15:47:20 Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Michael,
>
> On 10/30/23 08:40, Michael Osipov wrote:
> > On 2023/10/30 11:50:55 Mark Thomas wrote:
> >> 30 Oct 2023 10:25:07 micha...@apache.org:
> >>
> >>> This is an automated
rg/repos/asf/tomcat-native.git
> >
> >
> > The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
> > new ccc6bfe99 BZ 67818: SSL#setVerify()/SSLContext#setVerify()
> > silently set undocumented default verify paths
> > ccc6bfe99 is described below
> >
Reported: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67926
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 2023/10/25 01:54:10 li...@apache.org wrote:
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> lihan pushed a commit to branch main
> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
>
>
> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
Thanks for catching up!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 2023/10/20 07:30:04 Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am very pleased to report that after years of development, the
> Foreign Function & Memory API is (finally !) no longer a preview API.
> It is now available in build 20 of Java 22 where it can be used
> without the preview flag.
>
On 2023/10/19 11:24:35 r...@apache.org wrote:
> java/org/apache/catalina/manager/StatusTransformer.java | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/java/org/apache/catalina/manager/StatusTransformer.java
> b/java/org/apache/catalina/manager/StatusTransformer.java
>
On 2023/10/17 13:58:06 r...@apache.org wrote:
> @@ -51,6 +52,8 @@ public class StatusTransformer {
> response.setContentType("text/html;charset=" +
> Constants.CHARSET);
> } else if (mode == 1) {
> response.setContentType("text/xml;charset=" +
On 2023/10/12 11:46:55 Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Michael,
>
> On 10/12/23 06:13, micha...@apache.org wrote:
> > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
> >
> > michaelo pushed a commit to branch main
> > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
On 2023/10/12 01:32:37 Christopher Schultz wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.5.95 release is now available for voting.
>
> The notable changes compared to 8.5.94 are:
>
> - Correct a regression in 8.5.94 that broke the Tomcat JBDC
>connection pool
>
> - Correct a regression in 8.5.94
On 2023/10/06 09:14:54 Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 10:42 AM Michael Osipov wrote:
> >
> > Please let's not use the term Panama anymore, it is like with Jigsaw. They
> > were working titles, official name is Java FFM API. Even JEP 442 does not
> >
Please let's not use the term Panama anymore, it is like with Jigsaw. They were
working titles, official name is Java FFM API. Even JEP 442 does not mention
this term anymore.
On 2023/10/06 08:15:09 r...@apache.org wrote:
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
On 2023/10/05 12:19:43 Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 05/10/2023 12:10, koteswara Rao Gundapaneni wrote:
> > Here is my Tomcat environment details
> >
> > java version "1.8.0_202"
> > Apache Ant(TM) version 1.10.13
> > Windows 10 Pro
> > apache-tomcat-10.1.12-src
>
> Tomcat 10.1.x requires a minimum of
On 2023/09/26 10:47:34 Mark Thomas wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With OpenSSL 1.1.1 reaching EOL and there being a low severity issue in
> the OpenSSL versions used in the Windows binaries for the last releases,
> I'd like to propose a new set of Tomcat Native releases that:
>
> - include the fix for
On 2023/09/26 10:48:23 Mark Thomas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is an old thread (2021) but relevant to BZ 67061 [1].
>
> In short, optionalNoCA doesn't work unless OCSP is also disabled.
>
> Do we:
>
> a) Always skip the OCSP check if optionalNoCA is used (and document this
> for optionalNoCA)?
>
On 2023/08/16 15:03:23 ma...@apache.org wrote:
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> markt pushed a commit to branch 8.5.x
> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
> diff --git a/webapps/docs/changelog.xml b/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
>
x.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
> >
> >
> > The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
> > new b9a8bd4fda Remove used property
> > b9a8bd4fda is described below
> >
> > commit b9a8bd4fdaf31b0cc08cc72f95c802d35bb885f2
> > Author: Michael Osipov
On 2023/06/27 18:53:05 Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Michael,
>
> On 6/27/23 12:55, Michael Osipov wrote:
> > On 2023/06/27 14:44:46 Christopher Schultz wrote:
> >> Michael,
> >>
> >> On 6/27/23 10:37, Michael Osipov wrote:
> >>> On 2023/06
On 2023/06/27 14:44:46 Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Michael,
>
> On 6/27/23 10:37, Michael Osipov wrote:
> > On 2023/06/27 14:13:37 Christopher Schultz wrote:
> >> Michael,
> >>
> >> On 6/27/23 04:06, Michael Osipov wrote:
> >>> Chris,
> &
On 2023/06/27 14:13:37 Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Michael,
>
> On 6/27/23 04:06, Michael Osipov wrote:
> > Chris,
> >
> > On 2023/06/26 19:50:39 Christopher Schultz wrote:
> >> Michael,
> >> On 6/26/23 13:11, micha...@apache.org wrote:
> >>
Please also read my BZ issue:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64826
Nothing new here...
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
ox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat-native.git
> >
> >
> > The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/1.2.x by this push:
> > new 8049561c8 Align default pass phrase prompt with HTTPd
> > 8049561c8 is described below
> >
> > commit 8049561c86c3270b
On 11/01/2023 14:13, Michael Osipov wrote:
While I cannot comment on Tomcat 11 requirements and Java 21 is
unavoidable I'd like to comment on this because I consider it wrong:
We could switch all branches to Java 17 as the the default build JRE
now as that supports targeting Java 7 onwards
While I cannot comment on Tomcat 11 requirements and Java 21 is
unavoidable I'd like to comment on this because I consider it wrong:
We could switch all branches to Java 17 as the the default build JRE now
as that supports targeting Java 7 onwards. That would allow us to easily
use some newer
Am 2022-02-11 um 11:16 schrieb Rémy Maucherat:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 10:47 AM Michael Osipov wrote:
I cannot share your further explanations as well. The Realm *is* already
an object store. Principal name and roles are attributes on that object,
so is password. Without this possibility you
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 8:10 AM Carsten Klein wrote:
Hello R=C3=A9my, Mark and Michael,
I'm new to the dev list and did not get your recent mails and didn't
figure out how to get them in order to answer. So, I decided to start a
new thread (sorry for that).
I guess, having those attributes
Rémy,
really, I don't understand your work attitude. Carsten contacted us on
the mailing list before providing the PR. Then he provided the PR. It
was open for EIGHT months. We discussed this in and out, with you and
Mark. Everyone expressed the conditions he is willing to accept the PR.
I
Am 2022-01-10 um 17:46 schrieb Mark Thomas:
[...]
Is this because of EJC going Java 11? Has anyone reached out to them?
Why 11? I assume that 8 will outlive 11 for some time. Java 8 still
seems like a good baseline.
-
To
Am 2022-01-03 um 12:20 schrieb Rémy Maucherat:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 11:53 AM Rainer Jung wrote:
For reference: this is probably the ticket about moving JDT (and ECJ) to
Java 11:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=572389
And this is the parallel mail discussion:
Am 2021-12-28 um 01:20 schrieb Christopher Schultz:
Michael,
[...]
Although, I haven't see your code I know that this is a lot of work I
have done some of that some for our enterprise CAs with pure Java
recently. Kudos!
It's always fun finding out ANOTHER RFC that only one tool in the world
Am 2021-12-27 um 17:13 schrieb Christopher Schultz:
Michael, All,
I haven't actually committed any source yet, as I'm still polishing it
up a bit but I intend to release a bunch of PEM-related code on GH under
this repository:
https://github.com/ChristopherSchultz/pem-utils
The license is
Am 2021-11-28 um 14:42 schrieb ma...@apache.org:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch 8.5.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/8.5.x by this push:
Am 2021-11-11 um 16:34 schrieb Christopher Schultz:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.5.73 release is now available for voting.
The notable changes compared to 8.5.72 are:
- Improvements to native/APR including avoiding a JVM crash if APR fails
to properly initialize and improving error
Am 2021-11-09 um 10:40 schrieb Mark Thomas:
All,
I am seeing some fairly consistent crashes when running the APR tests on
Windows for 10.0.x. I'm going to spend some time trying to track down
the root cause before I tag the next 10.0.x release.
That's surprising, all of a sudden?
Can you
Am 2021-11-08 um 15:01 schrieb Mark Thomas:
On 05/11/2021 08:37, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 02/11/2021 16:58, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mark,
On 11/2/21 07:45, Mark Thomas wrote:
Hi all,
There doesn't seem to be much in the changelogs at the moment and
the code signing is currently unavailable
Am 2021-06-30 um 17:45 schrieb r...@apache.org:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new
Am 2021-06-01 um 11:53 schrieb Mark Thomas:
Resending with correct subject line...
Version 1.2.30 includes the following changes compared to 1.2.28
- Fix an issue where some Windows systems in some configurations would
only listen on IPv6 addresses on dual stack systems even though
Am 2021-05-27 um 15:41 schrieb Mark Thomas:
On 27/05/2021 13:24, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/05/2021 11:12, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2021-05-27 um 11:52 schrieb Mark Thomas:
Michael,
I think we need to step back a bit.
I am unable to recreate the issue you describe. I am using:
- Windows
Prefences in the OS:
PS C:\Users\osipovmi> netsh interface ipv6 show prefixpolicies
Der aktive Status wird abgefragt...
Vorgänger Label Präfix
-- -
50 0 :::0:0/96
40 1 ::1/128
30 2 ::/0
20
- AprLifecycleListener is enabled
- No address configured for Connector
- Logs confirm http-apr-8080
I can access the default home page via both IPv4 and IPv6 from both the
local machine and remotely.
On 25/05/2021 18:23, Michael Osipov wrote: >>> * Windows 8+ or
Windows Server 2016/2019
* Have at l
?
This [1] is what you need to make it work.
Kindly respond to my PR.
M
[1]
https://github.com/apache/apr/commit/2bcd4b3ddb108d16f1c758c00a45de9aef57aa3a
On 25/05/2021 18:23, Michael Osipov wrote:
Folks,
we needed to deploy Tomcat 9.0.x on a Windows server (no jokes,
please
Am 2021-05-26 um 15:25 schrieb Mark Thomas:
On 25/05/2021 17:23, Michael Osipov wrote:
Nice research.
Mark, I don't know when the next APR release will happen, but I
consider this to be very annoying. Maybe it makes sense to push 1.2.29
with APR 1.7.1-dev to please Windows users?
I'd
Am 2021-05-26 um 15:29 schrieb Mark Thomas:
On 25/05/2021 17:27, Michael Osipov wrote:
Mark,
since you are going to remove all bits soon, will you rename Java
items with still carry the APR substring? E.g., AprLifecycleListener
will be a misleading name for obvious reasons.
I hadn't
Mark,
since you are going to remove all bits soon, will you rename Java items
with still carry the APR substring? E.g., AprLifecycleListener will be a
misleading name for obvious reasons.
Michael
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Folks,
we needed to deploy Tomcat 9.0.x on a Windows server (no jokes, please),
but the contractor wasn't able to configure the APR connector to accept
on external interfaces even after a day.
After my analysis it turned out be a subtile bug in libapr which affects
Windows users only. I am
Am 2021-05-25 um 10:06 schrieb Mark Thomas:
On 25/05/2021 09:03, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2021-05-25 um 09:44 schrieb Mark Thomas:
On 25/05/2021 08:27, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2021-05-24 um 20:55 schrieb Mark Thomas:
On 24/05/2021 18:43, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 6:34
Am 2021-05-25 um 09:44 schrieb Mark Thomas:
On 25/05/2021 08:27, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2021-05-24 um 20:55 schrieb Mark Thomas:
On 24/05/2021 18:43, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 6:34 PM wrote:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt
Am 2021-05-24 um 20:55 schrieb Mark Thomas:
On 24/05/2021 18:43, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 6:34 PM wrote:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
Am 2021-05-13 um 00:10 schrieb Mark Thomas:
All,
Assuming 7.0.109 is the last Tomcat 7 release I am the current release
manager for 10.0.x, 9.0.x, 8.5.x, migration tool, native and mod_jk. I'd
like to share the load and the knowledge a little.
The step-by-step release process was documented
Am 2021-02-04 um 17:36 schrieb Rémy Maucherat:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 5:31 PM Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2021-02-03 um 13:03 schrieb Mark Thomas:
Hi all,
We have an open PR related to this for HTTP/2 (#277) and I am seeing
related issues at $work with HTTP.
In short, applications are doing
Am 2021-02-03 um 13:03 schrieb Mark Thomas:
Hi all,
We have an open PR related to this for HTTP/2 (#277) and I am seeing
related issues at $work with HTTP.
In short, applications are doing things like:
response.setHeader("Transfer-Encoding", "chunked");
which, as you'd expect is causing
Am 2021-02-01 um 13:41 schrieb Graham Leggett:
On 01 Feb 2021, at 14:12, micha...@apache.org wrote:
Apply same UDS path perm approach in the AprEndpoint as in the NioEndpoint
---
java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/AprEndpoint.java | 10 +++---
Am 2021-02-01 um 10:51 schrieb Mark Thomas:
On 01/02/2021 09:29, micha...@apache.org wrote:
commit a616bf385a350175a33a0ebf09d8b6688344e9e3
Author: minfrin
AuthorDate: Fri Jan 15 17:12:51 2021 +
+if (family == Socket.APR_UNIX) {
+if
Am 2020-12-16 um 16:38 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
Le 11/12/2020 à 17:56, Michael Osipov a écrit :
Well, isn't that really a OS vendor problem not ours? We can provide
grace periods, but that's pretty much it. They need to solve that, not
us on a volunteer basis.
Note that (most) Debian
Am 2020-12-09 um 14:36 schrieb Graham Leggett:
On 01 Dec 2020, at 14:09, Mark Thomas wrote:
I also object to the removal of OpenSSL code, for the same reason.
It isn't being removed. The APR/Native library will be retained along
with OpenSSL support for the NIO and NIO2.
I expect the scope
Am 2020-12-06 um 11:03 schrieb Mark Thomas:
On 05/12/2020 11:38, Michael Osipov wrote:
A suitable roadmap for libtcnative would be:
* Tag current patch version
* Move to 1.3.0 and remove everything non-TLS/networking related out
* Move to 1.4.0 drop OpenSSL support for < 1.1.1 beca
Am 2020-12-11 um 17:41 schrieb Rémy Maucherat:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 5:36 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
On 11/12/2020 16:24, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2020-12-10 um 15:07 schrieb ma...@apache.org:
+ * @deprecated The scope of the APR/Native Library will be reduced
in Tomcat
+ * 10.1
Am 2020-12-11 um 17:36 schrieb Mark Thomas:
On 11/12/2020 16:24, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2020-12-10 um 15:07 schrieb ma...@apache.org:
...
You won't going to continue the APRLifecycleListener, will you?
There will almost certainly need to be something like it. I had imagined
it would get
Am 2020-12-08 um 18:17 schrieb Mark Thomas:
The following votes were case:
Binding:
+1 (beta): remm, isapir, mturk, mgrigorov, ebourg, markt
No other votes were cast.
The vote therefore passes.
Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
So, from the subject people get the
Am 2020-12-06 um 10:44 schrieb Mark Thomas:
On 05/12/2020 12:59, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2020-12-03 um 11:43 schrieb Mark Thomas:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 10.0.0 release is now available for
voting.
Apache Tomcat 10.x implements Jakarta EE 9 and, as such, the primary
package for all
Am 2020-12-10 um 15:07 schrieb ma...@apache.org:
+ * @deprecated The scope of the APR/Native Library will be reduced in Tomcat
+ * 10.1.x / Tomcat Native 2.x onwards to only include those
+ * components required to provide OpenSSL integration with the NIO
+ *
Am 2020-12-10 um 13:21 schrieb ma...@apache.org:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat-native.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
Am 2020-12-03 um 11:43 schrieb Mark Thomas:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 10.0.0 release is now available for
voting.
Apache Tomcat 10.x implements Jakarta EE 9 and, as such, the primary
package for all the specification APIs has changed from javax.* to jakarta.*
Applications that run on Tomcat 9
Am 2020-12-01 um 13:09 schrieb Mark Thomas:
On 01/12/2020 11:05, Graham Leggett wrote:
Hi all,
I object to the deprecation of the tomcat-native/APR connector.
Most specifically, I am -1 on the following:
https://marc.info/?l=tomcat-dev=160681846808019=2
Looking at past discussion on this,
Am 2020-10-19 um 16:34 schrieb Rémy Maucherat:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 3:11 PM Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2020-10-15 um 16:48 schrieb Rémy Maucherat:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 2:31 PM Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net>
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 6:32 PM Michael Osipov
wrote:
Am 2020-10-15 um 16:48 schrieb Rémy Maucherat:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 2:31 PM Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 6:32 PM Michael Osipov
wrote:
Am 2020-10-14 um 12:32 schrieb R=C3=A9my Maucherat:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 8:27 PM Michael Osipov
Am 2020-10-13 um 21:08 schrieb Michael Osipov:
Am 2020-10-13 um 12:32 schrieb Mark Thomas:
On 13/10/2020 10:48, Michael Osipov wrote:
Folks,
I'd like to propose to get rid of that config option in 10 and deprecate
in previous versions for the following reasons:
* It suffers from abstraction
Am 2020-10-15 um 16:48 schrieb Rémy Maucherat:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 2:31 PM Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 6:32 PM Michael Osipov
wrote:
Am 2020-10-14 um 12:32 schrieb R=C3=A9my Maucherat:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 8:27 PM Michael Osipov
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 6:32 PM Michael Osipov wrote:
>
> > Am 2020-10-14 um 12:32 schrieb R=C3=A9my Maucherat:
> > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 8:27 PM Michael Osipov
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Am 2020-10-13 um 16:05 schrieb r...@apache.org:
>
Am 2020-10-14 um 16:55 schrieb kfuj...@apache.org:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kfujino pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
Am 2020-10-14 um 12:32 schrieb Rémy Maucherat:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 8:27 PM Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2020-10-13 um 16:05 schrieb r...@apache.org:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch 8.5.x
in repository https
Am 2020-10-13 um 12:32 schrieb Mark Thomas:
On 13/10/2020 10:48, Michael Osipov wrote:
Folks,
I'd like to propose to get rid of that config option in 10 and deprecate
in previous versions for the following reasons:
* It suffers from abstraction: It assumes that the GSS name is always
email
Am 2020-10-13 um 16:05 schrieb r...@apache.org:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch 8.5.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/8.5.x by this push:
new
Am 2020-10-13 um 13:49 schrieb Rémy Maucherat:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 11:33 AM Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2020-10-07 um 22:34 schrieb r...@apache.org:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch 8.5.x
in repository https
Folks,
I'd like to propose to get rid of that config option in 10 and deprecate
in previous versions for the following reasons:
* It suffers from abstraction: It assumes that the GSS name is always
email style w/o checking its OID
* The realm part, if any, is an integeral part of the
Am 2020-10-07 um 22:34 schrieb r...@apache.org:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch 8.5.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
commit 50de36b7874da98591345e40b374a1e2dd52c188
Author: remm
AuthorDate: Thu
Am 2020-09-03 um 16:34 schrieb Mark Thomas:
The following votes were cast:
Binding:
+1: markt, mgrigorov, fschumacher
+0: schultz
The vote therefore passes.
I think it is worth noting that there were crashes / unit test failures
reported with LibreSSL. This isn't unexpected. There is more
Am 2020-08-24 um 15:42 schrieb Mark Thomas:
On 24/08/2020 12:58, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2020-08-21 um 20:22 schrieb Mark Thomas:
Version 1.2.25 includes the following changes compared to 1.2.24
- Improvements to LibreSSL support
- Improvements to HP_UX support
Various other fixes
Am 2020-08-24 um 15:42 schrieb Mark Thomas:
On 24/08/2020 12:58, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2020-08-21 um 20:22 schrieb Mark Thomas:
Version 1.2.25 includes the following changes compared to 1.2.24
- Improvements to LibreSSL support
- Improvements to HP_UX support
Various other fixes
Am 2020-08-21 um 20:22 schrieb Mark Thomas:
Version 1.2.25 includes the following changes compared to 1.2.24
- Improvements to LibreSSL support
- Improvements to HP_UX support
Various other fixes and improvements. See the changelog for details.
The proposed release artefacts can be found at
Am 2020-08-20 um 18:30 schrieb Mark Thomas:
Hi,
It has been a while since 1.2.24 and there are a few fixes in the
changelog (mainly for LibreSSL and better support for a range of
platforms). With this in mind, I'm currently intending to tag 1.2.25 in
~24 hours
Please go ahead. I have started
Am 2020-08-16 um 21:58 schrieb Igal Sapir:
Michael,
On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 11:37 AM Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2020-08-16 um 20:05 schrieb isa...@apache.org:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
isapir pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https
Am 2020-08-16 um 20:05 schrieb isa...@apache.org:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
isapir pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
Am 2020-08-11 um 21:04 schrieb Mark Thomas:
On 11/08/2020 17:30, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2020-08-10 um 17:46 schrieb Mark Thomas:
Hi all,
I'd like to propose removing all the functional spec pages from the
documentation web application.
+1
Can you list them specifically? I am a bit
1 - 100 of 258 matches
Mail list logo
