На пт, 26.06.2020 г. в 23:41 Rémy Maucherat написа:
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 4:48 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Picking up this thread again I see a range of views. "main" seems to be
>> the most popular although several folks suggested "10.0.x" and "use
>> whatever GitHub use". There
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 4:48 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Picking up this thread again I see a range of views. "main" seems to be
> the most popular although several folks suggested "10.0.x" and "use
> whatever GitHub use". There was also interest in "trunk". Particularly
> with the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 6/26/20 10:48, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Picking up this thread again I see a range of views. "main" seems
> to be the most popular although several folks suggested "10.0.x"
> and "use whatever GitHub use". There was also interest in "trunk".
>
Hi,
Picking up this thread again I see a range of views. "main" seems to be
the most popular although several folks suggested "10.0.x" and "use
whatever GitHub use". There was also interest in "trunk". Particularly
with the additional suggestion of "10.0.x" appearing in the middle of
the
Le 16/06/2020 à 10:02, Mark Thomas a écrit :
> Thoughts?
I'd prefer the status-quo and keep "master", I've always understood this
as the 'master record' (I know it might be historically wrong) and I
haven't seen evidences it has ever offended or deterred anyone from
contributing.
If there is a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 6/16/20 04:02, Mark Thomas wrote:
> All,
>
> You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside
> the ASF about the user of "master" as the name of the default git
> branch. If you haven't, the short version is that the name
вт, 16 июн. 2020 г. в 11:02, Mark Thomas :
>
> All,
>
> You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside the ASF
> about the user of "master" as the name of the default git branch. If you
> haven't, the short version is that the name can be traced back to
> master/slave and its
Hi,
Do you know if there would be a redirect of existing PR and "existing"
references to master or does it break the ecosystem for a while - if so I'm
not sure it is worth it ?
If it does not break anything "latest" does not sound that bad and likely
avoids this superior/inferior thought people
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 11:02 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
> All,
>
> You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside the ASF
> about the user of "master" as the name of the default git branch. If you
> haven't, the short version is that the name can be traced back to
>
+1 for main
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 8:00 AM Coty Sutherland wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 4:02 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside the ASF
>> about the user of "master" as the name of the default git branch. If you
>>
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 4:02 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
> All,
>
> You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside the ASF
> about the user of "master" as the name of the default git branch. If you
> haven't, the short version is that the name can be traced back to
> master/slave and
Am 2020-06-16 um 12:09 schrieb Mark Thomas:
On 16/06/2020 10:25, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2020-06-16 um 10:02 schrieb Mark Thomas:
All,
You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside the ASF
about the user of "master" as the name of the default git branch. If you
haven't,
On 16/06/2020 10:25, Michael Osipov wrote:
> Am 2020-06-16 um 10:02 schrieb Mark Thomas:
>> All,
>>
>> You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside the ASF
>> about the user of "master" as the name of the default git branch. If you
>> haven't, the short version is that the name
Am 2020-06-16 um 10:02 schrieb Mark Thomas:
All,
You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside the ASF
about the user of "master" as the name of the default git branch. If you
haven't, the short version is that the name can be traced back to
master/slave and its associations
На вт, 16.06.2020 г. в 11:02 Mark Thomas написа:
>
> All,
>
> You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside the ASF
> about the user of "master" as the name of the default git branch. If you
> haven't, the short version is that the name can be traced back to
> master/slave and
All,
You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside the ASF
about the user of "master" as the name of the default git branch. If you
haven't, the short version is that the name can be traced back to
master/slave and its associations with human slavery.
I'd like to propose that
16 matches
Mail list logo
