[Bug 52092] Please make AsyncFileHandler and OneLineFormatter the default for logging.properties

2013-08-07 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52092 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52092] Please make AsyncFileHandler and OneLineFormatter the default for logging.properties

2011-10-26 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52092 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de 2011-10-26 14:16:35 UTC --- I'm +1 for TC 8 and +0 for TC 7 (not a clear +1 because of user compatibility reasons) Rainer -- Configure bugmail:

OneLineFormatter by default?

2011-06-20 Thread Rainer Jung
Should we use the new OneLineFormatter as the default juli formatter? I never found anyone who liked the default java.util.logging log format, which spreads all messages out via two lines. One line contains the timestamp, the other line the message. So if your grep for a message, you want find

Re: OneLineFormatter by default?

2011-06-20 Thread Mark Thomas
On 20/06/2011 15:51, Rainer Jung wrote: Should we use the new OneLineFormatter as the default juli formatter? I never found anyone who liked the default java.util.logging log format, which spreads all messages out via two lines. One line contains the timestamp, the other line the message

Re: OneLineFormatter by default?

2011-06-20 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2011/6/20 Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de: Should we use the new OneLineFormatter as the default juli formatter? I never found anyone who liked the default java.util.logging log format, which spreads all messages out via two lines. One line contains the timestamp, the other line

Re: OneLineFormatter by default?

2011-06-20 Thread Rainer Jung
Thanks Konstantin. I'll take a look at cleaning up 1) to 3), likely using the DateFormatCache from the AccessLogValve as a utility class. Regards, Rainer On 20.06.2011 18:52, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: 2011/6/20 Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de: Should we use the new OneLineFormatter

Re: OneLineFormatter by default?

2011-06-20 Thread Mark Thomas
timestamps are accurate to the nearest second whereas the logging timestamps use ms. Mark Regards, Rainer On 20.06.2011 18:52, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: 2011/6/20 Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de: Should we use the new OneLineFormatter as the default juli formatter? I never found anyone

Re: OneLineFormatter by default?

2011-06-20 Thread Rainer Jung
On 20.06.2011 20:10, Mark Thomas wrote: On 20/06/2011 19:07, Rainer Jung wrote: Thanks Konstantin. I'll take a look at cleaning up 1) to 3), likely using the DateFormatCache from the AccessLogValve as a utility class. Already on it. Note DateFormatCache can't be used because a) JULI can't

Re: OneLineFormatter by default?

2011-06-20 Thread Christopher Schultz
Mark, On 6/20/2011 10:54 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 20/06/2011 15:51, Rainer Jung wrote: Should we use the new OneLineFormatter as the default juli formatter? I never found anyone who liked the default java.util.logging log format, which spreads all messages out via two lines. One line

Re: OneLineFormatter by default?

2011-06-20 Thread Mark Thomas
On 20/06/2011 19:55, Rainer Jung wrote: On 20.06.2011 20:10, Mark Thomas wrote: On 20/06/2011 19:07, Rainer Jung wrote: Thanks Konstantin. I'll take a look at cleaning up 1) to 3), likely using the DateFormatCache from the AccessLogValve as a utility class. Already on it. Note