gt;>> Going to very specifically look at this case and see what's up:
>>> https://github.com/dblevins/tomee-analysis/blob/master/apache-tomee-plume-8.0.3-SNAPSHOT.zip/apache-tomee-plume-8.0.3-SNAPSHOT/lib/jakarta.xml.bind-api-2.3.2.jar/jakarta/xml/bind/util/JAXBSource%241-asmified.java#L
the PR to see what's happening
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On Jun 3, 2020, at 10:45 AM, Jonathan Gallimore
> wrote:
>
> Made some progress by adjusting the rules - here's the latest counts (not
> including string references):
>
>
> On Jun 3, 2020, at 9:03 AM, Jonathan Gallimore
> wrote:
>
> Just wanted to follow up with some details on how I'm getting the numbers
> below. I'm using this tool: https://github.com/tomitribe/jkta
So people have a heads-up on that tool, I'm currently working on the Tomitribe
side with
ax.xml.rpc.
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On Jun 4, 2020, at 9:05 AM, Jonathan Gallimore
> wrote:
>
> Fixed this by migrating javax.management.j2ee, but leaving
> javax.management.
>
> Now I have this error:
>
>
ansformer to be wired in at runtime.
It does slow classloading which is the majority of startup time, but it
definitely would be achievable and not terribly difficult to write if you
already have the bytecode transformation code.
-David
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 12:54 PM David Blev
if we want to do a release).
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On Jun 10, 2020, at 2:11 AM, Jonathan Gallimore
> wrote:
>
> In terms of the technical aspects of doing the find/replace on non-class
> files with the Transformer - its po
communicating status in a big
announcement is to be a bit conservative. It's easier to surprise people than
to disappoint people.
Thoughts?
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
change). When we're passing we finally do cut master over to be completely
TomEE 9 / Jakarta EE 9.
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On Jun 11, 2020, at 12:42 AM, Thomas Andraschko
> wrote:
>
> From a user perspective i would really sugges
The short version: does anyone see an issue releasing these Jakarta EE 9
preview binaries created by the transformer for people to try.
-David
> On Jun 11, 2020, at 9:04 AM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> I think I left too many important details out, leaning on prior discussions.
>
&
> On Jun 11, 2020, at 9:15 AM, Jonathan Gallimore
> wrote:
>
>> This could be nice if Maven would allow it:
>>
>> miles:~/work/apache/tomee/tomee/apache-tomee/target 08:42:31
>> $ find *.zip
>> apache-tomee-microprofile-8.0.3-SNAPSHOT.zip
>>
> On Jun 11, 2020, at 1:14 PM, Jonathan Gallimore
> wrote:
>
> If what you're downloading from the website is
> called apache-tomee-webprofile-9.0.0-M1-SNAPSHOT, then if you're using
> Arquillian, in my mind it makes sense that your pom is referencing
>
> On Jun 10, 2020, at 7:58 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> I've gone ahead and created us a new repo and seeded it with the bytecode
> scanning/transformation code that I've been working on to Scan/Transform
> Maven Central.
>
> -
> https://github.com/apache/t
> On Jun 11, 2020, at 9:12 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> Still some tweaks to do on getting the replacement into the jar, but so far
> is looking really promising.
>
> The main goal was that any modifications we make to java files could be
> tracked in the same TomEE b
-8.0.3-SNAPSHOT/lib/java-support-7.3.0.jar/net/shibboleth/utilities/java/support/collection/ClassToInstanceMultiMap.adoc
Looks like there might be an issue with
`javax.annotation.concurrent.ThreadSafe`, otherwise it's very close.
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http
Ok, here's a quick status as to where I got.
- Picked through our remaining ambiguous "javax" string references and fixed
them by checking in the affected file at the library version we're using, then
took a look at their master branch to see how they've adapter for the "jakarta"
namespace
> On Jun 11, 2020, at 5:48 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
>> On Jun 11, 2020, at 1:14 PM, Jonathan Gallimore
>> wrote:
>>
>> If what you're downloading from the website is
>> called apache-tomee-webprofile-9.0.0-M1-SNAPSHOT, then if you're using
>> Arqui
can do my best to
guide you through.
BTW, love your email address :)
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On Oct 31, 2020, at 11:59 AM, Juan Moreno wrote:
>
> Hi all!
>
> I've been testing an Application with Arquillian
> On Dec 8, 2020, at 2:04 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Yesterday I worked on the EJB 3 failures related to naming context.
> I realized we were failing on a couple of tests and I've been able to fix
> them with configuration.
>
> But the last one was regarding the close
we need and in an environment like
that there are endless ways to have impact.
Thank you so much for showing interest!
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On Nov 25, 2020, at 8:47 AM, Jorge Luis Morales Reyes
> wrote:
>
> My name is Jorge M
- that seems to be the typical result).
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On Oct 30, 2020, at 6:56 AM, Thiago Henrique Hupner wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Is there any place where we can see the current results of the TCK?
>
> If not, it
. There's a whole other area/opportunity for contribution there.
Sometimes I question the need for JIRA anymore, but that's a whole other story.
:)
-David
> Em ter., 8 de dez. de 2020 às 18:42, David Blevins
> escreveu:
>
>> Hey Thiago!
>>
>> Thought I saw your name on
from Geronimo and
it's only been minorly changed over the years. Any kind of love is welcome.
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On Dec 8, 2020, at 3:48 PM, Thiago Henrique Hupner wrote:
>
> Hi all!
>
> I did some looking and most of
PR merged :)
- https://github.com/apache/tomee-tck/pull/13
Thank you much, Thiago! So amazing to see this kind of activity. You rock,
Thiago!
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On Dec 8, 2020, at 4:36 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> W
Merged!
What an amazing end to the Jakarta EE 9 release day :)
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On Dec 8, 2020, at 5:18 PM, Thiago Henrique Hupner wrote:
>
> Sure! I'll do right away
>
> Em ter., 8 de dez. de 2020 às 22:17, David Blev
+1
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On Nov 17, 2020, at 2:11 PM, Jonathan Gallimore
> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> This is a first attempt at a vote for a release of Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M3
> and Apache TomEE 8.0.5.
>
> On Nov 17, 2020, at 1:50 AM, Jonathan Gallimore
> wrote:
>
> I kicked off a run of this last night:
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Tomee/job/master/10/ - which completed (it
> was hanging before), with 38 test failures, looking to be OWB related. The
> tests I've looked at so far locally
+1 for both the release and starting your email with "ladies" :)
If women have to be constantly read, "hey guys", seems only fair we should
experience that from time to time :)
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On Oct 19, 2020, at
> On Oct 20, 2020, at 7:11 AM, Jonathan Gallimore
> wrote:
>
> Could I get some pointers on publishing the website? I guess its changed as
> we don't have the CMS any more.
>
> I have some updates I'd like to get on there, including new download links
> and updating documentation. I've pushed
> On Jan 3, 2021, at 8:24 AM, Thomas Andraschko
> wrote:
>
> Any News? We should also think about tomee embedded
Any interest in working on this? I'd be happy to help and we could definitely
use more contributors.
-David
> David Blevins schrieb am Mi., 30. Sept
Can we get the Jenkins notifications sent to commits@tomee.a.o ?
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On Jan 15, 2021, at 9:25 AM, Apache Jenkins Server
> wrote:
>
> See
> <https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Tomee/job/master-owasp-check/2
+1
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On Jan 14, 2021, at 8:05 AM, Jonathan Gallimore
> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> This is a first attempt at a vote for a release of Apache TomEE 8.0.6.
>
> Maven Repo:
> https://repository.apac
you've always been welcome, so instead I'll
say congratulations! You earned it, sir!
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On Jan 12, 2021, at 1:34 PM, Jean-Louis Monteiro
> wrote:
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache TomEE h
Gentle reminder to avoid cross-posting.
-David
> On Jun 9, 2021, at 10:13 AM, COURTAULT Francois
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> So I think we have 2 possibilities:
>
> *wait for a 8.0.8 release
>
> *wait for the 9.0 to be released
>
> According to you, what is the best strategy
Jencks
Jean-Louis Monteiro
Cesar Hernandez
Alex The Rocker
Jonathan Gallimore
Mark Struberg
David Blevins
+0
Richard Zowalla
-0
Martin Wiesner
Unspecified:
Alex Rabelo Ferreira
-David
> On May 3, 2021, at 8:01 AM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> Ok, folks,
>
> Here we go. Again,
Here's my +1
-David
> On May 3, 2021, at 8:01 AM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> Ok, folks,
>
> Here we go. Again, bear in mind we need these binaries for the Jakarta EE
> 9.1 release ballot today. Any issues and we can roll a Apache TomEE 8.0.8
> and Apache TomEE 9.0.0
We have some tools to help with release tasks in svn here:
- http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/sandbox/release-tools/
I think I'm going to try to convert that over to git and put some love into
them. Not sure what runs and what doesn't. I have to do the finishing steps
for the 8.0.7 and
t add JIRAs for them, mark them the
`fixVersion` as 8.0.7 or 9.0.0-M7, the resolve it and post here so I know to
regenerate the release notes.
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
> On May 10, 2021, at 3:50 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> We have some tools to help with release tasks in svn here:
>
> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/sandbox/release-tools/
>
> I think I'm going to try to convert that over to git and put some love into
> t
/
- Draft release notes for 9.0.0-M7 are available here:
https://tomee.apache.org/9.0.0-M7/release-notes.html
Remaining work:
- Clean up "Dependency upgrade" section of release notes to reflect actual
dependencies in the binary
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dbl
As long as I was doing the tomee-release-tools converstion from svn to git, I
went ahead and did this one too:
- https://github.com/apache/tomee-jakartaee-api
We did end up creating a module for an updated jakartaee-api jar in the
`tomee-jakarta` repo:
-
> On May 18, 2021, at 10:31 AM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> - Draft release notes for 9.0.0-M7 are available here:
> https://tomee.apache.org/9.0.0-M7/release-notes.html
>
> Remaining work:
>
> - Clean up "Dependency upgrade" section of release notes
The Apache TomEE team is pleased to announce the availability of Apache TomEE
9.0.0-M7
Apache TomEE implements the Jakarta EE and MicroProfile specifications. We're
very proud to announce that Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M7 passes the Jakarta EE 9.1 Web
Profile TCK. Jakarta EE 9.1 passed its release
When creating the tomee-release-tools git repo I mistakenly did a force push to
the wrong repo, the main tomee repo. This closed most of the open PRs.
Steps taken so far:
- Worked with Apache Infra on slack to restore the repo. This still doesn't
allow the PRs to be re-opened,
l/716
-David
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>
> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 6:38 PM David Blevins wrote:
> When creating the tomee-release-tools git repo I mistakenly did a force push
> to the wrong repo,
This one is minor, but I noticed I got a different tag name than I was
expecting and we seem to be getting it ever other release.
- tomee-8.0.1
- tomee-8.0.2
- tomee-8.0.5
- tomee-8.0.6
- tomee-project-8.0.3
- tomee-project-8.0.4
- tomee-project-8.0.7
We seem to flip between the two
One of the issues I had during the release and is still a mystery to me is this
command would definitely not work:
$ mvn -Darguments="-DskipTests -Dadditionalparam=-Xdoclint:none
-DadditionalJOption=-Xdoclint:none -Pmain,apache-release" release:perform
After a while of uploading binaries,
ob could automatically create the same branch in tomee-site-pub, update
the .asf.yaml and do a build/publish. It could potentially do that
automatically upon seeing a commit on a branch. Alternatively, we could have
one tomee-site-pub branch for staging everyone shares, which could work but
w
> On May 20, 2021, at 1:00 AM, Zowalla, Richard
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> looks good :)
Glad you like it! Ryan and Andrii do great work :)
> - Documentation is empty / seems to be broken on the staging
> environment. Is this intentional?
Yes, I just generated enough of the site to show the
to figure it out. I suspect @Humbedooh will get it
resolved.
The good news is that when he does, we're completely setup for automated
publishes to the website!
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On May 19, 2021, at 7:52 PM, Cesar Hernandez wrote:
>
All,
In celebration of our new accomplishment of being certified, I thought it would
be nice to have a refresh of the front page of the website to really make
people go "wow, there's some cool stuff happing over in TomEE." I enlisted the
help of Ryan (designer) and Andrii
will keep you updated:
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21903
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
> On May 28, 2021, at 3:23 PM, Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod)
> wrote:
>
> David,
>
> While I was working the Docker images for 9.0.0-M7, I could not use the keys
> file to verify the downloads. Does the keys file need an update?
>
Hey Rod!
I used a new key and uploaded it as part of the build.
Donnerstag, den 20.05.2021, 14:10 -0700 schrieb David Blevins:
>> All,
>>
>> Some updates on content in general as there are some changes there
>> too not related to the potential new front page.
>>
>> We had a lot of content still stuck in the old markdown format o
Things seem generally positive. I'll push tomorrow unless someone would like
us to wait.
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On May 19, 2021, at 12:09 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> All,
>
> In celebration of our new accomplishment of bei
by a combination of
commits, lines added and lines removed. If you contribute to any of our repos,
you go up the list.
* site-publish was still running when this email was sent, but should be done
in 20 minutes
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
smime.p7s
Description
> On Jul 7, 2021, at 1:56 PM, Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod)
> wrote:
>
> Also, can I get access to close issues on tomitribe/docker-tomee? There is
> an old issue lingering out there I was going to close.
Send me your github ID and I'll hook you up.
-David
>
> On 7/1/21, 9:12 PM, "Cesar
Heads up that we are narrowing in in the last few TCK issues and there is still
some chance we can be Jakarta EE 9.1 Web Profile certified in time for the
Jakarta EE 9.1 release vote Monday.
It would be super super and I mean *super* tight
However, if we can get it done we'll need to do a
Status update:
- We're down to our last 7 failures on the general portion of the EE 9.1 TCK.
Jean-Louis and I are on it.
- 3 jaxrs
- 1 servlet
- 1 securityapi
- 2 websocket
- We have the signature tests to configure and run still and there will be
failures there, but
suspect it's
the latest latest.
If anything is missed, we can roll a 8.0.8 immediately even as soon as Tuesday.
Basically, if we don't get a release vote up in the 8 to 16 hours, we'll miss
the Jakarta EE 9.1 release window.
-David
>
> Le dim. 2 mai 2021 à 19:09, David Blevins a écrit :
&
n, in order
> to get latest CVE fixes since 8.0.6.
>
> Kind regards,
> Alexandre
>
> Le sam. 1 mai 2021 à 03:32, David Blevins a écrit :
>>
>> Heads up that we are narrowing in in the last few TCK issues and there is
>> still some chance we can be Jakarta EE 9
I say merge it and let's see what the TCK says.
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On Apr 21, 2021, at 1:18 PM, Jean-Louis Monteiro
> wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> I've spent some time finishing Jakarta Security API implementation.
> See
. We're getting the opposite, so the most generic @Provider is
winning and tests are failing.
The trick is code to accurately find and resolve the 'Foo' value in a
declaration like `MessageBodyReader`. Working on that now. Happy path is
all good, edge cases in progress.
--
David Blevins
http
You're quite the impressive guy, Leonardo! I was a pretty aggressive 15
year-old as well, so I really respect your drive.
First, let me applaud your bash/linux focus. I was fortunate enough to work
with two guys early in my career who would routinely use bash/linux to generate
and modify
> On Apr 17, 2021, at 4:06 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> Digging up this old discussion thread on removing the tomee-foo-webapp
> modules.
>
> At the moment our TCK progress is essentially halted due to issues created by
> the complexity of these webapps and ho
> On Apr 23, 2021, at 5:15 PM, Leonardo Alonso
> wrote:
>
> Hi David, thanks for the feedback!
>
> Both options, both the automation with Jenkins and the creation of
> non-docker images interest me a lot.
Sounds good. If both sound good then the one I'd recommend starting with first
is
rg/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1184/
This vote will be open for 72 hours. Please vote +1, 0, -1. When voting -1,
please state the reason.
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
> On May 3, 2021, at 1:34 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> This seems like a good idea, but the current vote is for 3 sets of artifacts
> and if it passes would we be obligated to release all to the mirror system?
> Is it too late to have independent votes for the 3 sets?
Then we can simply leave
Dear Community.
The time has come :)
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
> On Jan 28, 2021, at 3:49 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We started the work on Jakarta EE 9 a few months ago. So far we are in good
> shape by only applying the transformer in our code. But it looks like we
> are facing some limitations.
>
> 1/ libraries we are using Tomcat,
> On Feb 8, 2021, at 2:00 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> Once we branched and changed the namespaces and dependencies we'd have
> conflicts and often wouldn't be able to use git cherry pick or merge without
> manual cleanup.
Here's a reference. Nishant did a conversion
> On Jan 28, 2021, at 3:49 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We started the work on Jakarta EE 9 a few months ago. So far we are in good
> shape by only applying the transformer in our code. But it looks like we
> are facing some limitations.
>
> 1/ libraries we are using Tomcat,
> On Feb 9, 2021, at 8:10 PM, Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod)
> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I have mentioned this a in the past, but I could use some discussion on the
> topic.
>
> We are not generating tar.gz files for TomEE 9, we are only generating a zip
> file. If I recall, the zip files do not
> On Mar 23, 2021, at 1:43 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro
> wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> I'm glad you moved on this. As I mentioned a little while ago, the current
> approach was not working.
>
> I had a quick look into the PR even though I did not get a chance to check
> it out and try locally.
ot to
digest, so even "sounds promising" is good :) Not expecting a line-by-line
code review, but that's certainly welcome if you have that kind of energy.
Thoughts?
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Thanks or pushing this back up to the top. Some thoughts below.
> On Mar 24, 2021, at 12:46 AM, Richard Zowalla wrote:
>
> It seems, we are already providing SHA256/SHA512 checksums for newer
> releases. To rephrase my comment: If we would switch to Maven
> repository links instead, we would
hose a different implementation, why are you
making me do this?" It's all the more frustrating as you know darn well the
impl dep needs a very specific version of that api dep -- you can't just use an
older or newer api version and expect things to work. Therefore I think having
an "
just tested it locally with one of the failing tests and it worked
> perfectly. So I am +1 here.
>
> Gruss
> Richard
>
> Am Freitag, den 02.04.2021, 15:09 -0700 schrieb David Blevins:
>> Richard mentioned some examples were broken after a recent library
>> upgrade a
d some simple ones in https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/779/files
>>
>>
>>
>> Vicente.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 11:43 PM Vicente Rossello
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, let me take a look at it tomorrow, I'll see what I can do
>>&
> On Mar 25, 2021, at 7:53 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> Some style advice, get in the habit of using the `final` keyword on all
> fields, variables and parameters.
Of course I mean "where possible." There are rare occasions where they are
needed. I tend to rework m
> On Mar 25, 2021, at 7:53 AM, Zowalla, Richard
> wrote:
>
> Hi David, Hi Jon,
>
> thanks for your replies.
>
> I just pushed some (short term) fixes to the tomee-site-generator:
>
> (a) Added an (experimental) generator to create the download page based
> on downloads.apache.org or
is clear for Antora and any other
things that can generate html from adoc. Us being on the CMS was definitely
standing in the way.
> Might also a good starting point for some contributors out where :-)
Agreed.
-David
> Am Mittwoch, den 24.03.2021, 15:14 -0700 schrieb David Blevins:
&g
mars 2021 à 23:45, David Blevins a écrit
> :
>>
>>> On Mar 26, 2021, at 9:16 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> I’ve been sitting in the Apache <—> Jakarta EE relationship manager seat
>>> for a little bi
. The summaries mentioned in the vote
thread are defined here under the section "Public TCK Results Summary":
- https://jakarta.ee/committees/specification/tckprocess/
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
. The summaries mentioned in the vote
thread are defined here under the section "Public TCK Results Summary":
- https://jakarta.ee/committees/specification/tckprocess/
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Please see Rob Tompkins' email "[jarkarta-ee] Is there apatite to ever use
Jakarta EE logos on the TomEE site"
This vote is strictly limited to 1) getting Jakarta EE Platform and Jakarta EE
Web Profile implementations at the ASF listed on the jakarta.ee compatible
products page[1] and 2) use
> On Mar 26, 2021, at 9:16 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I’ve been sitting in the Apache <—> Jakarta EE relationship manager seat for
> a little bit now, and I’m curious if you guys think that you’d ever want to
> use Jakarta EE logos on the site as having satisfied the TCKs or
> On Mar 30, 2021, at 11:43 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro
> wrote:
>
> Ok looks like we are back to normal. Everything is working so far. Bad news
> is that I have no idea what really fixed the problem.
I had the same thing happen to me last week. I did a clean build and it
magically went away.
does.
Ensure you have `` setup to point at an actual GlassFish 6
installation. The script will not do this part.
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
> On Mar 24, 2021, at 12:40 AM, Richard Zowalla wrote:
>
> I have merged the "manual" changes to add the missing links to the .asc
> files of the release download page.
>
> In this process, I discovered, that we are not using the Downloads
> generator class [2] anymore. My questions is:
>
>
it.
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
> On Mar 23, 2021, at 1:45 PM, Zowalla, Richard
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I went ahead and merged the changes. We are now capable of running
> JUnit 5 tests via @RunWithApplicationComposer with some modes to
> specify (container for each test method, for each test class, per jvm
> or based on
> On Apr 8, 2021, at 12:12 AM, Zowalla, Richard
> wrote:
>
> (b) I only know the "jira-rest-java-client-core" provided by Atlassian
> (see
> https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.atlassian.jira/jira-rest-java-client-core/5.2.2
> ) - might be worth a try? Sadly, it will only work with the
n/ts/tests/jaxrs/spec/provider/visibility
Hope any of the above is helpful!
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
> On Apr 6, 2021, at 11:34 AM, Zowalla, Richard
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I think this is the way the ASF parent POM configuration is generating
> the SHA512 hashes during a release process (at least it seems to be the
> same for other ASF projects (Maven, ...) as well).
>
> I am using a this way
ficult:
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-142
If there was good java client, I could very quickly whip up a nice CLI with
Crest.
-David
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/779#discussion_r607192663
>
>
> Am Samstag, den 03.04.2021, 16:45 -0700 schri
> On Apr 10, 2021, at 8:04 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> I've created the following issue that has 86 subtasks -- one for each failing
> test.
>
> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-3140
>
> Anyone is welcome to assign one of those tasks to yourself.
I've
> On Apr 8, 2021, at 12:52 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
>> On Apr 8, 2021, at 12:12 AM, Zowalla, Richard
>> wrote:
>>
>> (b) I only know the "jira-rest-java-client-core" provided by Atlassian
>> (see
>> https://mvnrepository.com/artifact
> On Apr 8, 2021, at 11:52 PM, Jean-Louis Monteiro
> wrote:
>
> Over the night, we went under 100 failures.
> 197 last week, 86 this week
>
> We are getting so close to the certification.
> As said already, the last failures are usually harder to fix and take more
> time.
>
> Help and
We should definitely fix that. Creating 174 subtasks is exactly the goal! :)
> I just created the related issue (TOMEE-3234) and all related sub-tasks
> for the examples, which are not yet transformed to the server / api bom
> approach.
Very excellent!
-David
> Am Samstag, den 10.04.202
with the
TCK can get some real-time feedback.
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On Apr 11, 2021, at 8:02 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
>> On Apr 10, 2021, at 8:04 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>>
>> I've created the following issue that has 86
601 - 700 of 857 matches
Mail list logo
