Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC3

2017-01-06 Thread Chip Senkbeil
Closing this vote. Going to start a vote for an RC4 once I get all of the artifacts in place on staging and dist. On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:59 AM Gino Bustelo wrote: > Go for it Chip. > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 6:21 PM Luciano Resende > wrote: > > > I would check with Gino if he is ok with someb

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC3

2016-12-02 Thread Gino Bustelo
Go for it Chip. On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 6:21 PM Luciano Resende wrote: > I would check with Gino if he is ok with somebody else continuing this, but > if you know he is way or something, then it should be ok for you to > continue, > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 7:10 AM, Chip Senkbeil > wrote: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC3

2016-12-01 Thread Luciano Resende
I would check with Gino if he is ok with somebody else continuing this, but if you know he is way or something, then it should be ok for you to continue, On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 7:10 AM, Chip Senkbeil wrote: > Does Gino need to be the one to do this? Or can I get it started by closing > the vote

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC3

2016-11-29 Thread Chip Senkbeil
Does Gino need to be the one to do this? Or can I get it started by closing the vote thread and opening an approval request in general for the release? On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 5:30 PM Luciano Resende wrote: > I haven't seen an e-mail closing the release vote, and neither the IPMC > vote thread s

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC3

2016-11-18 Thread Luciano Resende
I haven't seen an e-mail closing the release vote, and neither the IPMC vote thread started. Are we still waiting for something specific here ? Anything one of the mentors can help ? On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > First you need to close the vote. Then the release need

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC3

2016-11-11 Thread Luciano Resende
First you need to close the vote. Then the release needs to be approved in general, check the archives there for an example of the vote thread, as you need to add link to vote thread, cote result On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 7:03 PM Chip Senkbeil wrote: > So, with three +1s, what do we need to do

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC3

2016-11-11 Thread Chip Senkbeil
So, with three +1s, what do we need to do? Are there still things to address? Does this need to go to general Apache? This has been open for awhile. On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:31 PM Gino Bustelo wrote: > +1 > > We need to get this thing moving. > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 5:17 PM Hitesh Shah wrote

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC3

2016-11-08 Thread Gino Bustelo
+1 We need to get this thing moving. On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 5:17 PM Hitesh Shah wrote: > Sorry for the delay in reviewing the bits. > > Comments: > > KEYS file still missing. > Did signature/checksum checks for binary, source and pip bundles. > For the binary release, the assembly jar makes it

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC3

2016-11-04 Thread Hitesh Shah
Sorry for the delay in reviewing the bits. Comments: KEYS file still missing. Did signature/checksum checks for binary, source and pip bundles. For the binary release, the assembly jar makes it a bit tough to validate all dependencies. Not completed this fully though. Would be good if other fo

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC3

2016-11-03 Thread Hitesh Shah
Wiki would be good. — Hitesh > On Nov 2, 2016, at 6:40 AM, Gino Bustelo wrote: > > @hitesh Where would be an good place to put release instructions? > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 6:21 PM Marius van Niekerk > wrote: > >> >> >> On 2016-10-28 08:49 (-0400), Marius van Niekerk < >> marius.v.nie

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC3

2016-11-02 Thread Chip Senkbeil
+1. - Manually installed using the pip package; verified that the install worked and the Scala option was available in the notebook. - Ran Scala code on the notebook. - Ran some simple parallelization, reduces, etc. using a local Spark cluster. - Verified that PySpark interpreter worked correctly

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC3

2016-11-02 Thread Gino Bustelo
@hitesh Where would be an good place to put release instructions? On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 6:21 PM Marius van Niekerk wrote: > > > On 2016-10-28 08:49 (-0400), Marius van Niekerk < > marius.v.niek...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:35 Gino Bustelo wrote: > > > > > Please v

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC3

2016-11-01 Thread Marius van Niekerk
On 2016-10-28 08:49 (-0400), Marius van Niekerk wrote: > +1 > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:35 Gino Bustelo wrote: > > > Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as > > Apache Toree version 0.1.0. Pay special attention to the LICENSE and > > NOTICE files since this is our f

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC3

2016-10-31 Thread Gino Bustelo
I have written notes for now. My goal is to document all of it once we get this recipe right. Fortunately, most of the steps are handled by make. On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 2:00 PM Hitesh Shah wrote: > Folks, when voting, please do mention all the various verification steps > that you did for the r

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC3

2016-10-28 Thread Hitesh Shah
Folks, when voting, please do mention all the various verification steps that you did for the release bits. Given that releasing is part of the learning curve of being in the ASF, it will be helpful for everyone to learn from these votes regarding all the checks that need to be done. Also, @

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC3

2016-10-28 Thread Marius van Niekerk
+1 On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:35 Gino Bustelo wrote: > Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as > Apache Toree version 0.1.0. Pay special attention to the LICENSE and > NOTICE files since this is our first release. > > > The tag to be voted on is v0.1.0-rc3 > (5bef39490dae