Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.5.0 RC3

[X] +1 OK to release ;) -- Richard > On 28.09.2016, at 12:02, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote: > > I am +1 for the release based on your feedback regarding the license exclusion > and based on my review of the source package and tag. I didn't try to install > the plugin into

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.5.0 RC3

I am +1 for the release based on your feedback regarding the license exclusion and based on my review of the source package and tag. I didn't try to install the plugin into Eclipse, but since you and Marshall already did that successfully, it feels quite redundant doing that again. Best, --

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.5.0 RC3

Another gentle reminder. The vote has been open for 27 days now and only one vote is missing (for 21 days). Best, Peter Am 20.09.2016 um 10:26 schrieb Peter Klügl: > Another gentle reminder. > > > The vote has been open for 19 days and only one vote is missing. > > > Best, > > > Peter > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.5.0 RC3

Hi, sorry, I was too busy and forgot to report the findings. I removed it. There were no problems reported by rat for the source-release. In my eclipse workspace, there are three unapproved licenses of files that are not packaged: ruta-eclipse-update-site/.project

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.5.0 RC3

On 21.09.2016, at 22:53, Peter Klügl wrote: > >> - why is the purpose of this apparently very broad exclude in the rat plugin >> section of the pom in the project root? >> >> ** > > I do not remember why I added it, most likely because I had to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.5.0 RC3

Hi, Am 21.09.2016 um 19:41 schrieb Richard Eckart de Castilho: Hi, - comparing source release vs svn tag - OK - checking new modules - OK - ruta-maven-archetype - ruta-ep-parent - checking POM changes - OK - some dltk dependency changes in ruta-ep-textruler, ruta-ep-ide-ui, etc. -

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.5.0 RC3

Hi, - comparing source release vs svn tag - OK - checking new modules - OK - ruta-maven-archetype - ruta-ep-parent - checking POM changes - OK - some dltk dependency changes in ruta-ep-textruler, ruta-ep-ide-ui, etc. - but all seem to be scope provided - no significant dependency

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.5.0 RC3

Another gentle reminder. The vote has been open for 19 days and only one vote is missing. Best, Peter Am 12.09.2016 um 23:26 schrieb Marshall Schor: > reminder, this vote has been open for 12 days, (counting weekends) and needs > one > more vote... > > -Marshall

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.5.0 RC3

reminder, this vote has been open for 12 days, (counting weekends) and needs one more vote... -Marshall

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.5.0 RC3

Hi, Am 07.09.2016 um 17:13 schrieb Marshall Schor: > ... > > minor pdf format issue - not a blocker. overflow in example in section 4.4. > UIMA Ruta Maven Archetype fixed in current trunk. > (not a blocker) I think there needs to be a way to build Ruta without > referencing maven.averbis.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.5.0 RC3

signature check on source-release.zip: OK - note that signature is not certified with a trusted signature yet ... compare source-release with svn tag - OK build from source- ok issues fixed - OK install into Eclipse NEON and create UIMA Ruta project and create some artifacts - OK. minor pdf

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.5.0 RC3

Yes, they are not part of the release, but only built so that I did not have to change the complete build behavior. I do not remember why, but it was really much easier to get a correct build if the bininary release artefacts are also built. So please ignore them for the release :-) Peter

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.5.0 RC3

I noticed that the build-from-sources creates in /target files ruta-2.5.0-bin.tar.gz, .zip, tar.gz.asc, zip.asc. These ruta-2.5.0-bin... files: are they part of the release (meaning they're uploaded to some distribution spot or used in any way)? If not, perhaps the build should not build them?

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.5.0 RC3

starting review :-) On 9/1/2016 7:12 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: > Hi, > > the third release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.5.0 is ready for > voting. > > Changes rc2 -> rc3: > - UIMA-5091 Ruta: pdf formatting of documentation > - UIMA-5090Ruta: build warning for ide parser - ResourceLiteral >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.5.0 RC3

compared svn-tag to source-release - OK mvn clean install svn-tag - OK mvn clean install source-release - OK spot checked issues/license/notice/release-notes - OK spot checked signatures - OK installed UIMA Ruta Workbench in Eclipse Neon with UIMA 2.9.0 features installed - OK created simple