3/4 of the industry? 75% ? you must be joking...
do remember that 1.5 will not be released for quite some time
so even in 2010 you have a 1.4 version for i think the whole year.
So wicket 1.4 will only really be not so supported anymore in 2011
that means that java 5 will be more then 6 years old
+1
- Original message -
this vote is to release wicket 1.4.5
this build fixes some critical problems with 1.4.4, namely WICKET-2613
and some modal-window related issues.
branch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.5/
artifacts:
that teamcity can't connect to the agent... apparently port
9090 is blocked...
Martijn
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Johan Compagner
jcompag...@gmail.com wrote:
maven and postgres are updated.
so everything should start working now
On 14/12/2009, nino martinez wael
for confluence)?
Martijn
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com
wrote:
I fixed the 1.4 snapshot deploying (that still didnt go well it tried to
deploy on the wrong location because of a bad profile/configuration)
Now 1.4 snapshots should
- Compilation failure
-
/data/home/wicket/teamcity-5.0/buildAgent/work/wicket-trunk/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/ng/request/Url.java:[147,46]
cannot find symbol
- symbol : method copyOf(java.lang.String[],int)
- location: class java.util.Arrays
-
i cant believe that..java 6 is already out for years.. they are already at
update 17..
java 5 was sep 2004!
java 6 dec 2006
thats already 3 years ago..
I cant beleive that there are many still on java 5 they really should
upgrade because java 6 didnt maybe bring much api wise
but performance
mac's should be totally ignored in this area (and all other area's if you
ask me)
apple and java is the biggest pile of crap i ever worked with
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:45, Matej Knopp matej.kn...@gmail.com wrote:
They do, on snow leopard :)
Anyway, I don't feel too strongly about it,
so recently they moved to 5?
at a time that 6 is already almost 3 years there?
how stupid is that?
Why if you move you move to something that is already a dinosaur ?
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 13:03, Carl-Eric Menzel
cm.wic...@users.bitforce.com wrote:
I only know about our customers, who are
: Komponentenbasierte Webanwendungen in Java
http://www.wicketbuch.de/
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:12:45 +0100
Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com wrote:
so recently they moved to 5?
at a time that 6 is already almost 3 years there?
how stupid is that?
Why if you move you move to something
maven and postgres are updated.
so everything should start working now
On 14/12/2009, nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com wrote:
It's been a while since I've dabbled with FreeBsd, almost a decade... Would
be real nice with the maven upgrade, since all the snapshots unique are
+1
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 20:13, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
this vote is to release wicket 1.4.4
branch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.4/
artifacts:
the bad news is that it seems it is delayed again until the end of 2010??
back on the static methods, PropertyModel.getInstance(x,y) is a bit to long
i guess and PropertyModel.get(x.y) is also not not sounding quite right.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:42, Vladimir K koval...@gmail.com wrote:
I just got a question about:
Markup of type 'html' for component
'org.apache.wicket.markup.html.panel.Panel' not found
because it used a panel (but he meant to use in this example a
WebMarkupContainer)
But i think he shouldnt be allowed to say new Panel() at all...
I would expect that it would
So generate a detach() methods that looks up all the fields and do what on
those?
I guess if that is a detachable call it through and annotate other fields
that should be set to null?
so i we have this
class @detachable MyModel
{
private IModel innerModel;
private @detach Object myVar;
if you never want sessions to invalidate then just have an ajax timer
that polls the server just before your container time out like 29
minutes if the time out is 30
On 19/11/2009, Hawk Newton hnew...@cobaltgroup.comi wrote:
Hello Wicket folx.
First and foremost I want to commend you on an
http://java.dzone.com/news/closures-coming-java-7 -
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=ddhp95vd_6hg3qhc
then that would pretty much solve our none static typed property model in
java 7
i already did that
its up again but it was AGAIN disk full problems
and that is because of that STUPID maven that generates unique snapshots
Who is the maven expert here that will FIX that problems on all our pom
files?
i have been deleting stuff now for at least 1 hour!
johan
On Tue, Oct 27,
the projects which are not in wicketstuff-core.
El mar, 27-10-2009 a las 10:41 +0100, Johan Compagner escribió:
i already did that
its up again but it was AGAIN disk full problems
and that is because of that STUPID maven that generates unique
snapshots
Who is the maven expert here
We call it compressing because you have data X with 10 references to
objects.
then detaching clears 5 (or something like that) of those references to the
objects
So now you graph of objects is not 11 objects but only 6 thats what we call
compressing by detaching.
The after detaching we serialize
+100
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 22:28, Matej Knopp matej.kn...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, some of us think that brace on new lines make the code much
easier to read.
-Matej
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 10:25 PM, dtoffe dto...@yahoo.com.ar wrote:
Ok, but changing curly braces' alignment would
/ approximately 9 non-binding):
Martijn Dashorst
Jeremy Thomerson
Eelco Hillenius
NO VOTE:
Johan Compagner(commented on thread, but I wasn't sure what vote was
- I think he was voting on model thing)
UpayaviraAlex KarasuluAte DoumaGwyn EvansJonathan
hmmm i kind of like it
IModel or Model
And yes talking about abstract we already do that in places we have
AbstractRequestCycleProcessor
Or do you want to rename that to RequestCycleProcessor but what is then the
interface name?
It does break quite a lot of api without really fixing anything..
+1 release
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 20:46, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
Second attempt at releasing 1.4.2, now with bothersome WICKET-2451removed
Be sure to test with your projects and let us know of any problems
svn:
-1 then yes
that shouldnt be hardcoded but a property in our settings.
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:02, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro reier...@gmail.com
wrote:
[ X] No, don't release it and here is why...
After upgrading to 1.4.2 all my ISO-8859-1 encoded property files fail to
work. I
, Johan Compagner wrote:
-1 then yes
that shouldnt be hardcoded but a property in our settings.
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:02, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
reier...@gmail.com
wrote:
[ X] No, don't release it and here is why...
After upgrading to 1.4.2 all my ISO
+1
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 00:18, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
svn: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.1-prep
dist:
http://people.apache.org/~ivaynberg/wicket-1.4.1/disthttp://people.apache.org/%7Eivaynberg/wicket-1.4.1/dist
maven:
[ X] Yes release 1.4.0
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 20:28, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
[ X] Yes release 1.4.0
+1
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 20:27, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
I've created a release for Wicket 1.3.7.
svn:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/sandbox/ivaynberg/wicket-1.3.7
dist:
+1 release
Hopefully this one can be promoted to the final
On 10/07/2009, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
I've created a release for Wicket 1.4-rc7. Until it is officially
released, you can download from the following locations:
SVN Tag:
[X ] Yes release 1.4-rc6
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 09:32, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
I've created a release for Wicket 1.4-rc6. Until it is officially
released, you can download from the following locations:
SVN Tag:
done
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 17:55, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
any plans to check this into trunk?
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 2:27 AM, jcompag...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jcompagner
Date: Fri Jun 19 09:27:06 2009
New Revision: 786424
URL:
[XXX] Yes release 1.4-rc5
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 17:08, Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.comwrote:
I've created a release for Wicket 1.4-rc5. Until it is officially
released, you can download from the following locations:
SVN Tag:
this we already kind of have.
But it uses currently proxies. And is build on commons proxy that wants us
to hard code the proxie implementation
that you should use, thats in my eyes a wrong implementations, the whole
point of a wrapping class around a proxy
is that i dont want to choose at
+1 !
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 13:30, James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.comwrote:
I've tried pushing through the runtime implementation resolution
(similar to slf4j), but nobody seems keen on it. At least, they
didn't answer my emails. So, perhaps I'll just refactor it myself and
put it
wicket has something for that:
getResourceSettings().setAddLastModifiedTimeToResourceReferenceUrl(
*true*);
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 11:10, Jobartim vmorea...@gmail.com wrote:
I had the same problem but it was because the javascript file was still in
the browser cache of the user even if I
i fixed that one.
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 11:10, Max Bowsher m...@f2s.com wrote:
Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
Can everyone please review open issues against 1.4 and see if there is
anything that would prevent me from building 1.4-rc5 this weekend?
Hopefully we could build it and then promote it
i applied the patch for 1.4 (if this works ok in RC5 i will also back port
it)
it looks ok. Now it will only escape when it is added a tag attribute in
html
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 22:21, mbrictson m...@55minutes.com wrote:
I would very much appreciate a fix for WICKET-2033 before 1.4 goes
[x] Yes release 1.4-rc4
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 06:22, Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.comwrote:
I've created a release for Wicket 1.4-rc4. Until it is officially
released, you can download from the following locations:
SVN Tag:
thats only in 1.4
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 14:49, Martin Grigorov mcgreg...@e-card.bg wrote:
I remember Frank Bille fixed this by changing this HashMap to
LinkedHashMap.
El dom, 26-04-2009 a las 14:22 +0200, Juergen Donnerstag escribió:
are you using java 6? HashMap implementation in J6
+1 (we already use snapshot versions of 1.3.5+ for quite some time in servoy
and those are working fine)
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 07:59, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
I've created a release for Wicket 1.3.6. You can download the release
from the usual location:
dist:
Before i will use git (which i also think is a pretty great product) it has
to has eclipse plugins that are on par with svn/cvs
else it is just a big no go for me
johan
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 16:57, Craig Tataryn crai...@tataryn.net wrote:
I love git but I think since you need to run msys or
Hmm dont know about that.
Because this would mean that class cast exceptions can easily be get
even when from the outside you use generics all the way.
How does a user know that the first one is of that type? Maybe we
could add our own first our self.. This is just bad code if you ask me
On
Ohh wait, i didnt read the email fully, this should work find, i just
saw the supressed warning..
But that change would be fine
On 15/04/2009, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm dont know about that.
Because this would mean that class cast exceptions can easily be get
even when
any reason to do it?
I am not against it but i can think of stuff like show or close methods that
people do override
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:25, Juergen Donnerstag
juergen.donners...@gmail.com wrote:
In ModalWindow.java all public and protected methods are non-final,
even getters and
yes i think so,
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 14:34, Nikos Pougounias pougoun...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Martijn,
I would like to ask, how will it be easier to obtain JSR status by changing
the name?
Thanks in advance,
Nikos
2009/4/1 Martijn Dashorst dasho...@apache.org
The Wicket PMC has
this one is more up to date
http://www.wicketstuff.org/wicket13
If only somebody that has more knowledge then me of maven would fix this:
http://www.wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/apache/wicket/wicket-examples/1.3-SNAPSHOT/
that no timestamp snaphots are creeated for ANYTHING that is
page reference). And
the magic code will be gone in 1.5.
-Matej
- Show quoted text -
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com
wrote:
I dont think we can get rid of it all.
We need checking because what if i do this
MyModelInnerClassPageA model = new
not only may cause problems in
wicket core code, they can lead to headaches anywhere.
Martin
2009/3/3 Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com:
I dont think we can get rid of it all.
We need checking because what if i do this
MyModelInnerClassPageA model = new MyModelInnerClassPageA
...@gmail.com wrote:
Wicket2130Page touchedPage = new Wicket2130Page();
CharSequence urlFor = RequestCycle.get().urlFor(touchedPage);
This is called in creating a ModalWindow with a page as content.
Martijn
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think
Maybe i am not seeing it right but all the request targets are queued and
called detached on
in one go. So what would change?
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 18:50, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
since there can be more then one request target per request cycle we
should make the
I think we just need to check how it is possible that the page comes
not detached in that map. That shouldnt be possible
So what is the place that pushes it?
On 26/02/2009, Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
I've added this test to a JIRA issue, but I can also commit it. That
schrieb Johan Compagner:
i will look at that tomorrow
Also i think about moving wickestuff to another server (vm) on my own big
server in the coming months
johan
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 22:21, Martin Funk mafulaf...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Could it be that the build agent
look fine to me.
mf
Am 18.02.2009 um 15:51 schrieb Johan Compagner:
it is being build now? By core itself?
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 15:41, Martin Funk mafulaf...@googlemail.com
wrote:
wicket contrib gmap2 moved into wicketstuff-core,
so I just deleted that TeamCity Build project.
mf
i will look at that tomorrow
Also i think about moving wickestuff to another server (vm) on my own big
server in the coming months
johan
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 22:21, Martin Funk mafulaf...@googlemail.comwrote:
Could it be that the build agent on wicketstuff.org is not running
correctly?
yes initmodel shouldnt call getModel() on the parent
because that was a big performance penalty on some solutions because that
would create and walk over the complete hierarchy of things
and then many many in between models are created, that dont do really
anything.
But why not something like
bytes both consume 24 bytes.
My personal conclusion would be that if there is a memory saving advantage
to using IntHashMap, it is negligible. Further, the accidental complexity
IntHashMap introduces outweighs the memory savings.
Br,
Tuomas
Quoting Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com
not impact you. where is the problem?
-igor
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com
wrote:
you are forgetting that the value that is stored is also in mem
So if the value is an Integer object that is again an 4 bytes ci, 4
bytes
oi
and 4 bytes value
+1
Can be handy for debugging yes.
On 04/02/2009, Matej Knopp matej.kn...@gmail.com wrote:
in trunk of course..
fine by me
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 15:06, Ate Douma a...@douma.nu wrote:
Hi team and community,
Thijs Vonk, Antony Stubbs and myself have been working over the past few
months on upgrading and improving the Wicket Portlet.
Primary goal for that was upgrading to the now available Portlet API
fine by me
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 15:06, Ate Douma a...@douma.nu wrote:
Hi team and community,
Thijs Vonk, Antony Stubbs and myself have been working over the past few
months on upgrading and improving the Wicket Portlet.
Primary goal for that was upgrading to the now available Portlet API
+1
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:24, Frank Bille frankbi...@apache.org wrote:
Hey all,
I have build the second release candidate of version 1.4 and put it on my
p.a.o account for you to test.
Distribution:
I will look at them
On 24/12/2008, Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
Is there anything special I need to do after submitting a patch for a bug so
that it gets included? Currently I have three patches submittted to random
bugs / requests, two of which have been there for quite
I dont think installing continuum wil help at all it is just that
sourceforge is some how blocked. I will try to investigat that a bit
more, but it is not that teamcity is a problem the apache projects are
building just fine
On 29/11/2008, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who owns the
, or if you install it I can set it up -
whichever works best for you.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I dont think installing continuum wil help at all it is just that
sourceforge is some how blocked
]:* *java.io.IOException: /bin/bash: not found
what does that try to do?
*
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 22:00, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
teamcity seems to work fine
i just added wicket-core to it (but cant have a goal deploy on that one but
i just install it now)
And everything seems
Please make a case then i will do this when i am home (and dont forget it)
On 11/20/08, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could we please make the method above protected (rather than private). This
makes it very simple to do something like this:
@Override
protected
Try hybridurlencoding.
That is meant for bookmarkable redirects to a bookmarkable and interface url
On 10/29/08, Antony Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/10/29 Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 6:43 AM, Antony Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
With RENDER_TO_REDIRECT
and now?
the crontab also didnt look right, i changed it so i hope it will work auto
from now
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 6:17 PM, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
perhaps it wasn't started up again after server restart?
Frank
Hi,
i just got a complained that urls can be changed because the parameters in
an url (hybrid or something else bookmarkable)
are in 1.3 just random sorted because it is a HashMap en in 1.4 they are
sorted in natural order because we use a TreeMap
That last thing in 1.4 we do because of unit
i think it is sourceforge that thinks we are bombarding them or something
like that
if only we could make it clear that it is a build server and that that ip is
fine
johan
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah it's a
we can make SerializePage implement IClusterable thats not a problem
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 1:00 PM, richardwilko
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tc-config is almost the same, except need to add
include
In the current terracotta module will terracotta not monitor/instrument also
pages, components and models?
If we have this page store.. Then terracotta should only work on that page
store class right?
The rest is something that shouldnt be touched
johan
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Ari
[X] release 1.4-m3
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've created and uploaded a release candidate for 1.4-m3 to my p.a.o
space. I'm a little time constrained, so I didn't test the release in
a container. I do think that a 1.4-m3 release is due, because
AbstractPagStore clusterable?
I think thats is not what it supposed to be.
On 7/3/08, richardwilko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have attached a first take on a the terracottapagestore and would
appreciate any input anyone can give me, particularly to do with
concurrency, i.e. should i be
, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that would be a better name yes.
Don't know if we can break that in 1.2..
We could depricate it and point to onBeginRender()
Do we also need to have a onBeginRequest (or onBeginEventDispatch())?
johan
On 3/9/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED
+1 release
On 6/22/08, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've created a release for wicket 1.3.4. It's been a while since I've
done a release, so I'd appreciate any feedback and additional
scrutiny.
You can find the release here:
that one is really strange.
It looks like a concurrency issue but pages cant be accessed by multiply
threads at once.
For example if you place a breakpoint at one of these breakpoints
And you just do 2 request in your browser does it get to that place twice? I
guess not
Maybe the code to get the
just looked at that get page lock code and i dont see a loophole
We sync over the complete part..
I dont really have the time coming 2-3 days to really test it further,
beginning of next week is the earliest
johan
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
are serious enough
that this release is long overdue.
Martijn
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
just looked at that get page lock code and i dont see a loophole
We sync over the complete part..
I dont really have the time coming 2-3 days to really test
Test all work.. You are building and testing with java 6?
It shoukd be done with 5 for now
On 6/7/08, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes! Of course some tests fail during maven build but that is not unusual
for trunk.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Johan Compagner [mailto
so you have an exception purely at runtime but it compiles correct?
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The class AutoLinkResolver has an inner interface in line 510
private static interface ITagReferenceResolver
this leads to the following
If you call RequestCycle.get().setResponsePage() instead of just
setResponsePage()
what happens then?
I kind of like that ClassPage there. It describes the api
A few days ago something similar happened on the List with something else
(wicket tester)
if we also had there a Class the thing he
+1 release,release
On 5/25/08, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
This is the second attempt to release Apache Wicket 1.4-M2. This
release will give the users a chance to see how Wicket+Generics works
in greater details.
The distribution artifacts can be downloaded from here:
Ofcourse we will :)
On 5/23/08, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and for dropdownchoice that has like 8 constructors you are going to
add 8 factory methods?
-igor
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What i could do is add these methods
= TextField.create(foobaz)
{
@Override
public boolean isVisible()
{
return complexDynamicExpressionHere;
}
}
Am 23.05.2008 um 08:17 schrieb Johan Compagner:
Ofcourse we will :)
On 5/23/08, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and for dropdownchoice that has like 8 constructors you
What i could do is add these methods to TextField (for example)
public static final X TextFieldX create(String id)
{
return new TextFieldX(id);
}
public static final X TextFieldX create(String id, IModelX model)
{
return new TextFieldX(id, model);
}
then
go ahead
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I never did get around to building 1.3.4, so would anyone object to me
doing it saturday?
Frank
it works!
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Gwyn Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
test - 'to' is definately 'dev@wicket.apache.org'...
I think i wrote that stateless stuff, dont know exactly that it is al my code.
I guess looking at svn history will give tha answer
On 5/19/08, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically, it depends on what Eelco was thinking when he originally wrote
this.
I have no idea, it's quite a
.getComponentPath(),
requestParameters.getInterfaceName(),
requestParameters.getVersionNumber());
Otherwise my form's onSubmit method is not called because the interface
isn't recognized.
I've already fixed the code and I'll submit a patch.
-Doug
Johan Compagner
to be pretty busy tomorow, so if you have
time give it a shot, if not i will when i get a chance.
-igor
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 11:58 PM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You can make that change, if you want.
Does it all compile if you change that?
On 5/19/08, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL
hmm
i see that igor did a LOT of stuff this last night (my night)
When did you exactly build it?
Because if that is just before igors changes i liked to have a rebuild.
Because this would be a bit of a pity that all those changes
are just not in :(
johan
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 12:38 AM, Frank
through the code and learn what was going
on. I'm confident it resolves the issue I was seeing and that it retains
the old behavior for the case when the wicket interface is passed through
the path params.
Johan Compagner wrote:
I will look at that patch but it is weird, it shouldnt
I increased that tomcat can have to around 1G
Also started tomcat now with java 6
Can somebody look if we need to start a teamcity agent?
What is the prompt for that? We need to improve the restart behavior
of th server anyway.
.
Frank
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I increased that tomcat can have to around 1G
Also started tomcat now with java 6
Can somebody look if we need to start a teamcity agent?
What is the prompt for that? We need to improve the restart behavior
tonight? Anything preventing it?
Frank
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
There is a lot done compared to M1
I think of wicket core the most API stuff is generified at this time..
there are a lot of internal stuff but that is not something we need to fix
vm's? how many?
vm's have 1 problem that they all need an excact amount of memory that
they will consume. And the server has now 3G but that doesnt mean that
we can run many vm's on it that all are running tomcat.. Because for
that every vm must be configured to have a bit memory, atleast between
[X] yes, accept kitten-captcha into Wicket
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 8:22 PM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thoof has generously donated their fluffy kitten-captcha to the Apache
Wicket project for inclusion. Kitten captcha is a captcha that works
through selecting pictures of
aliases
in apache you only need 1 virtual host (because it has to do the same
thing
for every host anyway, and that is forward to tomcat).
Regards,
Sebastiaan
Johan Compagner wrote:
vm's? how many?
vm's have 1 problem that they all need an excact amount of memory
, and that is forward to tomcat).
Regards,
Sebastiaan
Johan Compagner wrote:
vm's? how many?
vm's have 1 problem that they all need an excact amount of memory
that
they will consume. And the server has now 3G but that doesnt mean
that
we can
101 - 200 of 417 matches
Mail list logo
