Hi all,
I've been writing a C++ client to communicate with Qpid Java Broker (v
0.18), for Artifact Deployment Server work, and was able to send/receive a
message successfully.
I need it to be working with WSO2 MB, so tested the same C++ client with MB
(v 1.0.2), but then I got the following
We profiled AppServer 4.1.0 compared it with the new AppServer packs
after removing the BAM publisher components. The old AppServer 4.1.0 is
about 10-15% faster!
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
After removing the BAM publisher components, the throughput
IMHO, we need a urgent code review on this. Also get Suho.
We also saw ESB stat collectors looping.
--Srinath
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
We profiled AppServer 4.1.0 compared it with the new AppServer packs
after removing the BAM publisher components.
Great, thanks.
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Nuwan Bandara nu...@wso2.com wrote:
Great, thanks for verifying supun.
Regards,
/Nuwan
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Supun Malinga sup...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi,
Tested this out after Nuwan's fix for reading web-context params from
Hi Krishantha,
Let's not add any other migrated tests at this point since we need to do
the release and the branch will be frozen. And, the tests are failing due
to issues in them from what I understand, and we do not have the time to
fix those (ex:- Registry916).
Thanks,
Senaka.
On Tue, Sep 4,
Hi Senaka,
I have fixed some of these issues yesterday. Not all issues are failures of
tests itself. I think following failure cases are due to G-Reg bugs.
testByAssociationDest(org.wso2.carbon.registry.utfsupport.test.UTFSupportForMetadataTestCase):
No Record Found expected object to not be
Hi Krishantha,
We will check on those, but we'll have to stop adding any new tests,
because we need to release.
Thanks,
Senaka.
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Krishantha Samaraweera
krishan...@wso2.comwrote:
Hi Senaka,
I have fixed some of these issues yesterday. Not all issues are
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Senaka Fernando sen...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Krishantha,
We will check on those, but we'll have to stop adding any new tests,
because we need to release.
+1
Thanks,
Krishantha.
Thanks,
Senaka.
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Krishantha Samaraweera
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Srinath Perera srin...@wso2.com wrote:
IMHO, we need a urgent code review on this. Also get Suho.
Sure, please let me know when the code review is.
Earlier Appserver BAM publishers are not Async, hence Sinthuja wrote a
AsyncDataPruclihser to solve this issue.
---
Carbon Snapshot Orbit #168 was successful.
---
This build was triggered at the scheduled time of 12:00 AM
The local caching should also solve the problem of the initial lookup as
well. That is we will only consult the registry to see whether stats or
activity is enabled ONCE, after that it has to just pass through.
Note that the best approach is to not engage the handlers at all, unless
stats or
Best is to check this at the time we create the handler and remember it
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Tharindu Mathew thari...@wso2.com wrote:
The local caching should also solve the problem of the initial lookup as
well. That is we will only consult the registry to see whether stats or
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Srinath Perera srin...@wso2.com wrote:
Best is to check this at the time we create the handler and remember it
+1
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Tharindu Mathew thari...@wso2.com wrote:
The local caching should also solve the problem of the initial
Will look into this.
Thanks,
Hasini.
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
See attached jprofiler screenshot.
The main culprit seems to be the isEngaged method call which is repeatedly
building the module name. The fix should be simple, we could remember the
What is the security policy you used here..?
Thanks regards,
-Prabath
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
Rampart handlers are causing much higher overhead in the outflow. See
attached screenshot.
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Hasini Gunasinghe
This is a simple echo service which has not been secured. In the in flow,
the overhead caused by the rampart handlers is 8% in the out flow the
overhead is 12%. So, we can improve performance by 20% just by optimizing
this bit of code.
Azeez
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Prabath Siriwardena
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
Amani, Reka,
Please review the attached screenshot fix.
Will fix it.
Thanks
Azeez
--
*Afkham Azeez*
Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
*
Hi Sagara,
Shall we do the $subject when we are done with the release. IMO, there are
several places we can improve the code/ configurations etc.
--Srinath
--
Srinath Perera, Ph.D.
Senior Software Architect, WSO2 Inc.
Visiting Faculty, University of Moratuwa
Fixed this issue [1]. I have attached the patch to the following jira[1]
[1] - https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-13859
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Amani Soysa am...@wso2.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
Amani, Reka,
Please review the
+1 better do this after WSO2 releases but before the Axis2 1.7.0 release. I
also think JMS need some reviews and we need to support some of the
significant features of SOAP over JMS spec too.
Thanks !
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Srinath Perera srin...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Sagara,
Shall we
Hi,
Does this freeze trunk as well. Currently its frozen at level [1]
[1] https://svn.wso2.org/repos/wso2/carbon/
Thanks.
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi all,
Please note that the Carbon 4 branch will be code frozen for chunk 1
releases on
Hi all,
Also, you probably don't make use of the CarbonContext etc (I noticed the
use of the EmbeddedRegistry service), to access the registries. If you use
the CarbonContext, you'd avoid the overhead of retrieving a
configSystemRegistry for instance.
Thanks,
Senaka.
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:28
Hi All,
Some of the features that are updated to new version(4.0.1 or 2.0.1) are
not yet updated in the products p2 profile. Can we please check this and
update, if not already updated?
Thanks,
Kishanthan.
--
*Kishanthan Thangarajah*
Software Engineer,
Development Technologies Team,
WSO2, Inc.
WSO2 App Factory v1.0.0 M5 Released
4th September, 2012
The WSO2 App Factory team is pleased to announce the release of 1.0.0
Milestone 5 version of WSO2 App Factory.
The pre-configured virtual machine could be downloaded from
Hi,
I'm getting the following errors when building:
compile:
[echo] Project: jdbc
[javac] Compiling 15 source files to
/home/amila/checkout/platform/4.0.0/dependencies/hive/0.8.1-wso2v3/build/jdbc/classes
[javac]
When I applied your patch, and tried to start the server, the server does
not start.
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Amani Soysa am...@wso2.com wrote:
Fixed this issue [1]. I have attached the patch to the following jira[1]
[1] - https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-13859
On Tue, Sep 4,
Did you take a pack from builder and replaced a jar with a one built in
your machine?
Has it got something to do with the patch or does the bundle does not get
activated? Some of us have faced a problem which the packs built from the
builder doesn't get started when we replace the jars. I have
Yes there's something wrong with the packs coming from the builder ... you
need to have your own build .. My fix was a simple fix where i remove the
String replace, that should not have any impact on server startup.
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Amila Maha Arachchi ami...@wso2.com wrote:
Did
I built a tomcat ext jar with your fix replaced the original, and still
server hangs at startup.
Azeez
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Amani Soysa am...@wso2.com wrote:
Yes there's something wrong with the packs coming from the builder ... you
need to have your own build .. My fix was a
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Amila Maha Arachchi ami...@wso2.com wrote:
Did you take a pack from builder and replaced a jar with a one built in
your machine?
Has it got something to do with the patch or does the bundle does not get
activated? Some of us have faced a problem which the
Anyway, how will the following improve performance?
- serviceName = serviceName.replace(/, );
+ serviceName = serviceName.substring(serviceName.indexOf('/')+1,
serviceName.length());
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
I built a tomcat ext jar with your fix
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
Anyway, how will the following improve performance?
Java String.replace uses regular expressions and can be slow, especially
for large strings requiring many replacements. Therefore, i thought of
using substring instead of
I have found a better way of improving the performance of String replace by
using org.apache.commons.lang.StringUtils.replace(serviceName, /, );.
And attached the jar file and the diff to the jira. For more information on
String replace performance [1]
[1] -
Your previous fix works. Now the method takes only 0.6% of the total
execution time.
Azeez
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Amani Soysa am...@wso2.com wrote:
I have found a better way of improving the performance of String replace
by using
---
WSO2 Carbon BRANCH Platform_4.0.0 #257 failed.
---
This build occurred because it is a dependant of WCB001-KER000-170.
No failed tests found, a possible
The StringUtils patch has resulted in an increase. Now it is 1.7%
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
Your previous fix works. Now the method takes only 0.6% of the total
execution time.
Azeez
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Amani Soysa am...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi,
A Possible compilation failure at 4.0.0 branch...
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.0.2:compile (default-compile) @
org.wso2.carbon.ntask.core ---
[INFO] Compiling 22 source files to
In the with_both_enabled image, one publisher is taking 21%, which is not
acceptable.
Can we ship with publishers disabled?
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Sinthuja Ragendran sinth...@wso2.comwrote:
Hi,
I have changed the AS publisher to use the local caching. Since the branch
is frozen i
Publishers are disabled by default. You enable through the UI.
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
In the with_both_enabled image, one publisher is taking 21%, which is
not acceptable.
Can we ship with publishers disabled?
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:56 PM,
Sinthuja,
Can you attach a profile with only stats enabled? The one you attached has
both stats and activity enabled. There also seems to be some more
improvements we can make to the data publisher side. We can offload more as
Azeez suggests.
Azeez, for how many requests did you profile for your
Echo service. 40k requests.
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Tharindu Mathew thari...@wso2.com wrote:
Sinthuja,
Can you attach a profile with only stats enabled? The one you attached has
both stats and activity enabled. There also seems to be some more
improvements we can make to the data
You need to svn up kernel and build. ServerStartupHandler class is in
carbon.core
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Hasitha Hiranya hasit...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi,
A Possible compilation failure at 4.0.0 branch...
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.0.2:compile (default-compile) @
What's the difference between a possible and actual compilation error ;)
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Hasitha Hiranya hasit...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi,
A Possible compilation failure at 4.0.0 branch...
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.0.2:compile (default-compile) @
Folks,
We need to get this to under 1% overhead by tomorrow. Throughout today, we
have made major performance improvements. Code segment have been improved
to yield from 20% to less than 1% overhead on the request-response path.
Several segments were tuned from 5-10% down to 1% overhead, so I
Hi Anjana,
What does dataSourceProps do? are these connectionProperties as explained
in http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/jdbc-pool.html? I found this
in the master-datasources.xml's sample data source.
Thanks,
Senaka.
--
*Senaka Fernando*
Member - Integration Technologies Management
Hi Azeez,
I agree with what you say, and this should reduce much closer to 0%. But, I
see some differences in our profile.
In the profile that we attached, when monitoring is disabled, there are
some modules consuming more than 3%. I want to see if there is an issue in
our profiling approach.
Hi All,
Can someone explain $Subject?
We need to get the Tenant Id for C-App deployment to Servers from Dev
Studio. Now that servers running in Service mode, C-App deployment also has
to be tenant specific. Therefore we need this.
Is there any existing Admin Service we can reuse? If yes, can
---
WSO2 Carbon BRANCH Platform_4.0.0 #258 failed.
---
This build occurred because it is a dependant of WCB001-KER000-171.
No failed tests found, a possible
Guys,
It is worth taking a look at it as it includes supports for AMQP 1.0 and
also for broker HA.
Danushka
-- Forwarded message --
From: Robbie Gemmell rob...@apache.org
Date: Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 12:52 AM
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Qpid 0.18 released
To: annou...@apache.org,
Hi Ajith,
On Sep 5, 2012 12:24 AM, Ajith Vitharana aji...@wso2.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Harshana Martin harsh...@wso2.com
wrote:
Hi All,
Can someone explain $Subject?
We need to get the Tenant Id for C-App deployment to Servers from Dev
Studio. Now that servers running
Hi Sanjeewa,
On Sep 5, 2012 12:36 AM, Sanjeewa Malalgoda sanje...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi,
How if we obtain super tenant carbon context and then get TenantManager.
if you have tenant manager then you can do same.
Is there a way to get the super tenants carbon context outside of a carbon
server?
---
WSO2 Carbon BRANCH Platform_4.0.0 #259 was successful.
---
This build occurred because it is a dependant of WCB001-KER000-172.
1724 tests in total.
Hi Senaka,
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 4:59 AM, Senaka Fernando sen...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi all,
Is $subject a mistake? Because, it looks a bit ugly right now.
The old data sources component uses the datasources.properties file, we
are suppose to move away from that and use the new one, which
we should be able to get 1.0 parsing stuff
Also we should look at any improvements to shared parts.
But both should be after the release
--Srinath
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura
danushka.menikkumb...@gmail.com wrote:
Guys,
It is worth taking a look at it as it
I didn't understand your requirements fully. Why do you need the tenant Id?
Normally, you logged in using correct tenant username, and internally it
will handle it. We do not need to handle this at the dev studio level. Can
you explain what kind of operations you are trying to do?
Shankar
On
Hi Shankar,
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar shan...@wso2.com
wrote:
I didn't understand your requirements fully. Why do you need the tenant
Id? Normally, you logged in using correct tenant username, and internally
it will handle it. We do not need to handle this at
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Harshana Martin harsh...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Shankar,
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar
shan...@wso2.com wrote:
I didn't understand your requirements fully. Why do you need the tenant
Id? Normally, you logged in using correct tenant
I have fixed most failure cases. Here are the latest test results. I will
check this failures again and create public JIRAs appropriately.
Tests run: 1224, Failures: 3, Errors: 0, Skipped: 2
Failed tests:
Hi Shankar,
On Sep 5, 2012 8:44 AM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar shan...@wso2.com
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Harshana Martin harsh...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Shankar,
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar
shan...@wso2.com wrote:
I didn't understand your
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Harshana Martin harsh...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Shankar,
On Sep 5, 2012 8:44 AM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar shan...@wso2.com
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Harshana Martin harsh...@wso2.com
wrote:
Hi Shankar,
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:41 AM,
---
Carbon Snapshot Orbit #169 was successful.
---
This build was manually triggered by Maheshika Goonetilleke.
Hi Senaka,
I'll fix the typo. About the location of the config, as bps.xml,
humantask.xml and attach-mgt-conf are major config file related to BPS we
thought of keeping them at repository/conf folder.
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 12:32 AM, Senaka Fernando sen...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi all,
I noticed
[INFO]
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] Total time: 2:10:35.466s
[INFO] Finished at: Wed Sep 05 01:34:27 IST 2012
[INFO] Final Memory: 692M/1240M
63 matches
Mail list logo
