Re: ZK crashing wit NPE ( WARN Exception caught (org.apache.zookeeper.server.NettyServerCnxnFactory) [nioEventLoopGroup-4-2] java.lang.NullPointerException

Hello Sreejesh, My read is that servers are not being able to connect to each other for leader election. -Flavio > On 3 May 2022, at 15:50, Sreejesh Radhakrishnan > wrote: > > Classification: Public > > Hi > > Sorry not sure if this is the right email. But still trying my luck, > > I

Re: Logback

We use logback in Pravega, it works fine for us. I'd be ok with the change. -Flavio > On 15 Dec 2021, at 12:02, Andor Molnar wrote: > > Hi ZK folks, > > What do you think about migrating ZK to logback? > The idea just crossed my mind due to the recent turbulence with log4j. > > Checking some

Re: Contribution：Official document notes

Hi Mo Qian, I think it would be great to have you contribute your notes. It would be good to find someone to review it, though. -Flavio > On 11 May 2021, at 11:09, 李新婷 wrote: > > Hello! > I'm currently learning from zookeeper's official documents and taking >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.3 candidate 2

+1 - Built from sources locally (there are a few flaky tests, though) - Verified digest and signature - Ran rat for license issues - Checked NOTICE and LICENSE files - Resolved zk dependency from staging repo - Ran a few smoke tests locally using the cli tool -Flavio > On 12 Apr 2021, at 18:15,

Re: rebase and retest on github

I do it from the command line and push. You can do it from an IDE too, but I'm not aware of a way of doing it directly on GitHub. -Flavio > On 29 Jan 2021, at 07:34, Benjamin Reed wrote: > > i would really like to get ZOOKEEPER-3922 but it needs to be rebased > and retested. is there a nice

Test failures on 3.7.0 RC1 (was: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.7.0 candidate 1)

I don't want to mess up with the vote thread, so I'm responding to this separately. I have been trying to build locally too unsuccessfully. I've been trying on an Ubuntu VM, Java 8 (build 1.8.0_181-b13), Maven 3.6.0. The set of tests failing varies from build to build, if it makes sense, I can

Re: ZooKeeper Operator

anks for sharing! >> >> We need more support for K8s in the OS community, this is a good step >> >> Enrico >> >> Il giorno lun 18 gen 2021 alle ore 11:18 Flavio Junqueira >> ha scritto: >> >>> We've been getting questions and sometimes contribu

ZooKeeper Operator

We've been getting questions and sometimes contributions to the ZooKeeper Kubernetes Operator we originally did for Pravega, so I feel that it has been useful more broadly. Perhaps this is something that others might be interested in too, and I thought of mentioning here.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.5.9

+1 -Flavio > On 18 Jan 2021, at 09:16, Szalay-Bekő Máté wrote: > > Thank you Norbert for driving this! :) > > Regards, > Mate > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 4:04 PM Norbert Kalmar wrote: > >> The Apache ZooKeeper team is proud to announce Apache ZooKeeper version >> 3.5.9 >> >> ZooKeeper is

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Commiter: Damien Diederen

Congrats, Damien. -Flavio > On 28 Oct 2020, at 12:59, Szalay-Bekő Máté wrote: > > Congratulations Damien! :) > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 12:37 PM Tamas Penzes > wrote: > >> Congrats Damien! >> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 11:34 AM Enrico Olivelli >> wrote: >> >>> The Project Management

Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] Require JDK 11 to build for 3.7

There are three points that stand out for me in this thread: - How do we determine how such a change affects our user base? - How much effort do the different options induce with respect to maintenance? - What's the right timeline for changes and how do we communicate them so that our users have

Re: ApacheCon Bug Bash

That's very cool. If I understand this correctly, these are not automated, there are real contributors behind the PRs, right? Closing the PR would be harsh, so why not simply asking the contributor to create an issue and update the PR? -Flavio > On 2 Oct 2020, at 17:26, Enrico Olivelli

Re: ApacheCon Bug Bash

It does sound like a good initiative, thanks for including us. I still have the concern that others have expressed below around exposing security issues. We have guidelines to follow and shouldn't be exposing them openly. I see that Tom said: >> All open source and in moderate to wide use

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.6.0 candidate 4

+1 (binding) - Built from sources (there are a good number of flaky tests, but it eventually built correctly) - Checked LICENSE and NOTICED - Checked release notes - Checked that the maven dependency resolve for the staging artifact - Ran some local smoke tests -Flavio > On 3 Mar 2020, at

Re: [CANCELLED] Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.0 candidate 2

Good catch, Enrico... > On 11 Feb 2020, at 09:43, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > -1 > I saw that 3.6 servers are not able to join a 3.5 cluster, this make > it difficult or rather impossible to have a graceful rolling upgrade. > > In a separate thread on this list we discussed about this problem

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.0 candidate 2

+1 binding - Built from sources and ran tests (some tests fail intermittently) - Checked SHA 512 and signature - Checked license and notice - Ran local smoke tests -Flavio > On 7 Feb 2020, at 10:04, Norbert Kalmar wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > - unit tests pass > - source tarball: compiled

[ANNOUNCE] Enrico Olivelli new ZooKeeper PMC Member

I'm pleased to announce that Enrico Olivelli recently became the newest ZooKeeper PMC member. Enrico has contributed immensely to this community; he became a ZooKeeper committer in May 2019 and now he joins the PMC. Join me in congratulating him on the achievement. Congrats, Enrico! -Flavio on

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.0 candidate 0

I can't parse Rudy's message, is it an issue with my mail application? -Flavio > On 15 Jan 2020, at 15:00, rudy_steiner wrote: > > environment:* MacOS High Sierra 10.13.1* JDK > 1.8.0_172I try to run junit test on branch-3.6, and unit test > thread get stuck, log as

Re: Hadoop logo

uot; (I mean > outside of any hadoop ecosystem). > > Regards, > Norbert > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 2:52 PM Flavio Junqueira wrote: > >> Should we remove that Hadoop logo from the documentation? It has been a >> while that we aren't a subproject of Hadoop any longer. >> >> -Flavio

Hadoop logo

Should we remove that Hadoop logo from the documentation? It has been a while that we aren't a subproject of Hadoop any longer. -Flavio

Re: ZK makes apache 2019 "top 5" projects

+1, thank you all for the hard work. -Flavio > On 12 Dec 2019, at 08:36, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > Yes, great. > > Please also note that Kafka and Lucene/Solr that are still listed in that > list are using Zookeeper :) > > > Enrico > > Il gio 12 dic 2019, 05:46 tison ha scritto: > >>

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 4

+1 - Built from sources - Validated digest and signature for sources tar.gz - Verified that dependency from staging repo resolves - Checked release notes - Ran some local smoke tests -Flavio > On 11 Oct 2019, at 08:45, Zili Chen wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > + verify source tarball

Re: Apache Zookeeper - Export Commodity Control Classification (ECCN) Needed

As we are not developing any cryptography code, we are only consumers, I understand that we should be classified as ECCN 5D002 as most of the software on the page Pat shared. Is there a document somewhere listing the dependencies we use for security? -Flavio > On 16 Jun 2019, at 07:19, Enrico

Re: [DISCUSS] Voting on pull requests

That's covered in the project bylaws, right? https://zookeeper.apache.org/bylaws.html -Flavio > On 6 Jun 2019, at 13:49, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > Il gio 6 giu 2019, 12:44 Andor Molnar > ha scritto: > >> Hi folks, >> >>

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ZooKeeper committer: Norbert Kalmar

Congrats, Norbert! -Flavio > On 27 May 2019, at 11:01, Tamas Penzes wrote: > > Congrats Norbert! > > On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 11:21 PM Patrick Hunt wrote: > >> The Apache ZooKeeper PMC recently extended committer karma to Norbert >> and he has accepted. Norbert has made some great

Re: Github & Jira notifications

To add to this conversation, we have 5 mailing lists as of today: dev@z.a.o commits@z.a.o private@z.a.o security@z.a.o user@z.a.o The commits@ one was historically supposed to be for notifications. -Flavio > On 17 May 2019, at 16:50, Lars Francke wrote: > > Alright, I will do so, thank you

Re: Crypto Policy (was: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.5 candidate 5)

t; >> Regards, >> Andor >> >> >> >>> On 2019. Apr 30., at 12:48, Andor Molnar wrote: >>> >>> Makes sense. >>> >>> I’ve tested it on a single machine with the same cert/key for all >> instances: keystore / truststor

Re: Crypto Policy (was: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.5 candidate 5)

>>> >>> Combined with the crypto issues, it might be worth a release note >>> suggesting that if you are going to compile with Java 1.8, you should use a >>> recent release at u211 (u212?) Or above. >>> >> >> +1 for a note on release do

Re: Crypto Policy (was: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.5 candidate 5)

> >>> >>>> On 2019. Apr 27., at 17:33, Andor Molnar wrote: >>>> >>>> Good catch, thanks Flavio for reporting this. We need to double check >> the tests with Ilya I believe. >>>> >>>> Having tests failure means that you were act

[ANNOUNCE] New ZooKeeper PMC member: Andor Molnar

The Apache ZooKeeper PMC recently invited Andor to join the PMC and he has accepted. Andor has made some significant contributions to the project, including driving releases. We are looking forward to even greater contributions from Andor now as part of the PMC. Congratulations and welcome

Re: Request for review & contribution of Apache Training

This is great, Lars. Thanks for putting this together. I have some additional comments: - I'd rather not characterize zookeeper as a key-value store, one reason being that to access a znode we give a "path" and not a "key". I don't want to open this up to a discussion on what a key-value store

Re: Crypto Policy (was: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.5 candidate 5)

ls cryptographic strengths according to the documentation, and is present because of crypto regulations in different countries. Thanks, -Flavio > On 27 Apr 2019, at 15:52, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > Il sab 27 apr 2019, 14:18 Flavio Junqueira ha scritto: > >> I have a clar

Crypto Policy (was: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.5 candidate 5)

I have a clarification question about the RC. To build the RC, I had to enable crypto.policy unlimited in the jre (I'm using build 1.8.0_152-b16). I'm wondering if this is going to be an issue for some users as this option is related to import/export regulation. Has anyone looked into it and

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.14 candidate 5

+1, I have checked the following: - Signature and checksums - Builds locally, unit tests pass - NOTICE file has been updated to reflect the present year - Smoke tests with a local ensemble - Maven project is able to resolve zookeeper dependency using the staging repository - Release notes

Re: Question on merge script

Thanks for the feedback, Pat. I think the wiki page with merge script instructions needs updating. I'll explore it a bit further and will update it. -Flavio > On 9 May 2018, at 20:05, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 1:18 AM, Flavio Junqueira &

Re: Name resolution in StaticHostProvider

. -Flavio > On 9 May 2018, at 16:44, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> wrote: > > I like the idea of indicating to the application that there is something > wrong with the list of servers so that it has a chance to look into it. With > the current code in `ClientCnxn`, we w

Re: Name resolution in StaticHostProvider

I like the idea of indicating to the application that there is something wrong with the list of servers so that it has a chance to look into it. With the current code in `ClientCnxn`, we will log at warn level and hope that someone sees it, but we are not really stopping the client. Throwing

Re: Question on merge script

ld be able to do what you > asked. > > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 4:06 PM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Could anyone remind me why we don't have the merge script on branch-3.5? >> Say I have a change that targets branch-3.5 alone. Shouldn't I be able t

Question on merge script

Could anyone remind me why we don't have the merge script on branch-3.5? Say I have a change that targets branch-3.5 alone. Shouldn't I be able to have a PR that targets branch-3.5 and use the merge script? Thanks, -Flavio

[jira] [Resolved] (ZOOKEEPER-2982) Re-try DNS hostname -> IP resolution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Flavio Junqueira resolved ZOOKEEPER-2982. - Resolution: Fixed Issue resolved by pull request 513 [https://github.com

Re: Name resolution in StaticHostProvider

efactor at all? > 2. If we do so, shall next() throw UnknownHostException or deal with error > inside. > > And I'd still go with: > 1. Yes > 2. Yes, throw > > So, I would leave the PR as it is now. > > Andor > > > > > > On Tue, May 8, 2018 a

Re: Name resolution in StaticHostProvider

brought upon in the PR. -Flavio > On 8 May 2018, at 21:08, Andor Molnar <an...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > I'm happy to do that once we have an agreement. > > > > > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 8:34 AM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> wrote: > >> It might

Re: Name resolution in StaticHostProvider

g > getByName() you don't necessarily fire a DNS request, only when the TTL is > expired. > > Andor > > > > > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 8:12 AM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi Andor, >> >> Thanks for your work on addressing

Re: Name resolution in StaticHostProvider

Hi Andor, Thanks for your work on addressing the issue. > On 8 May 2018, at 16:06, Andor Molnar wrote: > > Hi, > > Updating this thread, because the PR is still being review on GitHub. > > So, the reason why I refactored the original behaviour of > StaticHostProvider is

Re: Let's cut a ZK 3.5.4-beta release

Alexander Shraer <shra...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Lets also get this in: https://issues.apache.org/ >> jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2959 >> This affects anyone running observers. >> >> On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 1:45 PM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> wrote: &g

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2982) Re-try DNS hostname -> IP resolution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16467049#comment-16467049 ] Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-2982: - Based on this comment, I'm +1 from

[jira] [Assigned] (ZOOKEEPER-2982) Re-try DNS hostname -> IP resolution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Flavio Junqueira reassigned ZOOKEEPER-2982: --- Assignee: Flavio Junqueira > Re-try DNS hostname -> IP reso

Re: Let's cut a ZK 3.5.4-beta release

t;>> The url posted does not work for me, here is the query I use: >>>> https://goo.gl/3MJZMN >>>> >>>> Just had a chance to go through the JIRA and did some clean ups. >>>> - 1159: lower the priority from blocker to major. &g

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.12 candidate 1

+1, verified the following: - checksums and signature - build passes - rat tool output does not indicate any problem - LICENSE and NOTICE look both ok - local simple smoke tests work -Flavio > On 2 Apr 2018, at 02:01, Michael Han wrote: > > +1 > > - verified xsum/sig. > -

Re: [VOTE] Migrate ZK to Maven build

Definitely +1 > On 20 Apr 2018, at 16:06, Norbert Kalmar wrote: > > Hi, > > Let's start a vote on migrating to maven instead of ant. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3021 > > *Shall we migrate ZooKeeper build from ant to Maven?* > > Please reply with

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.12 candidate 0

We should consider not using md5 for the next RC as per the ASF policy: https://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution.html#sigs-and-sums -Flavio > On 26 Mar 2018, at 21:37, Abraham Fine wrote: > > Thank you everyone for your votes to far. Due to the issues that

Re: 3.4.12

+1 for cutting a 3.4.12 RC. Thanks for volunteering, Abe. -Flavio > On 8 Mar 2018, at 18:53, Rakesh Radhakrishnan wrote: > > Appreciate Abe for the initiative and efforts! > > +1, for "3.4.12" releasing. > > Please feel free to ping me if any help needed when making this

Re: Let's cut a ZK 3.5.4-beta release

.5.4. Need more eyes on 2901 though. > > Patrick > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 4:26 AM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> wrote: > >> I think ZK-2901 is close to being merged, yes? And with that, will we cut >> a 3.5.4 release? >> >> -Flavio >>

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2982) Re-try DNS hostname -> IP resolution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16398500#comment-16398500 ] Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-2982: - hey guys, here are some comments based

Re: Let's cut a ZK 3.5.4-beta release

There are 10 open blocker issues marked for 3.5.4. Can I get some help to sort out those issues? https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ZOOKEEPER/versions/12340141 -Flavio > On 14 Mar 2018, at 12:28, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2018-03-14 12:26 GMT+01:00 F

Re: Let's cut a ZK 3.5.4-beta release

I think ZK-2901 is close to being merged, yes? And with that, will we cut a 3.5.4 release? -Flavio > On 7 Dec 2017, at 00:27, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > I haven't forgotten about this - we've been stuck on ZOOKEEPER-2901 . I > think we getting closer but it's been tricky to

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2982) Re-try DNS hostname -> IP resolution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16372542#comment-16372542 ] Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-2982: - I have tried your recipe for reproducing

[jira] [Comment Edited] (ZOOKEEPER-2982) Re-try DNS hostname -> IP resolution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16372542#comment-16372542 ] Flavio Junqueira edited comment on ZOOKEEPER-2982 at 2/22/18 8:33 AM

Re: [SUGGESTION] Target branches 3.5 and master (3.6) to Java 8

; http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html) > - I would not upgrade Java to a non-LTS version. > > > What do you think about it? > > Thanks, Tamaas > > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 10:32 PM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> wrote: > >> I'm

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2982) Re-try DNS hostname -> IP resolution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371886#comment-16371886 ] Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-2982: - I think I know what's going

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2982) Re-try DNS hostname -> IP resolution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371452#comment-16371452 ] Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-2982: - >From the logs, we can see the s

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2982) Re-try DNS hostname -> IP resolution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16370721#comment-16370721 ] Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-2982: - [~eronwright] could you upload some server

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2982) Re-try DNS hostname -> IP resolution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16370695#comment-16370695 ] Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-2982: - [~eronwright] in your set up, once you get

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2982) Re-try DNS hostname -> IP resolution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16370690#comment-16370690 ] Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-2982: - [~eronwright] a follower invokes

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2982) Re-try DNS hostname -> IP resolution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16370682#comment-16370682 ] Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-2982: - I don't see a reason why it would

Re: [Discuss] ZOOKEEPER-2982 DNS negative caching in 3.5

Thanks for catching this, Eron. It looks like the port to 3.5 misses changes as you correctly pointed out: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/commit/d2a49163b7bc7c9589140dbba7f60e591028f908 In

Re: [SUGGESTION] Target branches 3.5 and master (3.6) to Java 8

a 7 for the client and Java 8 for >> the server will require a new way of packaging the artifacts and building >> the project (and this will require separating client side and server side >> code base). >> Maybe I am missing something. >> >> >> Enrico >&

[jira] [Assigned] (ZOOKEEPER-2184) Zookeeper Client should re-resolve hosts when connection attempts fail

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Flavio Junqueira reassigned ZOOKEEPER-2184: --- Assignee: Andor Molnar (was: Flavio Junqueira) > Zookeeper Cli

Re: [SUGGESTION] Target branches 3.5 and master (3.6) to Java 8

We have this section in the admin doc that talks about the system requirements: https://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/r3.5.3-beta/zookeeperAdmin.html#sc_requiredSoftware If we change, then we have to update that

Re: Review request for ZOOKEEPER-2845

Give me some time to catch up with the discussion thread in the issue, please. -Flavio > On 5 Feb 2018, at 15:43, Bobby Evans wrote: > > I was really hoping to get a review for ZOOKEEPER-2845 > > https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/453 (master) >

Criticism on ZK

Hello community, I came across this blog post: https://banzaicloud.com/blog/kafka-on-etcd/ And I thought it would be a good idea to discuss the criticism as a community. Let me copy the points here and add some notes: • Unlike Kafka it does not have a vibrant and huge community

New PMC Member: Michael Han

I'm very happy to announce that the Apache ZooKeeper PMC has voted to invite Michael Han to join the PMC and Michael accepted. Michael has done outstanding work in the community over the recent past and we felt it was time for Michael to deepen his level of engagement by joining the PMC.

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1260) Audit logging in ZooKeeper servers.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16044550#comment-16044550 ] Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-1260: - Should we revive this patch? It seems

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2804) Node creation fails with NPE if ACLs are null

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16044549#comment-16044549 ] Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-2804: - Good catch [~Bhupendra]! Do you want

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2355) Ephemeral node is never deleted if follower fails while reading the proposal packet

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16044197#comment-16044197 ] Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-2355: - It does look like a good candidate

Re: Build failure for recent commit

One of the project committers needs to cut a release candidate and put it up for a vote. If it is a bug fix release, then it should be relatively straightforward. -Flavio > On 06 Jun 2017, at 20:39, Ben Sherman wrote: > > Looking at

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2779) Add option to not set ACL for reconfig node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16033055#comment-16033055 ] Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-2779: - I'm sorry for jumping in late, but just so

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1936) Server exits when unable to create data directory due to race

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16028326#comment-16028326 ] Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-1936: - It also looks like the diff was broken

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1936) Server exits when unable to create data directory due to race

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16028323#comment-16028323 ] Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-1936: - I think it was simply closed, I had a few

Re: FYI - zetcd: running ZooKeeper apps without ZooKeeper

Yeah, that's a good reference, thanks for starting the thread. @phunt I see a lot of systems trying to implement the API of others in the same space hoping that they can make the migration easier. I feel that it isn't so much about us being a de facto standard, but more about the widespread

Question about license

I think this is a question more for Pat Hunt. When going over the RAT report for the 3.5.3 RC, I noticed a bunch of doxygen-related files that have been there for quite some as they don't have the Apache License header. What actually called my attention is this observation in the legal FAQ:

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.3-beta candidate 1

+1, I have checked license and notice, RAT report, digests and signature. I have also ran a few local tests. Looks good! I have an observation about the RAT report, but I'll send to the list separately. -Flavio > On 13 Apr 2017, at 05:47, sandeep shrids wrote: > >

[jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-2757) Incorrect path crashes zkCli

Flavio Junqueira created ZOOKEEPER-2757: --- Summary: Incorrect path crashes zkCli Key: ZOOKEEPER-2757 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2757 Project: ZooKeeper Issue

Re: Can't verify signature of RC (Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.3-beta candidate 1)

Yeah, this one worked, thanks. -Flavio > On 14 Apr 2017, at 20:08, Michael Han wrote: > > gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv 767E7473

Can't verify signature of RC (Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.3-beta candidate 1)

Michael, I can't verify the signature of the RC: $ gpg2 --verify zookeeper-3.5.3-beta.tar.gz.asc zookeeper-3.5.3-beta.tar.gz gpg: Signature made Mon Apr 3 18:39:14 2017 CEST using RSA key ID 767E7473 gpg: requesting key 767E7473 from hkp server keys.gnupg.net : can't connect to

Extending the vote (was: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.3-beta candidate 1)

Would it be ok to extend the vote until mid next week? -Flavio > On 03 Apr 2017, at 18:26, Michael Han wrote: > > Hi all, > > This is the second release candidate (RC1) of 3.5.3-beta, following the > first release candidate (RC0) cut off last week [1]. It fixes incorrect >

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2076) Improve Leader Change Mechanism

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15950735#comment-15950735 ] Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-2076: - Go for it, [~atris], I've assigned

[jira] [Assigned] (ZOOKEEPER-2076) Improve Leader Change Mechanism

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Flavio Junqueira reassigned ZOOKEEPER-2076: --- Assignee: Atri Sharma > Improve Leader Change Mechan

Re: Patch for ZOOKEEPER-2184 feedback

I'd love to see ZK-2184 fixed. If you have come up with a PR, Powell, I'd be happy to have a look and see if we can converge to a common set of changes. Michael is right that there is already a PR there, so we would eventually need to decide whether to make changes to it, drop or what. -Flavio

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.10 candidate 1

+1, ran tests, checked signature and digests, checked license and notice, ran some smoke tests locally. -Flavio > On 28 Mar 2017, at 22:44, Michael Han wrote: > > Yes, I forgot to mention that I did some backward compatible verification > as well. I was using 3.4.10 client

[jira] [Assigned] (ZOOKEEPER-2709) Clarify documentation around "auth" ACL scheme

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Flavio Junqueira reassigned ZOOKEEPER-2709: --- Assignee: Josh Elser > Clarify documentation around "auth&quo

Re: v 3.6.0

I had volunteered to manage it, but I got no cycles at all in the past 2-3 months. We are also a bit late with the other 3.4 and 3.5 releases, which helped with getting it delayed. I agree otherwise that it would be great to have it sooner rather than later, though. -Flavio > On 11 Mar 2017,

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2184) Zookeeper Client should re-resolve hosts when connection attempts fail

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15873730#comment-15873730 ] Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-2184: - I haven't had much time to work

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2260) Paginated getChildren call

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15844081#comment-15844081 ] Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-2260: - I really like this feature! Please submit

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2125) SSL on Netty client-server communication

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2125?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15843297#comment-15843297 ] Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-2125: - I remember having a different user on our

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2125) SSL on Netty client-server communication

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2125?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15842884#comment-15842884 ] Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-2125: - hello [~shivamvds], this is not a bug fix

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2672) Remove CHANGE.txt

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15839537#comment-15839537 ] Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-2672: - I'm not aware on any dependency

Re: ZooKeeper 3.4.10 release discussion

te: > > Agreed, will try to resolve ZK-2184. I have included this to 3.4.10 > releasing. I could see few open review comments in the PR, probably will > push once this is concluded. > > Thanks, > Rakesh > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 2:01 AM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apac

Re: ZooKeeper 3.4.10 release discussion

I'd like to have ZK-2184 in as well. I have seen many cases in which applications are affected by that problem. If folks can help me push it through, I'd appreciate. -Flavio > On 25 Jan 2017, at 17:01, Rakesh Radhakrishnan wrote: > > I've reviewed ZOOKEEPER-2044 pull

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-2633) Build failure in contrib/zkfuse with gcc 6.x

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2633?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Flavio Junqueira updated ZOOKEEPER-2633: Assignee: Raghavendra Prabhu > Build failure in contrib/zkfuse with gcc

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >