Re: Questions about Zookeeper

Hi Aditya, If it's related to security related items then please visit https://zookeeper.apache.org/security.html and follow the steps. Otherwise, Please feel free to post your queries here. Some of us will pitch in and will look at it. Following are a few sets of docs related to the atomic

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.7.0 candidate 2

+1 (binding) - built ZooKeeper jar from source - setup 3 node ZK cluster and tested a few cases(HDFS-HA failover and java zkClient ops), exec basic CLI commands, checked jmx beans and all looks fine to me. - verified sig/xsum. Thanks Damien and others who have worked on making this release

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.5 candidate 6

+1 - built ZooKeeper jar from source - tested using 3 node cluster, ran smoke test scenarios, ran command line client, checked jmx beans and LGTM. - verified sig/xsum, release notes looks fine. Thanks Andor and others who have worked on making this release happen! Rakesh On Fri, May 3, 2019 at

Re: Zookeeper at Twitter by Micheal

Great article Michael. Appreciate all the efforts in making this blog! Cheers, Rakesh On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 1:56 PM Norbert Kalmar wrote: > Good blog post! > Can't wait for the PRs ;) > I'm very positive about ZooKeeper's future (heard lot of talks lately about > etcd overthrowing ZooKeeper

Re: Test failures (SASL) with Java 11 - any ideas?

Do you know why 3.4 is not using kerby? In short, Kerby was failing with java-6. Please refer jira: https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2689 "ZooKeeper runs in Java, release 1.6 or greater (JDK 6 or greater)." https://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/r3.4.13/zookeeperAdmin.html Rakesh

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.13 candidate 1

Thanks Michael for putting up the RC. +1 Verified using java version "1.8.0_45" and CentOS "7.3.1611" env. - built from source. - ran unit tests, all passed. - created 3 node cluster, performed basic zk cmds, jmx and a couple of 4lws, looks fine. - release notes looks good. Rakesh On Tue,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ZooKeeper committer: Andor Molnar

Congratulations Andor, keep up the great work! Thanks, Rakesh On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 7:17 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > The Apache ZooKeeper PMC recently extended committer karma to Andor and he > has accepted. Andor has made some great contributions and we are looking > forward to even more :)

Re: Let's cut a ZK 3.5.4-beta release

I have added my feedback to the PR. Please take a look at it. Rakesh On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 8:38 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > No one has looked at 2901, while I'm not super happy with it it seems fine > - I'll commit it as-is if I don't hear anything by EOD tomorrow (Monday). >

Re: [VOTE] Migrate ZK to Maven build

I really appreciate your initiative! +1 On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 7:36 PM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: > Definitely +1 > > > On 20 Apr 2018, at 16:06, Norbert Kalmar wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Let's start a vote on migrating to maven instead of ant. > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.12 candidate 1

+1 Verified using jdk 1.8.0_111 and CentOS 7.3.1611 env - successfully compiled and ran the tests, all passed. - xsum/sig verified, OK. - set up 3 node cluster, verified through zk cmds and a couple of 4lws, looks fine. Rakesh On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 12:25 AM, Patrick Hunt

Re: 3.4.12

Appreciate Abe for the initiative and efforts! +1, for "3.4.12" releasing. Please feel free to ping me if any help needed when making this release. Regards, Rakesh On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 4:19 AM, Abraham Fine wrote: > I am very much interested in taking a turn as a RM and I

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ZooKeeper committer: Abraham Fine

Congrats Abe! Well deserved. Thanks, Rakesh On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 5:52 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > The Apache ZooKeeper PMC recently extended committer karma to Abe and he > has accepted. Abe has made some great contributions and we are looking > forward to even more :) > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.11 candidate 1

Thanks for making the release. Here is my +1. Verified using jdk 1.8.0_111 and CentOS 7.3.1611 env - checked previously reported cases of 'readme.md' and rc tag, looks good. - xsum/sig verified. - release note looks good. - setup a small 3 node cluster. - ran command line zk client - create &

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.11 candidate 0

Thank you Pat for getting this out. I'm adding few observations, (1) "$ZK_HOME/zookeeper-3.4.11/README.md" is missing in the tar ball. I could see recently renamed 'README.txt' to 'README.md' and requires build.xml changes to include this. (2) I failed to see release tag. Step-9 in

Re: New PMC Member: Michael Han

Congratulations Michael! Keep up the great efforts! Rakesh On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 10:18 PM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: > I'm very happy to announce that the Apache ZooKeeper PMC has voted to > invite Michael Han to join the PMC and Michael accepted. Michael has done >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.3-beta candidate 1

Thanks, Michael, for your efforts to get this release out. +1 - built zookeeper jar from source with jdk1.8.0_45 - ran zk unit test suite, all passed - tested with a couple of different ensemble sizes, exec basic cli commands, jmx beans - verified sig/xsum - checked release notes Rakesh On

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.3-beta candidate 0

Good Work! Thanks Michael for making 3.5.3 beta release. Noticed one thing in http://people.apache.org/~hanm/zookeeper/zookeeper-3.5.3-beta-rc0/zookeeper-3.5.3-beta.tar.gz artifact. "zookeeper-3.5.3-beta/zookeeper-3.5.3-beta/zookeeper-3.5.3-beta.jar/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF" contains details of

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.10 candidate 1

With 3 +1 binding votes (including mine), and no -1, the vote for candidate 1 passes. I'll work on publishing the release to the web site. Here are the vote results, Binding votes +1s: +3 from PMC members (Patrick Hunt, Flavio Junqueira, Rakesh Radhakrishnan) Non-binding votes +1s

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.10 candidate 1

uster and it worked fine. > > 3.4.9 > > >> client accessing 3.4.10 rc1 ensemble worked fine as well. > > >> > > >> Patrick > > >> > > >> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> > wrote: > >

Vote on release 3.4.10 candidate 1

. Thanks, Rakesh -- Forwarded message -- From: Rakesh Radhakrishnan <rake...@apache.org> Date: Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 6:10 PM Subject: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.10 candidate 1 To: DevZooKeeper <dev@zookeeper.apache.org> This is the second release candidat

Re: [VOTE] Make 3.5.3 the first beta release.

+1 Rakesh On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 10:41 PM, Jordan Zimmerman < jor...@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote: > +1 non binding > > > Jordan Zimmerman > > > On Mar 23, 2017, at 11:50 AM, Michael Han wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > As previously discussed on dev list [1]

[VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.10 candidate 1

This is the second release candidate for 3.4.10. This candidate fixed the MiniKDC authentication test case failures reported in the previous candidate. This is a bug fix release candidate for 3.4.10. It fixes 43 issues, including security feature QuorumPeer mutual authentication via SASL and

Re: Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.10 candidate 0

assed. Kudos! > > Patrick > > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 9:11 PM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <rake...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Thank you Pat and Michael for voting and comments. We are *not* releasing > > this candidate. > > > > Need to fix MiniKdc test failur

Re: Patch or PR?

Hi Jordan, It is encouraged to create PR rather than patches. I could see, committers are preferring PR. Reference: Hope you have referred "Pull requests via github" section in below link to know the PR approach, https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/HowToContribute Rakesh On

Re: ZooKeeper Build failure - Unsupported major.minor version 52.0

vio > has to do the following: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Jenkins#Jenkins- > HowdoIgetanaccount > > Patrick > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:31 PM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <rake...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Yes, I've tried visiting the

Re: Disabling snapshots in ZooKeeper

Hi Aishwarya, >Is there a way to disable snapshots Its interesting, just curious to know the thought process behind disabling snapshot feature. Thanks! Rakesh On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Michael Han wrote: > >> Is there a way to disable snapshots when the

Re: Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.10 candidate 0

Connection refused > > (Connection refused) > > 2017-03-08 08:54:58,508 [myid:] - INFO > > [Thread-1:JUnit4ZKTestRunner$LoggedInvokeMethod@74] - TEST METHOD > FAILED > > testValidCredentials > > java.lang.AssertionError: waiting for server 1 being up > > > > &g

Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.10 candidate 0

This is a bug fix release candidate for 3.4.10. It fixes 39 issues, including security feature QuorumPeer mutual authentication via SASL and other potential bugs. The full release notes are available at: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310801=12338036 ***

Re: Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.10 candidate 0

Sorry, kindly ignore this mail as the links are not proper. Thanks, Rakesh On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <rake...@apache.org> wrote: > This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.4.10. It fixes 39 issues, > including security feature > QuorumPeer mutual aut

Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.10 candidate 0

This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.4.10. It fixes 39 issues, including security feature QuorumPeer mutual authentication via SASL and other potential bugs. The full release notes are available at: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310801=12338036 *** Please

Re: ZooKeeper 3.4.10 release discussion

Thank you everyone for the great support! ZOOKEEPER-2693 has been merged. I hope we are good to go and I will prepare release candidate. Regards, Rakesh On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <rake...@apache.org> wrote: > Thank you Michael for the useful comments. I'v

Re: Partial crash bug described in Redundancy Does Not Imply Fault Tolerance: Analysis of Distributed Storage Reactions to Single Errors and Corruptions (FAST17)

Thanks a lot Andrew Purtell for pointing out this. I could see, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2247 jira is talking about similar case. Could you please go through this jira and let me know your comments. It seems they have used ZooKeeper (v3.4.8) for preparing the report. This

Re: New to Apache Zookeeper

Hi, Umbrella jira to fix flaky test cases: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2135. Probably, you could participate in code reviews(jira pull requests/patches etc.). This will also help you to learn the system. https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pulls I hope you have visited

Re: ZooKeeper Build failure - Unsupported major.minor version 52.0

ccount > > Patrick > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:31 PM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <rake...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Yes, I've tried visiting the page. But getting access denied exception. > > Could you please give permission to the user "rakeshr". A

Re: ZooKeeper Build failure - Unsupported major.minor version 52.0

-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ > ZooKeeper-trunk-openjdk7/configure > > look in the "build" section for the dropdown > > Do you want to give this a try? Now's the best time to learn. ;-) > > Patrick > > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:49 PM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <rake

Re: ZooKeeper Build failure - Unsupported major.minor version 52.0

Yes, logged in. But didn't see the drop down options. Rakesh On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 9:06 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: > Rakesh can you login to jenkins? > > Patrick > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:29 PM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <rake...@apache.org> > wro

ZooKeeper Build failure - Unsupported major.minor version 52.0

Hi All, I've created an https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13526 jira to understand more about the failure. From the discussion it looks like, Ant (latest) link was changed a few days ago to point to new Ant release 1.10.1 and this version of ant requires Java8. So the possible fix is,

Re: ZooKeeper 3.4.10 release discussion

it mentions merge patch. I think > the recommended approach (or best practice?) which Edward also pointed out > earlier is to use 'git cherry-pick', so we can have a consistent revision > history between branches. > > Thanks for putting up the wiki page! > > On Tue, Feb 7, 201

Re: ZooKeeper 3.4.10 release discussion

at 9:43 PM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <rake...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi All, > > I've tried an attempt by converting all the applicable svn commands to git > commands in "HowToRelease using git" cwiki page. Welcome comments, thanks! > > https://cwiki.apach

Re: CHANGES.txt?

), if there is no objection. Thanks! Thanks & Regards, Rakesh On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 9:06 PM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <rake...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 for removing the CHANGE.txt file. > > I agree to rely on source control (github) revision logs instead of > CHANGE.txt moving forward. > >

Re: ZooKeeper 3.4.10 release discussion

is: > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8640887/git-merge-without-auto-commit > > BUT I AM NOT GIT EXPERT, so I feel free to ignore this suggestion. > ​Further info​ > here: > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1241720/git-cherry- > pick-vs-merge-workflow > > ​Best regards,

Re: CHANGES.txt?

+1 for removing the CHANGE.txt file. I agree to rely on source control (github) revision logs instead of CHANGE.txt moving forward. Note: Jira issue ZOOKEEPER-2672 will be used to remove this file. Thanks, Rakesh On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 3:59 AM, Michael Han wrote: > See

Re: ZooKeeper 3.4.10 release discussion

don't like using "git commit -a" unless you're > > pretty sure that it is what you want. A much safer approach is to run > "git > > status" and "git add" to the individual files/directories. > > - Step 11: Why are we tagging with -s? Is that standard pra

Re: ZooKeeper 3.4.10 release discussion

se notes. > - Step 10: I personally don't like using "git commit -a" unless you're > pretty sure that it is what you want. A much safer approach is to run "git > status" and "git add" to the individual files/directories. > - Step 11: Why are we tagging with -s?

Re: ZooKeeper 3.4.10 release discussion

e ZK-2184 in as well. I have seen many cases in which > applications are affected by that problem. If folks can help me push it > through, I'd appreciate. > > -Flavio > > > On 25 Jan 2017, at 17:01, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <rake...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > I've

Re: ZooKeeper 3.4.10 release discussion

reviously afaict. Remind me after the release is published, > we should review the state of things at that point and ensure that that > state is what we expect (e.g. compare to the published state of previous > release(s)). > > Regards, > > Patrick > > > On Mon, Jan 16

Re: ZooKeeper 3.4.10 release discussion

gt; I've been looking at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2044 > today I think this could be a good addition to 3.4.10 release - what do you > think? Should we get this in 3.4.10? > > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <rake...@apache.org> >

Re: ZooKeeper 3.4.10 release discussion

/ZOOKEEPER/HowToRelease changes. Please refer my previous mail to understand more about it. Thanks, Rakesh On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <rake...@apache.org> wrote: > OK. I have modified ZK cwiki page https://cwiki.apache.org/ > confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Apache ZooKeeper Committer: Mohammad Arshad

Congratulations, Arshad! Rakesh On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Michael Han wrote: > Congratulations and welcome aboard, Arshad! > > On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 5:34 AM, Edward Ribeiro > wrote: > > > Congrats, Arshad! Super well deserved! :) > > > >

Re: Willing to Contribute to this Project

Thank you for your interest in ZooKeeper! https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/HowToContribute wiki page is a good resource for new folks interested in participating. Please feel free to post patches on ZooKeeper JIRA issues that interest you. If there is any question about how

Re: ZooKeeper cwiki - Updated ZooKeeper and SASL auth 1045 work

on, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:31 PM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <rake...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi All, > > FYI, I'm planning to delete our existing "https://cwiki.apache.org/conf > luence/display/ZOOKEEPER/Zookeeper+and+SASL" web page by tomorrow (IST). > > Then rename

Re: ZooKeeper 3.4.10 release discussion

nge > the > > tag like, > > > > "The RC tag in git to be voted upon: release-X.Y.Z-rcR" > > > > > > *Publishing* > > 1. Tag the release: > > git tag -s release-X.Y.Z -m "ZooKeeper X.Y.Z release." > > > > P

Re: ZooKeeper cwiki - Updated ZooKeeper and SASL auth 1045 work

wiki.apache.org/ confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/Zookeeper+and+SASL" in place of the deleted page. Please let me know if you have any comments. Thanks! Regards, Rakesh On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <rake...@apache.org> wrote: > Like I mentioned at the beginning o

Re: ZooKeeper 3.4.10 release discussion

uot; Push the newly created release tag to the remote repo. git push release-X.Y.Z I'd like to know whether I'm going in the right direction and start cutting the 3.4.10 release by following this approach. Thanks! Thanks, Rakesh On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <rake..

Re: ZooKeeper 3.4.10 release discussion

browse/ZOOKEEPER-2573 is worth > targeting 3.4.10 too? > > Edward > > > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <rake...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > I hope to cut an RC in a week - giving some more time for your favorite &g

Re: ZooKeeper 3.4.10 release discussion

your support in releasing 3.4.10 version. Thanks! Please find the open issues marked for 3.4.10 release here, https://goo.gl/XdraFA Thanks, Rakesh On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <rake...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi All, > > I am interested in going through the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ZooKeeper committer: Michael Han

Congrats Michael, and welcome! Rakesh On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 12:59 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > The Apache ZooKeeper PMC recently extended committer karma to Michael and > he has accepted. Michael has made some great contributions and we are > looking forward to even more :) > >

Re: ZooKeeper cwiki - Updated ZooKeeper and SASL auth 1045 work

k Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: > LGTM. Those changes are very helpful, thanks Rakesh! > > Patrick > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <rake...@apache.org > > > wrote: > > > Thanks a lot Patrick Hunt for the review comments. Please take anoth

Re: ZooKeeper cwiki - Updated ZooKeeper and SASL auth 1045 work

d in 3.4 branch" is ambiguous - perhaps > rephrase. What "feature" are you referring to, 1045 or to rolling upgrade? > Also the ref to 3.4 itself is ambiguous - perhaps change to 3.4.10+? > > These are some minor nits, overall impressive effort -- thanks again > Rakesh! >

Re: Merge pull request using zk-merge-pr.py script

on master branch missing editing of CHANGE.TXT How is CHANGE.TXT edited before migrating to git during a commit? Is it done automatically or manually (that a committer has to update the file)? On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 8:32 PM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <rake...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > &

Merge pull request using zk-merge-pr.py script

Hi, I have an observation about the merge PR python script. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/Committing+changes I could see the commit made using this automated merge script is missing to edit the 'CHANGES.TXT' file and then add the jira details that correspond to the patch.

Reg ZooKeeper git commit

Hi, Commit Log:- https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=zookeeper.git;a=commit;h= 2afed855ad966d4c4cd0370e6d24a01c04e75d67 My bad, I have made a commit from the system where git user name and mail id was configured in my colleague's name(PMC of another Apache project). So the commit shows his

ZooKeeper cwiki - Updated ZooKeeper and SASL auth 1045 work

Hi All, I've incorporated ZK-1045 feature details into the Apache ZooKeeper project cwiki. Since "ZooKeeper and SASL" section is quite large I've splitted ZooKeeper client-server and server-server sections into sub-pages. Please read the following page,

ZooKeeper 3.4.10 release discussion

Hi All, I am interested in going through the release process as the RM. Overall, I could see total 41 issues marked for 3.4.10 release as of now, which includes 4 blockers, 5 critical, 20 major and 12 minor issues. I count 9 issues fixed/committed already for 3.4.10 which includes 1 blocker and

Re: Test plan for ZK-1045 - Call for volunteers

bout pushing the current > >> >>>> approach as a first step and based on the community interests later > >> we > >> >>>> could enhance this feature by programmatically builds the JAAS > >> context. > >> >>>

Re: Upcoming 3.4/3.5 releases.

Now that ZOOKEEPER-2014 has been committed I think we should cut a 3.5.3-alpha release. We're getting close to beta with that one finalized. Plan looks good. +1 for a beta version. I believe Rakesh (please confirm) is interested in releasing 3.4.10 once ZOOKEEPER-1045 is committed.

Re: Test plan for ZK-1045 - Call for volunteers

Thanks a lot Andrew Purtell for your time and comments. >I like how Hadoop programmatically builds the JAAS context from its >configuration such that the JAAS configuration file and definition of >system property pointing to same are not needed. Would be nice if ZK could

Re: Test plan for ZK-1045 - Call for volunteers

I've uploaded feature document to the ZOOKEEPER-1045 jira, link => https://goo.gl/cvzG8A. I hope this doc will help you to setup a secured zk cluster and start testing the feature. It would be really great to see the test/review/usability feedback. Thanks! Rakesh On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 8:04

Re: 3.6.0-alpha release?

Thanks @Flavio for the initiative. +1 on the idea of "3.6.0-alpha" release plans. Just a thought - I'm not sure, whether multiple on going alpha versions(3.5.x-alpha and 3.6.x-alpha) could create confusion to the users. I'd prefer to make 3.5.x to a beta or a stable version first, then release

Re: Subscription

Hi Rakesh Kumar Singh, Could you please follow the link https://zookeeper.apache.org/lists.html details and I hope that will help you to subscribe ZooKeeper mailing list. Best Regards, Rakesh On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Rakesh Singh wrote: > Subscribing >

Re: 2.4.9 ZooKeeperServer uninitialized variable

Thanks for the analysis and discussions. There is already jira raised to address this case, ZOOKEEPER-2383. Its in patch available state now and waiting for more reviews & +1 votes to push it upstream. Appreciate help in resolving this and include this in 3.4.10 version. Rakesh On Sat, Sep 17,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.4.9

FYI, created ZOOKEEPER-2552 to revisit the release note and do the corrective actions. Rakesh On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <rake...@apache.org> wrote: > Thanks Edward for pointing out this. Its wrongly marked the fix version as > "3.4.8", all th

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.4.9

, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Kudos Rakesh on pushing this through. Thanks to everyone that > contributed. > > > > Patrick > > > > On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 1:57 AM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> wrote: &g

[ANNOUNCE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.4.9

The Apache ZooKeeper team is proud to announce Apache ZooKeeper version 3.4.9. ZooKeeper is a high-performance coordination service for distributed applications. It exposes common services - such as naming, configuration management, synchronization, and group services - in a simple interface so

Fwd: Please add your release data for 'zookeeper'

Hi PMC members, It would be really great if one of you could help me with this part of the release process, since I am not a PMC member. Thank you! Rakesh On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Apache Reporter Service < no-re...@reporter.apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > This is an automated email from

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.9 candidate 2

re and checksums. > > -Verified content of LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt. > > -Verified correct version information in src/c/include/winconfig.h. > > -All unit tests passed. > > > > Rakesh, thank you for your hard work on this release. > > > > --Chris Nauroth

Re: [VOTE] move Apache Zookeeper to git

+1 (non-binding) Rakesh On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés wrote: > +1 > > -rgs > > On Aug 31, 2016 3:29 PM, "Benjamin Reed" wrote: > > > flip the switch to git and update the relevant scripts and docs. > > > > i couldn't figure

Re: Issues with release notes in 3.4.9 RC2 (was: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.9 candidate 2)

, Rakesh On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 12:04 AM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <rake...@apache.org> wrote: > OK, it would be good to update the existing list in 'HowToRelease' page so > that it will be clear to everyone. > > > Hi All, > > I'd request everyone to cast your vote on 3.4.

Re: switching to git?

+1 Rakesh On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 11:05 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote: > i'm starting to get back into zk development :) i'm a bit distressed that > we are still using svn and patches managed by jiras. i've gotten extremely > spoiled by gerritt and phabricator over the years! > >

Status: Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.9 candidate 2

Hi All, With inclusion of my own +1 (non-binding), the current tally on the [VOTE] for release 3.4.9 candidate 2 is: 1 +1 (binding) 2 +1 (non-binding) If required, I will extend the voting to one more week September 7th 2016, 23:59 UTC+0. I'd request everyone to cast your vote on 3.4.9-RC2 and

Re: Issues with release notes in 3.4.9 RC2 (was: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.9 candidate 2)

gated as part of the release, I'd say that going forward we > should exclude issues marked as "not a problem". > > I don't see the need to -1 the RC2 based on the inclusion of ZK-1676, > though. > > -Flavio > > > > On 29 Aug 2016, at 05:22, Rakesh Radhakrish

Re: Issues with release notes in 3.4.9 RC2 (was: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.9 candidate 2)

(typ > fixed) in that release. However in this case I don't see why it's a very > big deal - if folks are that interested in the issue they could quickly see > (by opening the jira) what the resolution was. > > Patrick > > On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <rake.

Re: Issues with release notes in 3.4.9 RC2 (was: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.9 candidate 2)

anything. https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? projectId=12310801=12323310 Rakesh On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Patrick Hunt <phu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 8:18 AM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <rake...@apache.org> > wrote: > > &g

[VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.9 candidate 2

This is the third release candidate for 3.4.9. This candidate removes the extra *.asc files found in the second candidate. This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.4.9. It fixes 21 issues, including issues that affect ACL cache in DataTree never removes entries, prevent multiple init of login

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.9 candidate 1

ng we can do about that retroactively > now, but we can update the release instructions for greater clarity on > future releases. > > Yes, I think it would be ideal to cut another release candidate. > > --Chris Nauroth > > On 8/22/16, 7:57 PM, "Rakesh Radhakri

Re: Help needed to commit a couple of patches related to flaky tests

Thanks Michael for the reminder. I will take a look at these issues by this week. Rakesh On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 3:06 AM, Michael Han wrote: > Hi committers, > > I'd like get some help to finalize and commit these patches that related to > flaky tests. These patches are

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.9 candidate 1

ookeeper-3.4.9/dist-maven/ > zookeeper-3.4.9-sources.jar.sha1.asc > -rw-rw-r-- 1 cnauroth 819 Aug 22 14:36 zookeeper-3.4.9/dist-maven/ > zookeeper-3.4.9-tests.jar.asc > -rw-rw-r-- 1 cnauroth 819 Aug 22 14:36 zookeeper-3.4.9/dist-maven/ > zookeeper-3.4.9-tests.jar.md5.asc > -rw-rw-r-

[VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.9 candidate 1

This is the second release candidate for 3.4.9. This candidate fixes the autotools issue found in the first candidate. This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.4.9. It fixes 21 issues, including issues that affect ACL cache in DataTree never removes entries, prevent multiple init of login object

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.9 candidate 0

things > like file timestamps. We want the artifact in the tarball to match the > artifact in Nexus, so I think it’s safer to repeat step 8 for this RC. > > --Chris Nauroth > > On 8/22/16, 11:39 AM, "Rakesh Radhakrishnan" <rakeshr.apa...@gmail.com> > wrote: &

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.9 candidate 0

> > > Makefile.am aminclude.am config.sub install-sh > > > zookeeper.vcproj > > > Makefile.in autom4te.cache/ configure ltmain.sh > > > > > > and those files should make it into the release artifact .tar.gz > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.9 candidate 0

nch-3.4]$ autoreconf --version > autoreconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.69 > > Patrick > > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 2:25 AM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <rake...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Thanks Chris, Michael for the observations and advice. > > > > Yes, I a

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.9 candidate 0

gt; > 9/build/test/test-cppunit > > [exec] checking for doxygen... no > > [exec] checking for perl... /usr/bin/perl > > [exec] checking for dot... no > > [exec] configure: error: cannot find install-sh, install.sh, or > >

[VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.9 candidate 0

This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.4.9. It fixes 21 issues, including issues that affect ACL cache in DataTree never removes entries, prevent multiple init of login object in each ZKSaslClient instance, ZK service becomes unavailable when leader fails to write transaction log, upgrade netty

Re: ZooKeeper 3.4.9 release discussion

anything here? Rakesh On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <rake...@apache.org> wrote: > It seems, https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/blob/branch- > 3.4/docs/releasenotes.html beginning with "ZooKeeper 3.4.5 Release > Notes". I hope I need to append th

Re: ZooKeeper 3.4.9 release discussion

2016 at 8:13 AM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <rake...@apache.org> wrote: > Thanks Patrick and Chris for quickly resolving this. I will continue with > the release procedures. > > Rakesh > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 4:50 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: > >>

Re: ZooKeeper 3.4.9 release discussion

would >> help to >> unstick Rakesh with 3.4.9 (although he can review/commit as well but >> given >> the timezone diff...) >> >> Thanks, >> >> Patrick >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Chris Nauroth

Re: ZooKeeper 3.4.9 release discussion

issues here, https://goo.gl/SEliwm Thanks, Rakesh On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <rake...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi All, > > (1) ZK-2383 -> Attached patch and the bug reporter has shown interests to > review/test the available patch. @Flavio, @Patrick, do

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Chris Nauroth joins the Apache ZooKeeper PMC

Congratulations, Chris! Rakesh On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 11:35 PM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: > In recognition of all his contributions to the project, the Apache > ZooKeeper PMC has invited Chris Nauroth to join the PMC and he has > accepted. I'd like to take the opportunity to

Re: ZooKeeper 3.4.9 release discussion

nks, Rakesh On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan > <rake...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > >>>>>ZK-1045 is a major change and I suggest we give time for folks to >

Re: PreCommitBuild - Adding comment to Jira

ave/ > > > >> workspace/ZooKeeper-trunk-solaris/trunk/build.xml:324: Execute > failed: > > > >> java.io.IOException: Cannot run program "sh": error=12, Not enough > > space > > > >> > > > >> https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKe

  1   2   >