I would like to vote for voting.
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
On 2015-06-11 6:43 PM, Chris Hofmann wrote:
>> Furthermore, since bugs with lots of votes also have lots of CCs (see an
>> earlier post of mine), if we want to just acknowledge that a bug is
>> popular, we can just use CC counts above a certain threshold.
>> Admittedly there's no way to search for
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 3:49 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> On 2015-06-11 2:51 PM, Jared Wein wrote:
>>
>> DevTools does something like this with UserVoice. I don't think we should
>> get rid of voting unless we replace it with something else (UserVoice is a
>> good alternative).
>>
>> There are plent
--
此致
礼
罗勇刚
Yours
sincerely,
Yonggang Luo
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
On 6/11/2015 3:57 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
For what it's worth, I'd pay more attention to votes if I could see
the graph of how vote counts changed over time.
I explicitly want to call out attention to this. In my experience, it's
not the absolute vote count that matters but rather the vote v
On 6/11/2015 4:59 PM, Daniel Veditz wrote:
Forums like Reddit and StackOverflow use "upvoting" to great benefit. If
you think it's a democratic "vote" that has a specified result if you "win"
then you'll be disappointed; if you realize it's the same thing as various
other site's ways to express i
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Mike Hoye wrote:
> The word "vote" implies that the act of voting has a direct effect on the
> outcome, which is clearly not the case here and really shouldn't be. But
> that's probably the root of a lot of community frustration.
>
Forums like Reddit and StackOv
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Mark Côté wrote:
>
> >
> > There are a few of us still round from the origin of many of these
> bugzilla
> > features
> > and for this one I think it was mostly just intended as a mechanism to
> > make sure we
> > had some ways to get a good collection of eyeball
On 2015-06-11 4:46 PM, Chris Hofmann wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Mike Hoye wrote:
>
>> On 2015-06-11 3:48 PM, R Kent James wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe the correct fix is to start paying attention to votes.
>>>
>> If you choose your project priorities based on internet voting, you're
>> gonn
On Thursday 2015-06-11 11:13 -0700, Steve Fink wrote:
> If I were to handwave up a new mechanism to replace bug comments + voting,
> I'd probably want a feature/bug page with
>
> - upvote/downvote counts (3 vs 100 is useful information, even if it
> doesn't decide anything on its own)
> - list o
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Mike Hoye wrote:
> On 2015-06-11 3:48 PM, R Kent James wrote:
>
>> Maybe the correct fix is to start paying attention to votes.
>>
> If you choose your project priorities based on internet voting, you're
> gonna have a bad time.
>
> The word "vote" implies that th
On 6/11/15 10:18 PM, Mike Hoye wrote:
> On 2015-06-11 3:48 PM, R Kent James wrote:
>> Maybe the correct fix is to start paying attention to votes.
> If you choose your project priorities based on internet voting, you're
> gonna have a bad time.
I don't think its about the complete list of project
On 2015-06-11 3:48 PM, R Kent James wrote:
Maybe the correct fix is to start paying attention to votes.
If you choose your project priorities based on internet voting, you're
gonna have a bad time.
The word "vote" implies that the act of voting has a direct effect on
the outcome, which is cle
On 6/11/2015 11:51 AM, Jared Wein wrote:
There are plenty of people that recommend others to "vote" on bugs that
they want prioritized, and us removing voting will make it look to the
outsider that Mozilla is becoming more "closed".
If ignoring votes is a sign the Mozilla is "closed", and there
On 2015-06-11 2:51 PM, Jared Wein wrote:
DevTools does something like this with UserVoice. I don't think we should
get rid of voting unless we replace it with something else (UserVoice is a
good alternative).
There are plenty of people that recommend others to "vote" on bugs that
they want prior
DevTools does something like this with UserVoice. I don't think we should
get rid of voting unless we replace it with something else (UserVoice is a
good alternative).
There are plenty of people that recommend others to "vote" on bugs that
they want prioritized, and us removing voting will make it
I agree. While it is certainly true that prioritizing work based on how
many noisy people are campaigning for it is not a good idea, I reject
the notion that the only useful goal here is to prevent bugspam, as that
implies that user input is worthless.
"me too"/+1 comments on bugs are clearly
Here's something to consider. I've seen my friend Jen Simmons encourage
people to use voting as a way to tell us that it's important to them for
Firefox to support a particular html or css feature. Here's a recent
example https://twitter.com/jensimmons/status/601184865732534272 - the bug
mentioned
On 09/06/15 23:07, Mark Côté wrote:
> I would ask, then, what the purpose of the feature is. If we know it
> isn't used to make decisions, why use it? The only thing I can think of
> is as a sort of "spam honeypot", to get people to not "+1" or "me too"
> bugs, but this seems strange at best and
On 10/06/15 16:10, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> Concrete examples would help. I can't find any test in
> browser/components/sessionstore right now with an assertion annotation
> so it's hard to say what the exact issue that you saw was, but I think
> you are complaining about the lack of documentation a
20 matches
Mail list logo
