Re: Do we have some documents listing up when we need to touch CLOBBER?

On 2016/12/16 19:53, Mike Hommey wrote: On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 05:16:25PM +0900, Masayuki Nakano wrote: Hi, I'm looking for some documents which explain when we need to touch CLOBBER to avoid build failure. However, I've not found such document yet. I see such information only in CLOBBER

Re: Do we have some documents listing up when we need to touch CLOBBER?

Oh, do you mean that nobody doesn't have concrete scenarios when developers need to touch CLOBBER? When not touching CLOBBER causes build failure at autoland, will it be fixed by a follow up landing which touches CLOBBER or backed out and need to reland same patches with touching CLOBBER?

Re: Who loves multiple selection feature in editor?

On 2016-12-15 4:46 AM, Masayuki Nakano wrote: > At investigating selection API behavior, I realized that non-Gecko > engines don't support multiple selection. > > For example, document.getSelection().addRange(somethingNewRange) does > nothing when the selection has a range. > > You can see the

Re: Intent to ship: NetworkInformation

On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Jason Duell wrote: > So a switch that toggles the "network is expensive" bit, plus turns off > browser updates, phishing list fetches, etc? Windows 10 has such a switch, although I suspect it's up to applications to opt-in. An API to query

Re: Intent to ship: NetworkInformation

On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Tantek Çelik wrote: > > Honestly this is starting to sound more and more like a need for a > "Minimal Network" variant of the "Work Offline" option we have in > Firefox (which AFAIK no other current browser has), since no amount of >

Re: Intent to ship: NetworkInformation

On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Gervase Markham wrote: > On 15/12/16 14:20, Daniel Stenberg wrote: >> Looking at that collection of existing user, basically all of them want >> the user to anser this question: >> >> "Use expensive traffic (y/n)" > > And this should be an

Re: Intent to ship: NetworkInformation

On 15/12/16 14:20, Daniel Stenberg wrote: > Looking at that collection of existing user, basically all of them want > the user to anser this question: > > "Use expensive traffic (y/n)" And this should be an OS-level switch which the browser and other apps both respect and reflect. Doesn't

Re: Do we have some documents listing up when we need to touch CLOBBER?

On 12/16/16 3:16 AM, Masayuki Nakano wrote: I see such information only in CLOBBER about WebIDL change. This is specifically about https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1103153 or something else? -Boris ___ dev-platform mailing list

Re: Rust required to build Gecko

Anyway, thanks for the suggestion, Simon. I filed https://bugzil.la/1324040 with this fix. In the meantime, the curl command line from https://rustup.rs/ should work equivalently. -r On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Ralph Giles wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 9:19 AM,

Re: Rust required to build Gecko

On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Simon Sapin wrote: > RUSTUP_URL_BASE = 'https://static-rust-lang-org.s3.amazonaws.com/rustup' > > If that fixes the issue for you, it’s likely that your Python version does > not support SSL SNI. I can reproduce with python

Re: Do we have some documents listing up when we need to touch CLOBBER?

One of my goal when introducing CLOBBER was to document what was causing us to CLOBBER so that we could audit and fix them if we ever found the time. You can get a pretty good idea by going through the history of the file. I don't believe anyone has taken to time to go through the CLOBBER hg

Re: Rust required to build Gecko

On 16/12/16 17:27, Ben Kelly wrote: I tried ./mach bootstrap on a fresh m-c this morning and got: Will try to install Rust. Downloading rustup-init... Error running mach: ['bootstrap'] The error occurred in code that was called by the mach command. This is either a bug in the called code

Re: Intent to ship: NetworkInformation

On 2016-12-15 6:28 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 12/15/16 6:15 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: >> (I personally agree with most of what you said, except that I'm >> convinced that we should expose that one bit.) > > Exposing this one bit makes a lot of sense to me. > >> From a more practical

Re: Rust required to build Gecko

I tried ./mach bootstrap on a fresh m-c this morning and got: Will try to install Rust. Downloading rustup-init... Error running mach: ['bootstrap'] The error occurred in code that was called by the mach command. This is either a bug in the called code itself or in the way that mach is

Re: Intent to unship: BeforeAftereKeyboardEvent

On 12/16/2016 10:36 AM, Masayuki Nakano wrote: Due to the end of B2G platform, I'd like to remove mozbrowserbeforekeydown, mozbrowserbeforekeyup, mozbrowserafterkeydown and mozbrowserafterkeyup events and its event classes. They were implemented by bug 989198 [1] for allowing embedded browser

Intent to unship: BeforeAftereKeyboardEvent

Due to the end of B2G platform, I'd like to remove mozbrowserbeforekeydown, mozbrowserbeforekeyup, mozbrowserafterkeydown and mozbrowserafterkeyup events and its event classes. They were implemented by bug 989198 [1] for allowing embedded browser elements to override keyboard events [2].

Do we have some documents listing up when we need to touch CLOBBER?

Hi, I'm looking for some documents which explain when we need to touch CLOBBER to avoid build failure. However, I've not found such document yet. I see such information only in CLOBBER about WebIDL change. So, is there any document which lists up when we need to touch CLOBBER? -- Masayuki