On 18/12/2012 12:02 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
Bug 808466 is about changes in selection sometimes not being rendered in a
timely manner. Basically you select something and the selection doesn't
show up immediately. It will usually show up after some delay.
I *think* this is a rendering bug
On 23/04/13 24:18 , Nicolas B. Pierron wrote:
On 04/22/2013 07:53 AM, Justin Lebar wrote:
This is the wifi worker. I think script-sources is code. Note that
fragmentation (unused-arenas) is way too high, but even despite this
the worker uses too much memory.
2.38 MB (05.13%) --
On 29/05/13 08:22 , Hao Dong wrote:
I try to use the following code to get the the jsdIDebuggerService, but it
failed
nsresult rv;
const char jsdServiceCtrID[] = @mozilla.org/js/jsd/debugger-service;1;
nsCOMPtr jsds = do_GetService(jsdServiceCtrID, rv);
who can help me solve
On 29/05/13 10:50 , Neil wrote:
Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
Don't use the old JSD1 debugger service anymore. It has been replaced
by JSD2.
Do you mean replaced in the sense of here's how to replace what you
were doing in JSD1 or in the sense of JSD2 is cool! Let's drop JSD1?
The latter
On 01/07/13 19:01 , Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 7/1/13 12:43 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
I outlined two issues
below, but I'm sure there are more.
Another big one I'm aware of is the issue of how to treat '\\' in URLs.
-Boris
We also have issues with hashes and URI-encoding (
On 02/07/13 17:34 , Paul Rouget wrote:
The Firefox OS Simulator is a XulRunner instance run
from Firefox. Two processes, two windows, two different
version of gecko.
It would be very useful if we could display the simulator
as part of Firefox. Inside a tab.
With Linux, we could use
On 11/07/13 12:09 , Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Jeff Walden jwalden+...@mit.edu wrote:
Establishing one-day turnaround time on reviews, or on requests, would require
a lot more polling on my review queue.
You poll your review queue? Like, by visiting your
On 17/09/13 11:18 , Neil wrote:
Gavin Sharp wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 5:12 AM, Aryeh Gregor a...@aryeh.name wrote:
The real question is: what's the use-case you're trying to solve? If
it's some sort of optimization, false positives should be okay.
The find bar wants to avoid finding
On 20/09/13 13:29 , Henri Sivonen wrote:
I don't happen to have multi-locale Android or B2G builds set up, but
I need to know how they behave to avoid breaking them. Does anyone
happen to know if the following code would end up printing the locale
code for the active browser UI localization on
On 02/10/13 21:33 , Erik Rose wrote:
What features do you most use in MXR and DXR?
Over in the recently renamed Web Engineering group, we're working hard to
retire MXR. It hasn't been maintained for a long time, and there's a lot of
duplication between it and DXR, which rests upon a more
On 07/10/13 14:11 , Honza Bambas wrote:
Is this supposed to work on Windows too?
a clobbered build of up to date m-c with export MOZ_PSEUDO_DERECURSE=1
gives me an error during configure phase (./mach build):
No:
On 10/2/2013 3:17 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
snip
Except if you're using pymake,
http://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central shouldn't 404, but do something
useful (probably redirect to either root or %source/)
~ Gijs
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
On 16/10/13 22:52 , Brian Smith wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 1:39 PM, al...@yahoo.com wrote:
In general, if I understand correctly, it's hard to use native subpixel AA
in layers that use hardware accelerated compositing. So in some cases we
might need to choose between speed and subpixel
On 21/10/13 16:19 , Matthew Gertner wrote:
I'm loading a page into a browser type=content but I want the close()
method to call a function defined in chrome. I tried the obvious:
window.wrappedJSObject.close() = function() { ... };
However, the old close() method is still called (as far as I
On 21/10/13 17:24 , Nathan Froyd wrote:
[Not sure if this is strictly dev-platform material; dev-planning might have
been more appropriate in some respects.]
Our Firefox builds for OS X currently build a 32-bit version, a 64-bit version,
and then squash those together to produce a universal
I tend to use something like
./mach build browser/base browser/components browser/themes
browser/locales browser/devtools
(obviously including only the directories where I changed stuff)
Which is fast and works.
~ Gijs
On 21/10/13 23:47 , David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote:
Wouldn't it be
On 03/11/13, 11:46 , Neil wrote:
14. Rebasing a bitrotted patch
14.0 What it looks like when you qpush a patch that has conflics
14.1 Open a rej file
14.2 Apply the change to the file
Shouldn't be necessary these days ;-)
Uh, why not?
~ Gijs
On 04/11/13, 10:30 , Neil wrote:
Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
On 03/11/13, 11:46 , Neil wrote:
14. Rebasing a bitrotted patch
14.0 What it looks like when you qpush a patch that has conflics
14.1 Open a rej file
14.2 Apply the change to the file
Shouldn't be necessary these days ;-)
Uh, why
On 25/11/13, 10:25 , Philip Chee wrote:
Original blog post at
http://msujaws.wordpress.com/2013/11/21/running-a-backout-branch-with-mercurial/
An other problem with identifying a patch as Australis specific are
patches with bits in Australis/browser and bits in Gecko (e.g. layout or
content).
From what I've been able to tell from the interwebs, extracting
documentation (autodoc-fashion) from JS/C++/IDL isn't possible with
Sphinx. Is that correct?
This makes me sad because it means I probably have to end up
copy-pasting my source code documentation elsewhere either way (in which
On 19/01/2014 16:38, Ed Morley wrote:
On 19 January 2014 16:35:11, Ed Morley wrote:
In addition, this change will mean that try repository resets (done
periodically to avoid problems with the way we abuse mercurial for try
server) will no longer stop you accessing old job results - as long as
While I realize this is unlikely to be an option for gaia, I'll just
note that for (Firefox Desktop's) Australis' Customization Mode, we
ended up just having a pref which tests toggle, in which case we set an
attribute, in which case we override the CSS transition duration to be
really short.
On 23/02/2014 00:33, Joshua Cranmer wrote:
On 2/22/2014 5:57 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
On Feb 22, 2014, at 8:18, Kyle Huey m...@kylehuey.com wrote:
If you needed another reason to follow the style guide:
https://www.imperialviolet.org/2014/02/22/applebug.html
Code coverage would have
On 20/03/2014 02:25, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 3/19/14 9:41 PM, Justin Dolske wrote:
It uses a weak reference with the observer service, plus a dummy strong
reference (via addEventListener()) to automatically manage the
lifetime... When the node/document does away, so does the event listener.
On 27/03/2014 13:43, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 3/27/2014 2:58 AM, Doug Turner wrote:
Want to move to github?
(0) sudo apt-get install python-setuptools
(1) sudo easy_install hg-git
(2) add |hggit =| under [extensions] in your .hgrc file
(3) Go to GitHub.com and create your new repo.
(4)
On 15/04/2014 14:21, Andreas Tolfsen wrote:
On 15/04/2014 11:17, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Jorge Villalobos jo...@mozilla.com
wrote:
FWIW, many add-ons use XPath. If there's anything we should be
recommending add-on developers to migrate to, please let me know.
On 15/04/2014 22:34, K. Gadd wrote:
Arguably if you wait for other vendors to expose VR before you do it,
you'll end up having to implement a sub-standard proprietary API like
you did with Web Audio.
We had an alternative implementation + API (
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Audio_Data_API ). I
On 16/04/2014 00:05, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
We just released rr 1.2 and I think this would be a good time for people to
try to use it for one of the tasks it was designed for: debugging
intermittent test failures.
This is awesome! Three questions:
1) Is anyone working on something similar
Looking on from m.d.tree-management, on Fx-Team, the merge from this
change caused a 40% CART regression, too, which wasn't listed in the
original email. Was this unforeseeen, and if not, why was this
considered acceptable?
As gavin noted, considering how hard we fought for 2% improvements
On 22/05/2014 14:56, thills wrote:
Hi Gijs:
Thanks for your response. Please see inline.
On 5/22/14, 9:46 AM, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
Some questions:
What platform is this on?
This is on Mac OSX Mavericks
How are you invoking the test suite?
I'm doing a sudo ./mach mochitest-browser from
concerning to me as a newbie as I want to make
sure I've got all the proper tests chosen.
Thanks,
-tamara
On 5/26/14, 8:44 AM, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
On 22/05/2014 14:56, thills wrote:
Hi Gijs:
Thanks for your response. Please see inline.
On 5/22/14, 9:46 AM, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
Some questions
On 30/05/2014 16:16, andreas@gmail.com wrote:
Please read my email again. This kind of animation cannot be rendered with high
FPS by any engine.
This doesn't make sense. Avih posted numbers sans-OMTC, and the same
machine he used that doesn't manage to get 60fps with OMTC gets almost
Playing devil's advocate for a bit - are there more non-checkin-needed
backouts? That is, people who, err, feel it is unnecessary to push to
try to land something with checkin-needed, and therefore then land it
themselves and burn the tree? :-)
And also: has the throughput in checkin-needed
Warning: pet peeve coming up.
I agree we should separate these things more clearly. I don't think
making people type the same 7 characters repeatedly is a good way to do
that.
I think we should be more liberal with using blank lines instead. It's
too often I see 30-line blocks of code with
On 03/06/2014 12:27, Mike de Boer wrote:
snip
5. Assertion semantics are indeed poorly specified, across the board.
Our switch from `do_check_matches()` to `deepEqual()` even revealed a
buggy implementation there, which we didn’t know about. Apart from
that, it was largely undocumented, not
of our test framework(s)
seem eminently on-topic for m.d.platform.
~ Gijs
On 03/06/2014 14:45, Mike de Boer wrote:
I understand all that and I *think* you missed the header mentioning I was
going off-topic…
Mike.
On 03 Jun 2014, at 15:39, Gijs Kruitbosch gijskruitbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03
On 03/06/2014 15:35, Mike de Boer wrote:
I started to summarise the things I’d like to see in a JS unit test runner
here[1]:
* mini-core.
* Async support as a base. We’ve added `add_task()` methods where possible,
but we haven’t made it a core feature of the legacy suites in use today.
On 04/06/2014 07:34, Byron Jones wrote:
thanks to dylan's work on bug 489028, bugzilla now tracks when you view
a bug, allowing you to search for bugs which have been updated since you
last visited them.
see my blog post for more details: http://wp.me/p1JUqW-9M
Hrm. But this includes trivial
On 05/06/2014 15:56, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Gijs Kruitbosch gijskruitbo...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 04/06/2014 07:34, Byron Jones wrote:
thanks to dylan's work on bug 489028, bugzilla now tracks when you view
a bug, allowing you to search for bugs which have been
On 06/06/2014 10:29, James Graham wrote:
On 05/06/14 10:38, Mike de Boer wrote:
As I tried to explain, the CommonJS API naively made sense to me at
the time. To others as well, because we’re happily using it. As I now
understand, some of us are very attached to a specific, different,
API.
On 06/06/2014 11:56, James Graham wrote:
On 06/06/14 11:41, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
On 06/06/2014 10:29, James Graham wrote:
On 05/06/14 10:38, Mike de Boer wrote:
As I tried to explain, the CommonJS API naively made sense to me at
the time. To others as well, because we’re happily using
On 06/06/2014 15:26, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 6/6/14, 7:12 AM, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
No, I think that in 99.99% of cases, I don't care about the type, and
therefore I would normally use is() and not care that it's using
non-strict equality. I think the case where there is (a) a possibility
On 07/06/2014 03:40, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2014-06-06, 4:11 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 6/6/14, 3:19 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
Can we make is() do those checks explicitly and if neither of these
cases apply, fall back to a non-strict equality check?
Yes. As in, we could make it
Yeah, this caught me out yesterday. xpcshell tests on Android have, for
instance, a pre-existing default search engine, whereas xpcshell tests
running on desktop do not.
It would be nice if this were documented on MDN.
~ Gijs
On 20/06/2014 02:24, Mark Finkle wrote:
Fennec/Android does have
(I meant to loop in m.d.platform originally, but the message seems to
have gotten lost in the void)
On 01/07/2014 20:14, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
(Followup/reply-to: m.tools.bmo / tools-bmo@lists.m.o)
For a little over half a year now, I've been following new bugs filed in
Firefox::Untriaged
On 02/07/2014 17:46, Joshua Cranmer wrote:
On 7/2/2014 11:18 AM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
I find the current state extremely frustrating. I had big plans for
the in-tree docs, including capturing JavaScript docs and having JSM
APIs automatically published to MDN so we don't have to write docs
On 09/07/2014 16:00, Tobias B. Besemer wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 9. Juli 2014 03:51:32 UTC+2 schrieb Tobias B. Besemer:
I tried to help and clean up a bit Bugzilla with updating the Target
Milestone to a Milestone that get still developed ...
I did this:
), then
why do we still have it? If it isn’t equivalent, then we may be losing some
information if we reset it back to New.
--
- Milan
On Jul 9, 2014, at 11:27 , Daniel Holbert dholb...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 07/09/2014 08:16 AM, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
On 09/07/2014 16:00, Tobias B. Besemer wrote
This is the case on opt builds, but at least on tbpl, debug builds of
xpcshell dump error information about why a file failed to load/run,
e.g.
https://tbpl.mozilla.org/php/getParsedLog.php?id=43053178tree=Mozilla-Esr24
~ Gijs
On 11/07/2014 09:12, Mike de Boer wrote:
Error code 3, for me,
On 15/08/2014 07:17, Jeff Walden wrote:
I think our best bet is probably to evangelize the change hard,
update AMO linters to flag the issue, and (gulp) wait for, and assist
wherever possible, addon authors to update their code. Part #1,
shouldn't be too bad because they're syntax errors easily
On 22/08/2014 15:55, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
On 8/22/2014 5:04 AM, xunxun wrote:
And we should use VC2013 update2 or newer edition, whose PGO is faster
than
WPO.
Yes, we had to wait for update 2 for fixes that would allow Firefox PGO
builds to complete at all (there were previously internal
On 04/10/2014 13:50, Heinrich Boers wrote:
e.g.: browser type=content src=localhost flex=1
Have you tried making src an actual valid URI (e.g. http://localhost/ ) ?
Gijs
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
On 14/10/2014 21:53, L. David Baron wrote:
There is a regression in bugzilla.mozilla.org such that review
granted, feedback granted, etc., emails no longer contain the
comments made when granting the review.
This bug is tracked in:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1082887
Until
On 16/10/2014 13:56, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Gijs Kruitbosch gijskruitbo...@gmail.com
wrote:
There are also interesting height computation issues that I'm pretty sure
HTML (flexbox) doesn't have, e.g. bug 451997. I'm not sure that's a
function of the box model
Hi,
Can you or someone else in the know update
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Developer_Guide/Build_Instructions/Windows_Prerequisites
and friends, or (if you don't like wiki software, don't want to create
an account, or have other reasons not to want to do this...) provide
On 20/10/2014 16:56, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2014-10-20 11:44 AM, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
Hi,
Can you or someone else in the know update
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Developer_Guide/Build_Instructions/Windows_Prerequisites
and friends, or (if you don't like wiki software, don't
On 21/10/2014 21:00, Chris AtLee wrote:
Hi,
Just a quick note that we're hoping to enable 64-bit windows builds
tests across most trunk branches this week. This includes branches such
as mozilla-central, mozilla-inbound, fx-team, etc.
In order to get adequate test coverage without at the same
All of hg.m.o is currently 503
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1094922
~ Gijs
On 06/11/2014 16:58, Benoit Girard wrote:
Cool. I'm eager to try this out. Sadly
https://hg.mozilla.org/hgcustom/version-control-tools is giving me a
503 error at this time.
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at
Where can we read about how this decision was made? On my profiles with
Force RTL, e10s perma-crashes (
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1072980 ), and in most
other cases, I only ever see spinners for remote content (ie can't
actually browse the web - doesn't matter too much for
On 07/11/2014 10:12, Marco Bonardo wrote:
On 07/11/2014 10:40, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
Where can we read about how this decision was made? On my profiles with
Force RTL, e10s perma-crashes (
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1072980 ), and in most
other cases, I only ever see spinners
On 07/11/2014 16:26, Dave Townsend wrote:
wrote:
Where can we read about how this decision was made? On my profiles with
Force RTL, e10s perma-crashes ( https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/
show_bug.cgi?id=1072980 ), and in most other cases, I only ever see
spinners for remote content (ie can't
Are we currently planning to let this default ride into aurora in 2
weeks' time?
~ Gijs
On 07/11/2014 21:44, Gavin Sharp wrote:
Yes, it is currently disabled by safe mode.
There is currently a checkbox in prefs to toggle it, in Nightly
builds. When it rides the trains, we'll have to
It looks like all reviews (and patches) are currently public. Is there
some way to have them not be so, for security/confidential bugs/reviews?
~ Gijs
On 06/11/2014 04:50, Mark Côté wrote:
A couple months ago I gave a sneak peak into our new repository-based
code-review tool based on Review
On 25/11/2014 10:40, Kan-Ru Chen (陳侃如) wrote:
Hi,
Currently we have many tests that are skipped for various reasons. Do we
have data on which test runs on which platforms? For example if a test
is accidentally skipped on all platforms, could we identify it?
Kanru
A tool called Test
On 25/11/2014 14:22, rayna...@gmail.com wrote:
I need to get the audio sample data and do some math on it, then play it in the
speaker, with the minimum of latency (arround 20ms).
Only the wasapi driver could allow this.
Have you actually tried using getusermedia/web audio for this? Or are
(replying to m.d.platform, but also pulling some folks into the CC list)
Hi Philip,
Thanks for raising this.
On 05/12/2014 23:13, Philip Chee wrote:
I think the changes for this bug are sub-optimal.
First:
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/460d573b8822#l3.17
+!ENTITY
Because I've been working on a few of them and here's what I think would
make them a lot easier to fix, and therefore improve our test coverage
and make sheriffs much happier
1) make it easier to figure out from bugzilla/treeherder when and where
the failure first occurred
- I don't want to
On 07/12/2014 05:11, Philip Chee wrote:
People using high contrast themes in windows would know what high
contrast themes are since they have to select those themes from the
High Contrast Themes section.
So you're suggesting... ?
(fwiw, *I* have no idea what beware of leopard means)
That
On 19/12/2014 14:56, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
Logging sufficiently is
almost always enough to not have to use these timers, as those tests
have demonstrated in practice.
Who's working on improving the log output from tinderbox? Timestamps get
mashed [0], sometimes only the failing assertion is
On 19/12/2014 20:45, William McCloskey wrote:
I was the person in the previous thread who found them useful, and I still
do. Some of the extraWarnings stuff is of questionable value, but the
undefined property stuff is really useful.
Can you give an example of a useful undefined property
I was looking at these now... it looks like the mochitest-bc-e10s count
went up from 48% in the week ending Dec. 12 to 57% in the week ending
Dec. 28. Yet this report records no change since the previous run.
What gives? :-)
~ Gijs
On 29/12/2014 15:50, Test Informant wrote:
Test Informant
On 27/01/2015 21:31, Chris Peterson wrote:
On 1/27/15 9:29 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
We keep telling websites to not use the UA string, however we've so
far been very bad at asking them why they use the UA string and then
create better alternatives for them.
Essentially many websites need to do
On 28/01/2015 15:25, Gervase Markham wrote:
On 27/01/15 09:16, Chris Peterson wrote:
btw, here is the spartan User-Agent string for Microsoft's new Spartan
browser:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like
Gecko) Chrome/39.0.2171.71 Safari/537.36 Edge/12.0
Really?
On 29/12/2014 13:48, Paolo Amadini wrote:
On 12/26/2014 5:59 PM, Jeff Walden wrote:
On 12/22/2014 08:08 AM, Paolo Amadini wrote:
Maybe we could make available
an opt-in code linting solution - and these typos would become errors,
not warnings,
Introducing our own proprietary version of JS
On 06/03/2015 17:27, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
A large number of permissions we currently allow users to store
persistently for a given origin. I suggest we stop offering that
functionality when there's no lock in the address bar.
Can we make an exception for localhost and its IPv4 and IPv6
IME the issue is not so much about not running tests identical to the
ones on CI, but the OS environment which doesn't match, and then
reproducing intermittent failures.
If a failure happens once in 100 builds, it is very annoying for the
sheriffs (happens multiple times a day) and needs
Hi,
I've been noticing that the number of builds + tests we run on certain
changesets could still do with improving. I realize that we try to be
conservative because we don't want magically appearing orange, but I
still think that it should be possible to do better here. That seems
like it
On 22/04/2015 01:26, Mike Hommey wrote:
Here are a few crude stats, gathered over the last 25271 changesets,
assuming my pattern matching worked properly:
- 1438 changesets were backed out (~5.7%)
Thank you for some stats, which is clearly better than no stats at all!
(Like everyone else who
Are you going to build a web UI for this so I don't need to check out a
repo and run a python script with syntax that I'll likely need to look
up every time I want to do it, guessing builder names that I don't know?
(don't get me wrong, I could probably use it if I needed to, but it's
harder
Can you link to the previous study?
~ Gijs
On 29/04/2015 17:59, olgabay...@gmail.com wrote:
(Sorry for cross-posting)
Dear Mozilla developer,
We, researchers from the University of Waterloo and Universite de Montreal,
Canada (some of you might remember our names from the previous study),
On 06/05/2015 14:33, Andrew Halberstadt wrote:
2) --close-when-done is now the default, so this option has been
removed. Use --keep-open to turn it off.
It was a pain to get this right for people's expectations when I messed
with this - mochitest-browser and mochitest-plain behave
On 06/05/2015 15:14, Andrew Halberstadt wrote:
Yeah, you shouldn't notice any difference when running from mach. The
only change is that the harness is handling defaults instead of the mach
command, and that they now both have the same command line. I think what
you are thinking of is when you
On 14/05/2015 01:21, Martin Thomson wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Matthew N.
mattn+firefox-...@mozilla.com wrote:
In JavaScript, == is preferred to ===. from
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Developer_guide/Coding_Style#Operators
Ahh, that's where it was hiding.
On 14/05/2015 18:12, Martin Thomson wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Gijs Kruitbosch
gijskruitbo...@gmail.com wrote:
Crockford offers plenty of
reasons in his book.
I've not read Crockford's book and have no plans to, but there are plenty of
reasons against, too. :-)
Do you want me
On 14/05/2015 17:14, Martin Thomson wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:17 AM, Gijs Kruitbosch
gijskruitbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14/05/2015 01:21, Martin Thomson wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Matthew N.
mattn+firefox-...@mozilla.com wrote:
In JavaScript, == is preferred to ===. from
On 14/05/2015 19:08, Martin Thomson wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Gijs Kruitbosch
gijskruitbo...@gmail.com wrote:
I mean, obviously the example is simplified. You seem to think that ===
means I'm sure this will be the right type. In the same way you imply that
== indicates
On 14/05/2015 23:15, Adam Roach wrote:
On 5/14/15 16:33, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
Can you give a concrete example where you had to change a
contributor's patch in frontend gaia code to prefer === to prevent
real bugs?
From what I've seen, it's typically a matter of making the results
On 14/05/2015 21:45, Andrew Sutherland wrote:
On 05/14/2015 04:22 PM, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
== is not any less explicit than ===. Both versions have an exact,
specified meaning.
They both have exact meanings. But people, especially new contributors
new to JS, frequently use == without
On 14/05/2015 22:55, Eric Rescorla wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Gijs Kruitbosch
gijskruitbo...@gmail.com mailto:gijskruitbo...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe there is a difference with firefox browser JS and platform
JS here (on which you seem to be working), in terms of which
On 16/04/2015 09:37, Jan Odvarko wrote:
If not, can you take the same approach here?
We are obviously trying to avoid C++ code in devtools, but also XUL/XBL in
favor of pure JS/HTML/CSS stack.
Not sure if there is yet another way how to manipulate content with a script
that is living outside
On 16/04/2015 15:30, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 4/16/15 4:52 AM, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
but that would still require
that application/json loads as text in the browser, which I think it
currently doesn't?
Totally does ever since
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=667533 (so about 3.5
On 07/04/2015 23:41, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Gavin Sharp ga...@gavinsharp.com wrote:
We don't have telemetry yet. I've done some measurements and haven't
found
any cases where tab switching consistently takes longer in e10s. However,
it's certainly possible
On 09/06/2015 13:12, Neil wrote:
Boris Zbarsky wrote:
That said, it's pretty weird to me that we're exposing the entirety of
chrome://browser like that. Seems like we should scope it down.
You could move the relevant files (presumably the CSS for those about:
pages) into a different
I'm sure this is a dumb question, but why not modify the actual
implementation of innerHTML in the core DOM if you're doing a modified
try-run anyway?
~ Gijs
On 18/06/2015 13:37, Frederik Braun wrote:
Hi,
I am planning to do a little analysis of FxOS Gaia to identify instances
of innerHTML
On 06/07/2015 17:08, Marcello Stanisci wrote:
Alternatively, create an empty dialog and manipulate the dialog using DOM
based on the arguments you pass using window.open[Dialog](...). This is
What do you mean by 'empty dialog'? Is it a
a. xul skeleton file
This.
~ Gijs
Use a data: URL, or failing that, define your own protocol handler and
use that to return the XUL DOM you want, when used with openDialog.
Alternatively, create an empty dialog and manipulate the dialog using
DOM based on the arguments you pass using window.open[Dialog](...). This
is probably
As others have said, XUL is going away.
It is not going away tomorrow.
We should be careful about if and how we invest here, so usecases are
important.
On 15/08/2015 20:48, Philip Chee wrote:
Use case 1:
chrome://foo/content/bar.xul?a=bc=d
This could be written as
Are you effectively saying that you use crypto for signing financial
transactions, and the PIN is used for authenticating the user but not
involved in the actual signature/crypto algorithm? Therefore, if a user
finds a way to invoke the same crypto without providing the PIN, they
can effect
On Windows I still get "No module named Cookie!" after using ./mach
mercurial-setup to update vcs-tools.
~ Gijs
On 15/09/2015 22:52, Jeff Walden wrote:
The Mercurial extensions to interact with Bugzilla -- bzexport and the like --
have been updated to handle 2fa details. No need to add API
.
Things have or will break unless running MozillaBuild 2.0.
Please file a Developer Services product bug with the command output with
--traceback added to the args so we can track failing more gracefully.
On Sep 16, 2015, at 05:02, Gijs Kruitbosch <gijskruitbo...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Win
1 - 100 of 255 matches
Mail list logo
