Other recommended reading when discussing this:
https://crypto.stackexchange.com/questions/5118/is-aes-256-weaker-than-192-and-128-bit-versions
https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/07/another_new_aes.html
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 01:40:45 +0200
Kai Engert k...@kuix.de wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 20:51 +0200, Kai Engert wrote:
Do you claim that Firefox 34 will continue to fall back to SSL 3 when
necessary?
Yes. If I understand correctly, it seems that Firefox indeed still falls
back to SSL3,
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 20:27:24 +0200
Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de wrote:
* Richard Barnes:
If there are any objections or comments on that proposal, please
raise them in this thread.
A lot of this has already been hashed out on the IETF TLS WG mailing
list, with a slightly different
://bugzilla.mozilla.org/
--
Reed Loden - r...@reedloden.com
--
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=556468 for
(any) investigation tracking.
~reed
--
Reed Loden - r...@reedloden.com
--
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
uses NSS to establish a TLS connection for authentication
purposes, this allows a local attacker to enable features which make
it easier to impersonate the authentication server.
I couldn't find any programs which might suffer from such a problem,
though.
--
Reed Loden - r...@reedloden.com
a stop-gap) to
this very annoying problem, as we know it affects the ability to just get work
done.
Thanks for your patience in this matter.
~reed, wearing my Mozilla SysAdmin hat
--
Reed Loden - r...@reedloden.com
--
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 05:22:35 -0600
Reed Loden r...@reedloden.com wrote:
I've filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479949 to track this
issue, ...
Apparently, I didn't notice https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425122
when filing, so I've duped the above bug to bug
for *.mozilla.org?
The O= is currently Mozilla Corporation, rather than Mozilla Foundation.
~reed
--
Reed Loden - r...@reedloden.com
___
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 22:13:53 +0200
Eddy Nigg eddy_n...@startcom.org wrote:
On 12/28/2008 09:45 PM, Reed Loden:
You can use any e-mail address as a Google Account, so yes, I
really think so. Patricia's reply confirms this, too.
Reed, Servage is a hosting company, their MX record isn't
Groups, and I bet her google account is the address used in the post
to which you're referring. She probably just forgot to change it to
her work address before sending. I wouldn't fault her or her company for
this mistake in any way.
~reed
--
Reed Loden r...@reedloden.com
11 matches
Mail list logo