Re: Using Maven wrapper

< rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > This seems to be something interesting to be used. Do we need to make > changes to our pom.xml files to use it? Or is it only a matter of > protocol/guidelines? > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 7:06 PM, Khosrow Moossavi <kmooss...@cloudops.

Re: Using Maven wrapper

Well basically anywhere (either manual or in scripts/CI) maven is required to do something with ACS. Basically using *"./mvnw foo bar -Pbaz" *instead of *"mvn foo bar -Pbaz"* in which mvnw is an executable file in the repo not installed in the OS. Khosrow Moossavi Cloud Infr

Clean up old and obsolete branches

/CLOUDSTACK-10169 I would appreciate your questions, comments, suggestions. Thanks Khosrow Moossavi Cloud Infrastructure Developer CloudOps

Re: Clean up old and obsolete branches

> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Erik Weber <terbol...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 9:05 PM, Khosrow Moossavi > > <kmooss...@cloudops.com> wrote: > > > Hi Community > > > > > > I would like to start the discussion around de

Re: XenServer 7.1 and 7.2

Apparently XenServer "xen-tools" has been renamed from version 7.0 onward to "guest-tools". https://docs.citrix.com/content/dam/docs/en-us/xenserver/xenserver-7-0/downloads/xenserver-7-0-quick-start-guide.pdf (Section 4.2, point 3) And this comment:

Re: Master Blockers and Criticals

@Paul you can assign CLOUDSTACK-9862 to me, we already have it fixed in our own fork. On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Paul Angus wrote: > Hi All, here is an updated summary of the open Critical and Blocker Issues > in Jira. > If you are working on any of these

Using Maven wrapper

Hi I'm new to ACS community, so I'm not sure if this topic has already come up before. I wanted to suggest using Maven Wrapper ( https://github.com/takari/maven-wrapper) and actually check it in in the repo rather than relying on existence of it on dev, ci, build, host, etc machine. With this

Re: Using Maven wrapper

Not at all, I'll open one soon. On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 7:28 AM, Rafael Weingärtner < rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > This seems to be interesting. Would you mind opening a PR? > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 7:53 PM, Khosrow Moossavi <kmooss...@cloudops.com> >

Re: Clean up old and obsolete branches

branch. (I, personally, like the second approach better) Khosrow Moossavi Cloud Infrastructure Developer t 514.447.3456 <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 5:05 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > also I think we can tolerate collective work on

Re: Can't build master

Mike I have no idea about your issue on OS X but if you only need and care to build the artifacts, you can use docker based cloudstack-deb-builder[1] or if you only want to run maven phases (test, verify, etc) you can override docker image entrypoint, such as: docker run -it ...

Re: John Kinsella and Wido den Hollander now ASF members

That's awesome! Congratulations! On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 12:19 PM Tutkowski, Mike wrote: > Congratulations, guys! :-) > > > On May 2, 2018, at 9:58 AM, David Nalley wrote: > > > > Hi folks, > > > > As noted in the press release[1] John Kinsella and

Squeeze another PR (#2398) in 4.11 milestone

Hi community We've found [1] and fixed [2] an issue in 4.10 regarding snapshots remaining on primary storage (XenServer + Swift) which causes VDI chain gets full after some time and user cannot take another snapshot. Please include this in 4.11 milestone if you see fit. [1]:

Re: Squeeze another PR (#2398) in 4.11 milestone

an exception happens during the transfer from > primary to secondary storage. > > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 3:25 PM, Khosrow Moossavi <kmooss...@cloudops.com> > wrote: > > > Hi community > > > > We've found [1] and fixed [2] an issue in 4.10 regarding snapshots > > r

Re: Squeeze another PR (#2398) in 4.11 milestone

omething like: 1) snapshot-01 (at rest) 2) snapshot-01, snapshot-02 (while taking snapshot-02 on primary storage and sending to secondary storage) 3) snapshot-02 (at rest again, after successful) OR 3) snapshot-01 (at rest again, after failure) Khosrow Moossavi Cloud Infrastructure Developer t

Re: Squeeze another PR (#2398) in 4.11 milestone

Rafael, It got changed on this PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749/files#diff-6eeb1a2fb818cccb14785ee80c93a561R560 On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 4:44 PM, Khosrow Moossavi <kmooss...@cloudops.com> wrote: > That is correct Mike. The quoted part above was misleading, it sh

Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11

+1 Daan and Rohit Khosrow Moossavi Cloud Infrastructure Developer t 514.447.3456 <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:58 AM, Boris Stoyanov <boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com > wrote: > Yes let’s do that. > > > boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com > www.shape

Enhance package.sh script

stom built packages from community build ones just by looking at the file name. If POM version contains branding string (x.y.z.a-NAME[-SNAPSHOT]) it will generate packages like: cloudstack-package-x.y.z.a-NAME.NUMBER.el7.centos.x86_64 [1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2433 Khosrow Moossavi CloudOps

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 LTS [RC2]

Awesome! Good job everyone +1 Khosrow Moossavi Cloud Infrastructure Developer t 514.447.3456 <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK> On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 2:50 PM, Tutkowski, Mike <mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote: > Congratulations, everyone! > > On 2/5/18, 3:09 AM, &q

Re: Potential backward incompatibility problem in building SystemVM

it's not backward compatible as well, the build process has > been changed from virtualbox+veewee/ruby based to packer+qemu/kvm based so > the old script/jobs are broken as well. > > > - Rohit > > <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > > > > __

Potential backward incompatibility problem in building SystemVM

nyway. if [ "systemvmtemplate" != "${appliance_build_name}" ]; then instead of: if [ "${appliance}" != "${appliance_build_name}" ]; then [1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/3839239a21fc14a64acc18900ae303961036ef91#diff-68ae31f5f30dae8f541e26b8acbd75eeL247 Khosrow Moossavi CloudOps

Re: I'd like to introduce you to Khosrow

<pd...@cloudops.com> > wrote: > > > Hi fellow colleagues, > > > > I might be a bit late with this email... > > > > I'd like to introduce Khosrow Moossavi, who recently join our team and > his > > focus is currently exclusively on dev for Cloudstack w

Re: Potential backward incompatibility problem in building SystemVM

prove the README or send > a PR that modifies the build.sh script to handle exporting appliances to > custom name (but as a general option, not specific to systemvmtemplate). > > > - Rohit > > <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > > > > ___

Re: [DISCUSS] Changing events to include UUIDs, could it break your integration

+1 on API versioning and make it really RESTful (cherry on top). I'm willing to participate on this change if voted for. Khosrow Moossavi CloudOps On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Rene Moser <m...@renemoser.net> wrote: > Hi > > On 12/28/2017 10:52 AM, Rohit Yadav

Re: [VOTE] Clean up old and obsolete branches.

+1 Khosrow Moossavi CloudOps On Jan 2, 2018 14:07, "Nicolas Vazquez" <nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > +1 > > > From: Simon Weller <swel...@ena.com.INVALID> > Sent: Tuesday, January 2, 2018 3:38:00 PM > To

Removing IAM services

database too. Please let us know if you have any questions, comments, concerns about this removal or if you are willing to revive the project in some shape or form. [1]: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2613 [2]: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2817 Khosrow Moossavi Cloud

Re: Github Issues

I sort of agree with Marc-Aurèle and Will, and like github issues way better than Jira. It definitely is easier that both the issues and fix for those issues live in the same place and easily can be referenced from one another. The only thing is that we need to come up with good set of labels

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack Connection Pools

oot in general and Spring Boot Data in particular rather than only changing the CP functionality, and slowly refactor/retire the DAO layer in favor of Spring Boot equivalent implementation. Khosrow Moossavi CloudOps On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 9:32 PM, Nicolas Vazquez < nicolas.vazq...@shapebl

Re: [DISCUSS] Relax strict requirement of JIRA ID for PRs

es NUMBER") directly from commit or PR body. Khosrow Moossavi CloudOps On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Syed Ahmed <sah...@cloudops.com> wrote: > I agree with the relaxation as Rohit pointed out. At this point we should > ask if Jira is really needed. Most people here I believe

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack Connection Pools

to agree on any of those CP libraries and implement, the same way we chose for example log4j or slf4j over one another, or any other _library_ we use. Khosrow Moossavi CloudOps On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Nicolas Vazquez < nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > Thanks Khosrow a

Re: [DISCUSS] New VPN implementation based on IKEv2 backed by Vault

ods, I do believe you should only return > the private key once. Therefore, you should not store it in ACS. > > On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 4:36 PM, Khosrow Moossavi <kmooss...@cloudops.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Community > > > > I want to open up a discussion around th

Re: [DISCUSS] New VPN implementation based on IKEv2 backed by Vault

d and install the Root CA on their local machine and open up VPN connection with strongSwan client of the correspondning OS they're on import the Root CA, and their credential (EAP on VPN side), and that's it. > > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 11:22 AM, Khosrow Moossavi <kmooss...@clou

Re: [DISCUSS] New VPN implementation based on IKEv2 backed by Vault

thing I do not understand. This Vault thing that you > mention, how does it work? Is it similar to let's encrypt? > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 12:15 PM, Khosrow Moossavi <kmooss...@cloudops.com> > wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Rafael Weingärtner < > &g

Re: [DISCUSS] New VPN implementation based on IKEv2 backed by Vault

based on IKEv2 backed by > Vault > > Thanks for sharing the details. Now I have a better perspective of the > proposal.It is an interesting integration of CloudStack VPN service with > Vault PKI feature. > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 12:38 PM, Khosrow Moossavi <kmooss...@cl

Re: [DISCUSS] New VPN implementation based on IKEv2 backed by Vault

not against it, but: > > 1) Please consider decoupling it from cloudstack-management server - and > > release it as server plugin > > 2) Test coverage must be sufficient enough to validate the functionality > > (perhaps mock vault endpoints and response) > > > >

Dockerizing Cloudstack package builders

]: https://hub.docker.com/r/khos2ow/cloudstack-deb-builder/ [4]: https://hub.docker.com/r/khos2ow/cloudstack-rpm-builder/ Thanks Khosrow Moossavi Cloud Infrastructure Developer t 514.447.3456 <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK>

Re: [VOTE] Move to Github issues

+1 On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 9:05 AM, Will Stevens wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018, 5:51 AM Nicolas Vazquez, < > nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > From: Dag Sonstebo > > Sent:

[DISCUSS] New VPN implementation based on IKEv2 backed by Vault

document here[1], and share your feedback. I will open up a PR -as is- soon to be able to have a source code to discuss around it as well. [1]: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/VPN+Implementation+based+on+IKEv2+backed+by+Vault+as+PKI+Engine Thanks Khosrow Moossavi Cloud

Re: Committee to Sort through CCC Presentation Submissions

I can help as well. On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 4:19 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > I can support this. > > Cheers, > > Will > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2018, 12:39 PM Tutkowski, Mike, > > wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > As you may be aware, this coming

Re: Dockerizing Cloudstack package builders

which have the source code at their disposals. I'm gonna wait for others feedback/suggestions before enhancing this though. On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> wrote: > > > On 03/26/2018 06:21 PM, Khosrow Moossavi wrote: > > Hi community >

Re: Marketing CCC Montreal

Somehow related, the tweet sent out earlier today, has the date wrong. https://twitter.com/CloudStack/status/976819870426902530?s=19 On Mar 22, 2018 10:37, "Will Stevens" wrote: > Hey Everyone, > We need your help to promote the visibility of the CCC conference we are >

Re: Marketing CCC Montreal

gt; > *Will Stevens* > Chief Technology Officer > c 514.826.0190 > > <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK> > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Khosrow Moossavi <kmooss...@cloudops.com > > > wrote: > > > Somehow related, the tweet sent out earlier today, has the date

Re: New committer: Dag Sonstebo

Congratulations Dag! On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 6:57 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > hey Dag, keep up the good work, thanks and welcome > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 9:21 PM, Simon Weller > wrote: > > > Congrats Dag, much deserved! > > > >

Re: Notice that Gabriel Bräscher now works at PCextreme

Congratulations Gabriel! On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 5:40 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > nice going Gabriel and congratulations to PCextreme! > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 8:36 PM, Gabriel Beims Bräscher < > gabrasc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thank you, guys :) > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Relax strict requirement of JIRA ID for PRs

Thanks Rohit, that's a really great sum-up of proposition! According to the private issue topic, as far as I understand, we don't have any private issue per se, unless they are security, vulnerability or CVE related and the process of reporting them -being really private until they are fixed- are

Re: GSoC ideas for the 2018 edition

. [1]: http://s.apache.org/gsoc2018ideas Khosrow Moossavi <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 4:21 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > devs, > > Google Summer of Code is coming again. Apache is applying as organisation > and we can hitch o

Re: GSoC ideas for the 2018 edition

Cool! +1 On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 4:13 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > fixed > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 7:43 PM, Khosrow Moossavi <kmooss...@cloudops.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Daan > > > > I just noticed filter for issues on g

POM version in 4.11 branch

Hi While working on a PR, Rafael and myself noticed that the POM version of 4.11 branch is 4.11.0.1-SNAPSHOT and not 4.11.1.0-SNAPSHOT. Was this planned? Shouldn't we be on micro version rather than patch version? Khosrow Moossavi CloudOps

Re: POM version in 4.11 branch

of doing a new 4.11.0.1 release. > > > Let me fix that. > > > - Rohit > > <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > > > > > From: Khosrow Moossavi <kmooss...@cloudops.com> > Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 4:46:36 PM

Re: Build CloudStack 4.10.0 Error

As Rafael mentioned this was a known issue and fixed (the commit he sent). You can check the version of java running in the build tools like: docker run -it --entrypoint environment-info.sh khos2ow/cloudstack-deb-builder:ubuntu1404 java version: openjdk version "1.8.0_171" OpenJDK Runtime

Wrong tags pushed to Github

shapeblue-4.5.2-00 -> shapeblue-4.5.2-00 * [new tag] shapeblue-4.6.0-00 -> shapeblue-4.6.0-00 * [new tag] shapeblue-4.6.1-00 -> shapeblue-4.6.1-00 Cheers Khosrow Moossavi Cloud Infrastructure Developer t 514.447.3456 <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK>

Re: New VP of CloudStack: Paul Angus

Congratulations Paul! On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 9:29 AM Boris Varbanov wrote: > Congratulations Paul! > Excellent news! Definitely well deserved! > > Best, > Boris Varbanov > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 11:16 AM Tutkowski, Mike < > mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> > wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > >

Re: Trying to build the EL6 packages, getting the EL7 ones

Hi Vladimir You need to build the RPMs *on* CentOS 6 machines to be able to have el6 in the name. Or as an alternative you can use https://khos2ow.github.io/cloudstack-rpm-builder/ which contains all the required tools to build RPMs. On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 7:59 AM Andrija Panic wrote: >