FlexJS comes with samples using databinding, but basic 'curly brace syntax'
is broken.
these two lines can reproduce the problem:
the code works as expect in Flex application, but it doesn't set text to
the Label in FlexJS 0.7 or 0.6
Thank you
Pan Li
My Apache Flex community contribution i
Hi,
I just wanted to post, that I have finished setting up a new version of the
Website. The source is located in the "maven-site" branch of the
"flex-site.git" repository.
This is a Maven build which produces the Website using the maven-site-plugin
and the reflow-site plugin to render a res
Just to join in on the discussion ... I was consumed by the Website task for
the last few days and couldn't find the time to participate here.
Are you talking about a cool bells&whistles version of ASDoc for which still
the static version will be generated? Or are you thinking about dropping th
Do you have already add a proper binding bead?
Olaf
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-databinding-using-curly-braces-syntax-is-broken-in-0-7-tp55708p55711.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Is there a URL we can go to and see the results of this workflow?
-Alex
On 10/12/16, 5:48 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>
>I just wanted to post, that I have finished setting up a new version of
>the Website. The source is located in the "maven-site" branch of the
>"flex-site.git" reposit
On 10/12/16, 5:53 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Just to join in on the discussion ... I was consumed by the Website task
>for the last few days and couldn't find the time to participate here.
>
>
>Are you talking about a cool bells&whistles version of ASDoc for which
>still the static version w
Hi Alex,
Well I know IntelliJ uses the javadoc modules automatically. So that would be
one :-)
And if the dita XML contains all the important information, I prefer an option
to produce that XML and have an additional tool to to the XSLT.
Being an Apache Cocoon 1.0 user I have been using XSL
iirc binding into a textinput text does not work on 0.7. There was a recent
fix for this in nightly builds. But in this case the lalbel binding should
be {myTI.text} in the earlier example in the earlier example.
-Greg
[sent from my phone]
On 13/10/2016 2:26 AM, "OK" wrote:
Do you have already
Hi Alex,
Currently there is no such place, where you can just go with the browser, but
just clone the flex-site repo and checkout the "asf-site" branch and you should
have the working version locally.
Just open index.html with your favorite browser :-)
At least I just checked exactly that p
On 10/12/16, 10:34 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>
>Well I know IntelliJ uses the javadoc modules automatically. So that
>would be one :-)
I didn't know the Flex SDK came with javadoc modules. Is that something
FlexMojos provides?
>
>
>And if the dita XML contains all the importan
I'm seeing emails titled "Automatic Site Publish by Buildbot". Are you
sure we can't see the buildbot output? I think you'd get more feedback if
folks don't have to bring down the repos and set it up.
-Alex
On 10/12/16, 10:39 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>
>Currently there is no s
Hi,
I just noticed that I had setup a Jenkins job in parallel, that does the same
generation thing, but doesn't commit to the "asf-site" branch. So you should be
able to access it from the jobs workspace at:
https://builds.apache.org/view/E-G/view/Flex/job/Flex-Site%20(Maven)/ws/target/site/in
Ok ... I just noticed that if you do it that way Chrome complained about
"unsecure scripts" (I don't get that message when accessing the files
otherwise. I had to enable those scripts to get the menus and carousel working.
Chris
Von: Alex Harui
Gesendet: Mittw
Safari spit some warnings like that to the console but the menu and
carousel seems to be working.
I noticed in the emails from the buildbot that it seems to be copying html
files into the flex-site repo. The version of index.html in the repo
comes out differently.
https://git1-us-west.apache.org
Well I think I wrote down the entire workflow as well as the when's and why's
so many times that I'm not going to repeat them again.
You don't need the build at builds.a.o at all. I just set that up in the
beginning because in the beginning I thought I would have to trigger buildbot
from there
I will look into this. Thanks for finding it.
Peter Ent
Adobe Systems/Apache Flex Project
On 10/12/16, 12:43 AM, "Pan Li" wrote:
>
>
> DateField is not working in FlexJS 0.7
>
>it pops error when starting in awf mode
>it does show in javascript mode but it doesn't response mouse click:
>
>
>
>
Hi,
I have committed and pushed a change to fix this. The problem was that the
DateFieldMouseController was being sent a MouseEvent but was typed to
receive a Event.
The next successful build should have this change or you can pick it up
from the repo now.
Regards,
Peter
On 10/12/16, 12:43 AM, "
yes the sample I post was wrong
Thank you for point out
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-databinding-using-curly-braces-syntax-is-broken-in-0-7-tp55708p55725.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Well, maybe I'm just being dense, but in the most recent two threads you
started on this topic, you mention buildbot, and I saw a lot of buildbot
traffic come into my mailbox. So apologies if I haven't followed your
emails in detail, but I did not see any prior mention of not needing
buildbot and
On the JS side I'm getting
base.js:2498 Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'apply' of undefined
For this line in base.js:
return parentCtor.prototype[methodName].apply(me, args);
where methodName is set__visible
The AS code is:
super.visible = value;
for a metho
Hi Alex,
Well you do need buildbot ... nothing else is allowed to commit. But nothing
else than buildbot.
I was talking about the user workflow. These three steps are the steps you
need, if you want to change something and I guess you can't get any simpler
than that. Especially with the abil
Getters and Setters should now generate a get__ and set__ method. So on
your class A if you have:
override public function set visible(value:Boolean):void
You should get:
A.prototype.set__visible(value)
Super calls should then generate calls to base so
super.visible = value;
Should p
Hi guys,
I just wanted to take the opportunity to ask you what's keeping you from
participating in any discussions here on the list and on contributing anything
else.
Apache Flex currently has the 10th largest committer base in the ASF, but
currently it feels like there is only 4-5 people st
I obviously have not been following well enough.
What was the reason for this change?
On Oct 13, 2016, at 8:52 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Getters and Setters should now generate a get__ and set__ method. So on
> your class A if you have:
>
> override public function set visible(value:Boolean):v
On 10/12/16, 11:12 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>I obviously have not been following well enough.
>
>What was the reason for this change?
Lizhi found that the previous way of accessing the super setter or getter
was significantly slower.
But if everything was compiled with the same version of the comp
25 matches
Mail list logo
